Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Role of Endoscopic Ultrasound in Biliary Obstruction

  • Biliary Tract (J Baillie, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Gastroenterology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The role of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in the diagnosis of biliary obstruction is well established, and emerging evidence suggests it may also play a therapeutic role. Differentiating between benign and malignant causes of biliary obstruction can be challenging, but EUS is a crucial tool in the armamentarium of the physician. Evolving technologies such as elastography and contrast enhancement may further supplement the diagnostic abilities of EUS. Therapeutic applications of EUS are evolving rapidly, and EUS-guided cholangiography may aid biliary decompression when endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) has failed or is not possible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Fusaroli P, Kypreos D, Petrini CA, et al. Scientific publications in endoscopic ultrasonography: changing trends in the third millennium. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2011;45:400–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Barkun AN, Barkun JS, Fried GM, et al. Useful predictors of bile duct stones in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg. 1994;220:32–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Freeman ML. Adverse outcomes of ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;56:S273–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Shea JA, Berlin JA, Escarce JJ, et al. Revised estimates of diagnostic test sensitivity and specificity in suspected biliary tract disease. Arch Intern Med. 1994;154:2573–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Einstein DM, Lapin SA, Ralls PW, et al. The insensitivity of sonography in detection of choledocholithiasis. Am J Roentgenol. 1984;142:725–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Laing FC, Jeffrey RB, Wing VW. Improved visualization of choledocholithiasis by sonography. Am J Roentgenol. 1984;143:949–52.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Polkowski M, Palucki J, Regula J, et al. Helical computed tomographic cholangiography versus endosonography for suspected bile duct stones: a prospective blinded study in non-jaundiced patients. Gut. 1999;45:744–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Tse F, Lui L, Barkun AN, et al. EUS: a meta-analysis of test performance in suspected choledocholithiasis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;67:235–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Verma D, Kapadia A, Eisen G, et al. EUS vs MRCP for detection of choledocholithiasis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;64:248–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. •• Petrov MS, Savides TJ. Systemic review of endoscopic ultrasonography versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for suspected choledocholithiasis. Br J Surg. 2009;96:967–74. This meta-analysis of 4 RCTs containing 213 patients demonstrated that for patients with a low to intermediate probability of choledocholithiasis, EUS guided ERCP could have avoided the need for ERCP in 67.1 % of the cases. This resulted in a relative risk reduction of 0.35 in terms of overall complications.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Romagnuolo J, Bardou M, Rahme E, et al. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: a meta-analysis of test performance in suspected biliary disease. Ann Intern Med. 2003;139:547–57.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rosch T, Meining A, Fruhmorgen S, et al. A prospective comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of ERCP, MRCP, CT and EUS in biliary strictures. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;55:870–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Tsao JI, Nimura Y, Kamiya J, et al. Management of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: comparison of an American and a Japanese experience. Ann Surg. 2000;232:166–74.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gerhards MF, Vos P, van Gulik TM, et al. Incidence of benign lesions in patients resected for suspicious hilar obstruction. Br J Surg. 2001;88:48–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Fogel EL, de Bellis M, McHenry L, et al. Effectiveness of a new long cytology brush in the evaluation of malignant biliary obstruction: a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;63:71–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Farrell RJ, Jain AK, Brandwein SL, et al. The combination of stricture dilation, endoscopic needle aspiration, and biliary brushings significantly improves diagnostic yield from malignant bile duct strictures. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;54:587–94.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Levy MJ, Baron TH, Clayton AC, et al. Prospective evaluation of advanced molecular markers and imaging techniques in patients with indeterminate bile duct strictures. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103:1263–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Fritcher EG, Kipp BR, Halling KC, et al. A multivariable model using advanced cytologic methods for the evaluation of indeterminate pancreaticobiliary strictures. Gastroenterology. 2009;136:2180–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fritscher-Ravens A, Broering DC, Knoefel WT, et al. EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration of suspected hilar cholangiocarcinoma in potentially operable patients with negative brush cytology. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;99:45–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lee JH, Salem R, Aslanian H, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound and fine-needle aspiration of unexplained bile duct strictures. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;99:1069–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Garrow D, Miller S, Sinha D, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound: a meta-analysis of test performance in suspected biliary obstruction. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;5:616–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wu LM, Jiang XX, Gu HY, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy in the evaluation of bile duct strictures and gallbladder masses: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;23:113–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. •• Mohamadnejad M, DeWitt JM, Sherman S, et al. Role of EUS for preoperative evaluation of cholangiocarcinoma: a large single-center experience. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;73:71–8. This prospective study from a single center represents the largest cohort reported to date in the literature of EUS-FNA for the evaluation of cholangiocarcinoma. The reported sensitivity for distal CBD strictures was significantly higher at 81 % compared to proximal strictures at 59 %.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hirooka Y, Goto H, Itoh A, et al. Case of intraductal papillary mucinous tumor in which endosonography guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy caused dissemination [letter]. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003;18:1323–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Chong A, Venugopal K, Segarajasingam D, et al. Tumor seeding after EUS-guided FNA of pancreatic tail neoplasia. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;74:933–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Levy MJ, Gleeson FC, Campion MB, et al. Prospective cytological assessment of gastrointestinal luminal fluid acquired during EUS: a potential source of false positive FNA and needle tract seeding. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105:1311–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Chen CH, Yang CC, Yeh YH, et al. Reappraisal of endosonography of ampullary tumors: correlation with transabdominal sonography, CT and MRI. J Clin Ultrasound. 2009;37:18–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. • Hewitt MJ, McPhail MJ, Possamai L, et al. EUS-guided FNA for diagnosis of solid pancreatic neoplasms: a meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;75:319–31. This recent meta-analysis of 33 studies of nearly 5000 patients confirms the role of EUS-FNA in the diagnosis of solid pancreatic neoplasms. The pooled sensitivity and specificity for EUS-FNA was 85 % and 98 % respectively.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Horwhat JD, Paulson EK, McGrath K, et al. A randomized comparison of EUS-guided FNA versus CT or US-guided FNA for the evaluation of pancreatic mass lesions. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;63:966–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Volmar KE, Vollmer RT, Jowell PS, et al. Pancreatic FNA in 1000 cases: a comparison of imaging modalities. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;61:854–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Eloubeidi M, Gress FG, Savides TJ, et al. Acute pancreatitis after EUS-guided FNA of solid pancreatic masses: a pooled analysis from (EUS) centers in the United States. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;60:385–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Eloubeidi M, Tamhane A, Varadarajulu S, et al. Frequency of major complications after EUS-guided FNA of solid pancreatic masses: a prospective evaluation. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;63:622–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Tadic M, Kujundzic M, Stoos-Veic T, et al. Role of repeated endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration in small solid pancreatic masses with previous indeterminate and negative cytological findings. Dig Dis. 2008;26:377–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Bhutani MS, Gress FG, Giovannini M, et al. The No Endosonographic Detection of Tumor (NEST) study: a case series of pancreatic cancers missed on endoscopic ultrasonography. Endoscopy. 2004;36:385–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Krishna NB, Mehra M, Reddy AV, et al. EUS/EUS-FNA for suspected pancreatic cancer: influence of chronic pancreatitis and clinical presentation with or without obstructive jaundice on performance characteristics. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;70:70–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Varadarajulu S, Tamhane A, Eloubeidi MA, et al. Yiled of EUS-guided FNA of pancreatic masses in the presence or the absence of chronic pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;62:728–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Gleeson FC, Kipp BR, Caudill JL, et al. False positive endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration cytology: incidence and risk factors. Gut. 2010;59:586–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Siddiqui AA, Kowalski TE, Shahid H, et al. False-positive EUS-guided FNA cytology for solid pancreatic lesions. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;74:535–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Iglesias-Garcia J, Larino-Noia J, Abdulkader I, et al. Quantitative endoscopic ultrasound elastography: an accurate method for the differentiation of solid pancreatic masses. Gastroenterology. 2010;139:1172–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Saftoiu A, Vilmann P, Gorunescu F, et al. Accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound elastography used for differential diagnosis of focal pancreatic masses: a multicenter study. Endoscopy. 2011;43:596–603.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Napoleon B, Alvarez-Sanchez MV, Gincoul R, et al. Contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound in solid lesions of the pancreas: results of a pilot study. Endoscopy. 2010;42:564–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Kitano M, Kudo M, Yamao K, et al. Characterization of small solid tumors in the pancreas: the value of contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107:303–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Huibregste K, Kimmey MB. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, endoscopic sphincterotomy and endoscopic biliary and pancreatic drainage. In Textbook of Gastroenterology. Edited by Yamada T. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott; 1995:2590–2617.

  44. Hamlin JA, Friedman M, Stein MG, et al. Percutaneous biliary drainage: complications of 118 consecutive catheterizations. Radiology. 1986;158:199–202.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Wiersema MJ, Sandusky D, Carr R, et al. Endosonograpy-guided cholangiopancreatography. Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;43:102–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Kim YS, Gupta K, Mallery S, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound rendezvous for bile duct access using a transduodenal approach: cumulative experience at a single center. A case series. Endoscopy;42:496–502.

  47. Shah JN, Marson F, Weilert F, et al. Single-operator, single-session EUS-guided anterograde cholangiopancreatography in failed ERCP or inaccessible papilla. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;75:56–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Itoi T, Isayama H, Sofuni A, et al. Stent selection and tips on placement technique of EUS-guided biliary drainage: transduodenal and transgastric stenting. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2011;18:664–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Park DH, Jang JW, Lee SS, et al. EUS-guided biliary drainage with transluminal stenting after failed ERCP: predictors of adverse events and long-term results. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;74:1276–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Weilert F, Binmoeller KF, Marson F, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided anterograde treatment of biliary stones following gastric bypass. Endoscopy. 2011;43:1105–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosure

No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Section on Gastroenterology, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC, 27157, USA

    Lennart Choo

  2. Internal Medicine, Endoscopic Ultrasound Services, Advanced Endoscopy Fellowship Program, Section on Gastroenterology, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC, 27157, USA

    Jason Conway

  3. Internal Medicine, Section on Gastroenterology, Endoscopy & Clinical Services, Section on Gastroenterology, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC, 27157, USA

    Girish Mishra

Authors
  1. Lennart Choo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jason Conway
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Girish Mishra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lennart Choo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Choo, L., Conway, J. & Mishra, G. The Role of Endoscopic Ultrasound in Biliary Obstruction. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 14, 520–527 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-012-0295-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-012-0295-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation