Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Mindset and Communication Barriers in the Diffusion of Bariatric Surgery

  • Lipid and Metabolic Effects of Gastrointestinal Surgery (R. Cohen, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Atherosclerosis Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Cumulating evidence is available to demonstrate the efficacy of bariatric surgery (BS) in achieving weight loss and optimizing comorbidities. However, currently, only a minority of eligible patients approaches bariatric centers. The underuse of BS can no longer be explained by the lack of evidence supporting its beneficial outcomes along with its favorable safety-profile, rather, by the supporting infrastructure, insurance coverage, and mindset of society, including potential patients and allied healthcare professionals. As a framework to approach mindset barriers in the diffusion of BS, we used the Rogers’ levels of the innovation adoption process: (1) knowledge, (2) persuasion, (3) decision, (4) implementation, and (5) confirmation.

Recent Findings

Knowledge: people tend to believe that obesity is a result of lack of willpower and they have difficulties in differentiating BS from cosmetic surgery. Eligible patients often do not assess themselves as being morbidly obese and are unaware that they would qualify for BS. Persuasion: majority of BS candidates search health information online, with the aim of getting information about surgical techniques and other patients’ experiences. Decision: metabolically more compromised patients are more likely to opt for BS. Implementation: general practitioners who already referred patients for BS seem to be more confident to refer again, to tackle obesity and manage postoperative follow-up. Confirmation: postbariatric patients seem to be more self-confident and more productive at work; however, their stigmatization might prevail related to the way they have achieved weight loss.

Summary

Dissemination of balanced and corroborative information seems to be the main instrument to combat mindset barriers. The integration of general practitioners under the umbrella of bariatric centers has a great potential to increase referrals. Social media may represent a helpful tool to be used by medical professionals and patient-role models to improve confident decision-making of bariatric candidates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Ledley RS, Lusted LB. Reasoning foundations of medical diagnosis; symbolic logic, probability, and value theory aid our understanding of how physicians reason. Science. 1959;130(3366):9–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Yumuk V, Tsigos C, Fried M, Schindler K, Busetto L, Micic D, et al. Obesity management task force of the European Association for the Study of Obesity. European guidelines for obesity management in adults. Obes Facts. 2015;8(6):402–24.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. •• Kaplan LM, Golden A, Jinnett K, Kolotkin RL, Kyle TK, Look M, et al. Perceptions of barriers to effective obesity care: results from the National ACTION Study. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2018;26(1):61–9. Large-sample study that examined obesity-related perceptions, attitudes, and behaviors among people with obesity, healthcare providers and employer representatives.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. McCulloch P, Altman DG, Campbell WB, Flum DR, Glasziou P, Marshall JC, et al. No surgical innovation without evaluation: the IDEAL recommendations. Lancet. 2009;374(9695):1105–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Grübler A. Time for a change: on the patterns of diffusion of innovation. Daedalus. 1996;125(3):19–42.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rogers EM. Diffusion of innovations. 3rd ed. New York: The Free Press; 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  7. • Rubino F, Nathan DM, Eckel RH, Schauer PR, Alberti KG, Zimmet PZ, et al. Delegates of the 2nd Diabetes Surgery Summit. Metabolic Surgery in the Treatment Algorithm for Type 2 Diabetes: A Joint Statement by International Diabetes Organizations. Diabetes Care. 2016;39(6):861–77. Recent guidelines and meta-analysis on metabolic surgery for diabetes.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gero D, Favre L, Allemann P, Fournier P, Demartines N, Suter M. Laparoscopic Roux-En-Y gastric bypass improves lipid profile and decreases cardiovascular risk: a 5-year longitudinal cohort study of 1048 patients. Obes Surg. 2018;28(3):805–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Salminen P, Helmiö M, Ovaska J, Juuti A, Leivonen M, Peromaa-Haavisto P, et al. Effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy vs laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass on weight loss at 5 years among patients with morbid obesity: the SLEEVEPASS randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2018;319(3):241–54.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Lage-Hansen PR, Holm J, Gram J, Larsen K. Sleep apnoea in patients undergoing bariatric surgery. Dan Med J. 2018;65(2): pii: A5440.

  11. Escobar-Morreale HF, Santacruz E, Luque-Ramírez M, Botella Carretero JI. Prevalence of ‘obesity-associated gonadal dysfunction’ in severely obese men and women and its resolution after bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2017;23(4):390–408.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Winder AA, Kularatna M, MacCormick AD. Does bariatric surgery affect the incidence of breast cancer development? A systematic review. Obes Surg. 2017;27(11):3014–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sjöström L. Review of the key results from the Swedish Obese Subjects (SOS) trial—a prospective controlled intervention study of bariatric surgery. J Intern Med. 2013;273(3):219–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Shubeck S, Dimick JB, Telem DA. Long-term outcomes following bariatric surgery. JAMA. 2018;319(3):302–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Peterli R, Wölnerhanssen BK, Peters T, Vetter D, Kröll D, Borbély Y, et al. Effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy vs laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass on weight loss in patients with morbid obesity: the SM-BOSS randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2018;319(3):255–65.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Jakobsen GS, Småstuen MC, Sandbu R, Nordstrand N, Hofsø D, Lindberg M, et al. Association of bariatric surgery vs medical obesity treatment with long-term medical complications and obesity-related comorbidities. JAMA. 2018;319(3):291–301.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Neovius M, Bruze G, Jacobson P, Sjöholm K, Johansson K, Granath F, Sundström J, Näslund I, Marcus C, Ottosson J, Peltonen M, Carlsson LMS. Risk of suicide and non-fatal self-harm after bariatric surgery: results from two matched cohort studies. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018;6(3):197-207.

  18. Ahmed A, AlBuraikan D, ALMuqbil B, AlJohi W, Alanazi W, AlRasheed B. Readmissions and Emergency department visits after bariatric surgery at Saudi Arabian hospital: the rates, reasons, and risk factors. Obes Facts. 2017;10(5):432–43. https://doi.org/10.1159/000456667.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Tucker ON, Fajnwaks P, Szomstein S, Rosenthal RJ. Is concomitant cholecystectomy necessary in obese patients undergoing laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery? Surg Endosc. 2008;22(11):2450–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. •• Afonso BB, Rosenthal R, Li KM, Zapatier J, Szomstein S. Perceived barriers to bariatric surgery among morbidly obese patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2010;6(1):16–21. Study to identify factors that patients regard as barriers to undergoing a bariatric surgical procedure.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Alsumali A, Eguale T, Bairdain S, Samnaliev M. Cost-effectiveness analysis of bariatric surgery for morbid obesity. Obes Surg. 2018;15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-017-3100-0.

  22. https://bbenchmarks.org (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03440138).

  23. Muller X, Marcon F, Sapisochin G, Marquez M, Dondero F, Rayar M, et al. Defining benchmarks in liver transplantation: a multicenter outcome analysis determining best achievable results. Ann Surg. 2018;267(3):419–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Duvoisin C, Favre L, Allemann P, Fournier P, Demartines N, Suter M. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: ten-year results in a cohort of 658 patients. Ann Surg. 2017;29 https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002538.

  25. Pedroso FE, Angriman F, Endo A, Dasenbrock H, Storino A, Castillo R, Watkins AA, Castillo-Angeles M, Goodman JE, Zitsman JL. Weight loss after bariatric surgery in obese adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018;14(3):413-422.

  26. Sepúlveda M, Alamo M, Saba J, Astorga C, Lynch R, Guzmán H. Long-term weight loss in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017;13(10):1676–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Gero D, Dayer-Jankechova A, Worreth M, Giusti V, Suter M. Laparoscopic gastric banding outcomes do not depend on device or technique. long-term results of a prospective randomized study comparing the Lapband® and the SAGB®. Obes Surg. 2014;24(1):114–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. • Makaronidis JM, Batterham RL.Obesity, body weight regulation and the brain: Insights from fMRI. Br J Radiol. 2018;16:20170910 Doi: https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20170910. Review on the pathoaetiology of obesity with a focus on the role of fMRI studies in understanding the central regulation of eating behaviour and energy homeostasis.

  29. Teo EY, Lew PS, Foo CS. Public perceptions of obesity and bariatric surgery in Singapore: a pilot study. Singap Med J. 2012;53(2):104–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Champion C, Glenn N, Berry T, Spence JC. Exploring women's responses to online media coverage of weight loss surgery. Clin Obes. 2015;5(5):281–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. •• Paolino L, Genser L, Fritsch S, De’Angelis N, Azoulay D, Lazzati A. The web-surfing bariatic patient: the role of the internet in the decision-making process, Obes Surg. 2015;25(4):738–43. Study on the role of the Internet in the decision-making process of obese patients seeking bariatric surgery.

  32. Bhogal SK, Reddigan JI, Rotstein OD, Cohen A, Glockler D, Tricco AC, et al. Inequity to the utilization of bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Surg. 2015;25(5):888–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Wee CC, Huskey KW, Bolcic-Jankovic D, Colten ME, Davis RB, Hamel M. Sex, race, and consideration of bariatric surgery among primary care patients with moderateto severe obesity. J Gen Intern Med. 2014;29(1):68–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Arterburn D, Westbrook EO, Terrell A. Weight control practices of severely obese patients who are not seeking bariatric surgery. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2013;21(8):1509–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. • Weinstein AL, Marascalchi BJ, Spiegel MA, Saunders JK, Fagerlin A, Parikh M. Patient preferences and bariatric surgery procedure selection; the need for shared decision-making. Obes Surg. 2014;24(11):1933–9. Study on defining the relationship between preferences of patients considering bariatric surgery and the procedure patients actually undergo.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Trainer S, Benjamin T. Elective surgery to save my life: rethinking the “choice” in bariatric surgery. J Adv Nurs. 2017;73(4):894–904.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Schauer DP, Arterburn DE, Wise R, Boone W, Fischer D, Eckman MH. Predictors of bariatric surgery among an interested population. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014;10(3):547–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Gradaschi R, Noli G, Cornicelli M, Camerini G, Scopinaro N, Adami GF. Do clinical and behavioural correlates of obese patients seeking bariatric surgery differ from those of individuals involved in conservative weight loss programme? J Hum Nutr Diet. 2013;26 Suppl 1:34–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. • Wee CC, Davis RB, Huskey KW, Jones DB, Hamel MB. Quality of life among obese patients seeking weight loss surgery: the importance of obesity-related social stigma and functional status. J Gen Intern Med. 2013;28(2):231–8. Study on the relative importance of different quality of life domains and weight stigma for health utility.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Summers RH, Elsey H, Moore M, Byrne C, Byrne J, Welbourn R, et al. Weight loss surgery for non-morbidly obese populations with type 2 diabetes: is this an acceptable option for patients? Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2014;15(3):277–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Doumouras AG, Saleh F, Sharma AM, Anvari S, Gmora S, Anvari M, et al. Geographic and socioeconomic factors affecting delivery of bariatric surgery across high- and low-utilization healthcare systems. Br J Surg. 2017;104(7):891–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. •• Dietz WH, Baur LA, Hall K, Puhl RM, Taveras EM, Uauy R, et al. Management of obesity: improvement of health-care training and systems for prevention and care. Lancet. 2015;385(9986):2521–33. Guidelines on medical and surgical management of obesity.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Gill RS, Majumdar SR, Wang X, Tuepah R, Klarenbach SW, Birch DW, et al. Prioritization and willingness to pay for bariatric surgery: the patient perspective. Can J Surg. 2014;57(1):33–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. •• Tork S, Meister KM, Uebele AL, Hussain LR, Kelley SR, Kerlakian GM, Tymitz KM. Factors influencing primary care physicians’ referral for bariatric surgery. JSLS. 2015;19(3). Study on perceptions of primary care physicians of the role of bariatric surgery in the management of obese patients and on possible barriers to treatment.

