Abstract
Purpose of Review
Sexual desire discrepancy continues to be a challenging issue in relationships. Due to the negative impact that distressing discrepant desire has on sexual and relational satisfaction, it continues to be a source of conflict and disconnection for couples. We conducted a review of current literature to examine the state of understanding of this complex phenomenon.
Recent Findings
Researchers have focused on understanding protective factors during situations of discrepant desire and have found that partners motivated by approach-related goals and partner-focused motives for sex experience higher rates of relationship cohesion and overall satisfaction, potentially mitigating the sexual desire discrepancy. In addition, recent research has explored ways that couples navigate discrepancies, with activities focused on increasing closeness and intimacy being associated with more satisfaction.
Summary
While the literature on sexual desire discrepancy continues to be sparse, key findings around motivation and mitigating behaviors shape our understanding of this phenomenon.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
Laumann EO, Paik A, Rosen RC. Sexual dysfunction in the United States: prevalence and predictors. JAMA. 1999;281:537–44.
Shifren JL, Monz BU, Russo PA, Segreti A, Johannes CB. Sexual problems and distress in United States women: prevalence and correlates. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;112:970–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181898cdb.
Bridges SK, Horne SG. Sexual satisfaction and desire discrepancy in same-sex women’s relationships. J Sex Marital Ther. 2007;33:41–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/00926230600998466.
Davies S, Katz J, Jackson JL. Sexual desire discrepancies: effects on sexual and relationship satisfaction in heterosexual dating couples. Arch Sex Behav. 1999;28:553–67. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018721417683.
Mark KP. The relative impact of individual sexual desire and couple desire discrepancy on satisfaction in heterosexual couples. Sex Relatsh Ther. 2012;27:133–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681994.2012.678825.
Mark KP. The impact of daily sexual desire and daily sexual desire discrepancy on the quality of the sexual experience in couples. Can J Hum Sex. 2014;23:27–33. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjhs.23.1.A2.
Mark KP, Murray SH. Gender differences in desire discrepancy as a predictor of sexual and relationship satisfaction in a college sample of heterosexual romantic relationships. J Sex Marital Ther. 2012;38(2):198–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2011.606877.
Mark KP. Sexual desire discrepancy. Curr Sex Health Rep. 2015;7:198–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11930-015-0057-7.
Willoughby BJ, Farero AM, Busby DM. Exploring the effects of sexual desire discrepancy among married couples. Arch Sex Behav. 2014;43:551–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-013-0181-2.
Willoughby BJ, Vitas J. Sexual desire discrepancy: the effect of individual differences in desired and actual sexual frequency on dating couples. Arch Sex Behav. 2012;41:477–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-011-9766-9.
Herbenick D, Mullinax M, Mark KP. Sexual desire discrepancy as a feature, not a bug, of long-term relationships: women’s self-reported strategies for modulating sexual desire. J Sex Med. 2014;11(9):2196–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsm.12625.
Vowels MJ, Mark KP, Vowels LM, Wood ND. Using spectral and cross-spectral analysis to identify patterns and synchrony in couples’ sexual desire. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0205330. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205330.
Klusmann D. Sexual motivation and the duration of partnership. Arch Sex Behav. 2002;31:275–87. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015205020769.
Muise A, Impett EA, Kogan A, Desmarais S. Keeping the spark alive: being motivated to meet a partner’s sexual needs sustains sexual desire in long-term romantic relationships. Soc Psychol Personal Sci. 2013;4:267–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550612457185.
•• Muise A, Boudreau GK, Rosen NO. Seeking connection versus avoiding disappointment: an experimental manipulation of approach and avoidance sexual goals and the implications for desire and satisfaction. J Sex Res. 2017;54:296–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2016.1152455 Thorough investigation of approach/avoidance goals.
•• Day LC, Muise A, Joel S, Impett EA. To do it or not to do it? How communally motivated people navigate sexual interdependence dilemmas. Personal Soc Psychol Bull. 2015;41(6):791–804. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167215580129 Study of SDD and sexual communal motivation.
•• Kim J, Muise A, Impett EA. The relationship implications of rejecting a partner for sex kindly versus having sex reluctantly. J Soc Pers Relat. 2018;35(4):485–508. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407517743084 Explored how sexual rejection impacts relationships.
Impett EA, Peplau LA. Sexual compliance: gender, motivational, and relationship perspectives. J Sex Res. 2003;40:87–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490309552169.
Impett EA, Gable SL, Peplau LA. Giving up and giving in: the costs and benefits of daily sacrifice in intimate relationships. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005;89:327–44.
•• Vowels MJ, Mark KP.. Strategies for mitigating sexual desire discrepancy in relationships. Manuscript submitted for publication. 2018. Study of mitigating strategies for SDD.
Frederick D, Lever J, Gillespie B, Garcia JR. What keeps passion alive? Sexual satisfaction is associated with sexual communication, mood setting, sexual variety, oral sex, orgasm, and sex frequency in a national U.S. study. J Sex Res. 2016;54:186–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2015.1137854.
Basson R. Using a different model for female sexual response to address women’s problematic low sexual desire. J Sex Marital Ther. 2001;27(5):395–403. https://doi.org/10.1080/713846827.
Basson R. Biopsychosocial models of women’s sexual response: applications to management of ‘desire disorders.’. Sex Relatsh Ther. 2003;18:107–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/1468199031000061308.
Brezsnyak M, Whisman MA. Sexual desire and relationship functioning: the effects of marital satisfaction and power. J Sex Marital Ther. 2004;30:199–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/00926230490262393.
• Girard A, Woolley SW. Using emotionally focused therapy to treat sexual desire discrepancy in couples. J Sex Marital Ther. 2017;8:720–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623x.2016.1263703 First article to suggest treatment modality.
Johnson SM. The practice of emotionally focused couple therapy: creating connection. 2nd ed. New York: Brunner/Routledge; 2004.
Johnson S, Zuccarini D. Integrating sex and attachment in emotionally focused couple therapy. J Marital Fam Ther. 2010;36:431–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2009.00155.x.
Metz M, McCarthy B. Enduring desire. New York: Routledge; 2010.
McCarthy B, Wald L. Maintaining sexual desire and satisfaction in securely bonded couples. The Family Journal. 2018;26:217–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1066480718775732.
McCarthy B, Wald LM. Strategies and techniques to directly address sexual desire problems. J Fam Psychother. 2015;26:286–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/08975353.2015.1097282.
Perel E. Mating in captivity. New York: Harper-Collins; 2006.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The author declares that she has no conflicts of interest.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Clinical Therapeutics
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Girard, A. Sexual Desire Discrepancy. Curr Sex Health Rep 11, 80–83 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11930-019-00196-w
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11930-019-00196-w