Skip to main content
Log in

Use of Heparin in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Is There Still a Role?

  • Cardiovascular Disease and Stroke (S Prabhakaran, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Atherosclerosis Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Heparin has long been a contested therapy in acute ischemic stroke (AIS). In current practice, heparin is considered on a case-by-case basis, but there is no consensus as to the appropriate timing of anticoagulation or for which ischemic stroke subtypes heparin may be beneficial. To provide better clarity on this issue, we review current research focusing on the use of heparin in AIS in each stroke subtype and subsequently make recommendations to provide readers with a systematic approach to managing complex stroke patients for which acute anticoagulation may be valuable. We conclude that there are certain subpopulations of ischemic stroke patients that may derive benefit from heparin when given acutely, including patients with symptomatic large artery stenosis >70 %, non-occlusive intraluminal thrombus, and in patients with high-risk cardiac conditions including left ventricular thrombus, left ventricular assist devices, and mechanical heart valves.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Sacco RL et al. Determinants of early recurrence of cerebral infarction. The Stroke Data Bank. Stroke J Cereb Circ. 1989;20:983–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Fisher CM. Anticoagulant therapy in cerebral thrombosis and cerebral embolism. A national cooperative study, interim report. Neurology. 1961;11(4)Pt 2:119–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Immediate anticoagulation of embolic stroke: a randomized trial. Cerebral Embolism Study Group. Stroke J Cereb Circ. 1983;14: 668–76.

  4. The International Stroke Trial (IST): a randomised trial of aspirin, subcutaneous heparin, both, or neither among 19435 patients with acute ischaemic stroke. International Stroke Trial Collaborative Group. Lancet. 1997; 349: 1569–81.

  5. Low molecular weight heparinoid, ORG 10172 (danaparoid), and outcome after acute ischemic stroke: a randomized controlled trial. The Publications Committee for the Trial of ORG 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST) Investigators. JAMA. 1998;279: 1265–72.

  6. Bath PM et al. Tinzaparin in acute ischaemic stroke (TAIST): a randomised aspirin-controlled trial. Lancet. 2001;358:702–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wong KS et al. Low-molecular-weight heparin compared with aspirin for the treatment of acute ischaemic stroke in Asian patients with large artery occlusive disease: a randomised study. Lancet Neurol. 2007;6:407–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Diener HC et al. Treatment of acute ischemic stroke with the low-molecular-weight heparin certoparin: results of the TOPAS trial. Therapy of Patients with Acute Stroke (TOPAS) Investigators. Stroke J Cereb Circ. 2001;32:22–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sandercock PAG, Gibson LM, Liu M. Anticoagulants for preventing recurrence following presumed non-cardioembolic ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009; CD000248. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD000248.pub2

  10. Camerlingo M et al. Intravenous heparin started within the first 3 hours after onset of symptoms as a treatment for acute nonlacunar hemispheric cerebral infarctions. Stroke J Cereb Circ. 2005;36:2415–20.

