Abstract
The production of renewable energy in agricultural biogas plants is being widely criticized because—among other things—most of the feedstock comes from purpose-grown crops like maize. These activities (generously subsidized in the Czech Republic) generate competitive pressure to other crops that are used for feeding or food production, worsening their affordability. Unique pretreatment technology that allows substitution of the purpose-grown crops by farming residues (such as husk or straw) was built 6 years ago on a commercial basis in Pěčín (Czech Republic) under modest funding and without publicity. The design of the concept; financial assessment and moral viewpoint were analyzed based on practical operating data. It showed that the apparatus improves economic, environmental and moral acceptance as well. However, according to the government’s view, public funding for this type of processing was shortened, “because waste materials represent a lower cost”. The impact of such governance was analyzed as well.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ajanovic, A. (2011). Biofuels versus food production: Does biofuels production increase food prices? Energy, 36(4), 2070–2076.
Bjerre, A. B., Olesen, A. B., Fernqvist, T., Plöger, A., & Schmidt, A. S. (1996). Pretreatment of wheat straw using combined wet oxidation and alkaline hydrolysis resulting in convertible cellulose and hemicellulose. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 49(5), 568–577.
Chen, H. Z., & Liu, Z. H. (2015). Steam explosion and its combinatorial pretreatment refining technology of plant biomass to bio-based products. Biotechnology Journal, 10(6), 866–885.
Cotana, F., Cavalaglio, G., Gelosia, M., Nicolini, A., Coccia, V., & Petrozzi, A. (2014). Production of bioethanol in a second generation prototype from pine wood chips. Energy Procedia, 45, 42–51.
Dale, B. E., Anderson, J. E., Brown, R. C., Csonka, S., Dale, V. H., Herwick, G., et al. (2014). Take a closer look: Biofuels can support environmental, economic and social goals. Environmental Science and Technology, 48(13), 7200–7203.
Hašková, S. (2016). Holistic assessment and ethical disputation on a new trend in solid biofuels. Science and Engineering Ethics. doi:10.1007/s11948-016-9790-1.
Jönsson, L. J., Alriksson, B., & Nilvebrant, N. O. (2013). Bioconversion of lignocellulose: Inhibitors and detoxification. Biotechnology for Biofuels. doi:10.1186/1754-6834-6-16.
Kim, K. H., & Hong, J. (2001). Supercritical CO2 pretreatment of lignocellulose enhances enzymatic cellulose hydrolysis. Bioresource Technology, 77(2), 139–144.
Kolář, L., Kužel, S., Peterka, J., Štindl, P., & Plát, V. (2008). Agrochemical value of organic matter of fermenter wastes in biogas production. Plant, Soil and Environment, 54(8), 321–328.
Kolk, A. (2016). The social responsibility of international business: From ethics and the environment to CSR and sustainable development. Journal of World Business, 51(1), 23–34.
Kumar, P., Barrett, D. M., Delwiche, M. J., & Stroeve, P. (2009). Methods for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass for efficient hydrolysis and biofuel production. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 48(8), 3713–3729.
Mardoyan, A., & Braun, P. (2015). Analysis of Czech subsidies for solid biofuels. International Journal of Green Energy, 12(4), 405–408.
Maroušek, J. (2012). Finding the optimal parameters for the steam explosion process of hay. Revista Técnica de la Facultad de Ingeniería, 35(2), 170–178.
Maroušek, J. (2013). Study on agriculture decision-makers behavior on sustainable energy utilization. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 26(3), 679–689.
Maroušek, J. (2014). Significant breakthrough in biochar cost reduction. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 16(8), 1821–1825.
Maroušek, J., Hašková, S., Zeman, R., Váchal, J., & Vaníčková, R. (2014). Nutrient management in processing of steam—exploded lignocellulose phytomass. Chemical Engineering and Technology, 37(11), 1945–1948.
Maroušek, J., Hašková, S., Zeman, R., Váchal, J., & Vaníčková, R. (2015). Assessing the implications of EU subsidy policy on renewable energy in Czech Republic. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 17(2), 549–554.
Maroušek, J., Itoh, S., Higa, O., Kondo, Y., Ueno, M., Suwa, R., et al. (2013). Enzymatic hydrolysis enhanced by pressure shockwaves opening new possibilities in Jatropha curcas L. processing. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology, 88(9), 1650–1653.
Maroušek, J., Kawamitsu, Y., Ueno, M., Kondo, Y., & Kolář, L. (2012). Methods for improving methane yield from rye straw. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 28(5), 747–755.
Maroušek, J., Vochozka, M., Plachý, J., & Žák, J. (2016). Glory and misery of biochar. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy. doi:10.1007/s10098-016-1284-y.
McIntosh, S., Zhang, Z., Palmer, J., Wong, H. H., Doherty, W. O., & Vancov, T. (2016). Pilot-scale cellulosic ethanol production using eucalyptus biomass pre-treated by dilute acid and steam explosion. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, 10(4), 346–358.
Meissner, R. (2015). The relevance of social theory in the practice of environmental management. Science and Engineering Ethics, 22(5), 1345–1360.
Misra, N., Panda, P. K., Parida, B. K., & Mishra, B. K. (2016). Way forward to achieve sustainable and cost-effective biofuel production from microalgae: A review. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 13(11), 2735–2756.
Painuly, J. P. (2001). Barriers to renewable energy penetration: A framework for analysis. Renewable Energy, 24(1), 73–89.
Pimentel, D. (2003). Ethanol fuels: Energy balance, economics, and environmental impacts are negative. Natural Resources Research, 12(2), 127–134.
Sun, Y., & Cheng, J. (2002). Hydrolysis of lignocellulosic materials for ethanol production: A review. Bioresource technology, 83(1), 1–11.
Van der Horst, D. (2007). NIMBY or not? Exploring the relevance of location and the politics of voiced opinions in renewable energy siting controversies. Energy policy, 35(5), 2705–2714.
Wijaya, Y. P., Putra, R. D. D., Widyaya, V. T., Ha, J. M., Suh, D. J., & Kim, C. S. (2014). Comparative study on two-step concentrated acid hydrolysis for the extraction of sugars from lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresource Technology, 164, 221–231.
Wüstenhagen, R., Wolsink, M., & Bürer, M. J. (2007). Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: An introduction to the concept. Energy policy, 35(5), 2683–2691.
Yang, Z., Kang, H., Guo, Y., Zhuang, G., Bai, Z., Zhang, H., et al. (2013). Dilute-acid conversion of cotton straw to sugars and levulinic acid via 2-stage hydrolysis. Industrial Crops and Products, 46, 205–209.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vochozka, M., Maroušková, A. & Šuleř, P. Economic, Environmental and Moral Acceptance of Renewable Energy: A Case Study—The Agricultural Biogas Plant at Pěčín. Sci Eng Ethics 24, 299–305 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9881-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9881-7