Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Coloproctology procedure clinic: a novel service developed to reduce suffering of patients with bleeding per rectum

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aims

Evaluation of the role and impact of introducing a dedicated coloproctology procedure clinic in tertiary referral colorectal unit.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of 126 consecutive patients managed in the coloproctology clinic between March2015 and September 2016 was carried out. All patients were preselected for attendance based on symptom-based protocol.

Results

Based on the information available in GP referrals, 126 patients with bleeding per rectum with low risk of cancer were re-triaged from the general outpatient to dedicated coloproctology procedure clinic. Those patients accounted for 14% of waiting list. The average waiting time to attend clinic was 27 months from referral to undergoing definitive procedure. A proctoscopy or/and rigid sigmoidoscopy was performed in patients. Seventy-nine (89.7%) patients were completely managed and discharged after attending their first visit. Sixty-seven (76%) patients had 2nd- or 3rd-degree haemorrhoids and were treated with rubber band ligation (RBL) or phenol injection in outpatient setting. Two patients had an anal fissure and were managed conservatively with medication. After clinic, follow-up was through telephone clinic. This avoids attendance physically in the hospital. Symptoms persisted in nine patients and were subsequently scheduled for colonoscopy, three had benign polyps. With the introduction of the procedure clinic, the waiting time from referral to treatment was reduced from 27 to 6 months (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

Establishing a dedicated “Coloproctology procedure clinic” is an effective strategy in reducing number of hospital visits per patient and hospital waiting list. This innovative clinic reduces utilisation of precious endoscopy unit resources. This ultimately will improve endoscopy efficiency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Knight J, Senapati A, Lamparelli M (2008) National UK audit of procedure for prolapsing haemorrhoids on behalf of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland. Color Dis 10(5):440–445

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Davila RE, Rajan E, Adler DG, Egan J, Hirota WK, Leighton JA et al (2005) ASGE Guideline: the role of endoscopy in the patient with lower-GI bleeding. Gastrointest Endosc 62(5):656–660

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Pasha SF, Shergill A, Acosta RD, Chandrasekhara V, Chathadi KV, Early D et al (2014) The role of endoscopy in the patient with lower GI bleeding. Gastrointest Endosc 79(6):875–885

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hardy A, Chan C, Cohen C (2005) The surgical management of haemorrhoids—a review. Dig Surg 22(1–2):26–33

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dent OF, Goulston KJ, Zubrzycki J, Chapuis PH (1986) Bowel symptoms in an apparently well population. Dis Colon Rectum 29(4):243–247

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, Murray T et al (2008) Cancer statistics, 2008. CA Cancer J Clin 58(2):71–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Spinzi G, Dal Fante M, Masci E, Buffoli F, Colombo E, Fiori G et al (2007) Lack of colonic neoplastic lesions in patients under 50 yr of age with hematochezia: a multicenter prospective study. Am J Gastroenterol 102(9):2011–2015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bhagatwala J, Singhal A, Aldrugh S, Sherid M, Sifuentes H, Sridhar S (2015) Colonoscopy—indications and contraindications. Screening for Colorectal Cancer with Colonoscopy, InTech. https://doi.org/10.5772/61097

  9. Potter JD, Slattery ML, Bostick RM, Gapstur SM (1993) Colon cancer: a review of the epidemiology. Epidemiol Rev 15(2):499–545

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hakama M, Hoff G, Kronborg O, Påhlman L (2005) Screening for colorectal cancer. Acta Oncol 44(5):425–439

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mandel J, Church T, Ederer F (1993) Screening for colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 329(18):1353–1354

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nisar PJ, Scholefield JH (2003) Managing haemorrhoids. BMJ Br Med J 327(7419):847

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lohsiriwat V (2012) Hemorrhoids: from basic pathophysiology to clinical management. World J Gastroenterol: WJG 18(17):2009

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lee HH, Spencer RJ, Beart RW (1994) Multiple hemorrhoidal bandings in a single session. Dis Colon Rectum 37(1):37–41

