Abstract
Air pollution around schools has been considered a crucial concern worldwide, as children are at school for a large part of the day. A growing body of evidence finds that schools are located in areas with high levels of air pollutants with significant contributions from motor vehicles. Determining children exposure to air pollutants at schools is crucial for disease prevention and control. In this paper, we evaluated PM2.5 intake fractions for vehicular emissions at elementary schools in Hamilton, Canada. Specifically, we estimated the mass inhalation of PM2.5 (that comes from traffic) by children considering two environments: outdoor (during drop-off period) and indoor (during class period). We evaluated PM2.5 intake fractions (iF) for vehicular emissions in 32,298 students from 86 elementary schools in Hamilton. Indoor exposure presented the highest iF. On average, each student inhales 0.53 × 10−6 ppm daily during the drop-off time (outdoor exposure) and 13.06 ppm daily during class hours (indoor exposure). Considering time spent in classes, this estimate indicates that approximately 13 g of PM2.5 emitted from motor vehicles is inhaled for every million grams of PM2.5 emitted. Our sensitivity analysis showed that traffic emissions were the variable that affects the iF most during outdoor and indoor exposure. Our findings can help in future investigations to advance environmental health effects research, especially on children’s health and human health risk assessment. Our results are important for future public policies related to transportation, environmental health, and urban planning, including air pollution and location of schools.
ᅟ
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams MD, Kanaroglou PS (2016) Mapping real-time air pollution health risk for environmental management: combining mobile and stationary air pollution monitoring with neural network models. J Environ Manag 168:133–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.12.012
Adams MD, Requia WJ (2017) How private vehicle use increases ambient air pollution concentrations at schools during the morning drop-off of children. Atmos Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.06.046
Adams MD, De Luca PF, Corr D, Kanaroglou PS (2012) Mobile air monitoring: measuring change in air quality in the city of Hamilton, 2005–2010. Soc Indic Res 108:351–364. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-012-0061-5
Adams MD, Yiannakoulias N, Kanaroglou PS (2016) Air pollution exposure: an activity pattern approach for active transportation. Atmos Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.05.055
Amato F, Rivas I, Viana M et al (2014) Sources of indoor and outdoor PM2.5 concentrations in primary schools. Sci Total Environ 490:757–765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.05.051
Amram O, Abernethy R, Brauer M et al (2011) Proximity of public elementary schools to major roads in Canadian urban areas. Int J Health Geogr 10:68. https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-072X-10-68
Appatova AS, Ryan PH, LeMasters GK, Grinshpun SA (2008) Proximal exposure of public schools and students to major roadways: a nationwide US survey. J Environ Plan Manag 51:631–646. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640560802208173
Apte JS, Bombrun E, Marshall JD, Nazaroff WW (2012) Global intraurban intake fractions for primary air pollutants from vehicles and other distributed sources. Environ Sci Technol 46:3415–3423. https://doi.org/10.1021/es204021h
Bell ML, Zanobetti A, Dominici F (2014) Who is more affected by ozone pollution? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Epidemiol 180:15–28. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwu115
Bennett DH, McKone TE, Evans JS et al (2002) Defining intake fraction. Environ Sci Technol 36:206A–211A
Brook JR, Poirot RL, Dann TF et al (2007) Assessing sources of PM2.5 in cities influenced by regional transport. J Toxicol Environ Health A 70:191–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/15287390600883000
Buonanno G, Fuoco FC, Morawska L, Stabile L (2013) Airborne particle concentrations at schools measured at different spatial scales. Atmos Environ 67:38–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.10.048
Calderón-Garcidueñas L, Mora-Tiscareño A, Ontiveros E et al (2008) Air pollution, cognitive deficits and brain abnormalities: a pilot study with children and dogs. Brain Cogn 68:117–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2008.04.008
Chakraborty J, Zandbergen PA (2007) Children at risk: measuring racial/ethnic disparities in potential exposure to air pollution at school and home. J Epidemiol Community Health 61:1074–1079. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2006.054130
Diapouli E, Chaloulakou A, Spyrellis N (2007) Levels of ultrafine particles in different microenvironments—implications to children exposure. Sci Total Environ 388:128–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.07.063
EPA (2009) Metabolically derived human ventilation rates: a revised approach based upon oxygen consumption rates (Final Report, 2009). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, EPA/600/R-06/129F.