  11. Chamorro A et al. The rapid anticoagulation prevents ischemic damage study in acute stroke—final results from the writing committee. Cerebrovasc Dis Basel Switz. 2005;19:402–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Whiteley WN et al. Targeted use of heparin, heparinoids, or low-molecular-weight heparin to improve outcome after acute ischaemic stroke: an individual patient data meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Lancet Neurol. 2013;12:539–45. Meta-analysis assessing acute ischemic stroke patients with an increased risk of venous or arterial thomboembolism that were treated with unfractionated heparin or low-molecular weight heparin. There was a reduction in thrombotic events at the expense of a similar increase in hemorrhage for patients receiving intravenous heparin.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sacco RL, Shi T, Zamanillo MC, Kargman DE. Predictors of mortality and recurrence after hospitalized cerebral infarction in an urban community: the Northern Manhattan Stroke Study. Neurology. 1994;44:626–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Petty GW et al. Ischemic stroke subtypes: a population-based study of functional outcome, survival, and recurrence. Stroke J Cereb Circ. 2000;31:1062–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lovett JK, Coull AJ, Rothwell PM. Early risk of recurrence by subtype of ischemic stroke in population-based incidence studies. Neurology. 2004;62:569–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Moroney JT, Bagiella E, Paik MC, Sacco RL, Desmond DW. Risk factors for early recurrence after ischemic stroke: the role of stroke syndrome and subtype. Stroke J Cereb Circ. 1998;29:2118–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Rerkasem K, Rothwell PM. Systematic review of the operative risks of carotid endarterectomy for recently symptomatic stenosis in relation to the timing of surgery. Stroke J Cereb Circ. 2009;40:e564–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:445–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Brott TG et al. Stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of carotid-artery stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:11–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ois A, Cuadrado-Godia E, Rodríguez-Campello A, Jimenez-Conde J, Roquer J. High risk of early neurological recurrence in symptomatic carotid stenosis. Stroke J Cereb Circ. 2009;40:2727–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bruetman ME, Fields WS, Crawford E, De Bakey ME. Cerebral hemorrhage in carotid artery surgery. Arch Neurol. 1963;9:458–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wylie EJ, Hein MF, Adams JE. Intracranial hemorrhage following surgical revascularization for treatment of acute strokes. J Neurosurg. 1964;21:212–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Nehler MR et al. Anticoagulation followed by elective carotid surgery in patients with repetitive transient ischemic attacks and high-grade carotid stenosis. Arch Surg. 1993;128:1117–21. discussion 1121–1123.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bhatti AF et al. Free-floating thrombus of the carotid artery: literature review and case reports. J Vasc Surg. 2007;45:199–205.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Buchan A, Gates P, Pelz D, Barnett HJ. Intraluminal thrombus in the cerebral circulation. Implications for surgical management. Stroke J Cereb Circ. 1988;19:681–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Heros RC. Carotid endarterectomy in patients with intraluminal thrombus. Stroke J Cereb Circ. 1988;19:667–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. O’Gara PT et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines: developed in collaboration with the American College of Emergency Physicians and Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv Off J Soc Card Angiogr Interv. 2013;82:E1–E27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Members AF et al. ESC guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J. 2012;33:2569–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Mokin M et al. Intravenous heparin for the treatment of intraluminal thrombus in patients with acute ischemic stroke: a case series. J Neurointerv Surg. 2013;5:144–50. Case series of patients with acute ischemic stroke and intraluminal thrombus showing improvement or resolution clot burden in patients given heparin.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Chimowitz MI et al. Stenting versus aggressive medical therapy for intracranial arterial stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:993–1003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Sacco RL, Kargman DE, Gu Q, Zamanillo MC. Race-ethnicity and determinants of intracranial atherosclerotic cerebral infarction. The Northern Manhattan Stroke Study. Stroke J Cereb Circ. 1995;26:14–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Li H, Wong KS. Racial distribution of intracranial and extracranial atherosclerosis. J Clin Neurosci. 2003;10:30–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Chimowitz MI et al. Comparison of warfarin and aspirin for symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:1305–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kasner SE et al. Warfarin vs aspirin for symptomatic intracranial stenosis: subgroup analyses from WASID. Neurology. 2006;67:1275–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Wang Q et al. Low-molecular-weight heparin and early neurologic deterioration in acute stroke caused by large artery occlusive disease. Arch Neurol. 2012;69:1454–60. Follow up analysis of FISS-tris trial. Patients with large-artery associated ischemic stroke treated with low-molecular weight heparin had lower incidence of early neurologic deterioration within the first 10 days after stroke.

  36. Wang QS et al. Low-molecular-weight heparin versus aspirin for acute ischemic stroke with large artery occlusive disease: subgroup analyses from the Fraxiparin in Stroke Study for the treatment of ischemic stroke (FISS-tris) study. Stroke J Cereb Circ. 2012;43:346–9. Subgroup analysis of the FISS-tris study, looking at 6-month Barthel index of patients treated with fraxiparin. Benefit seen for LWMH in elderly stroke patients and those with posterior circulation disease.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Yi X, Lin J, Wang C, Zhang B, Chi W. Low-molecular-weight heparin is more effective than aspirin in preventing early neurologic deterioration and improving six-month outcome. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis Off J Natl Stroke Assoc. 2014;23:1537–44. Randomized trial to assess outcomes of ischemic stroke patients treated with either enoxaparin or aspirin within 48 hours of stroke symptoms. Patients with posterior circulation disease, (particularly basilar artery disease) and elderly patients had improved 6-month outcomes with enoxaparin.

  38. Puetz V et al. Frequency and clinical course of stroke and transient ischemic attack patients with intracranial nonocclusive thrombus on computed tomographic angiography. Stroke J Cereb Circ. 2009;40:193–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Lucas C, Moulin T, Deplanque D, Tatu L, Chavot D. Stroke patterns of internal carotid artery dissection in 40 patients. Stroke. 1998;29:2646–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Srinivasan J, Newell DW, Sturzenegger M, Mayberg MR, Winn HR. Transcranial Doppler in the evaluation of internal carotid artery dissection. Stroke J Cereb Circ. 1996;27:1226–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Molina CA et al. Cerebral microembolism in acute spontaneous internal carotid artery dissection. Neurology. 2000;55:1738–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Lyrer P, Engelter S. Antithrombotic drugs for carotid artery dissection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010; CD000255. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD000255.pub2

  43. Antiplatelet treatment compared with anticoagulation treatment for cervical artery dissection (CADISS): a randomised trial. Lancet Neurol. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(15)70018-9. Randomized trial showing no difference in recurrent ischemic stroke for patients with cervical artery dissection treated with antiplatelet therapy vs anticoagulation.

  44. Saxena R, Lewis S, Berge E, Sandercock PA, Koudstaal PJ. Risk of early death and recurrent stroke and effect of heparin in 3169 patients with acute ischemic stroke and atrial fibrillation in the International Stroke Trial. Stroke J Cereb Circ. 2001;32:2333–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Kelley RE, Berger JR, Alter M, Kovacs AG. Cerebral ischemia and atrial fibrillation: prospective study. Neurology. 1984;34:1285–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Hart RG, Coull BM, Hart D. Early recurrent embolism associated with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: a retrospective study. Stroke J Cereb Circ. 1983;14:688–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Berge E, Abdelnoor M, Nakstad PH, Sandset PM. Low molecular-weight heparin versus aspirin in patients with acute ischaemic stroke and atrial fibrillation: a double-blind randomised study. HAEST Study Group. Heparin in Acute Embolic Stroke Trial. Lancet. 2000;355:1205–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Hart RG, Palacio S, Pearce LA. Atrial fibrillation, stroke, and acute antithrombotic therapy: analysis of randomized clinical trials. Stroke J Cereb Circ. 2002;33:2722–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. O’Donnell MJ, Berge E, Sandset PM. Are there patients with acute ischemic stroke and atrial fibrillation that benefit from low molecular weight heparin? Stroke J Cereb Circ. 2006;37:452–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Paciaroni M, Agnelli G, Micheli S, Caso V. Efficacy and safety of anticoagulant treatment in acute cardioembolic stroke a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Stroke. 2007;38:423–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Transesophageal echocardiographic correlates of thromboembolism in high-risk patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. The Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Investigators Committee on Echocardiography. Ann Intern Med. 1998; 128: 639–47.

  52. Mügge A et al. Assessment of left atrial appendage function by biplane transesophageal echocardiography in patients with nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation: identification of a subgroup of patients at increased embolic risk. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;23:599–607.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Black IW, Hopkins AP, Lee LC, Walsh WF. Left atrial spontaneous echo contrast: a clinical and echocardiographic analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991;18:398–404.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Vincelj J, Sokol I, Jaksić O. Prevalence and clinical significance of left atrial spontaneous echo contrast detected by transesophageal echocardiography. Echocardiography. 2002;19:319–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Jugdutt BI, Sivaram CA. Prospective two-dimensional echocardiographic evaluation of left ventricular thrombus and embolism after acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1989;13:554–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Weinreich DJ, Burke JF, Pauletto FJ. Left ventricular mural thrombi complicating acute myocardial infarction. Long-term follow-up with serial echocardiography. Ann Intern Med. 1984;100:789–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Keating EC et al. Mural thrombi in myocardial infarctions. Prospective evaluation by two-dimensional echocardiography. Am J Med. 1983;74:989–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Asinger RW, Mikell FL, Elsperger J, Hodges M. Incidence of left-ventricular thrombosis after acute transmural myocardial infarction. Serial evaluation by two-dimensional echocardiography. N Engl J Med. 1981;305:297–302.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Friedman MJ, Carlson K, Marcus FI, Woolfenden JM. Clinical correlations in patients with acute myocardial infarction and left ventricular thrombus detected by two-dimensional echocardiography. Am J Med. 1982;72:894–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Haugland JM, Asinger RW, Mikell FL, Elsperger J, Hodges M. Embolic potential of left ventricular thrombi detected by two-dimensional echocardiography. Circulation. 1984;70:588–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Visser CA, Kan G, Meltzer RS, Dunning AJ, Roelandt J. Embolic potential of left ventricular thrombus after myocardial infarction: a two-dimensional echocardiographic study of 119 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1985;5:1276–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Stratton JR, Resnick AD. Increased embolic risk in patients with left ventricular thrombi. Circulation. 1987;75:1004–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Spirito P et al. Prognostic significance and natural history of left ventricular thrombi in patients with acute anterior myocardial infarction: a two-dimensional echocardiographic study. Circulation. 1985;72:774–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Heik SC et al. Efficacy of high dose intravenous heparin for treatment of left ventricular thrombi with high embolic risk. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;24:1305–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Vaitkus PT, Barnathan ES. Embolic potential, prevention and management of mural thrombus complicating anterior myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;22:1004–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Vandvik PO et al. Primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease: antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest. 2012;141:e637S–68S.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Hurlen M, Abdelnoor M, Smith P, Erikssen J, Arnesen H. Warfarin, aspirin, or both after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:969–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Whitlock RP et al. Antithrombotic and thrombolytic therapy for valvular disease: antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest. 2012;141:e576S–600S.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Nishimura RA et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: executive summary a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2014;129:2440–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Mok CK et al. Warfarin versus dipyridamole-aspirin and pentoxifylline-aspirin for the prevention of prosthetic heart valve thromboembolism: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Circulation. 1985;72:1059–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Cannegieter SC, Rosendaal FR, Briët E. Thromboembolic and bleeding complications in patients with mechanical heart valve prostheses. Circulation. 1994;89:635–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Rossi M, Serraino GF, Jiritano F, Renzulli A. What is the optimal anticoagulation in patients with a left ventricular assist device? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2012;15:733–40.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Charitos EI, Sievers H-H. Antithrombotic therapy in patients with left ventricular assist devices: a critical view of the data and lessons from the past. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2010;11:505.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Pereira NL, Chen D, Kushwaha SS, Park SJ. Discontinuation of antithrombotic therapy for a year or more in patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2010;11:503–5.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Dobkin BH. Heparin for lacunar stroke in progression. Stroke J Cereb Circ. 1983;14:421–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Compliance with Ethics Guidelines

Conflict of Interest

IM Ruff and JA Jindal both declare no conflicts of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ilana M. Ruff.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Cardiovascular Disease and Stroke

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ruff, I.M., Jindal, J.A. Use of Heparin in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Is There Still a Role?. Curr Atheroscler Rep 17, 51 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11883-015-0528-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11883-015-0528-3

Keywords

Navigation