Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Anatomy of Classic Bladder Exstrophy: MRI Findings and Surgical Correlation

  • New Imaging Techniques (S Rais-Bahrami and K Porter, Section Editors)
  • Published:
Current Urology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

The exstrophy-epispadias complex (EEC) represents a group of congenitally acquired malformations involving the musculoskeletal, gastrointestinal, and genitourinary systems. Classic bladder exstrophy (CBE) is the most common and best studied entity within the EEC. In this review, imaging features of CBE anatomy will be presented with surgical correlation.

Recent Findings

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has emerged as a useful modality for pre- and postnatal assessment of the abdominal wall, pelvic floor, and gastrointestinal and genitourinary systems of children with CBE. The authors’ experience supports use of preoperative MRI, in conjunction with navigational software, as a method for identifying complex CBE anatomy.

Summary

Imaging facilitates surgical approach and improves visualization of complex anatomy, potentially helping to avoid complications. Continued investigation of imaging guidance in CBE repair is needed as surgical techniques improve.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Jayachandran D, Bythell MW, Platt MW, Rankin J. Register based study of bladder exstrophy-epispadias complex: prevalence, associated anomalies, prenatal diagnosis and survival. J Urol. 2011;186(5):2056–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Vermeij-Keers C, Hartwig NG, van der Werff JF. Embryonic development of the ventral body wall and its congenital malformations. Semin Pediatr Surg. 1996;5(2):82–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Manner J, Kluth D. The morphogenesis of the exstrophy-epispadias complex: a new concept based on observations made in early embryonic cases of cloacal exstrophy. Anat Embryol (Berl). 2005;210(1):51–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-005-0008-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Muecke EC. The role of the cloacal membrane in exstrophy: the first successful experimental study. J Urol. 1964;92:659–67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Blaschko SD, Cunha GR, Baskin LS. Molecular mechanisms of external genitalia development. Differentiation. 2012;84(3):261–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diff.2012.06.003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Sinclair AH, Berta P, Palmer MS, Hawkins JR, Griffiths BL, Smith MJ, et al. A gene from the human sex-determining region encodes a protein with homology to a conserved DNA-binding motif. Nature. 1990;346(6281):240–4. https://doi.org/10.1038/346240a0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Yamada G, Satoh Y, Baskin LS, Cunha GR. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of development of the external genitalia. Differentiation. 2003;71(8):445–60. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1432-0436.2003.7108001.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hamilton W, Boyd J, Mossman H. Human embryology. 4th ed. Cambridge, England: Heffer; 1972.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Sponseller PD, Bisson LJ, Gearhart JP, Jeffs RD, Magid D, Fishman E. The anatomy of the pelvis in the exstrophy complex. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995;77(2):177–89.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Stec AA, Pannu HK, Tadros YE, Sponseller PD, Wakim A, Fishman EK, et al. Evaluation of the bony pelvis in classic bladder exstrophy by using 3D-CT: further insights. Urology. 2001;58(6):1030–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Stec AA, Pannu HK, Tadros YE, Sponseller PD, Fishman EK, Gearhart JP. Pelvic floor anatomy in classic bladder exstrophy using 3-dimensional computerized tomography: initial insights. J Urol. 2001;166(4):1444–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Stec AA, Baradaran N, Tran C, Gearhart JP. Colorectal anomalies in patients with classic bladder exstrophy. J Pediatr Surg. 2011;46(9):1790–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2011.03.019.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Williams AM, Solaiyappan M, Pannu HK, Bluemke D, Shechter G, Gearhart JP. 3-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging modeling of the pelvic floor musculature in classic bladder exstrophy before pelvic osteotomy. J Urol. 2004;172(4 Pt 2):1702–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tekes A, Ertan G, Solaiyappan M, Stec AA, Sponseller PD, Huisman TA, et al. 2D and 3D MRI features of classic bladder exstrophy. Clin Radiol. 2014;69(5):e223–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2013.12.019.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Stec AA, Tekes A, Ertan G, Phillips TM, Novak TE, Solaiyappan M, et al. Evaluation of pelvic floor muscular redistribution after primary closure of classic bladder exstrophy by 3-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging. J Urol. 2012;188(4 Suppl):1535–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2012.02.039.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gargollo PC, Borer JG, Retik AB, Peters CA, Diamond DA, Atala A, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of pelvic musculoskeletal and genitourinary anatomy in patients before and after complete primary repair of bladder exstrophy. J Urol. 2005;174(4 Pt 2):1559–66; discussion 66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Halachmi S, Farhat W, Konen O, Khan A, Hodapp J, Bagli DJ, et al. Pelvic floor magnetic resonance imaging after neonatal single stage reconstruction in male patients with classic bladder exstrophy. J Urol. 2003;170(4 Pt 2):1505–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000087463.92231.b1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ebert AK, Reutter H, Ludwig M, Rosch WH. The exstrophy-epispadias complex. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2009;4:23. https://doi.org/10.1186/1750-1172-4-23.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Inouye BM, Tourchi A, Di Carlo HN, Young EE, Gearhart JP. Modern management of the exstrophy-epispadias complex. Surg Res Pract. 2014;2014:587064. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/587064.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Stec AA, Baradaran N, Gearhart JP. Congenital renal anomalies in patients with classic bladder exstrophy. Urology. 2012;79(1):207–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2011.09.022.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Goldman S, Szejnfeld PO, Rondon A, Francisco VV, Bacelar H, Leslie B, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of bladder exstrophy by fetal MRI. J Pediatr Urol. 2013;9(1):3–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2012.06.018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Silver RI, Yang A, Ben-Chaim J, Jeffs RD, Gearhart JP. Penile length in adulthood after exstrophy reconstruction. J Urol. 1997;157(3):999–1003.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Schlegel PN, Gearhart JP. Neuroanatomy of the pelvis in an infant with cloacal exstrophy: a detailed microdissection with histology. J Urol. 1989;141(3):583–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Woodhouse CR, Kellett MJ. Anatomy of the penis and its deformities in exstrophy and epispadias. J Urol. 1984;132(6):1122–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Gearhart JP, Yang A, Leonard MP, Jeffs RD, Zerhouni EA. Prostate size and configuration in adults with bladder exstrophy. J Urol. 1993;149(2):308–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. • Benz KS, Dunn E, Maruf M, Facciola J, Jayman J, Kasprenski M, et al. Novel anatomical observations of the prostate, prostatic vasculature and penile vasculature in classic bladder exstrophy using magnetic resonance imaging. J Urol. 2018;200(6):1354–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2018.06.020 In this article, the authors discuss MRI depiction of prostate anatomy and course of neurovascular bundles in CBE males prior to repair. Identification of anatomical landmarks prior to surgery may help to avoid neurovascular damage during genital reconstruction.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Woodhouse CR, Hinsch R. The anatomy and reconstruction of the adult female genitalia in classical exstrophy. Br J Urol. 1997;79(4):618–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. • Benz KS, Dunn E, Solaiyappan M, Maruf M, Kasprenski M, Jayman J, et al. Novel observations of female genital anatomy in classic bladder exstrophy using 3-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging reconstruction. J Urol. 2018;200(4):882–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2018.04.071 In this article, the authors discuss MRI depiction of CBE female genitalia, which were previously less well-described compared with their male counterparts. Identification of the clitoral bodies may help to avoid their injury during surgery.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. •• Di Carlo HN, Maruf M, Massanyi EZ, Shah B, Tekes A, Gearhart JP. 3D MRI-guided pelvic floor dissection in bladder exstrophy: a single arm trial. J Urol. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000000210 In this article, the authors describe preoperative MRI used in conjunction with surgical navigation software, which aids the dissection of small and indistinct soft tissue structures during surgical repair of children with CE and CBE.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Baka-Jakubiak M. Combined bladder neck, urethral and penile reconstruction in boys with the exstrophy-epispadias complex. BJU Int. 2000;86(4):513–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Grady RW, Mitchell ME. Complete primary repair of exstrophy. J Urol. 1999;162(4):1415–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Meldrum KK, Baird AD, Gearhart JP. Pelvic and extremity immobilization after bladder exstrophy closure: complications and impact on success. Urology. 2003;62(6):1109–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Gearhart JP, Peppas DS, Jeffs RD. The failed exstrophy closure: strategy for management. Br J Urol. 1993;71(2):217–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Gearhart JP, Forschner DC, Jeffs RD, Ben-Chaim J, Sponseller PD. A combined vertical and horizontal pelvic osteotomy approach for primary and secondary repair of bladder exstrophy. J Urol. 1996;155(2):689–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Cervellione RM, Husmann DA, Bivalacqua TJ, Sponseller PD, Gearhart JP. Penile ischemic injury in the exstrophy/epispadias spectrum: new insights and possible mechanisms. J Pediatr Urol. 2010;6(5):450–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2010.04.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emily A. Dunn.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Emily A. Dunn, Matthew Kasprenski, James Facciola, Karl Benz, Mahir Maruf, Mohammad H. Zaman, John Gearhart, Heather Di Carlo, and Aylin Tekes each declare no potential conflicts of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on New Imaging Techniques

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dunn, E.A., Kasprenski, M., Facciola, J. et al. Anatomy of Classic Bladder Exstrophy: MRI Findings and Surgical Correlation. Curr Urol Rep 20, 48 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-019-0916-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-019-0916-2

Keywords

Navigation