Skip to main content
Log in

From Logic in Islam to Islamic Logic

  • Published:
Logica Universalis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Speaking of relations between logic and religion in Islamic world may refer to logic in two respects: (1) logic in religious texts, from doctrinal sacred texts such as Qur’ān and sayings of the Prophet (as well as Imāms, in Shī’īism) to the Qur’ānic commentaries and the texts related to the principles and fundamentals of jurisprudence, all of which make use of some reasoning to persuade the audiences or to infer the rules and prescripts for religious behavior of the members of religious community; and (2) logic as a discipline that is studied and applied both independently and as a tool for reasoning in (a) schools of Islamic theology (from Ash’arīs to Mu’tazilīs and Shī’īs), (b) systems of Islamic philosophy (from Peripatetics to Illuminationists), and (c) other types of knowledge in medieval Islamic world, all being strongly influenced by religious doctrines of Islam. Accordingly, this paper speaks of (i) the different manifestations of using logical reasoning, particularly analogy, in Qur’ānic arguments, e.g. for the existence of God and resurrection after death; (ii) some contradictions or paradoxes reported by different opponents in the verses of Qur’ān; (iii) the place of logic in the classification of disciplines and the courses taught at the schools and seminaries; (iv) the influence of the attitudes of different religious sects on logic; (v) the instrumental role of logic for both religious and secular reasonings; (vi) the relation between reason and dogmatic religious doctrines, and, finally, (vii) the reflection of this relation on progress or recession of logic in medieval Islamic world.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. ‘Abd al-Jabbār: Sharh-e Usūl al-Khamsa (= Commentary on the Five Principles), edited by ‘Abd al-Karīm ‘Usmān, Cairo (1384 Lunar Hejirah)

  2. ‘Azmī, T.A.: al-Ghazali’s Views on Logic, Thesis presented for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Arts, University of Edinburgh, 1981 (its file in pdf is accessible via internet)

  3. Abed, S.B.: Aristotelian Logic and the Arabic Language in al-Fārābī. State University of New York Press, Albany (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Akramī, Mūsa.: “Ibn Sīnā’s Two-Partite Versus Nine-Partite Logicography”, in Arnold Koslow and Arthur Buchsbaum (eds), The Road to Universal Logic, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing (Birkhauser), pp. 1-112 (2015)

  5. Al-Fārābī.: Ihsā al-Ulūm (= Enumeration of the Sciences), ed. U. Amin, Cairo: Librairie Anglo-Égyptienne, 3rd edn (1968)

  6. Al-Fārābī.: Falsafah Aristutalis (Philosophy of Aristotle), trans. M. Mahdi in al-Fārābī’s Philosophy of Plato and Aristotle, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press (1969)

  7. Al-Ghazālī, Abū Hāmid.: al-Qisţās al-Mustaqīm (= The Correct Balance), tr. by Richard McCarthy, S. J., http://www.Ghazālī.org/works/qastas.htm

  8. Al-Ghazālī, Abū Hāmid.: al-Qisţās al-Mustaqīm (The Just Balance), tr. by D. P. Brewster, Pakistan, Lahore, Sh. Muhammad Ashraf, (1978)

  9. Al-Rāzi, Fakhr ad-Dīn: Sharh-e ‘Uyun al-Hikma, In: Ahmad Hejazi as-Saqqa (ed.), Tehran: Mu’assesa as-Sadiq (1373 Solar Hejirah)

  10. Badavī, ‘Abd or-Rahmān.: Eflutin ‘end al-Arab (= Plotinus among Arabs). Vekalatol-Matbu’at, Kuwait (1977)

  11. Etymology Dictionary, 2001, Online edition: http://www.etymonline.com

  12. Fakhry, M.: Islamic Theology, Philosophy, and Mysticism: a Short Introduction. One world Publications, Oxford (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fakhry, M.: al- Fārābī, Founder of Islamic Neoplatonism: His Life Works and Influence. Oneworld Publications, Oxford (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Frank, R.M.: Classical Islamic Theology: The Ash’arites. Texts and Studies on the Development and History of Kalam, Vol. III. In: Dimitri Gutas (ed.), Aldershot: Ashgate (2008)

  15. Gleave, R.: Islam and Literalism: Literal Meaning and Interpretation in Islamic Legal Theory. Edinburg University Press, Edinburgh (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hallaq, W.B.: The Origins and Evolution of Islamic Law. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ibn Sīnā: ash-Shifa’ (Healing), al-Madkhal (Isagog), In: G. Anawati, M. El-Khodeiri and F. al-Ahwani, rev. I. Madkour (eds.), Cairo: al-Matba’ah al-Amiriyyah (1952)

  18. Ibn Sīnā: al-Isharatwa al-Tanbīhāt(= Remarks and Admonitions), Part One: Logic, trans. S.C. Inati, Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies (1984)

  19. Ibn Sīnā: Burhān (\(=\) Demonstration), translated into Persian by M. QavāmSafarī, Tehran: Fekr-e Rūz Publishing (1373 Solar Hejirah)

  20. Ibn Sīnā: Dānishnāme-ye ‘Alāyī (\(=\) ‘Alāyī Encyclopedia), Mantiq, Edition with Introduction by Muhammad Mu’in and Muhammad 910 Meshkat, Tehran: Dehkhoda Book Shopping (1353, Solar Hejirah)

  21. Ibn Sīnā: Risāla dar Haqīqat va dar Keyfīyyat-e Selsela Marātib-e Mawjūdāt (= Treatise on the Nature and Quality of the Hierarchy of the Beings), Hamadan: Anjuman-e Asar

  22. Inati, S.: “Logic”. In Nasr, S.H., Leaman, O. (eds): History of Islamic Philosophy, pp. 23–802. Routledge, ch, London (1996)

  23. Khurdeh Avestā, Translated into English by Ervad Maneck Furdoonji Kangama, Avesta Org., Kasson MN, USA, (1993). http://www.avesta.org/kanga/ka_english_kanga_epub.pdf

  24. Lameer, J.: al- Fārābī and Aristotelian Syllogistics: Greek Theory and Islamic Practice. Brill, Leiden (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Liddell, H.G., Scott, R.: Greek-English Lexicon. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1935)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Marmura, M.E.: Studies in the History of Arabic Logic. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Marmura, M.E.: Ghazālī’s Attitude to the Secular Sciences and Logic. In Hourani, G.F. (ed.) Essays on Islamic Philosophy. State University of New York Press, Albany (1975)

  28. Momen, M.: An Introduction to Shī’ī Islam : The History and Doctrines of TwelverShī’īsm. G. Ronald, Oxford (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Mullā Sadrā [\(=\) Sadr ad-Dīn Muhammad Ibn Ibrāhīm al-Shīrāzī]: SharhUsūl al-Kāfī, vol. 1, Kitāb al-‘Aqlwa al-Jahl, In: Muhammad Khājawī (ed.), Tehran: Mu’assasa-ye Mutāli‘āt wa Tahqīqāt-I Farhangī (1366, Solar Hejirah)

  30. Mullā Sadrā [\(=\) Sadr ad-Dīn Muhammad IbnIbrāhīm al-Shīrāzī].: al-Hikmat al-Muta’ālīyyah fī Asfār al-‘Aqlīyyah al-Arba’ah (= Trabscendent Theosophy in the Four Rational Journeys), Beirut: DārIhyā’ al-Turāth al-‘Arabī (1981)

  31. Muzaffar, Muhammad Rizā.: Usūl-e Fiqh (= The Principles of Jurisprudence), translated into Persian by ‘Abbās Zerā’at and Hamid Masjedsarāyī, Payam-e Now-Avar, vol. 3 (1393)

  32. Qur’ān, tr. by Muhammad Marmaduke Pickthall (various prints), http://web.archive.org/web/20071114044153; http://www.al-sunnah.com/call_to_islam/quran/pickthall/

  33. Rescher, N.: The Development of Arabic Logic. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh (1964)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Rescher, N.: Studies in the History of Arabic Logic. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh (1963)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Suyūtī, Jalāl, ad-Dīn. : al- Qawl al-Mashriqfī Tahrīm al-Mantiq (= “The Uncontestable Verdict on the Proscripition of Logic”), In: Sayyid Muhammad ‘Abd al-Wahhāb. Dār al-Hadīth (ed.), Cairo (2008)

  36. Tabābtabāyī, Muhammad Husayn.: al-Mīzān (in Arabic Language, 12 Vols), Vol. 2, Various Printings

  37. Walzer, R.: Greek into Arabic: Essays on Islamic Philosophy. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1962)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Musa Akrami.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Akrami, M. From Logic in Islam to Islamic Logic. Log. Univers. 11, 61–83 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11787-017-0158-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11787-017-0158-3

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation