Skip to main content
Log in

Synchronous Multiple Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumors of Different Cell Lineages

  • Published:
Endocrine Pathology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We report clinicopathological features of a large series of synchronous multiple pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs) of different cell lineages. Retrospective review of pathology records from 2001 to 2016 identified 13 synchronous multiple PitNETs from 1055 PitNETs classified using pituitary cell-lineage transcription factors, adenohypohyseal hormones, and other biomarkers. Clinical, radiological, and histopathological features of these tumors were reviewed. The series included seven females and six males. Mean age at diagnosis was 55.23 years (range 36–73). Imaging was unavailable for four patients; among the other nine, mean tumor size was 2.23 cm (range 0.9–3.9). Five patients had acromegaly, four had Cushing disease, and four had clinically non-functional tumors. Twelve had double PitNETs; one had a triple PitNET. The most common tumor type was corticotroph (n = 8; six densely and one sparsely granulated and one Crooke cell; three densely and one sparsely granulated were clinically silent), gonadotroph tumors (n = 8), and somatotroph tumors (n = 5; four sparsely granulated and one densely granulated somatotroph) were followed by lactotroph tumors (n = 4; all sparsely granulated), poorly differentiated Pit-1 lineage tumor (n = 1), and unusual plurihormonal tumor (n = 1). A 54-year-old man with Cushing disease had MEN1-driven Crooke cell and gonadotroph tumors. The triple pitNET consisted of a multilineage plurihormonal tumor associated with a gonadotroph and a sparsely granulated lactotroph tumor. The Ki67 (available from 10 specimens) ranged from 1 to 5% in individual tumors. Radiological and biochemical follow-up was available for 10 and 11 patients, respectively. Radiological tumor persistence/recurrence was identified in three patients with double PitNETs consisting of sparsely granulated lactotroph and gonadotroph tumors (n = 1), sparsely granulated somatotroph and silent corticotroph tumors (n = 1), and gonadotroph and silent corticotroph tumors (n = 1) with cavernous sinus invasion. Biochemical persistence was noted in four patients with double PitNETs consisting of sparsely granulated somatotroph and silent corticotroph tumors (n = 2), gonadotroph and Crooke cell tumors (n = 1), and densely granulated somatotroph and silent corticotroph tumors (n = 1). Multiple PitNETs represent about 1% of PitNETs and usually have hormone excess due to at least one tumor component. Clinical manifestations may be due to the minor component, especially in patients with Cushing disease. Invasive growth and aggressive histological subtypes predicted disease persistence/recurrence. This series also highlights the importance of routine application of pituitary cell lineage transcription factors along with hormones to distinguish and subtype multiple synchronous PitNETs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Asa SL, Casar-Borota O, Chanson P, Delgrange E, Earls P, Ezzat S, Grossman A, Ikeda H, Inoshita N, Karavitaki N, Korbonits M, Laws Jr ER, Lopes MB, Maartens N, McCutcheon IE, Mete O, Nishioka H, Raverot G, Roncaroli F, Saeger W, Syro LV, Vasiljevic A, Villa C, Wierinckx A, Trouillas J, and the attendees of 14th Meeting of the International Pituitary Pathology Club, Annecy, France, November 2016 From pituitary adenoma to pituitary neuroendocrine tumor (PitNET): an International Pituitary Pathology Club proposal. Endocr Relat Cancer 2017; 24(4):C5-C8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ezzat S, Asa SL, Couldwell WT, Barr CE, Dodge WE, Vance ML, McCutcheon IE The prevalence of pituitary adenomas: a systematic review. Cancer 2004; 101(3):613–619.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Asa SL. Tumors of the Pituitary Gland. AFIP Atlas of Tumor Pathology, Series 4, Fascicle 15, Silverberg SG, editor. ARP Press, Silver Spring, MD. 2011.

