Skip to main content
Log in

Much Adwu about Nothing: A Nonrealist Reading of Wang Bi’s Dao

Dao Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In his Laozi Commentary (Laozi Zhu 老子注) and Structure of the Laozi’s Subtle Pointers (Laozi Weizhi Lilüe 老子微指例略), Wang Bi 王弼 seems to identify the Dao 道 with “absence” or “nothingness” (wu 無). Despite this identification, some modern commentators regard Wang Bi’s Dao as a being. Other commentators deny that the Dao is a being but, nonetheless, seem to regard it as a reality of some kind. In contrast, I propose that Wang Bi’s Dao is literal absence and that we need not reify this absence in any way. Wang Bi’s descriptions of the Dao can be understood as metaphorical descriptions of mere absence. To support this proposal, I present an interpretation of Wang Bi’s Dao and then apply this interpretation to the first section of Wang Bi’s Laozi Commentary and to the first section of the Structure of the Laozi’s Subtle Pointers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Chalmers, John. 1868. The Speculations on Metaphysics, Polity, and Morality, of “the Old Philosopher,” Lau-tsze. London: Trübner & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, Alan. 2019. “Neo-Daoism.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/neo-daoism/ (last accessed on 12 Jan 2021).

  • Fox, Alan. 2007. “Teaching Daoism as Philosophy: Teaching Thinking through Controversy.” Teaching Philosophy 30.1: 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong, Hao. 2019. “The Metaphysics of Dao in Wang Bi’s Interpretation of Laozi.” Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 18.2: 219–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Paul J. 1977. A Translation of Lao-tzu’s Tao Te Ching and Wang Pi’s Commentary. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, JeeLoo. 2014. “Was There Something in Nothingness? The Debate on the Primordial State between Daoism and Neo-Confucianism.” In Nothingness in Asian Philosophy, edited by JeeLoo Liu and Douglas L. Berger. New York: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lynne, Richard John. 1999. The Classic of the Way and Virtue: A New Translation of the Tao-Te Ching of Laozi as Interpreted by Wang Bi. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ______. 2015. “Wang Bi and Xuanxue.” In Dao Companion to Daoist Philosophy, edited by Xiaogan Liu. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, Rudolf G. 2003. A Chinese Reading of the Daodejing Wang Bi’s Commentary on the Laozi with Critical Text and Translation. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joseph Suk-Hwan Dowd.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dowd, J.SH. Much Adwu about Nothing: A Nonrealist Reading of Wang Bi’s Dao. Dao 21, 183–195 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-022-09824-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-022-09824-0

Keywords

Navigation