Abstract
The light metaphor is a perpetual favorite for philosophers, both East and West. I seek to revaluate its opposite, darkness. I claim that there are good reasons to favor darkness over light, or at least to not see them as mutually incompatible or in hierarchical fashion. In recent Western philosophy, both Heidegger and Derrida argue that what the light metaphor represents, the promise of clarity and objectivity, is exactly what makes Western metaphysics problematic. In Chinese philosophy, classical Daoism offers a thinking that does not favor the light metaphor over its opposite. Daoists have the good sense to acknowledge darkness as a positive contribution to human life, at the very least on par with light. I argue that both the Western criticism of the light metaphor, and the Daoist approach to light and darkness, can be read as challenging the metaphysics of presence and providing an alternative way of thought.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Almond, Ian. 2004. Sufism and Deconstruction: A Comparative Study of Derrida and ‘Ibn Arabi. London and New York: Routledge.
Ames, Roger T., and David L. Hall. 2003. Dao De Jing: A Philosophical Translation. New York: Ballantine Books.
Blumenberg, Hans. 1957/1993. “Light as a Metaphor for Truth: At the Preliminary Stage of Philosophical Concept Formation.” In Modernity and the Hegemony of Vision, edited by David Michael Levin. London, Berkeley, and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Burik, Steven. 2010. “Thinking on the Edge: Heidegger, Derrida and the Daoist Gateway (Men 門).” Philosophy East and West 60.4: 499–516.
Derrida, Jacques. 1973. Speech and Phenomena and Other Essays: On Husserl’s Theory of Signs. Trans. by David B. Allison. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
______. 1976. Of Grammatology. Trans. by G. C. Spivak. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
______. 1978. Writing and Difference. Trans. by Alan Bass. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
______. 1982. Margins of Philosophy. Trans. by Alan Bass. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
______. 1986. Glas. Trans. by John P. Leavey, Jr. and Richard Rand. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
______. 2005. The Politics of Friendship. Trans. by George Collins. London and New York: Verso.
Descartes. 1984. The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, Vol. II. Trans. by John Cottingham, Robert Stoothoff, and Dugald Murdoch. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Graham A. C. 1986. Studies in Chinese Philosophy and Philosophical Literature. Singapore: Institute of East Asian Philosophies.
______. 1989. Disputers of the Tao: Philosophical Argument in Ancient China. La Salle: Open Court.
______. 2001. Chuang-tzǔ: The Inner Chapters. Indianapolis: Hackett.
Harrison, Victoria. 2015. “Seeing the Dao: Conceptual Metaphors and the Philosophy of Religion.” Religious Studies 51.3: 307–322.
Heidegger, Martin. 1994. Heraklit. Gesamtausgabe 55. Frankfurt: Vittorio Klostermann.
______. 2002a. The Essence of Truth: On Plato’s Cave Analogy and Theaetetus. Trans. by Ted Sadler. London and New York: Continuum.
______. 2002b. Off the Beaten Track. Ed. and trans. by Julian Young and Kenneth Haynes. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
______. 2012. Bremen and Freiburg Lectures: Insight Into That Which Is and Basic Principles of Thinking. Trans. by Andrew J. Mitchell. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
Kierkegaard, Søren. 1993. Kierkegaard’s Writings, XV: Upbuilding Discourses in Various Spirits. Edited and trans. by Howard V. Hong and Edna H. Hong. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
______. 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.
Lindsay, James. 1910. “The Philosophy of Schelling.” The Philosophical Review 19.3: 259–275. https://doi.org/10.2307/2177432.
Van Fraassen, B. C. 1986. “The World We Speak Of, and the Language We Live In.” In Philosophy and Culture: Proceedings of the XVII-th World Congress of Philosophy. Montreal: Editions du Beffroi.
Watson, Burton. 2003. Zhuangzi: Basic Writings. New York: Columbia University Press.
Ziporyn, Brook. 2003. The Penumbra Unbound: The Neo-Taoist Philosophy of G uo Xiang. Albany: SUNY Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Burik, S. Darkness and Light: Absence and Presence in Heidegger, Derrida, and Daoism. Dao 18, 347–370 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-019-09670-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-019-09670-7