Skip to main content
Log in

World Map of Scientific Misconduct

  • Letter
  • Published:
Science and Engineering Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 18 July 2017

This article has been updated

Abstract

A comparative world map of scientific misconduct reveals that countries with the most rapid growth in scientific publications also have the highest retraction rate. To avoid polluting the scientific record further, these nations must urgently commit to enforcing research integrity among their academic communities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Change history

  • 18 July 2017

    An erratum to this article has been published.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Behzad Ataie-Ashtiani.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares no competing financial interest.

Additional information

The original version of this article has been revised: Reference ‘Qiu, J. (2010). China drought highlights future climate threats. Nature, 463(7278), 142–143.’ has been replaced by ‘Qui, J. (2010). Publish or perish in China. Nature, 463(7278), 142–143.’

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Three-dimensional world map of scientific misconduct of 180 countries (MP4 8801 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ataie-Ashtiani, B. World Map of Scientific Misconduct. Sci Eng Ethics 24, 1653–1656 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9939-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9939-6

Keywords

Navigation