Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison of Biomass and Coal in the Recovery Process of silicon in an Electric Arc Furnace

  • Advances in Process Metallurgy
  • Published:
JOM Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Silicon recovery of silica ore (\( {\text{SiO}}_{2} \)) has been studied with two types of carbon materials, charcoal as a biomass and coal as a fossil fuel, at elevated temperatures between 1800 and 2000°C in an electric arc furnace. The effects of porosity and electrical resistance of the carbon materials were investigated. To this end, recovery of silicon and ferrosilicon production were tested separately by charcoal and coal, and the products were investigated both qualitatively and quantitatively. A higher electrical resistance of charcoal was found in comparison with coal, with increased efficiency of the furnace and decreased electric energy consumption (per ton of product). The efficiency of the furnace using charcoal and coal was 92.13% and 77.4%, respectively. In addition, the higher porosity of charcoal facilitates the flow of SiO gas through the carbon material leading to a higher reactivity and reducing the electric energy consumption for each ton of FeSi.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. F. Li, M. Tangstad, and E. Ringdaneld, Metall. Mater. Trans. B 49, 1078 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-018-1195-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. E. Ringdalen, JOM 67, 484 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-014-1149-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. M. Gasik, Handbook of Ferro Alloys Theory and Technology, ed. M. Tangstad, (Massachusetts, Ma: Elsevier, 2013). p. 179.

  4. G. Tranell, M. Andersson, E. Ringdalen, O. Ostrovski, and J.J. Steinmo, Reaction zone in a FeSi75 furnace-results from an industrial excavation, 12th international ferro alloys congress (Helsinky: Finland, 2010), pp. 709–716.

    Google Scholar 

  5. F. Buboltz Ferreira, B. Deves Flores, E. Osório, and A. Cezar Faria Vilela, REM. Int. Eng. J. 71, 411 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1590/0370-44672017710040.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Z. Chen, W. Ma, K. Wei, S. Li, and W. Ding, J. Clean. Prod. 158, 359 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. H. Hasannezhad and A.H. Meysami, JOM 71, 336 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-018-3172-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. M. Fraga, B. Flores, E. Osório, and A. Vilela, J. Mater. Res. Technol. 9, 3406 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.01.076.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. R.G.D. Pinto, A.S. Szklo, and R. Rathmann, Energy Policy 114, 380 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.11.040.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. J.G. Pohlmann, A.G. Borrego, E. Osório, M.A. Diez, and A.C.F. Vilela, J. Clean. Prod. 129, 1 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. T. Norgate, N. Haque, M. Somerville, and S. Jahanshahi, ISIJ 52, 1472 (2012). https://doi.org/10.2355/isijinternational.52.1472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. S. Halder and R.J. Fruehan, Metall. Mater. Trans. B 39B, 796 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-008-9203-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. B. Monsen and B. Tangstad, Use Of Charcoal in Silicomanganese Production, Tenth International Ferroalloys Congress, Cape Town, South Africa, 1–4 February 2004, pp. 392–404.

  14. Y. Liu and Y. Shen, Fuel 258, 116088 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2019.116088.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. M. Somerville and S. Jahanshahi, Renew. Energy 80, 471 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2015.02.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. N.K. Batra, Ironmak. Steelmak. 30, 399 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1179/030192303225004088.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. S. Tian-ming, D. Li-min, W. Chen, G. Wen-li, W. Li, and L. Tong-xiang, New Carbon Mater. 28, 349 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1872-5805(13)60087-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zh. Nurmukhanbetov, O. Privalov, L. Prokopyev, Reducibility and Electric Resisntance of Carbonaceus Materials Within Ferroalloys Smelting Processes, in The 13th International Ferroalloys Congress, Almaty, Kazakhstan, June 9–13, 2013, 479-488.

  19. K. Nishimiya, T. Hata, H. Kikuchi, and Y. Imamura, J. Wood. Sci. 50, 177 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10086-003-0532-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors are grateful to the Golpayegan Faculty of Engineering, Iran Ferroalloys Industries Co. and to Mr. Ali Nasiri for his assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amirhossein Meysami.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all the authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 151 kb)

Appendix: Calculation of Carbon Material Weight

Appendix: Calculation of Carbon Material Weight

$$ {\text{X}} = {\text{F}}\frac{{0.4{\text{W}}_{{{\text{SiO}}_{2} }} }}{{\left( {1 - {\text{m}}} \right) \times {\text{fix C}}}} $$
(5)

In Eq. 5, \( {\text{X}} \), \( {\text{F}} \), \( {\text{W}}_{{{\text{SiO}}_{2} }} \), \( {\text{m}} \), and fix C are the carbon materials’ weight, weight ratio, quartz rock weight, moisture percentage, and carbon content, respectively.

The amount of \( {\text{Si}} \) in the quartz rock in the inlet to the furnace is calculated by Eq. 6:

$$ {\text{Si}}_{\text{inlet}} = {\text{W}}_{{{\text{SiO}}2}} \frac{{{\text{M}}_{\text{Si}} }}{{{\text{M}}_{{{\text{SiO}}_{2} }} }}\left( P \right) $$
(6)

In Eq. 6, \( {\text{Si}}_{\text{inlet}} \), \( {\text{W}}_{{{\text{SiO}}2}} \), \( {\text{M}}_{\text{Si}} \), \( {\text{M}}_{{{\text{SiO}}_{2} }} \), and \( P \) are the amount of \( {\text{Si}} \) in the quartz rock, quartz rock weight, \( {\text{Si}} \) molecular weight, \( {\text{SiO}}_{2} \) molecular weight, and quartz rock purification percentage, respectively. The value of \( {\text{Si}} \) in the melt outlet from the furnace is calculated by Eq. 7 as follows:

$$ {\text{Si}}_{\rm{outlet}} = {\text{W}}_{\rm{melt}} \cdot {\text{p}}^{\prime} $$
(7)

In Eq 7, \( {\text{Si}}_{\text{outlet}} \), \( {\text{W}}_{\text{melt}} \), and \( p^{\prime } \) are the values of \( {\text{Si}} \) in the melt outlet from the furnace, the melt weight, and the \( {\text{Si}} \) weight percentage in the melt, respectively. Finally, the efficiency of \( {\text{Si}} \) recovery (\( ef_{Si} \)), based on Eqs. 57, is calculated as Eq. 4:

$$ ef_{\text{Si}} = \frac{{{\text{Si}}_{\rm{outlet}} }}{{{\text{Si}}_{\rm{inlet}} }}\cdot 100 $$
(8)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hasannezhad, H., Meysami, A. Comparison of Biomass and Coal in the Recovery Process of silicon in an Electric Arc Furnace. JOM 73, 1030–1036 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-020-04533-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-020-04533-6

Navigation