  4. Knosp E, Steiner E, Kitz K, Matula C. Pituitary adenomas with invasion of the cavernous sinus space: a magnetic resonance imaging classification compared with surgical findings. Neurosurgery 1993; 33(4):610–617.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mete O, Asa SL. Therapeutic implications of accurate classification of pituitary adenomas. Semin Diagn Pathol 2013; 30(3):158–164.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mete O, Asa SL. Clinicopathological correlations in pituitary adenomas. Brain Pathol 2012; 22(4):443–453.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Asa SL, Mete O. The Pituitary Gland. In: Mete O, Asa SL, editors. Endocrine Pathology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016: 315–397.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mete O, Lopes MB. Overview of the 2017 WHO Classification of Pituitary Tumors. Endocr Pathol 2017; 28(3):228–243.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kontogeorgos G, Kovacs K, Horvath E, Scheithauer BW. Multiple adenomas of the human pituitary. A retrospective autopsy study with clinical implications. J Neurosurg 1991; 74:243–247.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kontogeorgos G, Scheithauer BW, Horvath E et al. Double adenomas of the pituitary: A clinicopathological study of 11 tumors. Neurosurgery 1992; 31:840–849.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Apel RL, Wilson RJ, Asa SL. A composite somatotroph-corticotroph pituitary adenoma. Endocr Pathol 1994; 5:240–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sano T, Horiguchi H, Xu B, Li C, Hino A, Sakaki M, Kannuki S, Yamada S Double pituitary adenomas: six surgical cases. Pituitary 1999; 1(3–4):243–250.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ratliff JK, Oldfield EH. Multiple pituitary adenomas in Cushing’s disease. J Neurosurg 2000; 93(5):753–761.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kim K, Yamada S, Usui M, Sano T. Preoperative identification of clearly separated double pituitary adenomas. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2004; 61(1):26–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jastania RA, Alsaad KO, Al Shraim M, Kovacs K, Asa SL. Double Adenomas of the Pituitary: Transcription Factors Pit-1, T-pit, and SF-1 Identify Cytogenesis and Differentiation. Endocr Pathol 2005; 16(3):187–194.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Magri F, Villa C, Locatelli D, Scagnelli P, Lagonigro MS, Morbini P, Castellano M, Gabellieri E, Rotondi M, Solcia E, Daly AF, Chiovato L Prevalence of double pituitary adenomas in a surgical series: Clinical, histological and genetic features. J Endocrinol Invest 2010; 33(5):325–331.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Roberts S, Borges MT, Lillehei KO, Kleinschmidt-DeMasters BK. Double separate versus contiguous pituitary adenomas: MRI features and endocrinological follow up. Pituitary 2016; 19(5):472–481.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pantelia E, Kontogeorgos G, Piaditis G, Rologis D. Triple pituitary adenoma in Cushing’s disease: case report. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1998; 140(2):190–193.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Thodou E, Kontogeorgos G, Horvath E, Kovacs K, Smyth HS, Ezzat S. Asynchronous pituitary adenomas with differing morphology. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1995; 119:748–750.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Booth GL, Redelmeier DA, Grosman H, Kovacs K, Smyth HS, Ezzat S. Improved diagnostic accuracy of inferior petrosal sinus sampling over imaging for localizing pituitary pathology in patients with Cushing’s disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1998; 83:2291–2295.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Asa SL, Mete O. Immunohistochemical Biomarkers in Pituitary Pathology. Endocr Pathol 2018; 29(2):130–136.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Mete O, Cintosun A, Pressman I, Asa SL. Epidemiology and biomarker profile of pituitary adenohypophysial tumors. Mod Pathol 2018; 31(6):900–909.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Alahmadi H, Lee D, Wilson JR, Hayhurst C, Mete O, Gentili F, Asa SL, Zadeh G Clinical features of silent corticotroph adenomas. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2012; 154(8):1493–1498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sakurai T, Seo H, Yamamoto N, Nagaya T, Nakane T, Kuwayama A, Kageyama N, Matsui N Detection of mRNA of prolactin and ACTH in clinically nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas. J Neurosurg 1988; 69:653–659.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Black PM, Hsu DW, Klibanski A et al. Hormone production in clinically nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas. J Neurosurg 1987; 66:244–250.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sidhaye A, Burger P, Rigamonti D, Salvatori R. Giant somatotrophinoma without acromegalic features: more “quiet” than “silent”: case report. Neurosurgery 2005; 56(5):E1154.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Yamada S, Sano T, Stefaneanu L et al. Endocrine and morphological study of a clinically silent somatotroph adenoma of the human pituitary. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1993; 76:352–356.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Pagesy P, Li JY, Kujas M, Peillon F, Delalande O, Visot A, Derome P Apparently silent somatotroph adenomas. Pathol Res Pract 1991; 187:950–956.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kovacs K, Lloyd R, Horvath E et al. Silent somatotroph adenomas of the human pituitary. A morphologic study of three cases including immunocytochemistry, electron microscopy, in vitro examination, and in situ hybridization. Am J Pathol 1989; 134:345–353.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Mete O, Gomez-Hernandez K, Kucharczyk W, Ridout R, Zadeh G, Gentili F, Ezzat S, Asa SL Silent subtype 3 pituitary adenomas are not always silent and represent poorly differentiated monomorphous plurihormonal Pit-1 lineage adenomas. Mod Pathol 2016; 29(2):131–142.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Lloyd RV, Osamura RY, Kloppel G, Rosai J. WHO Classification of Tumours of Endocrine Organs (4th edition), IARC: Lyon, 2017. Lyon: IARC, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Di IA, Davidson JM, Syro LV et al. Crooke’s cell tumors of the pituitary. Neurosurgery 2015; 76(5):616–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. George DH, Scheithauer BW, Kovacs K, Horvath E, Young, Jr WF, Lloyd RV, Meyer FB Crooke’s cell adenoma of the pituitary: an aggressive variant of corticotroph adenoma. Am J Surg Pathol 2003; 27(10):1330–1336.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Franscella S, Favod-Coune C-A, Pizzolato G et al. Pituitary corticotroph adenoma with Crooke’s hyalinization. Endocr Pathol 1991; 2:111–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Asa SL, Kucharczyk W, Ezzat S. Pituitary acromegaly: not one disease. Endocr Relat Cancer 2017; 24(3):C1-C4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was presented by Mete et al. during the Endocrine Pathology poster session at the 2018 Annual Meeting of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology (USCAP) in Vancouver, BC, Canada.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Ozgur Mete or Sylvia L. Asa.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Omalkhaire M. Alshaikh is currently at Al Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mete, O., Alshaikh, O.M., Cintosun, A. et al. Synchronous Multiple Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumors of Different Cell Lineages. Endocr Pathol 29, 332–338 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12022-018-9545-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12022-018-9545-4

Keywords

Navigation