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lau W, Chow H, Poon G, Wong S (1982) Rubber band ligation of three primary hemorrhoids in a single session. Dis Colon Rectum 25(4):336–339

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Khubachandani IT (1983) A randomized comparison of single and multiple rubber band ligations. Dis Colon Rectum 26(11):705–708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wrobleski DE, Corman ML, Veidenheimer MC, Coller JA (1980) Long-term evaluation of rubber ring ligation in hemorrhoidal disease. Dis Colon Rectum 23(7):478–482

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Savioz D, Roche B, Glauser T, Dobrinov A, Ludwig C, Marti M-C (1998) Rubber band ligation of hemorrhoids: relapse as a function of time. Int J Color Dis 13(4):154–156

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Mattana C, Maria G, Pescatori M (1989) Rubber band ligation of hemorrhoids and rectal mucosal prolapse in constipated patients. Dis Colon Rectum 32(5):372–374

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Whitlock EP, Lin JS, Liles E, Beil TL, Fu R (2008) Screening for colorectal cancer: a targeted, updated systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task ForceScreening for Colorectal Cancer. Ann Intern Med 149(9):638–658

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Dominitz JA, Eisen GM, Baron TH, Goldstein JL, Hirota WK, Jacobson BC et al (2003) Complications of colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 57(4):441–445

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bressler B, Paszat LF, Vinden C, Li C, He J, Rabeneck L (2004) Colonoscopic miss rates for right-sided colon cancer: a population-based analysis. Gastroenterology 127(2):452–456

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bressler B, Paszat LF, Chen Z, Rothwell DM, Vinden C, Rabeneck L (2007) Rates of new or missed colorectal cancers after colonoscopy and their risk factors: a population-based analysis. Gastroenterology 132(1):96–102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kasugai K, Miyata M, Hashimoto T, Todoroki I, Tsutsui S, Nagase F et al (2005) Assessment of miss and incidence rates of neoplastic polyps at colonoscopy. Dig Endosc 17(1):44–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Studdert DM, Mello MM, Sage WM, DesRoches CM, Peugh J, Zapert K et al (2005) Defensive medicine among high-risk specialist physicians in a volatile malpractice environment. JAMA 293(21):2609–2617

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Summerton N (1995) Positive and negative factors in defensive medicine: a questionnaire study of general practitioners. BMJ 310(6971):27–29

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Hiyama T, Yoshihara M, Tanaka S, Urabe Y, Ikegami Y, Fukuhara T et al (2006) Defensive medicine practices among gastroenterologists in Japan. World J Gastroenterol: WJG 12(47):7671

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ortashi O, Virdee J, Hassan R, Mutrynowski T, Abu-Zidan F (2013) The practice of defensive medicine among hospital doctors in the United Kingdom. BMC Med Ethics 14(1):42

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Asher E, Greenberg-Dotan S, Halevy J, Glick S, Reuveni H (2012) Defensive medicine in Israel—a nationwide survey. PLoS One 7(8):e42613

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Bishop TF, Federman AD, Keyhani S (2010) Physicians’ views on defensive medicine: a national survey. Arch Intern Med 170(12):1081–1083

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Beuscart R (2009) The problem of defensive medicine: two Italian surveys. Detect Prev Adverse Drug Events: Inf Technol Hum Factors 148:206

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Trinity Centre of Learning and Development, Tallaght Hospital, Dublin 24, Ireland

    Yasir Bashir, Bernadette McGovern, Mohammed Tahtouh, Tahir Abbasi, Maria Murphy & Paul Neary

  2. Professorial Surgical Unit, Department of Surgery, The University of Dublin Trinity College, Tallaght Hospital, Dublin, Ireland

    Yasir Bashir

Authors
  1. Yasir Bashir
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bernadette McGovern
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mohammed Tahtouh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Tahir Abbasi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Maria Murphy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Paul Neary
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yasir Bashir.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bashir, Y., McGovern, B., Tahtouh, M. et al. Coloproctology procedure clinic: a novel service developed to reduce suffering of patients with bleeding per rectum. Ir J Med Sci 188, 119–124 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-018-1796-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-018-1796-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation