Skip to main content
Log in

The quality of information on three common ENT procedures on the Internet

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Irish Journal of Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The Internet hosts a large number of high-quality medical resources and poses seemingly endless opportunities to inform, teach, and connect professionals and patients alike. However, it is difficult for the lay person to distinguish accurate from inaccurate information.

Aim

This study was undertaken in an attempt to assess the quality of information on otolaryngology available on the Internet.

Methods

Sixty appropriate websites, using search engines Yahoo and Google, were evaluated for completeness and accuracy using three commonly performed ENT operations: tonsillectomy (T), septoplasty (S), and myringoplasty (M).

Results

A total of 60 websites were evaluated (NT = 20, NM = 20, NS = 20). A total of 86.7% targeted lay population and 13.3% targeted the medical professionals. 35% of the sites included all critical information that patients should know prior to undergoing surgery and over 94% of these were found to contain no inaccuracies. Negative bias towards medical profession was detected in 3% of websites.

Conclusions

In the current climate, with informed consent being of profound importance, the Internet represents a useful tool for both patients and surgeons.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rothschild M (1998) Otolaryngology and the Internet. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 31:255–276

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Silberg WM, Lundberg GD, Musacchio RA (1997) Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet. JAMA 277:1244–1245

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen LE, Minkes RK, Langer JC (2000) Pediatric surgery on the Internet: is the truth out there? J Pediatr Surg 35:1179–1182

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Myers EN (1997) Operative otolaryngology: head and neck Surgery. 1st edn. W. B. Saunders, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  5. Peter R, Sikorski R (1997) Digital dialogue: sharing information and interests on the Internet. JAMA 277:1258–1260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jadad AR, Gagliardi A (1998) Rating health information on the Internet. Navigating to knowledge or to babel? JAMA 279:611–614

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Murphy KR (1998) Computer-based patient education. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 31:310–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wilson S (2001) The Internet and the ENT clinicians in Scotland. ENT News 10:68–69

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kim P, Eng TR, Deering MJ, Maxfield A (1999) Published criteria for evaluating health related websites: review. BMJ 318:647–649

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Kulasegarah.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kulasegarah, J., Harney, M., Walsh, M. et al. The quality of information on three common ENT procedures on the Internet. Ir J Med Sci 181, 221–224 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-011-0787-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-011-0787-0

Keywords

Navigation