Abstract
The “social-political-hierarchical” qualifications have long been identified as the essential features of the Confucian golden rule. This essay challenges this prevailing characterization by revealing the relation and differences between Confucius’ original shu 恕 and a series of post-Confucius reformulations in ancient Confucianism. Specifically, the premise of equality, which underlies Confucius’ formulation of shu in correlation with ren 仁, rendered shu incompatible with asymmetrical relationships. Besides the advantage of overcoming this limitation by adapting the golden rule structure of shu to specified asymmetrical relationships, the post-Confucius formula, especially “the measuring square” in the Great Learning, was devised to guide one to infer universalizable rules of conduct for various roles in diverse relationships. On this basis, I demonstrate a pivotal shift in the golden rule practice of ancient Confucianism—a shift of focus from its correlation with ren to its conformity with li 禮 as the system of rules of conduct and the principle of “discriminations.”
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allinson, Robert E. 1985. “The Confucian Golden Rule: A Negative Formulation.” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 12: 305–315.
Ames, Roger T. 2002. “Observing Ritual ‘Propriety Li’ as Focusing the ‘Familiar’ in the Affairs of the Day.” Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 1.2: 143–156.
______. 2011. Confucian Role Ethics: A Vocabulary. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.
Ames, Roger T., and David L. Hall. 2001. Focusing the Familiar: A Translation and Philosophical Interpretation of the Zhongyong. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.
Aristotle. 1998. The Nicomachean Ethics. Trans. by David Ros and edited by Lesley Brown. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
Carson, Thomas L. 2010. Lying and Deception: Theory and Practice. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
Chan, Wing-tsit. 1963. A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Evangelical Alliance. 1862. “The Chinese Classics.” Evangelical Christendom Its State and Prospects 3: 13–19.
Fingarette, Herbert. 1979. “Following the ‘One Thread’ of the Analects.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 47: 373–405.
Fung, Yu-lan (Feng, Youlan). 1966. A Short History of Chinese Philosophy. Edited by Derk Bodde. 1st Free Press pbk. ed. New York: Free Press.
Gensler, Harry J. 2013. Ethics and the Golden Rule. New York: Routledge.
Goldin, Paul Rakita. 2017. “Introduction: Confucius and Confucianism.” In A Concise Companion to Confucius, edited by Paul Rakita Goldin. Hoboken: Wiley.
Goodman, John. 1688. The Golden Rule: Or, the Royal Law of Equity Explained. London: Printed by S. Roycroft for R. Clavell.
Hare, R. M. 1963. Freedom and Reason. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Ivanhoe, Philip J. 1990. “Reweaving the ‘One Thread’ of the Analects.” Philosophy East and West 40: 17–33.
______. 2008. “The ‘Golden Rule’ in the Analects.” In Confucius Now: Contemporary Encounters with the Analects, edited by David Edward Jones. Chicago: Open Court.
Kant, Immanuel. 1998. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. Trans. by Mary J. Gregor. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Knoblock, John, trans. 1994. Xunzi: A Translation and Study of the Complete Works, Vol. III. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Lee, Junghwan. 2019. “‘The golden rule of our Saviour … had been inculcated by Confucius, almost in the same words, four centuries before’: The Clash of the Christian and Confucian Golden Rules in 17th- to 19th-century England.” Journal of Confucian Philosophy and Culture 31: 75–116.
______. 2022. “The Golden Rule, Humanity, and Equality: Shu and Ren in Confucius’ Teachings and Beyond.” Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 21.3: 347–368.
Legge, James. 1861. The Chinese Classics: With a Translation, Critical and Exegetical Notes, Prolegomena, and Copious Indexes, vol. I. Hong Kong: At the Authors; London: Trübner.
______. 1885. The Li Ki, I–X. Part III of The Sacred Books of China: The Texts of Confucianism. Oxford: The Clarendon Press.
Li, Jingde 黎靖德, ed. 1994. The Conversations of Master Zhu, Arranged Topically 朱子語類. Beijing 北京: Zhonghua Shuju 中華書局.
Munro, Donald J. 1969. The Concept of Man in Early China. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Nivison, David. 1996. “Golden Rule Arguments in Chinese Moral Philosophy.” In The Ways of Confucianism: Investigations in Chinese Philosophy, edited by Bryan W. Van Norden. Chicago and La Salle: Open Court.
Nussbaum, Martha C. 2003. “Golden Rule Arguments: A Missing Thought?” In The Moral Circle and the Self: Chinese and Western Approaches, edited by Kim Chong Chong, Sor-hoon Tan, and C. L. Ten. Chicago: Open Court.
Plaks, Andrew H. 2003. Ta Hsüeh and Chung Yung (the Highest Order of Cultivation and on the Practice of the Mean). London and New York: Penguin Books.
Rosemont, Henry, and Roger T. Ames, trans. 2009. The Chinese Classic of Family Reverence: A Philosophical Translation of the Xiaojing. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.
Russell, L. J. 1942. “Ideals and Practice.” Philosophy 17.66: 99–116.
Singer, Marcus G. 1963. “The Golden Rule.” Philosophy: The Journal of the Royal Institute of Philosophy 38: 293–314.
Spooner, W. A. 1914. “Golden Rule.” In Encyclopædia of Religion and Ethics, edited by James Hastings. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark.
Tasker, J. G. 1906. “Golden Rule.” In A Dictionary of Christ and the Gospels, edited by James Hastings, John A. Selbie, and John C. Lambert. New York: C. Scribner’s Sons.
Wattles, Jeffrey. 1996. The Golden Rule. New York: Oxford University Press.
Zhu, Xi 朱熹. 1996. Collected Works of Zhu Xi 朱熹集. Chengdu 成都: Sichuan Jiaoyu Chubanshe 四川教育出版社.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
The author declares that there is no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Lee, J. Recharacterizing the Confucian Golden Rule: The Advent of the Post-Confucius Formula and a Shift of Focus from Ren to Li. Dao 22, 23–42 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-022-09865-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-022-09865-5