Abstract
Background
The most common cause of mortality following bariatric surgery is venous thromboembolism. Our study aimed to (1) determine the practice patterns of venous thromboembolism (VTE) chemoprophylaxis among bariatric surgeons participating in a large statewide quality collaborative and (2) compare the results of surgeon self-reported chemoprophylaxis practices to actual practices from abstracted chart data.
Methods
We administered a 13-question survey to 66 surgeons across a statewide collaborative aimed at revealing VTE practice patterns such as medication type, dosage, timing, duration, and level of trainee involvement (response rate 93%). We conducted on-site data audits to examine the charts of all patients that had developed VTE during the study period and 15 other randomly selected patient charts per site. We then evaluated both the ordered perioperative chemoprophylaxis and the actual administered chemoprophylaxis from nursing and electronic records.
Results
There was 31% overall discordance between self-reported and abstracted chart data for pre-operative VTE dosing regimens. Among patients who had a VTE, 39% of administered chemoprophylaxis did not match surgeon responses. Conversely, among patients who did not have a VTE, only 29% were discordant (p = 0.03). In contrast, for post-operative VTE dosing, there was no significant difference in the rate of discordance in patients with and without a VTE (47% discordance vs 38%, p = 0.0552, respectively).
Conclusions
Greater discordance between surgeon self-reported and actual perioperative VTE chemoprophylaxis is associated with significantly increased risk of VTE. Further understanding of the system characteristics associated with these practices may yield insights into how best to improve appropriate VTE chemoprophylaxis.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Quebbemann B, Akhondzadeh M, Dallal R. Continuous intravenous heparin infusion prevents peri-operative thromboembolic events in bariatric surgery patients. Obes Surg. 2005;15(9):1221–4.
Scholten DJ, Hoedema RM, Scholten SE. A comparison of two different prophylactic dose regimens of low molecular weight heparin in bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2002;12(1):19–24.
Escalante-Tattersfield T, Tucker O, Fajnwaks P, et al. Incidence of deep vein thrombosis in morbidly obese patients undergoing laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis Off J Am Soc Bariatr Surg. 2008;4(2):126–30.
Kardys CM et al. Safety and efficacy of intravascular ultrasound-guided inferior vena cava filter in super obese bariatric patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis Off J Am Soc Bariatr Surg. 2008;4(1):50–4.
Birkmeyer NJO et al. Comparative effectiveness of unfractionated and low-molecular-weight heparin for prevention of venous thromboembolism following bariatric surgery. Arch Surg. 2012;147(11):994–8.
Finks JF et al. Predicting risk for venous thromboembolism with bariatric surgery: results from the Michigan Bariatric Surgery Collaborative. Ann Surg. 2012;255(6):1100–4.
ASMBS updated position statement on prophylactic measures to reduce the risk of venous thromboembolism in bariatric surgery patients- ClinicalKey. [Online]. Available: https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/playContent/1-s2.0-S1550728913000993. [Accessed: 26-Oct-2018].
Pryor HI, Singleton A, Lin E, et al. Practice patterns in high-risk bariatric venous thromboembolism prophylaxis. Surg Endosc. 2012;27(3):843–8.
Prophylactic measures to reduce the risk of venous thromboembolism in bariatric surgery patients, American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. [Online]. Available: https://asmbs.org/resources/prophylactic-measures-to-reduce-the-risk-of-venous-thromboembolism-in-bariatric-surgery-patients. [Accessed: 01-Sep-2016].
Cohen AT et al. Venous thromboembolism risk and prophylaxis in the acute hospital care setting (ENDORSE study): a multinational cross-sectional study. Lancet. 2008;371(9610):387–94.
Bartlett MA, Mauck KF, Daniels PR. Prevention of venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing bariatric surgery. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2015;11:461–77.
Lau BDM et al. Individualized performance feedback to surgical residents improves appropriate venous thromboembolism prophylaxis prescription and reduces potentially preventable VTE: a prospective cohort study. Ann Surg. 264.6 (2016): 1181-1187.
Lau BD, Streiff MB, Pronovost PJ, et al. Attending physician performance measure scores and resident physicians’ ordering practices. JAMA Surg. 2015;150(8):813–4.
T. L. A. of B. S. (LABS) Consortium. Perioperative safety in the longitudinal assessment of bariatric surgery. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(5):445–54.
Dogan K et al. Effectiveness and safety of sleeve gastrectomy, gastric bypass, and adjustable gastric banding in morbidly obese patients: a multicenter, retrospective, matched cohort study. Obes Surg. 2015;25(7):1110–8.
Chiang HA et al. Implementation of a perioperative venous thromboembolism prophylaxis program for patients undergoing radical cystectomy on an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol. Eur Urol Focus. 2018;
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Conflict of Interest
Dr. Ghaferi is supported through grants from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (Grant Nos.: 5K08HS02362 and P30HS024403) and a Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute Award (CE-1304-6596). Dr. Ghaferi receives salary support from Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan as the Director of the Michigan Bariatric Surgery Collaborative.
Drs. Finks and Varban receive salary support from Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan in association with their participation in the Michigan Bariatric Surgery Collaborative.
The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest nor sources of outside funding to declare.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix. Survey question sent to participating MBSC surgeons
Appendix. Survey question sent to participating MBSC surgeons
-
Q1: Do you use MBSC’s Risk Calculator for VTE – (Y/N)
-
Q2: Do you follow the MBSC guidelines for VTE prophylaxis – (Y/N)
-
Q3: Do you use sequential compression devices (SCDs) for your patients – (Y/N)
-
Q4: What do you give patients for VTE prophylaxis PRE-operatively? (LMWH, 5000U Sub-Q Heparin, No Pharmacologic Prophylaxis, Other)
-
Q5: What dose of LMWH do you give PRE-operatively? – (30mg, 40mg, weight-based prophylactic dose)
-
Q6: What do you give patients for VTE prophylaxis POST-operatively? – (LMWH Injection, Sub-Q Heparin)
-
Q7: What dose of SubQ heparin do you use POST-operatively – (500U q8hrs, 500U q12hrs)
-
Q8: What dose of LMWH do you use POST-operatively – (30mg once daily, 30mg twice daily, 40mg once daily, 40mg twice daily, weight-based prophylactic LMWH and if so please specify)
-
Q9: When is the first POST-operative dose of VTE prophylaxis given? – (day after surgery, night of surgery, other please specify)
-
Q10: Do you give POST-DISCHARGE VTE prophylaxis? – (Yes, always; Yes, if the MBSC guidelines for risk recommend it; Yes, but I don’t use the MBSC risk parameters; No)
-
Q11: What do you give patients for VTE prophylaxis POST-DISCHARGE? – (LMWH 30mg twice daily, LMWH 40mg once daily, LMWH 40mg twice daily, LMWH Weight Based, Other)
-
Q12: What duration of days do you give VTE prophylaxis POST-DISCHARGE? – (1–7, 8–14, 15–21, 22–28, 29–35)
-
Q13: Do you work with residents in your daily practice? – (Never, Sometimes/Always)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
de Meireles, A., Carlin, A.M., Cain-Nielsen, A. et al. Association Between Surgeon Practice Knowledge and Venous Thromboembolism. OBES SURG 30, 2274–2279 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-04468-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-04468-6