Abstract
Hypnosis has a therapeutic effect on substance dependence. However, its neural basis remains unclear, which impedes its further clinical applications. This study investigated the mechanisms of smoking treatment based on hypnosis from two perspectives: immediate and follow-up effects. Twenty-four smokers screened from 132 volunteers underwent hypnosis suggestion and performed a smoking-related cue task twice during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scanning (in normal and hypnotic states). The number of cigarettes smoked per day was recorded at follow-up visits. The smokers reported decreased craving after hypnosis. The activations in the right dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex (rDLPFC), the left insula and the right middle frontal gyrus (rMFG), and the functional connectivity between the rDLPFC and the left insula were increased in the hypnotic state. The reduced craving was related to the DLPFC-insula network, which reflected the immediate mechanism of hypnosis on smoking. The number of cigarette use at the 1-week and 1 month follow-up was correlated with the rMFG activation which reflecting hypnotic depth, suggesting the follow-up effect of hypnosis on smoking depended on the trait of smokers. We identified two different mechanisms of hypnosis effect on smoking, which have important implications for design and optimization of hypnotic treatments on mental disorders.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 5th Edition: DSM-5. Washington D. C., Author.
Baillie, A. J., Mattick, R. P., Hall, W., & Webster, P. (1994). Meta-analytic review of the efficacy of smoking cessation interventions. Drug and Alcohol Review, 13, 157–170.
Barnes, J., Dong, C. Y., McRobbie, H., Walker, N., Mehta, M., & Stead, L. F. (2010). Hypnotherapy for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 6, CD001008.
Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108, 624–652.
Casale, A. D., Ferracuti, S., Rapinesi, C., Serata, D., Sani, G., Savoja, V., Kotzalidis, G. D., Tatarelli, R., & Girardi, P. (2012). Neurocognition under hypnosis: Findings from recent functional neuroimaging studies. The International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 60, 286–317.
Cox, R. W. (1996). AFNI: Software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. Computers and Biomedical Research, an International Journal, 29, 162–173.
Dale, L. C., Ebbert, J. O., Hays, J. T., & Hurt, R. D. (2000). Treatment of nicotine dependence. Mayo Clinic proceedings. Mayo Clinic, 75, 1311–1316.
Deeley, Q., Oakley, D. A., Toone, B., Giampietro, V., Brammer, M. J., Williams, S. C., & Halligan, P. W. (2012). Modulating the default mode network using hypnosis. The International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 60, 206–228.
Derbyshire, S. W., Whalley, M. G., Seah, S. T., & Oakley, D. A. (2017). Suggestions to reduce clinical fibromyalgia pain and experimentally induced pain produce parallel effects on perceived pain but divergent functional MRI-based brain activity. Psychosomatic Medicine, 79, 189–200.
Dienes, Z., & Hutton, S. (2013). Understanding hypnosis metacognitively: rTMS applied to left DLPFC increases hypnotic suggestibility. Cortex, 49, 386–392.
Doherty, K., Kinnunen, T., Militello, F. S., & Garvey, A. J. (1995). Urges to smoke during the first month of abstinence: Relationship to relapse and predictors. Psychopharmacology, 119, 171–178.
Elkins, G. R., Barabasz, A. F., Council, J. R., & Spiegel, D. (2015). Advancing research and practice: The revised APA division 30 definition of hypnosis. The American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 57, 378–385.
Etter, J. F., & Perneger, T. V. (2001). Attitudes toward nicotine replacement therapy in smokers and ex-smokers in the general public. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 69, 175–183.
Frankel, F. H. (1976). Hypnosis: Trance as a coping mechanism. New York: Plenum Medical Books.
Friston, K. J., Buechel, C., Fink, G. R., Morris, J., Rolls, E., & Dolan, R. J. (1977). Psychophysiological and modulatory interactions in neuroimaging. Neuroimage, 6, 218–229.
Green, J. P. (1999). Hypnosis and the treatment of smoking cessation and weight loss. In I. Kirsch, A. Capafons, E. Cardena-Buelna, & S. Amigo (Eds.), Clinical hypnosis and self-regulation: Cognitive–behavioral perspectives (pp. 249–276). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Grupe, D. W., Oathes, D. J., & Nitschke, J. B. (2013). Dissecting the anticipation of aversion reveals dissociable neural networks. Cerebral Cortex, 23, 1874–1883.
Gruzelier, J. H. (2006). Frontal functions, connectivity and neural efficiency underpinning hypnosis and hypnotic susceptibility. Contemporary Hypnosis, 23, 15–32.
Hasan, F. M., Zagarins, S. E., Pischke, K. M., Saiyed, S., Bettencourt, A. M., & Beal, L., , Macys, D., Aurora, S., & McCleary, N. (2014). Hypnotherapy is more effective than nicotine replacement therapy for smoking cessation: Results of a randomized controlled trial. Complementary Therapies in Medicine, 22, 1–8.
Hayes, D. J., & Northoff, G. (2012). Common brain activations for painful and nonpainful aversive stimuli. BMC Neuroscience, 13, 60.
Heatherton, T. F., Kozlowski, L. T., Frecker, R. C., & Fagerström, K. O. (1991). The Fagerström test for nicotine dependence: A revision of the Fagerstrom tolerance questionnaire. British Journal of Addiction, 86, 1119–1127.
Heishman, S. J., Singleton, E. G., & Pickworth, W. B. (2008). Reliability and validity of a short version of the tobacco craving questionnaire. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 10, 643–651.
Holroyd, J. (1980). Hypnosis treatment for smoking: An evaluative review. The International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 28, 341–357.
Hunt, W., & Bespalec, D. (1974). An evaluation of current methods of modifying smoking behaviors. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 30, 431–438.
Kihlstrom, J. F. (2013). Neuro-hypnotism: Prospects for hypnosis and neuroscience. Cortex, 49, 365–374.
Kirsch, I., & Braffman, W. (2001). Imaginative suggestibility and hypnotizability. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10, 57–61.
Kirsch, L., & Lynn, S. J. (1995). The altered state of hypnosis: Changes in the theoretical landscape. American Psychologist, 50, 846–858.
Laurence, J.–. R., Beaulieu-Prevost, D., & DuChene, T. (2008). Measuring and understanding individual differences in hypnotizability. In M. R. Nash & A. J. Barnier (Eds.), Oxford handbook of hypnosis: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 225–254). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Li, X., Ma, R., Pang, L., Lv, W., Xie, Y., Chen, Y., et al. (2017). Delta coherence in resting-state EEG predicts the reduction in cigarette craving after hypnotic aversion suggestions. Scientific Reports, 7, 2430.
Li, X., Chen, L., Ma, R., Wang, H., Wan, L., Wang, Y., Bu, J., Hong, W., Lv, W., Vollstadt-Klein, S., Yang, Y., & Zhang, X. (2018). The top-down regulation from the prefrontal cortex to insula via hypnotic aversion suggestions reduces smoking craving. Human Brain Mapping, 1–11.
Lindeløv, J. K., Overgaard, R., & Overgaard, M. (2017). Improving working memory performance in brain-injured patients using hypnotic suggestion. Brain, 140, 1100–1106.
Lynn, S. J., & Green, J. P. (2011). The socio-cognitive and dissociation theories of hypnosis: Toward a rapprochement. The International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 59, 277–293.
Lynn, S. J., Maxwell, R., & Green, J. P. (2017). The hypnotic induction in the broad scheme of hypnosis: A Sociocognitive perspective. The International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 59, 363–384.
MacDonald, A. W., 3rd, Cohen, J. D., Stenger, V. A., & Carter, C. S. (2000). Dissociating the role of the dorsolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortex in cognitive control. Science, 288, 1835–1838.
McCaul, K. D., Hockemeyer, J. R., Johnson, R. J., Zetocha, K., Quinlan, K., & Glasgow, R. E. (2006). Motivation to quit using cigarettes: A review. Addictive Behaviors, 31, 42–56.
McGeown, W. J., Mazzoni, G., Vannucci, M., & Venneri, A. (2015). Structural and functional correlates of hypnotic depth and suggestibility. Psychiatry Research, 231, 151–159.
McGeown, W. J., Mazzoni, G., Venneri, A., & Kirsch, I. (2009). Hypnotic induction decreases anterior default mode activity. Consciousness and Cognition, 18, 848–855.
Mendelsohn, A., Chalamish, Y., Solomonovich, A., & Dudai, Y. (2008). Mesmerizing memories: Brain substrates of episodic memory suppression in posthypnotic amnesia. Neuron, 57, 159–170.
Oakley, D. A., & Halligan, P. W. (2013). Hypnotic suggestion: opportunities for cognitive neuroscience. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience, 14, 565–576.
Paulus, M. P., & Stein, M. B. (2010). Interoception in anxiety and depression. Brain Structure & Function, 214, 451–463.
Peltz, E., Seifert, F., DeCol, R., Dörfler, A., Schwab, S., & Maihöfner, C. (2011). Functional connectivity of the human insular cortex during noxious and innocuous thermal stimulation. Neuroimage, 54, 1324–1335.
Perkins, K. A., Epstein, L. H., Grobe, J., & Fonte, C. (1994). Tobacco abstinence, smoking cues, and the reinforcing value of smoking. Pharmacology, Biochemistry, and Behavior, 47, 107–112.
Perry, C., Gelfand, R., & Marcovitch, P. (1979). The relevance of hypnotic susceptibility in the clinical context. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 88, 592–603.
Perry, C., Laurence, J. R. (1980). Hypnotic depth and hypnotic susceptibility: a replicated finding. The International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 28, 272–280.
Piasecki, T. M. (2006). Relapse to smoking. Clinical Psychology Review, 26, 196–215.
Raz, A. (2011). Hypnosis: A twilight zone of the top-down variety few have never heard of hypnosis but most know little about the potential of this mind-body regulation technique for advancing science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 555–557.
Scharmüller, W., Leutgeb, V., Schäfer, A., & Schienle, A. (2012). Investigating phobic specificity with standardized low resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA). Brain Research, 1477, 74–82.
Spiegel, H. (1964). A single treatment method to stop smoking using ancillary self-hypnosis. The International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 12, 230–238.
Spiegel, D., Frischholz, E. J., Fleiss, J. L., & Spiegel, H. (1993). Predictors of smoking abstinence following a single session restructuring intervention of self-hypnosis. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 150, 1090–1097.
Su, X., Li, L., Griffiths, S. M., Gao, Y., Lau, J. T., & Mo, P. K. (2015). Smoking behaviors and intentions among adolescents in rural China: The application of the theory of planned behavior and the role of social influence. Addictive Behaviors, 48, 44–51.
Tahiri, M., Mottillo, S., Joseph, L., Pilote, L., & Eisenberg, M. J. (2012). Alternative smoking cessation aids: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. The American Journal of Medicine, 125, 576–584.
Terhune, D. B., Cleeremans, A., Raz, A., & Lynn, S. J. (2017). Hypnosis and top-down regulation of consciousness. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 81(Pt A), 59–74.
Vanhaudenhuyse, A., Boly, M., Balteau, E., Schnakers, C., Moonen, G., Luxen, A., Lamy, M., Degueldre, C., Brichant, J. F., Maquet, P., Laureys, S., & Faymonville, M. E. (2009). Pain and non-pain processing during hypnosis: A thulium-YAG event-related fMRI study. Neuroimage, 47, 1047–1054.
Viswesvaran, C., & Schmidt, F. L. (1992). A meta-analytic comparison of the effectiveness of smoking cessation methods. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 554–561.
Wagstaff, G. F. (2010). Hypnosis and the relationship between trance, suggestion, expectancy and depth: Some semantic and conceptual issues. The International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 53, 47–59.
Weitzenhoffer, A. M., & Hilgard, E. R. (1962). Stanford hypnotic susceptibility scale, form C. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.
WHO (2013). WHO report on the global tobacco epidemic 2013.
Zahraa, K., Leonardb, N., Sverkerc, S., & Hosseind, G. A. (2018). Transcranial direct current stimulation based on quantitative electroencephalogram combining positive psychotherapy for major depression. Journal of Integrative Neuroscience, 17, 141–155.
Zhang, X., Salmeron, B. J., Ross, T. J., Gu, H., Geng, X., Yang, Y., & Stein, E. A. (2011). Anatomical differences and network characteristics underlying smoking cue reactivity. Neuroimage, 54, 131–141.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank all the smokers who participated in our study. We thank Guanbao Cui for his help in organizing recruitment and testing. This work was supported by grants from The National Key Basic Research Program (2016YFA0400900 and 2018YFC0831101), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31471071, 31771221, 61773360, and 71874170), and the Anhui Natural Science Foundation (1808085MH291), and the project of human social science of Anhui province (SK2016A047), and Grants for Scientific Research of BSKY (XJ201826) from Anhui Medical University, and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China. A portion of the numerical calculations in this study were performed with the supercomputing system at the Supercomputing Centre of USTC.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Ethical approval
The study was approved by the Human Ethics Committee of the University of Science and Technology of China. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. All participants signed a written informed consent form before the experiment and were paid 400 Chinese Yuan.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(DOC 39 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Li, X., Chen, L., Ma, R. et al. The neural mechanisms of immediate and follow-up of the treatment effect of hypnosis on smoking craving. Brain Imaging and Behavior 14, 1487–1497 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11682-019-00072-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11682-019-00072-0