  45. Funk LM, Jolles SA, Greenberg CC, Schwarze ML, Safdar N, McVay MA, et al. Primary care physician decision making regarding severe obesity treatment and bariatric surgery: a qualitative study. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;12(4):893–901.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. • Jung FU, Luck-Sikorski C, König HH, Riedel-Heller SG. Stigma and knowledge as determinants of recommendation and referral behavior of general practitioners and internists. Obes Surg. 2016;26(10):2393–401. Study to examine the effect of stigma and knowledge on recommendation of bariatric surgery and referral to a surgeon by general practitioners and internists.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Sarwer DB, Ritter S, Wadden TA, Spitzer JC, Vetter ML, Moore RH. Attitudes about the safety and efficacy of bariatric surgery among patients with type 2 diabetes and a body mass index of 30-40 kg/m2. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013;9(5):630–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Sarwer DB, Ritter S, Wadden TA, Spitzer JC, Vetter ML, Moore RH. Physicians’ attitudes about referring their type 2 diabetes patients for bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012;8(4):381–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Warholm C, Marie Øien A, Råheim M. The ambivalence of losing weight after bariatric surgery. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2014;9:22876.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. • Carels RA, Rossi J, Borushok J, Taylor MB, Kiefner-Burmeister A, Cross N, et al. Changes in weight bias and perceived employability following weight loss and gain. Obes Surg. 2015;25(3):568–70. Weight stigma study to examine whether attitudes toward and employability of a normal weight person can change after learning that the person had been obese.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Sockalingam S, Wnuk S, Kantarovich K, Meaney C, Okrainec A, Hawa R, et al. Employment outcomes one year after bariatric surgery: the role of patient and psychosocial factors. Obes Surg. 2015;25(3):514–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Jung FUCE, Dietrich A, Stroh C, Riedel-Heller SG, Luck-Sikorski C. Changes in attitudes towards bariatric surgery after 5 years in the german general public. Obes Surg. 2017;27(10):2754–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Bucher Della Torre S, Courvoisier DS, Saldarriaga A, Martin XE, Farpour-Lambert NJ. Knowledge, attitudes, representations and declared practices of nurses and physicians about obesity in a university hospital: training is essential. Clin Obes. 2018;8:11–130. https://doi.org/10.1111/cob.12238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Acosta A, Azzalin A, Emmons CJ, Shuster JJ, Jay M, Lo MC. Improving residents’ clinical approach to obesity: impact of a multidisciplinary didactic curriculum. Postgrad Med J. 2014;90(1069):630–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Engström M, Forsberg A. Wishing for deburdening through a sustainable control after bariatric surgery. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being 2011;6(1).

  56. McGlone ER, Wingfield LR, Munasinghe A, Batterham RL, Reddy M, Khan OA. A pilot study of primary care physicians’ attitude to weight loss surgery in England: are the young more prejudiced? Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018;14(3):376–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Primomo JA, Kajese T, Davis G, Davis R, Shah S, Orsak M, et al. Decreased access to bariatric care: an analysis of referral practices to bariatric specialists. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;12(9):1725–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Stone AB, Yuan CT, Rosen MA, Grant MC, Benishek LE, Hanahan E, et al. Barriers to and facilitators of implementing enhanced recovery pathways using an implementation framework: a systematic review. JAMA Surg. 2018;153:270. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2017.5565.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. •• Imbus JR, Voils CI, Funk LM. Bariatric surgery barriers: a review using Andersen’s model of health services use. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018;14(3):404-412. Review on potential barriers to undergoing bariatric surgery within the framework of Andersen’s behavioral model of health services use.

  60. • Doumouras AG, Anvari S, Breau R, Anvari M, Hong D, Gmora S. The effect of an online referral system on referrals to bariatric surgery. Surg Endosc. 2017;31(12):5127–34. Study to determine the impact on referral rates to bariatric surgery after converting to an online referral system from a fax-based system.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland

    Daniel Gero & Marco Bueter

  2. Brains and Cheek, Independent Healthcare Research Agency, London, UK

    Bors Hulesch

Authors
  1. Daniel Gero
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bors Hulesch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Marco Bueter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marco Bueter.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Daniel Gero, Bors Hulesch, and Marco Bueter declare no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Lipid and Metabolic Effects of Gastrointestinal Surgery

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gero, D., Hulesch, B. & Bueter, M. Mindset and Communication Barriers in the Diffusion of Bariatric Surgery. Curr Atheroscler Rep 20, 38 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11883-018-0738-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11883-018-0738-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation