Abstract
Background
Most surgeons calibrate the sleeve with 32-French (Fr) to 40-Fr bougies hypothesizing that smaller bougies are associated with greater weight loss and long-term lower weight regain. The purpose of this study was to assess the weight loss results and resolution of comorbidities 5 years after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG).
Methods
A prospective study of all the morbidly obese patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy calibrated with a 50-Fr bougie between October 2007 and February 2010 was performed. Excess weight loss (EWL) and remission of comorbidities were investigated at 1, 2, and 5 years after surgery.
Results
Fifty patients were included for the analysis. One year after surgery, mean excess weight loss (EWL) of 81.8 % was achieved, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) resolution rate was 76.9 %, hypertension resolution was observed in 73.3 %, sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome (SAHS) resolution in 100 % hypertriglyceridemia was normalized in all the cases, and hypercholesterolemia in 21.4 %. Two years after surgery, mean EWL was 84.4 % and comorbidity resolution rate similar to that obtained after the first postoperative year. Five years after surgery, mean EWL was 78.7 %, T2DM resolution 69.2 %, hypertension 66.7 %, SAHS 100 %, hypertriglyceridemia 100 %, and hypercholesterolemia 14.3 %.
Conclusions
LSG calibrated with a 50-Fr bougie obtained excellent results in weight loss and resolution comorbidities and their maintenance in the long-term follow-up in our series. In our opinion, the results depend more on a preoperative correct selection of candidates and a close postoperative follow-up, rather than using a narrow calibration bougie.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Buchwald H, Avidor Y, Braunwald E, et al. Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2004;292:1724–37.
Zhang F, Strain GW, Lei W, et al. Changes in lipid profiles in morbidly obese patients after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2011;21:305–9.
Rosenthal RJ, International Sleeve Gastrectomy Expert Panel, Diaz AA, et al. International Sleeve Gastrectomy Expert Panel Consensus Statement: best practice guidelines based on experience of >12,000 cases. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012;8:8–19.
Parikh M, Gagner M, Heacock L, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: does bougie size affect mean %EWL? Short-term outcomes. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2008;4:528–33.
Hawasli A, Jacquish B, Almahmeed T, et al. Early effects of bougie size on sleeve gastrectomy outcome. Am J Surg. 2015;209:473–7.
Melissas J, Daskalakis M, Koukouraki S, et al. Sleeve gastrectomy—a “food limiting” operation. Obes Surg. 2008;18:1251–6.
Ruiz-Tovar J, Boix E, Bozhychko M, et al. Adherencia pre y postoperatoria a la dieta mediterranea y su efecto sobre la pérdida de peso y los factores de riesgo cardiovascular tras gastrectomía vertical. Nutr Hosp. 2014;30:756–62.
Ruiz-Tovar J, Zubiaga L, Llavero C, et al. Serum cholesterol by morbidly obese patients after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and additional physical activity. Obes Surg. 2014;24:385–9.
Ruiz-Tovar J, Oller I, Tomas A, et al. Midterm impact of sleeve gastrectomy, calibrated with a 50-Fr bougie, on weight loss, glucose homeostasis, lipid profiles, and comorbidities in morbidly obese patients. Am Surg. 2012;78:969–74.
Ruiz-Tovar J, Boix E, Bonete JM, et al. Effect of preoperative feeding patterns and preoperative weight loss on the short- and mid-term weight loss results of sleeve gastrectomy. Cir Esp. 2014;93:241–7.
Atkins ER, Preen DB, Jarman C, et al. Improved obesity reduction and comorbidity resolution in patients treated with 40-French Bougie versus 50-French Bougie four years after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Analysis of 294 patients. Obes Surg. 2012;22:97–104.
Diamantis T, Apostolou KG, Alexandrou A, et al. Review of long-term weight loss results after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014;10:177–83.
Parikh M, Issa R, McCrillis A, et al. Surgical strategies that may decrease leak after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 9991 patients. Ann Surg. 2013;257:231–7.
Spivak H, Rubin M, Sadot E, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy using 42-French versus 32-French bougie: the first-year outcome. Obes Surg. 2014;24:1090–3.
Yuval JB, Mintz Y, Cohen MJ, et al. The effects of bougie caliber on leaks and excess weight loss following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Is there an ideal bougie size? Obes Surg. 2013;23:1685–91.
Gagner M, Deitel M, Erickson AL, et al. Survey on laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) at the Fourth International Consensus Summit on Sleeve Gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2013;23:2013–7.
Abd Ellatif ME, Abdallah E, Askar W, et al. Long term predictors of success after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Int J Surg. 2014;12:504–8.
Buchwald H, Estok R, Fahrbach K, et al. Meta-analysis of bariatric surgery and diabetes. Am J Med. 2009;122:248–56.
Sjostrom L, Narbro K, Sjostrom CD, et al. Swedish Obese Subjects Study. Effects of bariatric surgery on mortality in Swedish obese subjects. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:741–52.
Pories WJ. Bariatric surgery: risks and rewards. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93:89–96.
Melero Y, Ferrer JV, Sanahuja A, et al. Psychological changes in morbidly obese patients after sleeve gastrectomy. Cir Esp. 2014;92:404–9.
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Statement of Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Statement of Human Rights
All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Consortia
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ruiz-Tovar, J., Martínez, R., Bonete, J.M. et al. Long-term Weight and Metabolic Effects of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Calibrated with a 50-Fr Bougie. OBES SURG 26, 32–37 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-015-1731-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-015-1731-6