Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Potential or problem? An investigation of secondary school teachers’ attributions of the educational outcomes of students with specific learning difficulties

  • Published:
Annals of Dyslexia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite strong support for inclusive education in principle, many teachers and administrators still demonstrate mixed responses to the inclusion of certain students in their classrooms. Students with specific learning difficulties (SpLD) form a large group of students in inclusive classrooms yet some provincial, state and national jurisdictions fail to acknowledge the existence of these students. Not acknowledging and understanding these students can deny them the recognition and resources necessary for their genuine participation in education and, in turn, society. The aim of this study was to examine British in-service secondary teachers’ attributional responses to students with and without specific learning difficulties. The participants included 122 British secondary school teachers who were surveyed in response to vignettes of hypothetical male students who had failed a class test. The study found that while teachers attributed more positive causes towards students without SpLD, they exhibited more negative causes towards students with SpLD. Teachers’ causal attributional outcomes of students’ level of achievement can impact upon the students’ own attributions, with teachers’ responses for students with SpLD having the potential to, unintentionally, influence students’ own sense of self-efficacy and motivation. The paper concludes with a consideration of the implications of the research and recommendations for practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ainscow, M., Booth, T., & Dyson, A. (2006). Improving schools, developing inclusion. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avramidis, E., & Norwich, B. (2002). Teachers’ attitudes towards integration/inclusion: a review of the literature. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 17(2), 129–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booth, T., & Ainscow, M. (2002). Index for inclusion: developing learning and participation in schools. Bristol: Centre for Studies on Inclusive Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, C., Topping, K., & Jindal-Snape, D. (2013). Teachers’ attitudes towards inclusion in high schools. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 19(5), 527–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brady, K., & Woolfson, L. (2008). What teacher factors influence their attributions for children’s difficulties in learning? British Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(4), 527–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • British Dyslexia Association. (2016). Dyslexia and specific learning difficulties in adults. British Dyslexia Association. www.bdadyslexia.org.uk/dyslexia/dyslexia-and-specific-learning-difficulties-in-adults. Accessed 30 June 2016.

  • Clark, M. D. (1997). Teacher response to learning disability: a test of attributional principles. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30(1), 69–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, M. D., & Artiles, A. J. (2000). A cross-national study of teachers’ attributional patterns. The Journal of Special Education, 34(2), 77–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Vroey, A., Struyf, E., & Petry, K. (2016). Secondary schools included: a literature review. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 20(2), 109–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DfE. (2016). School workforce in England: November 2015. Department for Education. https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/school-workforce-in-england-november-2015. Accessed 19 July 2016.

  • DfE & DoH. (2015). Special educational needs and disability code of practice: 0 to 25 years. England: The Department for Education and the Department of Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • DfES. (2001). Special educational needs (SEN): Code of practice. England: The Department for Education and Skills.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaier, S. E. (2015). Understanding why students do what they do: using attribution theory to help students succeed academically. Research & Teaching in Developmental Education, 31(2), 6–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgiou, S. N., Christou, C., Stavrinides, P., & Panaoura, G. (2002). Teacher attributions of student failure and teacher behaviour toward the failing student. Psychology in the Schools, 39(5), 583–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glazzard, J. (2014). From integration to inclusive education in England: illuminating the issues through a life history account. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 9(1), 107–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, I., & Woodcock, S. (2014). Contesting the recognition of specific learning disabilities in educational policy: intra- and inter-national insights. International Journal of Educational Research, 66, 113–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, I., & Woodcock, S. (2015). Inclusive education policies: discourses of difference, diversity and deficit. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 19(2), 141–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hornstra, L., Denessen, E., Bakker, J., van de Bergh, L., & Voeten, M. (2010). Teacher attitudes toward dyslexia: effects on teacher expectations and the academic achievement of students with dyslexia. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43(6), 515–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobsen, B., Lowery, B., & DuCette, J. (1986). Attributions of learning disabled children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(1), 59–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klehm, M. (2014). The effects of teacher beliefs on teaching practices and achievement of students with disabilities. Teacher Education and Special Education, 37(3), 216–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paterson, D. (2007). Teachers’ in-flight thinking in inclusive classrooms. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40(5), 427–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reyna, C., & Weiner, B. (2001). Justice and utility in the classroom: an attributional analysis of the goals of teachers’ punishment and intervention strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(2), 309–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. (2011). Eta squared and partial eta squared as measures of effect size in educational research. Educational Research Review, 6(2), 135–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968). Pygmalion in the classroom. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scanlon, D. (2013). Specific learning disability and its newest definition: which is comprehensive? And which is insufficient. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 46(1), 26–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shifrer, D. (2013). Stigma of a label: educational expectations for high school students labelled with learning disabilities. Journal of Health and Social Behaviour, 54(4), 462–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shifrer, D. (2016). Stigma and stratification limiting the math course progression of adolescents labelled with a learning disability. Learning and Instruction, 42(1), 47–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, J., & Shaughnessy, M. F. (1996). An interview with Bernard Weiner. Educational Psychology Review, 8(2), 165–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slee, R. (2011). The irregular school: exclusion, schooling and inclusive education. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slee, R. (2013). How do we make inclusive education happen when exclusion is a political predisposition. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 17(8), 895–907.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soriano-Ferrer, M., Echegaray-Bengoa, J., & Joshi, R. M. (2016). Knowledge and beliefs about developmental dyslexia in pre-service and in-service Spanish speaking teachers. Annals of Dyslexia, 66(1), 91–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson, C. (1999). The differentiated classroom: responding to the needs of all learners. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tournaki, N. (2003). Effect of student characteristics on teachers’ predictions of student success. The Journal of Educational Research, 96(5), 310–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. (1994). The Salamanca statement and framework for action on special needs education. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. (2005). Guidelines for inclusion:ensuring access to education for all. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. (2009). Policy guidelines for inclusion in education. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waheeda, T., & Grainger, J. (2002). Self-concept, attributional style and self-efficacy beliefs of students with learning disabilities with and without attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Learning Disability Quarterly, 25(2), 141–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92(4), 548–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. (2000). Intrapersonal and interpersonal theories of motivation from an attributional perspective. Educational Psychology Review., 12(1), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. (2010). The development of an attribution-based theory of motivation: a history of ideas. Educational Psychologist, 45(1), 28–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, J. (2010). Modelling the influence of teacher characteristics on student achievement for Canadian students with and without learning disabilities. International Journal of Special Education, 25(3), 88–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock, S., & Vialle, W. (2010). Attributional beliefs of students with learning disabilities. The International Journal of Learning, 17(7), 177–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock, S., & Vialle, W. (2011). Are we exacerbating students’ learning disabilities? An investigation of preservice teachers’ attributions of the educational outcomes of students with learning disabilities. Annals of Dyslexia, 61(2), 223–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock, S., & Vialle, W. (2016). An examination of pre-service teachers’ attributions for students with specific learning difficulties. Learning and Individual Differences, 45, 252–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yailagh, M. S., Lloyd, J., & Walsh, J. (2009). The causal relationships between attribution styles, mathematics self-efficacy beliefs, gender differences, goal setting, and math achievement of school children. Journal of Education and Psychology, 3(2), 95–114.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stuart Woodcock.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Woodcock, S., Hitches, E. Potential or problem? An investigation of secondary school teachers’ attributions of the educational outcomes of students with specific learning difficulties. Ann. of Dyslexia 67, 299–317 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-017-0145-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-017-0145-7

Keywords

Navigation