Abstract
I report the results of an analysis of an episode of elementary school second language mathematics classroom talk focused on the classification of geometric forms, drawing on a dialogic, sources of meaning perspective. The episode was selected because participants make use of a variety of features of language, including vocabulary, gestures and diagrams. The analysis drew on methods and principles from conversation analysis and revealed that interactional repair was a key feature in the organisation of the episode. Repair sequences are stretches of interaction in which participants deal with explicitly signalled ‘trouble’ in participants’ working assumption of shared understanding. The results include a distinction between meaning-focused and language-focused repair, with some repair sequences embedded within others. This layered organisation is important in the emergence of meaning for participants’ utterances and mediates the tension between centripetal and centrifugal language forces. The findings highlight the complexity of mathematics classroom interaction and suggest possibilities for the careful management of focusing on language and on mathematical meaning in classroom interaction.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data generated during the study referred to in this paper are confidential to protect the identity of the participants. The anonymised transcript of the lesson that is the focus of this paper may be requested from the author with reasonable justication.
Notes
This finding is consistent with work in second language education based on Swain and Lapkin’s (1998) definition of ‘language-related episodes’. In a recent study in the context of content-language integrated learning (CLIL) classrooms, Smit and Finker (2022) found that the presence of regular language related episodes was linked to teachers’ explicit language-related goals.
Transcription conventions: Student names are pseudonyms. Bold denotes emphasis. (.) indicates a short pause. (1) indicates a one-second pause.:: indicates phoneme extension. [ indicates overlapping speech, vertically aligned. ^ ^ encloses quiet speech. () encloses uncertain transcription. (…) indicates inaudible utterances. < > encloses English translation, shown in italics after each turn.
References to mutual understanding should be taken to mean that the participants display an assumption of mutual understanding or mutually agreed interpretations sufficient to close the repair sequence and continue the interaction. They do not refer to some supposed internal mental state.
Observant readers will notice an incongruity in the teacher’s groupings. Later in the class, she realised that she had made an error: she had coloured two pentagons purple rather than white. In accordance with the principles of conversation analysis, this later revelation cannot be used to interpret the episode as presented.
References
Adler, J. (2000). Conceptualising resources as a theme for teacher education. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 3, 205–224.
Adler, J. (2001). Teaching mathematics in multilingual classrooms. Kluwer.
Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays. (Ed., M. Holquist; Trans, C. Emerson & M. Holquist). University of Texas Press.
Barwell, R. (2005). Working on arithmetic word problems when English is an additional language. British Educational Research Journal, 31(3), 329–348.
Barwell, R. (2016). Formal and informal mathematical discourses: Bakhtin and Vygotsky, dialogue and dialectic. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 92(3), 331–345.
Barwell, R. (2018). From language as a resource to sources of meaning in multilingual mathematics classrooms. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 50, 155–168.
Barwell, R. (2019). Repertoires of three second language learners of mathematics: Distal and situational sources of meaning. Research in Mathematics Education, 21(2), 135–151.
Barwell, R. (2020). Learning mathematics in a second language: Language positive and language neutral classrooms. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 51(2), 150–178.
Barwell, R., Moschkovich, J., & Setati Phakeng, M. (2017). Language diversity and mathematics: Second language, bilingual, and multilingual learners. In J. Cai (Ed.), Compendium for research in mathematics education (pp. 583–606). NCTM.
Blommaert, J., & Rampton, B. (2011). Language and superdiversity. Diversities, 13(2), 1–21.
Edwards, D. (1997). Discourse and cognition. SAGE.
Ingram, J. (2018). Moving forward with ethnomethodological approaches to analysing mathematics classroom interactions. ZDM Mathematics Education, 50(6), 1065–1075.
Ingram, J. (2020). Epistemic management in mathematics classroom interactions: Student claims of not knowing or not understanding. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 58, 100754.
Khisty, L., & Chval, K. (2002). Pedagogic discourse and equity in mathematics: When teachers’ talk matters. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 14(3), 154–168.
Macbeth, D. (2004). The relevance of repair for classroom correction. Language in Society, 33(5), 703–736.
McHoul, A. W. (1990). The organization of repair in classroom talk. Language in Society, 19(3), 349–377.
Moschkovich, J. N. (2000). Learning mathematics in two languages: Moving from obstacles to resources. In W. Secada (Ed.), Changing faces of mathematics: Perspectives on multiculturalism and gender equity (pp. 85–93). NCTM.
Moschkovich, J. N. (2008). “I went by twos, he went by one:” Multiple interpretations of inscriptions as resources for mathematical discussions. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17(4), 551–587.
Moschkovich, J. N. (2011). Supporting mathematical reasoning and sense making for English Learners. In M. Strutchens & J. Quander (Eds.), Focus in high school mathematics: Fostering reasoning and sense making for all students (pp. 17–36). NCTM.
Moschkovich, J. N. (2013). Principles and guidelines for equitable mathematics teaching practices and materials for English language learners. Journal of Urban Mathematics Education, 6(1), 45–57.
Planas, N. (2018). Language as resource: A key notion for understanding the complexity of mathematics learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 98(3), 215–229.
Planas, N., & Chronaki, A. (2021). Multilingual mathematics learning from a dialogic-translanguaging perspective. In N. Planas, C. Morgan, & M. Schütte (Eds.), Classroom research on mathematics and language (pp. 151–166). Routledge.
Planas, N., & Setati-Phakeng, M. (2014). On the process of gaining language as a resource in mathematics education. ZDM Mathematics Education, 46(6), 883–893.
Prediger, S. (2019). Promoting teachers’ pathways towards expertise for language-responsive mathematics teaching: A design research study. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 10, 367–392.
Prediger, S., Kuzu, T., Schüler-Meyer, A., & Wagner, J. (2019). One mind, two languages–separate conceptualisations? A case study of students’ bilingual modes for dealing with language-related conceptualisations of fractions. Research in Mathematics Education, 21(2), 188–207.
Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation. (Ed., G. Jefferson). Blackwell.
Setati, M. (2005). Teaching mathematics in a primary multilingual classroom. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 36(5), 447–466.
Smit, U., & Finker, T. (2022). Topicalizing language in CLIL teaching at technical colleges: A micro-level analysis of language-related episodes (LREs). English for Specific Purposes, 68, 102–115.
Staats, S. (2021). Mathematical poetic structures: The sound shape of collaboration. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 62, 100846.
Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1998). Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. The Modern Language Journal, 82(3), 320–337.
Turner, E., Domínguez, H., Maldonado, L., & Empson, S. (2013). English language learners’ identity-enhancing participation in mathematical discussion. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(1), 199–234.
Uribe, Á., & Prediger, S. (2021). Students’ multilingual repertoires-in-use for meaning-making: Contrasting case studies in three multilingual constellations. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 62, 100820.
Acknowledgements
I am indebted to the school, teacher and students who kindly participated in this research. I am grateful to Maya Shrestra, Maha Sinno, Adil Dsousa, Jennifer Chew Leung and Élysée Cadet for their work on different aspects of the project.
Funding
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, 410-2008-0544, Richard Barwell.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Barwell, R. Sourcing mathematical meaning as a dialogic process: meaning-focused and language-focused repairs. ZDM Mathematics Education 55, 535–550 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-023-01467-6
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-023-01467-6