Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Gender and creativity: an overview of psychological and neuroscientific literature

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Brain Imaging and Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The topic of gender differences in creativity is one that generates substantial scientific and public interest, but also courts considerable controversy. Owing to the heterogeneous nature of the findings associated with this line of research, the general picture often appears puzzling or obscure. This article presents a selective overview of psychological and neuroscientific literature that has a relevant bearing on the theme of gender and creativity. Topics that are explored include the definition and methods of assessing creativity, a summary of behavioral investigations on gender in relation to creativity, postulations that have been put forward to understand gender differences in creative achievement, gender-based differences in the structure and function of the brain, gender-related differences in behavioral performance on tasks of normative cognition, and neuroscientific studies of gender and creativity. The article ends with a detailed discussion of the idea that differences between men and women in creative cognition are best explained with reference to the gender-dependent adopted strategies or cognitive style when faced with generative tasks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abraham, A. (2014). Creative thinking as orchestrated by semantic processing vs. cognitive control brain networks. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 95. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00095.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Abraham, A., & Windmann, S. (2007). Creative cognition: the diverse operations and the prospect of applying a cognitive neuroscience perspective. Methods (San Diego, Calif.), 42(1), 38–48. doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2006.12.007.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Abraham, A., Pieritz, K., Thybusch, K., Rutter, B., Kröger, S., Schweckendiek, J., … Hermann, C. (2012). Creativity and the brain: uncovering the neural signature of conceptual expansion. Neuropsychologia, 50(8), 1906–1917. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.04.015.

  • Abraham, A., Thybusch, K., Pieritz, K., & Hermann, C. (2014). Gender differences in creative thinking: behavioral and fMRI findings. Brain Imaging and Behavior, 8(1), 39–51. doi:10.1007/s11682-013-9241-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M. (1982). Social psychology of creativity: a consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(5), 997–1013. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.43.5.997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M. (1993). Motivational synergy: toward new conceptualizations of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in the workplace. Human Resource Management Review, 3(3), 185–201. doi:10.1016/1053-4822(93)90012-S.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arden, R., Chavez, R. S., Grazioplene, R., & Jung, R. E. (2010). Neuroimaging creativity: a psychometric view. Behavioural Brain Research, 214(2), 143–156. doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2010.05.015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baer, J. (1997). Gender differences in the effects of anticipated evaluation on creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 10(1), 25–31. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1001_3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baer, J. (1998). Gender differences in the effects of extrinsic motivation on creativity*. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 32(1), 18–37. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.1998.tb00804.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baer, J. (1999). Gender differences. In M. A. Runco, & S. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity. San Diego: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baer, J., & Kaufman, J. C. (2008). Gender differences in creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 42(2), 75–105. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.2008.tb01289.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, F., Kennelly, J., & Tamplin, J. (2005). Themes within songs written by people with traumatic brain injury: gender differences. Journal of Music Therapy, 42(2), 111–122.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baron-Cohen, S., Knickmeyer, R. C., & Belmonte, M. K. (2005). Sex differences in the brain: implications for explaining autism. Science, 310(5749), 819–823. doi:10.1126/science.1115455.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bender, S. W., Nibbelink, B., Towner-Thyrum, E., & Vredenburg, D. (2013). Defining characteristics of creative women. Creativity Research Journal, 25(1), 38–47. doi:10.1080/10400419.2013.752190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binder, J. R., & Desai, R. H. (2011). The neurobiology of semantic memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(11), 527–536. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.10.001.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Binder, J. R., Desai, R. H., Graves, W. W., & Conant, L. L. (2009). Where is the semantic system? A critical review and meta-analysis of 120 functional neuroimaging studies. Cerebral Cortex (New York, N.Y.: 1991), 19(12), 2767–2796. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhp055.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bowden, E. M., & Jung-Beeman, M. (2003). Normative data for 144 compound remote associate problems. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers: A Journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc, 35(4), 634–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowden, E. M., & Jung-Beeman, M. (2007). Methods for investigating the neural components of insight. Methods (San Diego, Calif.), 42(1), 87–99. doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2006.11.007.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, S. A. (2004). How we use rules to select actions: a review of evidence from cognitive neuroscience. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 4(4), 564–579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabeza, R., & St Jacques, P. (2007). Functional neuroimaging of autobiographical memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(5), 219–227. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2007.02.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cahill, L. (2006). Why sex matters for neuroscience. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience, 7(6), 477–484. doi:10.1038/nrn1909.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cahill, L. (2014). Fundamental sex difference in human brain architecture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(2), 577–578. doi:10.1073/pnas.1320954111.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carrel, L., & Willard, H. F. (2005). X-inactivation profile reveals extensive variability in X-linked gene expression in females. Nature, 434(7031), 400–404. doi:10.1038/nature03479.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carson, S. H., Peterson, J. B., & Higgins, D. M. (2005). Reliability, validity, and factor structure of the creative achievement questionnaire. Creativity Research Journal, 17(1), 37–50. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1701_4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, D. W. (2005). Self-perceived creativity, family hardiness, and emotional intelligence of Chinese gifted students in Hong Kong. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 16, 47–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, P. C., & Lau, S. (2010). Gender differences in the creativity of Hong Kong school children: comparison by using the new electronic Wallach–kogan creativity tests. Creativity Research Journal, 22(2), 194–199. doi:10.1080/10400419.2010.481522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, J. R., & Zuckerman, H. (1987). Marriage, motherhood and research performance in science. Scientific American, 256(2), 119–125.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eliot, L. (2011). The trouble with sex differences. Neuron, 72(6), 895–898. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.12.001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fine, C. (2010). From scanner to sound bite issues in interpreting and reporting sex differences in the brain. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19(5), 280–283. doi:10.1177/0963721410383248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fink, A., & Neubauer, A. C. (2006). EEG alpha oscillations during the performance of verbal creativity tasks: differential effects of sex and verbal intelligence. International Journal of Psychophysiology: Official Journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology, 62(1), 46–53. doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2006.01.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, J. R., & Rossi-Casé, L. (2011). Modern women match men on Raven’s progressive matrices. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(6), 799–803. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.12.035.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frith, C. D., & Frith, U. (2006). The neural basis of mentalizing. Neuron, 50(4), 531–534. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2006.05.001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gong, G., He, Y., & Evans, A. C. (2011). Brain connectivity: gender makes a difference. The Neuroscientist: A Review Journal Bringing Neurobiology, Neurology and Psychiatry, 17(5), 575–591. doi:10.1177/1073858410386492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halpern, D. F. (1989). The disappearance of cognitive gender differences: what you see depends on where you look. American Psychologist, 44(8), 1156–1158. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.44.8.1156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halpern, D. F. (2011). Sex differences in cognitive abilities: 4th edition (4 ed.). New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, K. A., & Plucker, J. A. (2012). Creativity and intellectual styles. In L. Zhang, R. J. Sternberg, & S. Rayner (Eds.), Handbook of intellectual styles: Preferences in cognition, learning, and thinking (pp. 193–208). New York: Springer Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • He, W., & Wong, W. (2011). Gender differences in creative thinking revisited: findings from analysis of variability. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(7), 807–811. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.06.027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hein, G., & Knight, R. T. (2008). Superior temporal sulcus—it’s my area: or is it? Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20(12), 2125–2136. doi:10.1162/jocn.2008.20148.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hong, E., & Milgram, R. M. (2010). Creative thinking ability: domain generality and specificity. Creativity Research Journal, 22(3), 272–287. doi:10.1080/10400419.2010.503535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howieson, N. (1981). A longitudinal study of creativity — 1965–1975. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 15(2), 117–134. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.1981.tb00284.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hugdahl, K., Thomsen, T., & Ersland, L. (2006). Sex differences in visuo-spatial processing: an fMRI study of mental rotation. Neuropsychologia, 44(9), 1575–1583. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.01.026.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Iijima, M., Arisaka, O., Minamoto, F., & Arai, Y. (2001). Sex differences in children’s free drawings: a study on girls with congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Hormones and Behavior, 40(2), 99–104. doi:10.1006/hbeh.2001.1670.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ingalhalikar, M., Smith, A., Parker, D., Satterthwaite, T. D., Elliott, M. A., Ruparel, K., … Verma, R. (2014). Sex differences in the structural connectome of the human brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(2), 823–828. doi:10.1073/pnas.1316909110.

  • Joel, D., & Tarrasch, R. (2014). On the mis-presentation and misinterpretation of gender-related data: the case of Ingalhalikar’s human connectome study. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(6), E637. doi:10.1073/pnas.1323319111.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, K., & Wüstenberg, T. (2010). The neural network of spatial cognition and its modulation by biological and environmental factors. Journal of Individual Differences, 31(2), 83–90. doi:10.1027/1614-0001/a000015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan-Young, R. M. (2012). Hormones, context, and “brain gender”: a review of evidence from congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Social Science & Medicine, 74(11), 1738–1744. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.08.026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karwowski, M., Lebuda, I., Wisniewska, E., & Gralewski, J. (2013). Big five personality traits as the predictors of creative self-efficacy and creative personal identity: does gender matter? The Journal of Creative Behavior, 47(3), 215–232. doi:10.1002/jocb.32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, J. C. (2006). Self-reported differences in creativity by ethnicity and gender. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20(8), 1065–1082. doi:10.1002/acp.1255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, J. C., Plucker, J. A., & Baer, J. (2008). Essentials of creativity assessment (1 ed.). Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, J. C., Baer, J., Agars, M. D., & Loomis, D. (2010). Creativity stereotypes and the consensual assessment technique. Creativity Research Journal, 22(2), 200–205. doi:10.1080/10400419.2010.481529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimura, D. (2000). Sex and cognition. Cambridge: A Bradford Book.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozbelt, A., Beghetto, R. A., & Sternberg, R. J. (2010). Theories of creativity. In Handbook of creativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lentini, E., Kasahara, M., Arver, S., & Savic, I. (2013). Sex differences in the human brain and the impact of sex chromosomes and sex hormones. Cerebral Cortex (New York, N.Y.: 1991), 23(10), 2322–2336. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhs222.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, W.-L., Hsu, K.-Y., Chen, H.-C., & Wang, J.-W. (2012). The relations of gender and personality traits on different creativities: a dual-process theory account. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6(2), 112–123. doi:10.1037/a0026241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipp, I., Benedek, M., Fink, A., Koschutnig, K., Reishofer, G., Bergner, S., … Neubauer, A. (2012). Investigating neural efficiency in the visuo-spatial domain: an FMRI study. PloS One, 7(12), e51316. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0051316

  • Luders, E., & Toga, A. W. (2010). Sex differences in brain anatomy. Progress in Brain Research, 186, 3–12. doi:10.1016/B978-0-444-53630-3.00001-4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mar’i, S. K., & Karayanni, M. (1983). Creativity in Arab culture: two decades of research. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 16(4), 227–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, M. M., & Konkle, A. T. M. (2005). When is a sex difference not a sex difference? Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology, 26(2), 85–102. doi:10.1016/j.yfrne.2005.06.001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, M. M., Arnold, A. P., Ball, G. F., Blaustein, J. D., & De Vries, G. J. (2012). Sex differences in the brain: the not so inconvenient truth. The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 32(7), 2241–2247. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5372-11.2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, A. L. (2007). Creativity and cognitive style: the relationship between field-dependence-independence, expected evaluation, and creative performance. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 1(4), 243–246. doi:10.1037/1931-3896.1.4.243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. I., & Halpern, D. F. (2013). The new science of cognitive sex differences. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2013.10.011.

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Moriguchi, Y., Touroutoglou, A., Dickerson, B. C., & Barrett, L. F. (2013). Sex differences in the neural correlates of affective experience. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience. doi:10.1093/scan/nst030.

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Noppe, L. D., & Gallagher, J. M. (1977). A cognitive style approach to creative thought. Journal of Personality Assessment, 41(1), 85–90. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa4101_14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Northoff, G., Heinzel, A., de Greck, M., Bermpohl, F., Dobrowolny, H., & Panksepp, J. (2006). Self-referential processing in our brain–a meta-analysis of imaging studies on the self. NeuroImage, 31(1), 440–457. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.12.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pagnani, A. R. (2011). Gender differences. In M. A. Runco & S. R. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (Second Edition) (pp. 551–557). San Diego: Academic. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780123750389001060.

  • Piirto, J. (1991). Why are there so few (creative women: visual artists, mathematicians, musicians)? Roeper Review, 13(3), 142–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pink, D. H. (2011). Drive: The surprising truth about what motivates us. New York: Riverhead Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinker, S. (2009). The sexual paradox: Men, women and the real gender gap. New York: Scribner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinker, S., & Spelke, E. (2005). The science of gender and science: Pinker vs. Spelke, A Debate. Presented at the Mind Brain and Behavior Initiative (MBB), Harvard University. Retrieved from http://edge.org/3rd_culture/debate05/debate05_index.html.

  • Price, C. J. (2010). The anatomy of language: a review of 100 fMRI studies published in 2009. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1191, 62–88. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05444.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Puccio, G. J., Wheeler, R. A., & Cassandro, V. J. (2004). Reactions to creative problem solving training: does cognitive style make a difference? The Journal of Creative Behavior, 38(3), 192–216. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.2004.tb01240.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Razumnikova, O. M. (2004). Gender differences in hemispheric organization during divergent thinking: an EEG investigation in human subjects. Neuroscience Letters, 362(3), 193–195. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2004.02.066.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rippon, G., Jordan-Young, R., Kaiser, A., & Fine, C. (2014). Recommendations for sex/gender neuroimaging research: key principles and implications for research design, analysis, and interpretation. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 650. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00650.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Rudebeck, P. H., & Murray, E. A. (2011). Balkanizing the primate orbitofrontal cortex: distinct subregions for comparing and contrasting values. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1239, 1–13. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06267.x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ruigrok, A. N. V., Salimi-Khorshidi, G., Lai, M.-C., Baron-Cohen, S., Lombardo, M. V., Tait, R. J., & Suckling, J. (2014). A meta-analysis of sex differences in human brain structure. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 39, 34–50. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.12.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A. (1986). Predicting children’s creative performance. Psychological Reports, 59(3), 1247–1254. doi:10.2466/pr0.1986.59.3.1247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 92–96. doi:10.1080/10400419.2012.650092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A., & Pritzker, S. R. (Eds.). (2011). Encyclopedia of creativity, two-volume set, second edition (2 ed.). Boston: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A., Cramond, B., & Pagnani, A. R. (2010). Gender and creativity. In J. C. Chrisler & D. R. McCreary (Eds.), Handbook of gender research in psychology (pp. 343–357). New York: Springer. Retrieved from http://www.springerlink.com/content/r193k8872152l51k/abstract/.

  • Ruth, J.-E., & Birren, J. E. (1985). Creativity in adulthood and old age: relations to intelligence, sex and mode of testing. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 8(1), 99–109. doi:10.1177/016502548500800107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryman, S. G., van den Heuvel, M. P., Yeo, R. A., Caprihan, A., Carrasco, J., Vakhtin, A. A., … Jung, R. E. (2014). Sex differences in the relationship between white matter connectivity and creativity. NeuroImage, 101, 380–389. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.07.027

  • Sawyer, R. K. (2012). Explaining creativity: The science of human innovation (2 ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxe, R., Carey, S., & Kanwisher, N. (2004). Understanding other minds: linking developmental psychology and functional neuroimaging. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 87–124. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142044.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sayed, E. M., & Mohamed, A. H. H. (2013). Gender differences in divergent thinking: use of the test of creative thinking-drawing production on an Egyptian sample. Creativity Research Journal, 25(2), 222–227. doi:10.1080/10400419.2013.783760.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonton, D. K. (1992). Gender and genius in Japan: feminine eminence in masculine culture. Sex Roles, 27(3–4), 101–119. doi:10.1007/BF00290012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonton, D. K. (1994). Greatness: Who makes history and why. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonton, D. K. (2012). Quantifying creativity: can measures span the spectrum? Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 14(1), 100–104.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Spiers, H. J., & Maguire, E. A. (2007). The neuroscience of remote spatial memory: a tale of two cities. Neuroscience, 149(1), 7–27. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2007.06.056.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, M. I. (1953). Creativity and culture. The Journal of Psychology, 36(2), 311–322. doi:10.1080/00223980.1953.9712897.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, J. S., & Hamann, S. (2012). Sex differences in brain activation to emotional stimuli: a meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies. Neuropsychologia, 50(7), 1578–1593. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.03.011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stoltzfus, G., Nibbelink, B., Vredenburg, D., & Thyrum, E. (2011). Gender, gender role, and creativity. Social Behavior and Personality, 39(3), 425–432. doi:10.2224/sbp.2011.39.3.425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Subotnik, R. F., & Arnold, K. D. (1994). Beyond Terman: contemporary longitudinal studies of giftedness and talent. Norwood: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takeuchi, H., Taki, Y., Hashizume, H., Sassa, Y., Nagase, T., Nouchi, R., & Kawashima, R. (2012). The association between resting functional connectivity and creativity. Cerebral Cortex (New York, N.Y.: 1991), 22(12), 2921–2929. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhr371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takeuchi, H., Taki, Y., Sekiguchi, A., Hashizume, H., Nouchi, R., Sassa, Y., … Kawashima, R. (2015). Mean diffusivity of globus pallidus associated with verbal creativity measured by divergent thinking and creativity-related temperaments in young healthy adults. Human Brain Mapping, 36(5), 1808–1827. doi:10.1002/hbm.22739.

  • Terman, L. M. (1916). The measurement of intelligence; an explanation of and a complete guide for the use of the Stanford revision and extension of the Binet-Simon intelligence scale. Boston: Houghton Mifflin company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torrance, E. P. (1974). Torrance tests of creative thinking. Scholastic Testing Service, Inc.

  • Torrance, E. P., & Haensly, P. A. (2003). Assessment of creativity in children and adolescents. In Handbook of psychological and educational assessment of children: Intelligence, aptitude, and achievement, Volume 1 (2nd ed., pp. 584–607). New York: Guilford Press.

  • Volf, N. V., & Tarasova, I. B. (2013). The influence of reward on the performance of verbal creative tasks: behavioral and EEG effects. Human Physiology, 39(3), 302–308. doi:10.1134/S0362119713020187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallach, M. A., & Kogan, N. (1965). Modes of thinking in young children: a study of the creativity-intelligence distinction. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D. C. (1970). Lone woman: the story of Elizabeth Blackwell, the first woman doctor. Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of Interest

Anna Abraham declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Social, Psychological & Communication Sciences, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK

    Anna Abraham

Authors
  1. Anna Abraham
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna Abraham.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abraham, A. Gender and creativity: an overview of psychological and neuroscientific literature. Brain Imaging and Behavior 10, 609–618 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11682-015-9410-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11682-015-9410-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation