Skip to main content
Log in

Creating an organizational awareness of ethical responsibility about information technology

  • Published:
Science and Engineering Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a time of rapid technological and social change, business organizations must help their employees develop a new appreciation of how social and ethical values are being shaped and challenged by evolving information technologies. Many ethical and social conflicts have arisen around the advanced information technology used today. The emerging technologies continue to create situations not previously encountered. There are numerous risks facing corporations involved in the use of computing technology. Leaders of organizations looking ahead to assess the impact of technological changes can try to prepare their employees for the future. This paper addresses the urgent need for individuals in corporations to become more knowledgeable about computing technologies and their impact.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Neumann, P. (1994) Computer insecurity, Issues in Science and Technology XI (1): 50–54.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Association for Computing Machinery. Forum on risks to the public in computers and related systems: http://www.csl.sri.com/~risks/risks.txt (last accessed 1998).

  3. Smith, H.J. (1996) How private are personal databases? Beyond Computing 5 (4): 14–15.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Institute for Global Ethics: http://www.globalethics.org (last accessed 1998).

  5. Association for Computing Machinery and IEEE-Computer Society (1991) Computing Curricula 1991, a Joint Curriculum Task Force Report, ACM Press.

  6. CSAB: Computing Science Accreditation Board (1987), Criteria for Accrediting Programs in Computer Science in the United States, a technical report.

  7. Davis, G.B., Gorgone, J.T., Couger, J.D., Feinstein, D.L. and Longenecker, H.E., Jr. (1997) IS ’97: model curriculum and guidelines for undergraduate degree programs in information systems. Association of Information Technology Professionals, Association for Computing Machinery, and Association for Information Systems.

  8. Corliss, J. W. (1996) Communications decency act of 1996: implications for colleges and universities, First Annual Conference on Ethics and Technology, Loyola University, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Granger, M.J., Little, J.C., Adams, E.S., Bjorkman, C, Gotterbarn, D., Juettner, D., Martin, C.D., and Young, F.H. (1997), Using information technology to integrate social and ethical issues into the computer science and information systems curriculum, The SIGCSE Bulletin 29 (3), A publication of the ACM SIGCSE Symposium on Integrating Technology into Computer Science Education, ACM Press.

  10. Lynch, W.T. (1997/1998), Teaching engineering ethics in the United States, IEEE Technology and Society Magazine 16 (4): 27–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Martin, C.D., Huff, C.W., Gotterbarn, D. and Miller, K. (1996) Implementing a tenth strand in the CS curriculum (Second Report of the Impact CS Steering Committee), Communications of the ACM 39 (12): 75–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Luria, M.M. and Butzel, L.E. (May 1996) Net culture vs. copyright, Beyond Computing, IBM in affiliation with Forbes, N.Y., N.Y., USA..

  13. Schafer, S. (1995) How information technology is leveling the playing field, Inc. Technology (4): 92–96.

  14. Baase, S. (1997) A Grift of Fire: social, legal, and ethical issues in computing, Prentice-Hall, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Edgar, S.L. (1997) Morality and Machines: perspectives on computer ethics. Jones and Bartlett.

  16. Johnson, D.G. (1994) Computer ethics, Prentice-Hall, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Huff, C.W. and Martin, C.D. (1995). Computing Consequences: a framework for teaching ethical computing (First Report of the Impact CS Steering Committee), Communications of the ACM 38 (12): 75–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Davis, R.L. and Webster, R.W. (1997) Questioning Proposed CS Knowledge Units, Letters to the Editor, Communications of the ACM 40 (4): 20–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gotterbarn, D. and Riser, R. (1997) Ethics Activities in Computer Science Courses: goals and issues, Computers and Society 27 (1): 10–15.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Anderson, R.E., Johnson, D.G., Gotterbarn, D., and Perrolle, J. (1993) Using the new ACM code of ethics in decision making, Communications of the ACM 36 (2): 98–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gotterbarn, D., Miller, K. and Rogerson, S. (1997), Software engineering code of ethics, Communications of the ACM 40 (11): 110–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Cardinali, R.C. (1995) Reinforcing our moral vision: examining the relationship between unethical behavior and computer crime, Work Study 44 (8): 11–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Institute for Certification of Computing Professionals (ICCP): http://www.iccp.org (last accessed 1998).

  24. Rosen, D. (March 6, 1994), Ethical conundrums around the internet, The New York Times, 10.

  25. Laczniak, G and Inderrieden, E. J. (1987) The influences of stated organizational concerns upon ethical decision making, The Journal of Business Ethics 6 (4): 297–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Mary J. Granger or Joyce Currie Little.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Granger, M.J., Little, J.C. Creating an organizational awareness of ethical responsibility about information technology. SCI ENG ETHICS 7, 239–246 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-001-0045-3

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-001-0045-3

Keywords

Navigation