EPA U (2012) Motor Vehicle Emission Simulator (MOVES). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
Fan J, Li S, Fan C et al (2016) The impact of PM2.5 on asthma emergency department visits: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:843–850. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-5321-x
Favarato G, Anderson HR, Atkinson R et al (2014) Traffic-related pollution and asthma prevalence in children. Quantification of associations with nitrogen dioxide. Air Qual Atmos Health 7:459–466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-014-0265-8
Guo H, Morawska L, He C et al (2010) Characterization of particle number concentrations and PM2.5 in a school: influence of outdoor air pollution on indoor air. Environ Sci Pollut Res 17:1268–1278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-010-0306-2
Habil M, Massey DD, Taneja A (2013) Exposure of children studying in schools of India to PM levels and metal contamination: sources and their identification. Air Qual Atmos Health 6:575–587. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-013-0201-3
Huo H, Zhang Q, He K et al (2009) High-resolution vehicular emission inventory using a link-based method: a case study of light-duty vehicles in Beijing. Environ Sci Technol 43:2394–2399. https://doi.org/10.1021/es802757a
Ji S, Cherry CR, Bechle MJ et al (2012) Electric vehicles in China: emissions and health impacts. Environ Sci Technol 46:2018–2024. https://doi.org/10.1021/es202347q
Ji S, Cherry CR, Zhou W et al (2015) Environmental justice aspects of exposure to PM2.5 emissions from electric vehicle use in China. Environ Sci Technol 49:13912–13920. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b04927
Klepeis NE, Nelson WC, Ott WR et al (2001) The National Human Activity Pattern Survey (NHAPS): a resource for assessing exposure to environmental pollutants. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol 11:231–252. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jea.7500165
Laumbach RJ, Kipen HM (2012) Respiratory health effects of air pollution: update on biomass smoke and traffic pollution. J Allergy Clin Immunol 129:3–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2011.11.021
Lee WC, Catalano PJ, Yoo JY et al (2015) Validation and application of the mass balance model to determine the effectiveness of portable air purifiers in removing ultrafine and submicrometer particles in an apartment. Environ Sci Technol 49:9592–9599. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b03126
Maoh H, Kanaroglou P, Scott D et al (2009) IMPACT: an integrated GIS-based model for simulating the consequences of demographic changes and population ageing on transportation. Comput Environ Urban Syst 33:200–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2008.10.004
Marshall JD, Riley WJ, McKone TE, Nazaroff WW (2003) Intake fraction of primary pollutants: motor vehicle emissions in the South Coast Air Basin. Atmos Environ 37:3455–3468. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(03)00269-3
Mohai P, Kweon BS, Lee S, Ard K (2011) Air pollution around schools is linked to poorer student health and academic performance. Health Aff 30:852–862. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0077
Oliveira M, Slezakova K, Madureira J et al (2016) Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in primary school environments: levels and potential risks. Sci Total Environ 575:1156–1167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.09.195
Ontario Ministry of Education (2015) Elementary School Profiles https://www.app.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/sift/index.asp?schoolCount=under
Pope CA, Turner MC, Burnett RT et al (2015) Relationships between fine particulate air pollution, cardiometabolic disorders, and cardiovascular mortality. Circ Res 116:108–115. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.305060
Raysoni AU, Armijos RX, Weigel MM et al (2016) Assessment of indoor and outdoor PM species at schools and residences in a high-altitude Ecuadorian urban center. Environ Pollut 214:668–679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.04.085
Reche C, Viana M, Rivas I et al (2014) Outdoor and indoor UFP in primary schools across Barcelona. Sci Total Environ 493:943–953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.06.072
Réquia Júnior WJ, Koutrakis P, Roig HL (2015) Spatial distribution of vehicle emission inventories in the Federal District, Brazil. Atmos Environ 112:32–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.04.029
Requia WJ, Koutrakis P, Roig HL et al (2016) Association between vehicular emissions and cardiorespiratory disease risk in Brazil and its variation by spatial clustering of socio-economic factors. Environ Res 150:452–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2016.06.027
Requia WJ, Dalumpines R, Adams MD et al (2017) Modeling spatial patterns of link-based PM2.5 emissions and subsequent human exposure in a large canadian metropolitan area. Atmos Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.03.038
Reynolds A, Broderick B (2000) Development of an emissions inventory model for mobile sources. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ 5:77–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1361-9209(99)00025-5
Rice MB, Rifas-Shiman SL, Litonjua AA et al (2016) Lifetime exposure to ambient pollution and lung function in children. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 193:881–888. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201506-1058OC
Rivas I, Viana M, Moreno T et al (2014) Child exposure to indoor and outdoor air pollutants in schools in Barcelona, Spain. Environ Int 69:200–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2014.04.009
Ryan PH, LeMasters GK (2007) A review of land-use regression models for characterizing intraurban air pollution exposure. Inhal Toxicol 19:127–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/08958370701495998
Schwartz J, Bind M-A, Koutrakis P (2016) Estimating causal effects of local air pollution on daily deaths: effect of low levels. Environ Health Perspect. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP232
Siddique S, Ray MR, Lahiri T (2011) Effects of air pollution on the respiratory health of children: a study in the capital city of India. Air Qual Atmos Health 4:95–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-010-0079-2
Soares J, Kousa A, Kukkonen J et al (2014) Refinement of a model for evaluating the population exposure in an urban area. Geosci Model Dev 7:1855–1872. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-1855-2014
Svendsen ER, Gonzales M, Mukerjee S et al (2012) GIS-modeled indicators of traffic-related air pollutants and adverse pulmonary health among children in El Paso, Texas. Am J Epidemiol 176:131–141. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kws274
World Health Organization (2010) WHO guidelines for indoor air quality, 1st edn. WHO, Copenhagen
Xu J, Jin T, Miao Y et al (2015) Individual and population intake fractions of diesel particulate matter (DPM) in bus stop microenvironments. Environ Pollut 207:161–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2015.09.005
Yang J, Nam I, Yun H et al (2015) Characteristics of indoor air quality at urban elementary schools in Seoul, Korea: assessment of effect of surrounding environments. Atmos Pollut Res 6:1113–1122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2015.06.009
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by a Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada grant (886-2013-0001). Partial support was provided by the Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change, Best in Science Grant Program #1314051.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Highlights
• PM2.5 iF for vehicular emissions was evaluated in 32,298 students from 86 elementary schools.
• On average each student inhales 0.53 × 10−6 ppm daily during the drop-off time.
• On average each student inhales 13.06 ppm daily during class hours.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Requia, W.J., Adams, M.D., Arain, A. et al. Particulate matter intake fractions for vehicular emissions at elementary schools in Hamilton, Canada: an assessment of outdoor and indoor exposure. Air Qual Atmos Health 10, 1259–1267 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-017-0510-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-017-0510-z