Abstract
The International Mathematical Olympiad, now 62 years old, has catalyzed the formation of a remarkable international community that meets for 2 weeks each year to celebrate mathematical problem solving. It has influenced and expanded the greater global mathematical culture, and the value of problem-solving in numerous countries. It is time for the mathematics competition community to reach out and pose questions for serious inquiry. What is the extent of this influence? What are its effects? Reciprocally, what effects have different mathematical traditions had on the IMO? Some significant studies have been done to answer such questions, but several remain unanswered, and most remain unposed. We survey the work that has been done, then some anecdotal evidence, including case studies of the participation of individual countries in the IMO. We then suggest some topics needing a deeper inquiry. The intention of this article is to invite the research community to work with the IMO community in a serious investigation of the half-century of experience afforded us by the IMO.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Agarwal, R., & Gaule, P. (2020). Invisible Geniuses: Could the Knowledge Frontier Advance Faster? American Economic Review: Insights, 2(4), 409–424. https://doi.org/10.1257/aeri.20190457
Andreescu, T., & Andrica, D. (2009). Number theory: Structures, examples, and problems. Birkhäuser.
Andreescu, T., Gallian, J. A., Kane, J. M., & Mertz, J.E. (2008). Cross-cultural analysis of students with exceptional talent in math problem solving, Notices of the American Math Society 55 (10), 1248–1260. https://www.ams.org/journals/notices/200810/fea-gallian.pdf.
Applebaum, M., Kondratieva, M., & Freiman, V. (2013). Math Competitions and Gender Issues. Math Competitions 26 (1), 23–40, http://www.wfnmc.org/Journal%202013%201.pdf.
Beagle, E. G. (1979). Critical variables in math education. Math Association of America National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Wiley.
Becheanu, M. (2001). International math olympiads 1959–2000. Academic Distribution Center.
Berg, A. (2021). Statistical Analysis of the International Mathematical Olympiad. The Mathematical Intelligencer, 43, 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00283-020-10015-z
Civil, M. (2009). A survey of research on the mathematics teaching and learning of immigrant students. In: Proceedings of CERME 6, pp. 1442–1452, online at CERME6 (ens-lyon.fr)
Domoshnitsky, A., & Yavich, R. (2011). The Internet math olympiad for university students. Math Competitions, 24(1), 11–21, http://www.wfnmc.org/Journal%202011%201.pdf
Druck, S., & Spira, M. (2008). Math Olympiads for the Public Schools in Brazil. Math Competitions, 21(2), 21–40. http://www.wfnmc.org/Journal%202008%202.pdf.
Ellison, G., & Swanson, A. (2010). The gender gap in secondary school math at high achievement Levels. J. of Economic Perspectives, 24(2), 109–128. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.24.2.109
Engel, A. (1997). Problem-solving strategies. Springer.
Fomin, D., & Saul, M. (2010). Russian traditions in math education and Russian math contests. In A. Karp & B. R. Vogel (Eds.), Russian math education: History and world significance. World Scientific.
Glass, G. V., & Smith, M.L .(1979). Meta-analysis of research on class size and achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2–16 http://www.jstor.org/stable/1164099.
Gleason, J. (2008). An evaluation of math competitions using item response theory. Notices of the American Math Society, 55(1), 8–15. https://www.ams.org/notices/200801/tx080100008p.pdf
Hawkins, T. (1984). The Erlanger program of Felix Klein. Historia Mathematica, 11, 442–470.
Hilbert, D. (1902). Mathematical problems. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 8(10), 437–479. https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9904-1902-00923-3 Published in German in Hilbert, David (1900). "Mathematische Probleme". Göttinger Nachrichten: 253–297, as well as Hilbert, David (1901)."[Untitled]". Archiv der Mathematik und Physik. 3.1: 44–63, 213–237.
Holmes, O. (2015). Do the Maths: Is a competition just for girls a plus or a minus? The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/science/2015/oct/13/mathematical-ratios-competition-girls-plus-or-minus.
Jarvis, M. (2012). Math students trained by AAAS compete and collaborate at Mexican Olympiad, AAS News. https://www.aaas.org/news/math-students-trained-aaas-compete-and-collaborate-mexican-olympiad.
Karamzadeh, O. A. (2012). The math of math houses. In The mathematical intelligencer (pp. 46–52). Springer Science+Business Media New York, 34(4).
Kelevedjiev, E., Pavlov, D., & Tabov, J. (2008). Risk-taking behavior in math competitions. Mathematics Competitions, 21(2), 46–60.
King, K. D., Ochsendorf, R. J., Solomon, G. E. A., & Sloane, F. C. (2020). Posing fundable questions in math and science education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18(Suppl 1), S25–S36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10088-4
Konstantinov, N. N., Tabov, J. B., & Taylor, P. J. (1991). Birth of the tournament of towns. Mathematics Competitions, 4(2), 28–41.
Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press.
Lempinen, E. W. (2012). Elite Team Organized by AAAS Attends Prestigious Math Competition in Mexico, AAAS News Nov. 2012. https://www.aaas.org/news/elite-team-organized-aaas-attends-prestigious-mathematics-competition-mexico.
Libresco, L. (2015). Girls are rare at the International Math Olympiad, online at FiveThirtyEight, https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/girls-are-rare-at-the-international-math-olympiad/.
Liu, A., & Taylor, P. J. (2008). International math tournament of the towns, Book 6. Australian Math Trust Publishing.
Loewus, L. (2015) Gender Gaps at the math olympiad: where are the girls? Education Week, online at https://www.edweek.org/teaching-learning/gender-gaps-at-the-math-olympiad-where-are-the-girls/2015/07.
Mills, D. (2012). Anthropology and educations. In S. Delmont & A. Jones (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research in education (pp. 33–47). Edward E. Cheltenham.
Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal knowledge. University of Chicago Press.
Rejali, A. (2003). Math competitions, math teachers, and math education in Iran, Math Competitions, 16(1), http://www.wfnmc.org/mc20031.html.
Roehr, B., Ham, B., & Schaffer, C. (2012). AAAS-trained “Mathletes” score high in tunis olympiad. AAAS. https://www.aaas.org/news/aaas-trained-mathletes-score-high-tunis-olympiad.
Schoenfeld, A. (2020). On meaningful, researchable, and generative questions. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18, 567–582.
Shavelson, R. J. (2002). Scientific research in education. National Academy Press.
Soifer, A. (2016). The Goals and Means of Mathematics Instruction 7–30. Math Competitions, 29(1), 7–30.
Sriraman, B., & Kaiser, G. (2006). Theory usage and theoretical trends in Europe: A survey and preliminary analysis of CERME4 research reports. Zentralblatt Für Didaktik Der Mathematik, 39, 22–51.
UNESCO. (2011). Challenging mathematics—The math houses in Iran, in Les défis de I'enseignement des mathématiques dans l'education de base.
Urmi, T. I. (2021). Girls in Math Olympiad: What’s holding them back?, Online at https://www.thedailystar.net/opinion/society/news/girls-math-olympiad-whats-holding-them-back-1713598.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Maria Falk de Losada, Leonard Nakamura, Peter Taylor, for their important help in this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Saul, M., Vaderlind, P. Outreach by the International Mathematical Olympiad to the mathematics education community. ZDM Mathematics Education 54, 997–1007 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-022-01381-3
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-022-01381-3