Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Towards Higher Moral and Economic Goals in Renewable Energy

  • Original Research/Scholarship
  • Published:
Science and Engineering Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The European Union’s (EU) funding of electricity made of biogas that is obtained from purpose-grown plants accelerated the global boom of renewable energy two decades ago. Tens of thousands of biogas plants were built in EU farms soon after. As this specific trend toward renewable energy globally spreads, it has the potential to alter the features of agriculture in the future. Such conceptual changes are related to a variety of socio-economic and environmental implications that manifest itself over a large time scale. Regarding renewables made of purpose-grown plants, a majority of reservations are related to its production economy, particularly since these biofuels are expected to compete with food or feed. So far, little attention has been paid to the fact that the fields of farms that run biogas stations are subject to shortly repeated erosive crops followed by the intensive application of the fermentation residues obtained. The various types of soil on different European farms, which have been operating biogas stations for at least two decades, were analyzed. It was revealed for the first time that such practices cause soil degradation and pose a threat to food production, which has been overlooked until now. The relations between ethical and economical points of view are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmad, A. L., Yasin, N. M., Derek, C. J. C., & Lim, J. K. (2011). Microalgae as a sustainable energy source for biodiesel production: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,15(1), 584–593.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajanovic, A. (2011). Biofuels versus food production: Does biofuel production increase food prices? Energy,36(4), 2070–2076.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aziz, N. I. H. A., Hanafiah, M. M., & Gheewala, S. H. (2019). A review on life cycle assessment of biogas production: Challenges and future perspectives in Malaysia. Biomass and Bioenergy,122, 361–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bindraban, P. S., Bulte, E. H., & Conijn, S. G. (2009). Can large-scale biofuel production be sustainable by 2020? Agricultural Systems,101(3), 197–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broch, A., Hoekman, S. K., & Unnasch, S. (2013). A review of variability in the indirect land use change assessment and modeling in biofuel policy. Environmental Science & Policy,29, 147–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bureau, J. C., & Swinnen, J. (2018). EU policies and global food security. Global food security,16, 106–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, H. G., & Zhang, Y. H. P. (2015). New biorefineries and sustainable agriculture: Increased food, biofuels, and ecosystem security. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,47, 117–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dai, Z., Zhang, X., Tang, C., Muhammad, N., Wu, J., Brookes, P. C., et al. (2017). The potential role of biochars in decreasing soil acidification—A critical review. Science of the Total Environment,581, 601–611.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dernbach, J. C., & Brown, D. A. (2008). The ethical responsibility to reduce energy consumption. Hofstra Law Review,37(4), 985–1006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ding, Y., Liu, Y., Liu, S., Li, Z., Tan, X., Huang, X., et al. (2016). Biochar to improve soil fertility. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development,36(2), 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elum, Z. A., & Momodu, A. S. (2017). Climate change mitigation and renewable energy for sustainable development in Nigeria: A discourse approach. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,76, 72–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Escribà-Folch, A., & Wright, J. (2010). Dealing with tyranny: International sanctions and the survival of authoritarian rulers. International Studies Quarterly,54(2), 335–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forde, E. (2017). The ethics of energy provisioning: Living off-grid in rural Wales. Energy Research & Social Science,30, 82–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, E., Contestabile, M., Blazquez, J., Manzano, B., Workman, M., & Shah, N. (2017). The unstudied barriers to widespread renewable energy deployment: Fossil fuel price responses. Energy Policy,103, 258–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frantál, B., & Prousek, A. (2016). It's not right, but we do it. Exploring why and how Czech farmers become renewable energy producers. Biomass and Bioenergy,87, 26–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • German, L., & Schoneveld, G. (2012). A review of social sustainability considerations among EU-approved voluntary schemes for biofuels, with implications for rural livelihoods. Energy Policy,51, 765–778.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goulding, K. W. T. (2016). Soil acidification and the importance of liming agricultural soils with particular reference to the United Kingdom. Soil Use and Management,32(3), 390–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groom, M. J., Gray, E. M., & Townsend, P. A. (2008). Biofuels and biodiversity: Principles for creating better policies for biofuel production. Conservation Biology,22(3), 602–609.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hašková, S. (2017). Holistic assessment and ethical disputation on a new trend in solid biofuels. Science and Engineering Ethics,23(2), 509–519.

    Google Scholar 

  • Insam, H., Gómez-Brandón, M., & Ascher, J. (2015). Manure-based biogas fermentation residues—Friend or foe of soil fertility? Soil Biology and Biochemistry,84, 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaenzig, J., Heinzle, S. L., & Wüstenhagen, R. (2013). Whatever the customer wants, the customer gets? Exploring the gap between consumer preferences and default electricity products in Germany. Energy Policy,53, 311–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalra, Y. P., & Maynard, D. G. (1991). Methods manual for forest soil and plant analysis. Forestry Canada, Northwest Region, Northern Forestry Centre, Edmonton, Alberta. Information Report NOR-X-319E.

  • Koizumi, T. (2015). Biofuels and food security. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,52, 829–841.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolář, L., Kužel, S., Peterka, J., & Borová-Batt, J. (2011). The utilisation of waste from digesters for biogas production. In Biofuel's engineering orocess technology. InTech.

  • Kolář, L., Kužel, S., Peterka, J., Štindl, P., & Plát, V. (2008). Agrochemical value of organic matter of fermenter wastes in biogas production. Plant, Soil and Environment,54(8), 321–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lal, R. (2008). Soils and sustainable agriculture. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development,28(1), 57–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mardoyan, A., & Braun, P. (2015). An analysis of Czech subsidies for solid biofuels. International Journal of Green Energy,12(4), 405–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maroušek, J. (2013). Study on commercial scale steam explosion of winter Brassica napus straw. International Journal of Green Energy,10(9), 944–951.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maroušek, J. (2014). Biotechnological partition of the grass silage to streamline its complex energy utilization. International Journal of Green Energy,11(9), 962–968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maroušek, J., Hašková, S., Zeman, R., Žák, J., Vaníčková, R., Maroušková, A., et al. (2015). Techno-economic assessment of processing the cellulose casings waste. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy,17(8), 2441–2446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maroušek, J., Hašková, S., Zeman, R., Žák, J., Vaníčková, R., Maroušková, A., et al. (2016). Polemics on ethical aspects in the compost business. Science and engineering ethics,22(2), 581–590.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maroušek, J., Itoh, S., Higa, O., Kondo, Y., Ueno, M., Suwa, R., et al. (2013). Enzymatic hydrolysis enhanced by pressure shockwaves opening new possibilities in Jatropha Curcas L. processing. Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology,88(9), 1650–1653.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maroušek, J., Kolář, L., Vochozka, M., Stehel, V., & Maroušková, A. (2018). Biochar reduces nitrate level in red beet. Environmental Science and Pollution Research,25(18), 18200–18203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maroušek, J., Myšková, K., & Žák, J. (2015). Managing environmental innovation: Case study on biorefinery concept. Revista Técnica de la Facultad de Ingeniería Universidad del Zulia,38(3), 216–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maroušek, J., Stehel, V., Vochozka, M., Kolář, L., Maroušková, A., Strunecký, O., et al. (2019). Ferrous sludge from water clarification: Changes in waste management practices advisable. Journal of Cleaner Production,218, 459–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maroušek, J., Stehel, V., Vochozka, M., Maroušková, A., & Kolář, L. (2018). Postponing the intracellular disintegration step improves efficiency of phytomass processing. Journal of Cleaner Production,199, 173–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maroušek, J., Zeman, R., Vaníčková, R., & Hašková, S. (2014). New concept of urban green management. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy,16(8), 1835–1838.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathijs, E., & Swinnen, J. F. (1998). The economics of agricultural decollectivization in East Central Europe and the former Soviet Union. Economic Development and Cultural Change,47(1), 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Momsen, K., & Stoerk, T. (2014). From intention to action: Can nudges help consumers to choose renewable energy? Energy Policy,74, 376–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munro, P., van der Horst, G., & Healy, S. (2017). Energy justice for all? Rethinking sustainable development goal 7 through struggles over traditional energy practices in Sierra Leone. Energy Policy,105, 635–641.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nawaz, M. F., Bourrie, G., & Trolard, F. (2013). Soil compaction impact and modelling. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development,33(2), 291–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Painuly, J. P. (2001). Barriers to renewable energy penetration; A framework for analysis. Renewable Energy,24(1), 73–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paleari, S. (2017). Is the European Union protecting soil? A critical analysis of Community environmental policy and law. Land Use Policy,64, 163–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renn, O., & Marshall, J. P. (2016). Coal, nuclear and renewable energy policies in Germany: From the 1950s to the “Energiewende”. Energy Policy,99, 224–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rulli, M. C., Bellomi, D., Cazzoli, A., De Carolis, G., & D’Odorico, P. (2016). The water–land–food nexus of first-generation biofuels. Scientific reports,6, 22521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shin, H., Ellinger, A. E., Nolan, H. H., DeCoster, T. D., & Lane, F. (2018). An assessment of the association between renewable energy utilization and firm financial performance. Journal of Business Ethics,151(4), 1121–1138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skogstad, G. (2017). Policy feedback and self-reinforcing and self-undermining processes in EU biofuels policy. Journal of European Public Policy,24(1), 21–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomei, J., & Helliwell, R. (2016). Food versus fuel? Going beyond biofuels. Land Use Policy,56, 320–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulgiati, S. (2001). A comprehensive energy and economic assessment of biofuels: When “green” is not enough. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences,20(1), 71–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, E., Deumlich, D., & Kaupenjohann, M. (2016). Bioenergy maize and soil erosion—Risk assessment and erosion control concepts. Geoderma,261, 80–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wüstenhagen, R., Wolsink, M., & Bürer, M. J. (2007). Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: An introduction to the concept. Energy Policy,35(5), 2683–2691.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, Y., Damgaard, A., & Christensen, T. H. (2018). Bioethanol from corn stover—A review and technical assessment of alternative biotechnologies. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science,67, 275–291.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Business and Management, Brno University of Technology, Antonínská 548/1, 601 90, Brno, Czech Republic

    Stanislav Škapa

  2. The Institute of Technology and Business in České Budějovice, Okružní 517/10, 370 01, Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic

    Marek Vochozka

Authors
  1. Stanislav Škapa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marek Vochozka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stanislav Škapa.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Škapa, S., Vochozka, M. Towards Higher Moral and Economic Goals in Renewable Energy. Sci Eng Ethics 26, 1149–1158 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-019-00109-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-019-00109-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation