Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Bicuspid Aortic Valve and Aortic Root Disease

  • Published:
Current Cardiology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is the most common form of congenital heart disease, with frequent and premature occurrence of cardiac events, dominated by significant valvular dysfunction. BAV has a high prevalence of aortic wall abnormalities such as ascending aortic dilatation. Because more rapid aortic dilatation can occur, once the ascending aorta reaches 40 mm, annual imaging with echocardiography or other imaging techniques is indicated. The most feared complication is aortic dissection. However, the actual incidence of this complication is low (4%). Although limited data exist regarding prophylactic intervention, it is suggested that elective surgical repair of BAV-associated aortic dilatation should be more aggressively recommended. In patients with BAV, the decision to indicate surgical treatment in aortic diameters between 50 and 55 mm should be based on patient age, body size, comorbidities, type of surgery, and the presence of additional risk factors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. • Tadros TM, Klein MD, Shapira OM. Ascending aortic dilatation associated with bicuspid aortic valve. Pathophysiology, molecular biology, and clinical implications. Circulation 2009;119:880-890. This is an interesting article that updates the pathophysiology and molecular biology of ascending aorta dilatation in patients with BAV.

  2. Nistri S, Basso C, Marzari C, et al. Frequency of bicuspid aortic valve in young male conscripts by echocardiogram. Am J Cardiol. 2005;96:718–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tutar E, Ekici F, Atalay S, et al. The prevalence of bicuspid aortic valve in newborns by echocardiographic screening. Am Heart J. 2005;150:513–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Basso C, Boschello M, Perrone C, et al. An echocardiographic survey of primary school children for bicuspid aortic valve. Am J Cardiol. 2004;93:661–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. •• Siu SC, K Candice, Silversides K. Bicuspid aortic valve disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;55:2789-800. This is an excellent paper on the state of the art of BAV including recent studies on genetics, pathobiology, and clinical course of the disease.

  6. Lee TC, Zhao YD, Courtman DW, et al. Abnormal aortic valve development in mice lacking endothelial oxide synthase. Circulation. 2000;101:2345–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. • Fernandez B, Durán AC, Fernández-Gallego T, et al. Bicuspid aortic valves with different spatial orientations of the leaflets are distinct etiological entities. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;54:2312-8. This is an interesting study that assessed the pathogenesis of BAV in mice and showed that the different morphologies of BAV may result from different etiologies: anomalous septation or exacerbated nitric transformation.

  8. Glick BN, Roberts WC. Congenitally bicuspid aortic valve in multiple family members. Am J Cardiol. 1994;73:400–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Martin LJ, Ramachandran V, Cripe LH, et al. Evidence in favor of linkage to human chromosomal regions 18q, 5q and 13q for bicuspid aortic valve and associated cardiovascular malformations. Hum Genet. 2007;121:275–84.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Garg V, Muth AN, Ransom JF, et al. Mutations in NOTCH 1 cause aortic valve disease. Nature. 2005;437:270–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Guo DC, Pannu H, Tran-Fadulu V, et al. Mutations in smooth muscle alpha-actin (ACTA2) lead to thoracic aortic aneurysms and dissections. Nat Genet. 2007;39:1488–93.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Cripe L, Andelfinger G, Martin J, et al. Bicuspid aortic valve is heritable. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44:138–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Huntington K, Hunter AG, Chan KL. A prospective study to assess the frequency of familial clustering of congenital bicuspid aortic valve. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;30:1809–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Warnes CA, Williams RG, Bashore TM, et al. ACC/AHA 2008 guidelines for the management of adults with congenital heart disease: a report of the American College Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Develop Guidelines on the Management of Adults With Congenital Heart Disease). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52:e1–121.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Biner S, Rafique AM, Ray I, et al. Aortopathy is prevalent in relatives if bicuspid aortic valve patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;53:2288-2295. This study showed that 32% of first-degree relatives of patients with BAV presented abnormalities in the aortic root. Thus, screening in this population should be considered

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sabet HY, Edwards WD, Tazelaar HD, et al. Congenitally bicuspid aortic valves: a surgical pathology study of 542 cases(1991 through 1986) and a literature review of 2,715 additional cases. Mayo Clin Proc. 1999;74:14–26.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bauer M, Pasic M, Schaffarzyk R, et al. Reduction aortoplasty for dilatation of the ascending aorta in patients with bicuspid aortic valve. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;73:720–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hahn RT, Roman MJ, Mogtader AH, et al. Association of aortic dilation with regurgitant, stenotic and functionally normal bicuspid aortic valves. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;19:283–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Nistri S, Sorbo MD, Marin M, et al. Aortic root dilatation in young men with normally functioning bicuspid valves. Heart. 1999;82:19–22.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Alegret JM, Duran I, Palazon O, et al. Prevelance of and predictors of bicuspid aortic valves in patients with dilated aortic roots. Am J Cardiol. 2003;91:619–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Nkomo VT, Enriquez-Sarano M, Ammash NM, et al. Bicuspid aortic valve associated with aortic dilatation. A community-based study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2003;23:351–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ferencik M, Pape LA. Changes in size of ascending aorta and aortic function with time in patients with congenitally bicuspid aortic valves. Am J Cardiol. 2003;92:43–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Cecconi M, Manfrin M, Moraca A, et al. Aortic dimensions in patients with bicuspid aortic valve without significant valve dysfunction. Am J Cardiol. 2005;95:292–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Beroukhim RS, Kruzick TL, Taylor AL, et al. Progression of aortic dilation in children with a functionally normal bicuspid aortic valve. Am J Cardiol. 2006;98:828–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Warren AE, Boyd ML, O’Connell C, et al. Dilatation of the ascending aorta in paediatric patients with bicuspid aortic valve: frequency, rate of progression and risk factors. Heart. 2006;92:1496–500.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Holmes KW, Lehmann CU, Dalal D, et al. Progressive dilation of the ascending in children with isolated bicuspid aortic valve. Am J Cardiol. 2007;99:978–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Della Corte A, Bancone C, Quarto C, et al. Predictors of ascending aortic dilatation with bicuspid aortic valve: a wide spectrum of disease expression. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2007;31:397–404.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Keane MG, Wiegers SE, Plappert T, et al. Bicuspid aortic valves are associated with aortic dilatation out of proportion to coexistent valvular lesions. Circulation. 2000;102(suppl III):35–9.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Morgan-Hughes GJ, Roobottom CA, Owens PE, et al. Dilatation of the aorta in pure, severe, bicuspid aortic valve stenosis. Am Heart J. 2004;147:736–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Guntheroth WG. A critical review of the American college of cardiology/American heart association practice guidelines on bicuspid aortic valve with dilated ascending aorta. Am J Cardiol. 2008;102:107–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Bonow RO. Bicuspid aortic valves and dilated aortas: A critical review of the critical review of the ACC/AHA practice guidelines recommendations. Am J Cardiol. 2008;102:111–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Robicsek F, Thubrikar MJ, Cook JW, et al. The congenitally bicuspid aortic valve: how does it function? Why does it fail? Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;77:177–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Fedak PW, Verma S, David TE, et al. Clinical and pathophysiological implications of a bicuspid aortic valve. Circulation. 2002;106:900–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Fedak PW, de Sa MP, Verma S, et al. Vascular matrix remodeling in patients with bicuspid aortic valve malformations: implications for aortic dilatation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003;126:797–806.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Nataatmadja M, West M, West J, et al. Abnormal extracellular matrix protein transport associated with increased apoptosis of vascular smooth muscle cells in Marfan syndrome and bicuspid aortic valve thoracic aortic aneurysm. Circulation. 2003;108:II329–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Schmid F-X, Bielenberg K, Schneider A, et al. Ascending aortic aneurysm associated with bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valve: involvement and clinical relevance of smooth muscle cell apoptosis and expression of cell death-initiating proteins. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2003;23:537–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Ikonomidis JS, Jones JA, Barbour JR, et al. Expression of matrix metalloproteinases and endogenous inhibitors within ascending aortic aneurysms of patients with bicuspid or tricuspid aortic valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;133:1028–36.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. • Phillippi JA, Klyachko EA, Kenny JP, et al. Basal and oxidative stress-induced expression of metallothionein is decreased in ascending aortic aneurysms of bicuspid aortic valve patients. Circulation 2009;119:2498-2506. This study confirms the finding of others that MMP-9 expression is increased in BAV patients with concomitant ascending aortic disease.

  39. Novaro GM, Tiong IY, Pearce GL, et al. Features and predictors of ascending aortic dilatation in association with a congenital bicuspid aortic valve. Am J Cardiol. 2003;92:99–101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. • Schaefer BM, Lewin MB, Stout KK, et al. The bicuspid aortic valve: an integrated phenotypic classification of leaflet morphology and aortic root shape. Heart 2008; 94: 1634-1638. This is an echocardiographic study that compares the three BAV phenotypes with ascending aorta dilatation and shape.

  41. • Buchner S, Hülsmann M, Poschenrieder F, Hamer OW, et al. Variable phenotypes of bicuspid aortic valve disease: classification by cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Heart 2010; 96: 1233-1240. This study assessed by MRI 105 patients with BAV and characterized the valve phenotype showing that R-L fusion was the most predominant, but no differences in aortic dimensions were observed.

  42. •• Hope MD, Hope TA, Meadows AK, et al. Bicuspid aortic valve: Four-dimensional MR Evaluation of ascending aortic systolic flow patterns. Radiology 2010; 255: 53-61. This is a very interesting study showing, by four-dimensional flow MRI, abnormal helical systolic flow in the ascending aorta. Different patterns of flow jets were related to BAV morphology, ascending aorta dilatation, and aortic valve stenosis.

  43. Schaefer BM, Lewin MB, Stout KK, et al. Usefulness of bicuspid aortic valve phenotype to predict elastic properties of the ascending aorta. Am J Cardiol. 2007;99(5):686–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Thanassoulis G, Yip JW, Filion K, et al. Retrospective study to identify predictors of the presence and rapid progression of aortic dilatation in patients with bicuspid aortic valves. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med. 2008;5:821–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Borger MA, Preston M, Ivanov J, et al. Should the ascending aorta be replaced more frequently in pacients with bicuspid aortic valve disease? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004;128:677–83.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Russo C, Mazzetti S, Garatti A, et al. Aortic complications after bicuspid aortic valve replacement. Long term results. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;74:S1773–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Yasuda H, Nakatani S, Stugaard M, et al. Failure to prevent progressive dilatation of ascending aorta by aortic valve replacement in patients with bicuspid aortic valve:comparison with tricuspid aortic valve. Circulation. 2003;108(SupplII):II291–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. •• Michelena HI, Desjardins VA, Avierinos JF, et al. Natural history of asymptomatic patients with normally functioning or minimally dys-functional bicuspid aortic valve in the community. Circulation 2008;117:2776-2784. This interesting study included 212 normally functioning BAVs in the community and showed that survival after 20 years of diagnosis was similar to that of the general population . No aortic dissection occurred. However, surgical events were 27%, most of which (24%) were aortic valvular surgery.

  49. •• Tzemos N, Therrien J, Yip J, et al. Outcomes in adults with bicuspid aortic valves. JAMA 2008;300:1317-325. This is the largest study on outcomes of BAV. A total of 642 consecutive patients were followed up 9 (5) years. Mortality was similar to that of the general population. Intervention on aortic valve or ascending aorta was required in 22% and aortic dissection in less than 2%. Predictors of cardiac events were age and the severity of aortic valvular disease.

  50. Ciotti GR, Vlahos AP, Silverman NH. Morphology and function of the bicuspid aortic valve with and without coarction of the aorta in the young. Am J Cardiol. 2006;98:1096–102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Dore A, Brochu MC, Baril JF, et al. Progressive dilation of the diameter of the aortic root in adults with a bicuspid aortic valve. Cardiol Young. 2003;13:526–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. La Canna G, Ficarra E, Tsagalau E, et al. Progression rate of ascending aortic dilation in patients with normally functioning bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valves. Am J Cardiol. 2006;98:249–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. •• Davies RR, Kaple RK, Mandapati D, et al . Natural history of ascending aortic aneurysms in the setting of an unreplaced bicuspid aortic valve. Ann Thorac Surg 2007;83:1338-1344. This study shows that despite a faster growth rate of the ascending aorta, patients with BAV had similar rates of aortic dissection. Aortic stenosis added risk in patients with aneurysmal disease.

  54. Larson EW, Edwards WD. Risk factors for aortic dissection: a necropsy study of 161 cases. Am J Cardiol. 1984;53:849–55.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Roberts CS, Roberts WC. Dissection of the aorta associated with congenital malformation of the aortic valve. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991;17:712–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Svensson LG, Kim KH, Lytle BW, et al. Relationship of aortic cross-sectional area to height ratio and the risk of aortic dissection in patients with bicuspid aortic valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003;126:892–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Roman MJ, Devereux RB, Kramer-Fox R, et al. Two-dimensional echocardiographic aortic root dimensions in normal children and adults. Am J Cardiol. 1989;64:507–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Johnston KW, Rutherford RB, Tilson MD, et al. Suggested standards for reporting on arterial aneurysms. Subcommittee on Reporting Standards for Arterial Aneurysms, Ad Hoc Committee on Reporting Standards, Society for Vascular Surgery and North American Chapter, International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery. J Vasc Surg. 1991;13:452–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Vahanian A, Baumgartner H, Bax J, et al. Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease. The task force on the management of valvular heart disease of the European Society of Cardiology. European Heart Journal. 2007;28:230–68.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Chatterjee K, et al. 2008 Focused update incorporated into the ACC/AHA 2006 Guideline of patients with valvular Herat disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;52: e1-e-142.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Coady MA, Rizzo JA, Elefteriades JA. Developing surgical intervention criteria for thoracic aortic aneurysms. Cardiol Clin. 1999;17:827–39.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Elefteriades JA. Natural history of thoracic aortic aneurysms: indications for surgery, and surgical versus nonsurgical risks. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;74:S1877–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Etz CD, Zoli S, Brenner R, et al. When to operate on the bicuspid valve patient with a modestly dilated ascending aorta. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;90:1884–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Olearchyk AS. Congenital bicuspid aortic valve disease with an aneurysm of the ascending aorta in adults:vertical reduction aortoplasty with distal external synthetic wrapping. J Card Surg. 2004;19:144–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Mueller XM, Tevaearai HT, Genton CY, et al. Drawback of aortoplasty for aneurysm of the ascending aorta associated with aortic valve disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1997;63:762–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Etz CD, Bischoff MS, Bodian C, et al. The Bentall procedure: is it the gold standard? A series of 597 consecutive cases. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;140:S64–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Shimitto JD, Mokashi SA, Chen FY, et al. Aortic valve-sparing operations: state of the art. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2010;25:102–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. • Schäfers HJ, Kunihara T, Fries P, et al. Valve preseving root replacement in bicuspid aortic valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010; 140: S36-40. In this study, long-term stability of reconstructed aortic valve in 153 patients is reported with freedom from reoperation of 95% at 5 years.

  69. Takkenberg JJM, Klieverik LMA, Schoof PH, et al. The Ross procedure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Circulation. 2009;119:222–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. • Pettersson GB, Crucean AC, Savage R, et al. Toward predictable repair of regurgitant aortic valves. A systematic morphology approach to bicommissural repair. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008; 52: 40-49. A systematic segmental analysis of morphology by TEE facilitates aortic valve repair.

  71. Boodhwani M, de Kerchove L, Glineur D, et al. Repair of regurgitant bicuspid aortic valves: a systematic approach. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;140:276–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. • le Polain de Waroux JB, Pouleur AC, Robert A, et al. Mechanisms of recurrent aortic regurgitation after aortic valve repair. J Am Coll Cardiol Img2009: 2: 931-939. This study showed the usefulness of intraoperative TEE in aortic valve repair.

Download references

Disclosure

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Cardiac Imaging, Hospital Vall d´Hebron, Pº Vall d´Hebron 119-129, Barcelona, 08035, Spain

    Artur Evangelista

Authors
  1. Artur Evangelista
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Artur Evangelista.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Evangelista, A. Bicuspid Aortic Valve and Aortic Root Disease. Curr Cardiol Rep 13, 234–241 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-011-0175-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-011-0175-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation