Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of hanging wall and forward directivity in the 1999 Chi-Chi earthquake on inelastic displacement response of structures

  • Published:
Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The characteristics of the inelastic response of structures affected by hanging wall and forward directivity in the 1999 Chi-Chi earthquake are investigated. Inelastic displacement ratios (IDRs) for ground motions impacted by these nearfield effects are evaluated and comprehensively compared to far-field ground motions. In addition, the inelastic displacement responses to hanging wall and footwall ground motions are compared. It is concluded that the inelastic displacement response is significantly affected in the short period range by hanging wall and in the long period range by footwall. Although high peak ground acceleration was observed at hanging wall stations, the IDRs for structures on hanging wall sites are only larger than footwall sites in the very long period range. Forward directivity effects result in larger IDRs for periods longer than about 0.5s. Adopting statistical relationships for IDRs established using far-field ground motions may lead to either overestimation or underestimation in the seismic evaluation of existing structures located in near-field regions, depending on their fundamental vibration periods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrahamson NA and Silva WJ (1997), “Empirical Response Spectral Attenuation Relations for Shallow Crustal Earthquakes,” Seismological Research Letters, 68(1): 94–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baez JI and Miranda E (2000), “Amplification Factors to Estimate Inelastic Displacement Demands for the Design of Structures in the Near Field,” Proceedings of the 12th Word Conference on Earthquake Engineering, New Zealand, Paper No. 1561.

  • Cox KE and Ashford SA (2002), “Characterization of Large Velocity Pulses for Laboratory Testing,” Report No. 02-22, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iwan WD, Huang CT and Guyader AC (2000), “Important Features of the Response of Inelastic Structures to Near-Field Ground Motion,” Proceedings of the 12th Word Conference on Earthquake Engineering, New Zealand, Paper No. 1740.

  • Miranda E (1991), “Seismic Evaluation and Upgrading of Existing Structures,” Ph. D. Thesis, University of California, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miranda E (2000), “Inelastic Displacement Ratios for Structures on Firm Sites,” Journal of Structural Engineering, 126(10): 1150–1159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miranda E (2001), “Estimation of Inelastic Deformation Demands of SDOF Systems,” Journal of Structural Engineering, 127(9): 1005–1012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oglesby DD, Archuleta RJ and Nielsen SB (1998), “Earthquakes on Dipping Faults: the Effects of Broken Symmetry,” Science, 280: 1055–1059.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orozco GL and Ashford SA (2002), “Effects of Large Velocity Pulses on Reinforced Concrete Bridge Columns,” Report No. 02-23, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rathje EM, Abrahamson NA and Bray JD (1998), “Simplified Frequency Content Estimates of Earthquake Ground Motions,” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 124,(2): 150–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz-García J and Miranda E (2003), “Inelastic Displacement Ratios for Evaluation of Existing Structures,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 32(12): 1237–1258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz-García J and Miranda E (2006), “Inelastic Displacement Ratios for Evaluation of Structures Built on Soft Soil Sites,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 35(6): 679–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Somerville PG (2000), “Seismic Hazard Evaluation,” Proceedings of the 12th Word Conference on Earthquake Engineering, New Zealand, Paper No. 2833.

  • Somerville PG, Smith NF, Graves RW and Abrahamson NA (1997), “Modification of Empirical Strong Ground Motion Attenuation Relations to Include Amplitude and Duration Effects of Rupture Directivity,” Seismological Research Letters, 68(1): 199–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veletsos AS, Newmark NM and Chelapati CV (1965), “Deformation Spectra for Elastic and Elastoplastic Systems Subjected to Ground Shock and Earthquake Motions,” Proceedings of the 3th Word Conference on Earthquake Engineering, New Zealand, Vol.2: 663–682.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang GQ (2001), “The Characteristics of Near Fault Ground Motion Caused by the 1999, Chi-Chi, Taiwan, Earthquake,” Ph. D. Thesis, Institute of Geology, China Earthquake Administration, Beijing. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker AS, Constantinou M and Tsopelas P (1998), “Displacement Estimates for Performance-Based Seismic Design,” Journal of Structural Engineering, 124(8): 905–912.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhai CH, Gong MS, Xie LL and Zhang MZ (2005), “Influence Analysis on Displacement Ratio Spectra of Constant Yielding Strength for Evaluation of Existing Structures,” Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 37(4): 455–458. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Li Shuang Ph.D Candidate  (李爽).

Additional information

Supported by: National Natural Science Foundation of China Under Grant No. 50538050 and No. 50608024

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, S., Xie, L. Effects of hanging wall and forward directivity in the 1999 Chi-Chi earthquake on inelastic displacement response of structures. Earthq. Engin. Engin. Vib. 6, 77–84 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-007-0617-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-007-0617-6

Keywords

Navigation