Abstract
Yì 義 presents dual categories in classical Confucian conception. The first category is ethical-role duty originated from Zhou 周 ritual culture, which was a set of social norms defining ethical duties that fit each person’s role and status in the kinship group and society and regulating what was appropriate for a person’s behavior. The second category is moral conscience and rightness resulted from the internalization of social norms and ethical duties. From Confucius to Mencius, Xunzi 荀子, and others, while inheriting and elaborating yì’s ethical implication of role duty from Zhou ritual culture, they also gradually internalized yì to become the subject’s moral conscience of doing right things. During this process, classical Confucianism gradually formed an ethico-moral conception of yì as both role duty and moral rightness that abridged the dual categories of social norms for interpersonal relations and moral values for personal autonomy.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ames, Roger T., and Henry Rosemont, Jr., trans. 1998. The Analects of Confucius: A Philosophical Translation. New York: Ballantine.
Boltz, William G. 1986. “Review of Richett, Guanzi.” Journal of the American Oriental Society 106: 844–845.
Boodberg, Peter. 1953. “The Semasiology of Some Primary Confucian Concepts.” Philosophy East and West 2.4: 317–332.
Cai, Shen 蔡沈. 1999. Collected Commentaries on Book of Documents 書集傳. Complete Library in Four Sections 四庫全書. Hong Kong: The Chinese University of Hong Kong.
Chan, Alan K. L. 2011. “Harmony as a Contested Metaphor and Conceptions of Rightness (Yi) in Early Confucian Ethics.” In How Should One Live? Comparing Ethics in Ancient China and Greco-Roman Antiquity, edited by Richard A. H. King and Dennis Schilling. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Chen, Lai 陳來. 2012. Lectures on the Bamboo Manuscript Five Conducts 竹簡五行篇講稿. Beijing 北京: Sanlian Shudian 三聯書店.
Cheng, Chung-ying. 1972. “On Yi as a Universal Principle of Specific Application in Confucian Morality.” Philosophy East and West 22.3: 269–280.
Choi, Dobin. 2019. “Mengzi’s Maxim for Righteousness in Mengzi 2A2.” Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 18.3: 371–391.
Dworkin, Ronald. 2011. Justice for Hedgehogs. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Gao, Ming 高明. 1984. Modern Exegesis and Translation on the Elder Dai Records of Rites 大戴禮記今注今譯. Taipei 台北: Taiwan Shangwu Yinshuguan 台灣商務印書館.
Graham, A. C. 1978. Later Mohist Logic, Ethics and Science. London: School of Oriental and African Studies.
______. 1989. Disputers of the Tao: Philosophical Arguments in Ancient China. La Salle: Open Court.
Hall, David L., and Roger T. Ames. 1987. Thinking Through Confucius. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Hazels, Tabetha. 2015. “Ethics and Morality: What Should be Taught in Business Law?” Academy of Educational Leadership Journal 19.2: 77–89.
He, Linyi 何琳儀. 1998. Dictionary of Warring-States Ancient Scripts 戰國古文字典. Beijing 北京: Zhonghua Shuju 中華書局.
Hegel, G. W. F. 1991. Elements of the Philosophy of Right. Edited by Allen W. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
______. 1998. Phenomenology of Spirit. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers.
Hsiao, Kung-chuan 蕭公權. 1948. A History of Chinese Political Thought 中國政治思想史. Shanghai 上海: Shangwu Yinshuguan 商務印書館.
Huang, Chun-Chieh 黃俊傑. 1991. Mencian Hermeneutics: A History of Thought 孟學思想史論. Taipei 台北: Dongda Tushu Gongsi 東大圖書公司’.
Hutton, Eric. 1996. “On the Meaning of Yi (義) for Xunzi.” M.A. Thesis, Harvard University.
______. 2014. Xunzi: The Complete Text. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Ivanhoe, Philip J. 1998. “Mohist Philosophy.” In The Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, vol. 6. London: Routledge.
Jia, Jinhua. 2001. “An Interpretation of ‘Shi Keyi Qun.’” T’oung Pao 87: 1–13.
______. and Pang-fei Kwok. 2007. “From Clan Manners to Ethical Obligation and Righteousness: A New Interpretation of the Term Yi.” Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society 17.1: 1–10.
______. 賈晉華, and Huang Chenxi 黃晨曦. 2019. “Duties and Power-Profits: From Ritual Institutions to Classical Confucian Conception of Yi and Li 義務和權利: 從禮制到古典儒學的義利觀.” Confucian Studies 孔子研究 6: 28–36.
Jingmenshi Bowuguan 荊門市博物館. 1998. The Bamboo Texts from the Chu Tomb at Guodian 郭店楚墓竹簡. Beijing 北京: Wenwu Chubanshe 文物出版社.
Knoblock, John. 1994. Xunzi: A Translation and Study of the Complete Works. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Lau, D. C., trans. 1979. Confucius: The Analects. New York: Penguin Books.
______. 2003. Mencius: A Bilingual Edition, rev. ed. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.
Legge, James, trans. 1994. The Chinese Classics. 4 vols. Taipei: SMC Publishing.
Li, Xiangfeng 黎翔鳳, and Liang Yunhua 梁運華. 2004. Collation and Annotation on the Guanzi 管子校注. Beijing 北京: Zhonghua Shuju 中華書局.
Li, Zehou 李澤厚. 1986. On the History of Ancient Chinese Thought 中國古代思想史論. Beijing 北京: Renmin Chubanshe 人民出版社.
______. 2019. Outline of New Views on Ethics 倫理學新說述要. Beijing 北京: Shijie Tushu Chuban Gongsi 世界圖書出版公司.
Liang, Tao 梁濤. 2008. The Bamboo Texts of Guodian and the Zisi-Mencius School 郭店竹簡與思孟學派. Beijing 北京: Zhongguo Renmin Daxue Chubanshe 中國人民大學出版社.
Lin, Zhiqi 林之奇. 1999. Complete Exegesis on the Book of Documents 尚書全解. Complete Library in Four Sections 四庫全書. Hong Kong: The Chinese University of Hong Kong.
Liu, Xiang 劉翔. 1996. Hermeneutics of Traditional Chinese Values 中國傳統價值觀闡釋學. Shanghai 上海: Shanghai Sanlian Shudian 上海三聯書店.
Mizoguchi, Yūzō 溝口雄三. 2011. China’s Public and Private, Public-Privacy 中國的公與私・公私. Trans. by Zheng Jing 鄭靜. Beijing 北京: Sanlian Shudian 三聯書店.
Nylan, Michael, and Simon Leys, trans. 2014. The Analects. New York: W. W. Norton.
Pang, Pu 龐樸. 2005. Collation and Annotation on the Bamboo and Silk Texts of the Five Conducts 竹帛五行篇校注. In Collection of Pang Pu 龐朴文集, vol. 2, New Knowledge from Ancient Tombs 古墓新知. Ji’nan 濟南: Shandong Daxue Chubanshe 山東大學出版社.
Roetz, Heiner. 1993. Confucian Ethics of the Axial Age: A Reconstruction under the Aspect of the Breakthrough toward Postconventional Thinking. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Sato, Masayuki 佐藤將之. 2016. The Confucian Quest for Order: The Origin and Formation of the Political Thought of Xun Zi 參於天地之治: 荀子禮治政治思想的起源與構造. Taipei 台北: Taida Chuban Zhongxin 台大出版中心.
Schwartz, Benjamin I. 1975. “Transcendence in Ancient China.” Daedalus 104.2: 57–68.
______. 1985. The World of Thought in Ancient China. Cambridge: The Belknap Press.
Shanxisheng Wenwu Gongzuo Weiyuanhui 山西省文物工作委員會. 1976. Writings of Alliance from Houma 侯馬盟書. Beijing 北京: Wenwu Chubanshe 文物出版社.
Shun, Kwong-loi. 1997. Mencius and Early Chinese Thought. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Sun, Yirang 孫詒讓. 2001. Exegesis on the Mozi 墨子閒詁. Beijing 北京: Zhonghua Shuju 中華書局.
Tang, Wenming 唐文明. 2008. “Ren Yi and Internality and Exteriority 仁義與內外.” In Collection of Studies on the Confucian School of Zisi-Mencius 儒家思孟學派論集, edited by Shandong Shifan Daxue Qilu Wenhua Yanjiu Zhongxin 山東師範大學齊魯文化研究中心. Ji’nan 濟南: Qilu Shushe 齊魯書社.
Van Norden, Bryan W. 2002. “The Emotion of Shame and the Virtue of Righteousness in Mencius.” Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 2.1: 45–78.
Wang, Bo 王博. 2005. “Study on the Early Confucian View of Ren and Yi 早期儒家仁義說的研究.” Zhexue men 哲學門11: 71–97.
Wang, Huaiyu. 2009. “The Way of the Heart: Mencius’ Understanding of Justice.” Philosophy of East and West 59.3: 317–363.
Wang, Xianqian 王先謙. 1988. Collected Exegeses on the Xunzi 荀子集解. Beijing 北京: Zhonghua Shuju 中華書局.
Xu, Jinxiong 許進雄. 1995. Ancient Chinese Society: Perspective in Writing and Anthropology 中國古代社會: 文字與人類學的透視. Taipei 台北: Shangwu Yinshuguan 商務印書館.
Xu, Kai 徐鍇. 1975. Commentary on the Explanations of Simple Graphs and Analyses of Compound Characters 說文系傳. Cited in Complete Complements to Exegeses on the Explanations of Simple Graphs and Analyses of Compound Characters 說文解字詁林正補合編, edited by Ding Fubao 丁福保, vol. 7. Taipei 台北: Dingwen Shuju 鼎文書局.
Xu, Shen 許慎. 1963. Explanations of Simple Graphs and Analyses of Compound Characters 說文解字. Beijing 北京: Zhonghua Shuju 中華書局.
Yu, Jiyuan. 2006. “Yi: Practical Wisdom in Confucius’s Analects.” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 33.3: 335–348.
Zheng, Xuan 鄭玄, and Kong Yingda 孔穎達. 2000. Corrected Meanings of the Records of Rites 禮記正義. Beijing 北京: Beijing Daxue Chubanshe 北京大學出版社.
Zhou, Haichun 周海春, and Rong Guanghan 榮光漢. 2018. “On Mencius’ Yi 論孟子之 ‘義’.” Philosophical Researches 哲學研究 8: 44–51, 60.
Zhu, Xi 朱熹. 1992. Collected Exegeses on the Four Books 四書章句集注. Ji’nan 濟南: Qilu Shushe 齊魯書社.
Acknowledgment
I would like to thank the three anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jia, J. From Ritual Culture to the Classical Confucian Conception of Yì. Dao 20, 531–547 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-021-09797-6
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-021-09797-6