Abstract
A new trend in the production technology of solid biof uels has appeared. There is a wide consensus that most solid biofuels will be produced according to the new production methods within a few years. Numerous samples were manufactured from agro-residues according to conventional methods as well as new methods. Robust analyses that reviewed the hygienic, environmental, financial and ethical aspects were performed. The hygienic and environmental aspect was assessed by robust chemical and technical analyses. The financial aspect was assessed by energy cost breakdown. The ethical point of view was built on the above stated findings, the survey questionnaire and critical discussion with the literature. It is concluded that the new production methods are significantly favourable from both the hygienic and environmental points of view. Financial indicators do not allow the expressing of any preference. Regarding the ethical aspect, it is concluded that the new methods are beneficial in terms of environmental responsibility. However, it showed that most of the customers that took part in the survey are price oriented and therefore they tend to prefer the cheaper—conventional alternative. In the long term it can be assumed that expansion of the new technology and competition among manufacturers will reduce the costs.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alberola, E., Chevallier, J., & Chèze, B. (2008). Price drivers and structural breaks in European carbon prices 2005–2007. Energy Policy, 36(2), 787–797.
Analyses, E. E. (2013). Analysis of biomass prices—Future Danish prices for straw. Wood chips and wood pellets.
Avakian, M. D., Dellinger, B., Fiedler, H., Gullet, B., Koshland, C., Marklund, S., et al. (2002). The origin, fate, and health effects of combustion by-products: a research framework. Environmental Health Perspectives, 110(11), 1155.
Brennan, L., & Owende, P. (2010). Biofuels from microalgae—A review of technologies for production, processing, and extractions of biofuels and co-products. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14(2), 557–577.
Di Giacomo, G., & Taglieri, L. (2013). Development and evaluation of a new advanced solid bio-fuel and related production process. International Journal of Renewable Energy Research (IJRER), 3(2), 255–260.
Elmay, Y., Trouvé, G., Jeguirim, M., & Said, R. (2013). Energy recovery of date palm residues in a domestic pellet boiler. Fuel Processing Technology, 112, 12–18.
Fantozzi, F., & Buratti, C. (2010). Life cycle assessment of biomass chains: wood pellet from short rotation coppice using data measured on a real plant. Biomass and Bioenergy, 34(12), 1796–1804.
García-Maraver, A., Popov, V., & Zamorano, M. (2011). A review of European standards for pellet quality. Renewable Energy, 36(12), 3537–3540.
García-Maroto, I., García-Maraver, A., Muñoz-Leiva, F., & Zamorano, M. (2015). Consumer knowledge, information sources used and predisposition towards the adoption of wood pellets in domestic heating systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 43, 207–215.
Gomiero, T., Paoletti, M. G., & Pimentel, D. (2010). Biofuels: efficiency, ethics, and limits to human appropriation of ecosystem services. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 23(5), 403–434.
Hill, J., Nelson, E., Tilman, D., Polasky, S., & Tiffany, D. (2006). Environmental, economic, and energetic costs and benefits of biodiesel and ethanol biofuels. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103(30), 11206–11210.
Hoefnagels, R., Resch, G., Junginger, M., & Faaij, A. (2014). International and domestic uses of solid biofuels under different renewable energy support scenarios in the European Union. Applied Energy, 131, 139–157.
Kay, A., & Ackrill, R. (2012). Governing the transition to a biofuels economy in the US and EU: Accommodating value conflicts, implementing uncertainty. Policy and Society, 31(4), 295–306.
Lamers, P., Hoefnagels, R., Junginger, M., Hamelinck, C., & Faaij, A. (2015). Global solid biomass trade for energy by 2020: An assessment of potential import streams and supply costs to North-West Europe under different sustainability constraints. GCB Bioenergy, 7(4), 618–634.
Mani, S., Sokhansanj, S., Bi, X., & Turhollow, A. (2006). Economics of producing fuel pellets from biomass. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 22(3), 421.
Mardoyan, A., & Braun, P. (2015). Analysis of Czech subsidies for solid biofuels. International Journal of Green Energy, 12(4), 405–408.
Maroušek, J. (2013a). Study on agriculture decision-makers behavior on sustainable energy utilization. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 26(3), 679–689.
Maroušek, J. (2013b). Removal of hardly fermentable ballast from the maize silage to accelerate biogas production. Industrial Crops and Products, 44, 253–257.
Maroušek, J. (2014a). Economically oriented process optimization in waste management. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 21(12), 7400–7402.
Maroušek, J. (2014b). Significant breakthrough in biochar cost reduction. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 16(8), 1821–1825.
Maroušek, J. (2015). Economic analysis of the pressure shockwave disintegration process. International Journal of Green Energy, 12(12), 1232–1235.
Maroušek, J., Hašková, S., Zeman, R., Váchal, J., & Vaníčková, R. (2015a). Assessing the implications of EU subsidy policy on renewable energy in Czech Republic. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 17(2), 549–554.
Maroušek, J., Hašková, S., Zeman, R., & Vaníčková, R. (2015b). Managerial preferences in relation to financial indicators regarding the mitigation of global change. Science and Engineering Ethics, 21(1), 203–207.
Neij, L. (2008). Cost development of future technologies for power generation—a study based on experience curves and complementary bottom-up assessments. Energy policy, 36(6), 2200–2211.
Soytas, U., & Sari, R. (2009). Energy consumption, economic growth, and carbon emissions: Challenges faced by an EU candidate member. Ecological Economics, 68(6), 1667–1675.
Syred, C., Griffiths, A. J., Syred, N., Beedie, D., & James, D. (2006). A clean, efficient system for producing charcoal, heat and power (CHaP). Fuel, 85(10), 1566–1578.
Tumuluru, J. S., Hess, J. R., Boardman, R. D., Wright, C. T., & Westover, T. L. (2012). Formulation, pretreatment, and densification options to improve biomass specifications for co-firing high percentages with coal. Industrial Biotechnology, 8(3), 113–132.
Umbach, F. (2010). Global energy security and the implications for the EU. Energy Policy, 38(3), 1229–1240.
Van der Stelt, M. J. C., Gerhauser, H., Kiel, J. H. A., & Ptasinski, K. J. (2011). Biomass upgrading by torrefaction for the production of biofuels: A review. Biomass and Bioenergy, 35(9), 3748–3762.
Wannapeera, J., Fungtammasan, B., & Worasuwannarak, N. (2011). Effects of temperature and holding time during torrefaction on the pyrolysis behaviors of woody biomass. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 92(1), 99–105.
Yu, C. W. F., & Kim, J. T. (2010). Building pathology, investigation of sick buildings—VOC emissions. Indoor and Built Environment, 19(1), 30–39.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hašková, S. Holistic Assessment and Ethical Disputation on a New Trend in Solid Biofuels. Sci Eng Ethics 23, 509–519 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-016-9790-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-016-9790-1