Skip to main content
Log in

Sexual Desire Discrepancy

  • Clinical Therapeutics (B McCarthy and R Segraves, Section Editors)
  • Published:
Current Sexual Health Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Sexual desire discrepancy continues to be a challenging issue in relationships. Due to the negative impact that distressing discrepant desire has on sexual and relational satisfaction, it continues to be a source of conflict and disconnection for couples. We conducted a review of current literature to examine the state of understanding of this complex phenomenon.

Recent Findings

Researchers have focused on understanding protective factors during situations of discrepant desire and have found that partners motivated by approach-related goals and partner-focused motives for sex experience higher rates of relationship cohesion and overall satisfaction, potentially mitigating the sexual desire discrepancy. In addition, recent research has explored ways that couples navigate discrepancies, with activities focused on increasing closeness and intimacy being associated with more satisfaction.

Summary

While the literature on sexual desire discrepancy continues to be sparse, key findings around motivation and mitigating behaviors shape our understanding of this phenomenon.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Laumann EO, Paik A, Rosen RC. Sexual dysfunction in the United States: prevalence and predictors. JAMA. 1999;281:537–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Shifren JL, Monz BU, Russo PA, Segreti A, Johannes CB. Sexual problems and distress in United States women: prevalence and correlates. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;112:970–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181898cdb.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bridges SK, Horne SG. Sexual satisfaction and desire discrepancy in same-sex women’s relationships. J Sex Marital Ther. 2007;33:41–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/00926230600998466.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Davies S, Katz J, Jackson JL. Sexual desire discrepancies: effects on sexual and relationship satisfaction in heterosexual dating couples. Arch Sex Behav. 1999;28:553–67. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018721417683.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mark KP. The relative impact of individual sexual desire and couple desire discrepancy on satisfaction in heterosexual couples. Sex Relatsh Ther. 2012;27:133–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681994.2012.678825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mark KP. The impact of daily sexual desire and daily sexual desire discrepancy on the quality of the sexual experience in couples. Can J Hum Sex. 2014;23:27–33. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjhs.23.1.A2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mark KP, Murray SH. Gender differences in desire discrepancy as a predictor of sexual and relationship satisfaction in a college sample of heterosexual romantic relationships. J Sex Marital Ther. 2012;38(2):198–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2011.606877.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mark KP. Sexual desire discrepancy. Curr Sex Health Rep. 2015;7:198–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11930-015-0057-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Willoughby BJ, Farero AM, Busby DM. Exploring the effects of sexual desire discrepancy among married couples. Arch Sex Behav. 2014;43:551–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-013-0181-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Willoughby BJ, Vitas J. Sexual desire discrepancy: the effect of individual differences in desired and actual sexual frequency on dating couples. Arch Sex Behav. 2012;41:477–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-011-9766-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Herbenick D, Mullinax M, Mark KP. Sexual desire discrepancy as a feature, not a bug, of long-term relationships: women’s self-reported strategies for modulating sexual desire. J Sex Med. 2014;11(9):2196–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsm.12625.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Vowels MJ, Mark KP, Vowels LM, Wood ND. Using spectral and cross-spectral analysis to identify patterns and synchrony in couples’ sexual desire. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0205330. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205330.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Klusmann D. Sexual motivation and the duration of partnership. Arch Sex Behav. 2002;31:275–87. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015205020769.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Muise A, Impett EA, Kogan A, Desmarais S. Keeping the spark alive: being motivated to meet a partner’s sexual needs sustains sexual desire in long-term romantic relationships. Soc Psychol Personal Sci. 2013;4:267–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550612457185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. •• Muise A, Boudreau GK, Rosen NO. Seeking connection versus avoiding disappointment: an experimental manipulation of approach and avoidance sexual goals and the implications for desire and satisfaction. J Sex Res. 2017;54:296–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2016.1152455 Thorough investigation of approach/avoidance goals.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. •• Day LC, Muise A, Joel S, Impett EA. To do it or not to do it? How communally motivated people navigate sexual interdependence dilemmas. Personal Soc Psychol Bull. 2015;41(6):791–804. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167215580129 Study of SDD and sexual communal motivation.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. •• Kim J, Muise A, Impett EA. The relationship implications of rejecting a partner for sex kindly versus having sex reluctantly. J Soc Pers Relat. 2018;35(4):485–508. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407517743084 Explored how sexual rejection impacts relationships.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Impett EA, Peplau LA. Sexual compliance: gender, motivational, and relationship perspectives. J Sex Res. 2003;40:87–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490309552169.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Impett EA, Gable SL, Peplau LA. Giving up and giving in: the costs and benefits of daily sacrifice in intimate relationships. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005;89:327–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. •• Vowels MJ, Mark KP.. Strategies for mitigating sexual desire discrepancy in relationships. Manuscript submitted for publication. 2018. Study of mitigating strategies for SDD.

  21. Frederick D, Lever J, Gillespie B, Garcia JR. What keeps passion alive? Sexual satisfaction is associated with sexual communication, mood setting, sexual variety, oral sex, orgasm, and sex frequency in a national U.S. study. J Sex Res. 2016;54:186–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2015.1137854.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Basson R. Using a different model for female sexual response to address women’s problematic low sexual desire. J Sex Marital Ther. 2001;27(5):395–403. https://doi.org/10.1080/713846827.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Basson R. Biopsychosocial models of women’s sexual response: applications to management of ‘desire disorders.’. Sex Relatsh Ther. 2003;18:107–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/1468199031000061308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Brezsnyak M, Whisman MA. Sexual desire and relationship functioning: the effects of marital satisfaction and power. J Sex Marital Ther. 2004;30:199–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/00926230490262393.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. • Girard A, Woolley SW. Using emotionally focused therapy to treat sexual desire discrepancy in couples. J Sex Marital Ther. 2017;8:720–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623x.2016.1263703 First article to suggest treatment modality.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Johnson SM. The practice of emotionally focused couple therapy: creating connection. 2nd ed. New York: Brunner/Routledge; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Johnson S, Zuccarini D. Integrating sex and attachment in emotionally focused couple therapy. J Marital Fam Ther. 2010;36:431–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2009.00155.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Metz M, McCarthy B. Enduring desire. New York: Routledge; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  29. McCarthy B, Wald L. Maintaining sexual desire and satisfaction in securely bonded couples. The Family Journal. 2018;26:217–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1066480718775732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. McCarthy B, Wald LM. Strategies and techniques to directly address sexual desire problems. J Fam Psychother. 2015;26:286–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/08975353.2015.1097282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Perel E. Mating in captivity. New York: Harper-Collins; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abby Girard.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The author declares that she has no conflicts of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Clinical Therapeutics

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Girard, A. Sexual Desire Discrepancy. Curr Sex Health Rep 11, 80–83 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11930-019-00196-w

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11930-019-00196-w

Keywords

Navigation