Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Diverging rationalities between forest fire management services and the general public after the 21st-century mega-fires in Greece

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Forestry Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Wildfire risk related to hazards on people and assets is expected to increase in the face of climate change, especially in fire-prone environments such as the Mediterranean Basin. Distinguishing rationalities, i.e., the complex profile of multi-thematic, wildfire-related perceptions that collectively characterize and quantify all of a society’s responses, its interrelations, and influence on its insights, are of primary importance to understand the degree of preparedness and the direction that wildfire management policies are moving. Greece is a country that suffered mega-wildfire events during the first years of the twenty-first century. This paper presents a scheme of advanced multivariate statistical procedures applied on standard social survey questionnaires to uncover different or similar rationalities between fire management services and the general public. Profession-centered versus message-oriented rationalities is defined. They differ mainly on the priorities attributed to strengthening personnel and equipment capacities versus the need for public education and awareness. Both are evaluated against the needs of long-term risk assessment and forest management policies in Greece. The main conclusion is that Greek society, although traumatized by recent fire disasters, is not yet prepared for long-term strategic forestry adaptation and planning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Archibald S, Lehmann CE, Gómez-Dans JL, Bradstock RA (2013) Defining pyromes and global syndromes of fire regimes. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110(16):6442–6447

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Asah ST, Guerry AD, Blahna DJ, Lawler JJ (2014) Perception, acquisition and use of ecosystem services: human behavior, and ecosystem management and policy implications. Ecosyst Serv 10:180–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakhshaii A, Johnson EA (2019) A review of a new generation of wildfire–atmosphere modeling. Can J for Res 49(6):565–574

    Google Scholar 

  • Benayas JR, Martins A, Nicolau JM, Schulz JJ (2007) Abandonment of agricultural land: an overview of drivers and consequences. CAB Rev Perspect Agric Veterinary Sci Nutr Nat Res 2(57):1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Buizer M, Kurz T (2016) Too hot to handle: depoliticisation and the discourse of ecological modernisation in fire management debates. Geoforum 68:48–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Camia A, Durrant T, San-Miguel-Ayanz J (2013) Harmonized Classification Scheme of Fire Causes in the EU Adopted for the European Fire Database of EFFIS. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, p 51

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen W (2008) The prevention of bushfire arson through target hardening. Flinders J Law Reform 10(3):693–713

    Google Scholar 

  • Cozens P, Christensen W (2011) Environmental criminology and the potential for reducing opportunities for bushfire arson. Crime Prev Community Saf 13(2):119–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Darren G, Mallery P (2019) IBM SPSS statistics 26 step by step: a simple guide and reference, Sixteenth. Routledge, New York, USA, p 402

    Google Scholar 

  • De Groot R, Brander L, Van Der Ploeg S, Costanza R, Bernard F, Braat L, Christie M, Crossman N, Ghermandi A, Hein L (2012) Global estimates of the value of ecosystems and their services in monetary units. Ecosyst Serv 1(1):50–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Díaz S, Demissew S, Carabias J, Joly C, Lonsdale M, Ash N, Larigauderie A, Adhikari JR, Arico S, Báldi A (2015) The IPBES Conceptual Framework—connecting nature and people. Current Opinion Environ Sustainability 14:1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas M (1994) Risk and Blame: Essays in Cultural Theory. Routledge, London, UK, p 336

    Google Scholar 

  • EFFIS (2020) European Forest Fire Information System, Joint Research Centre: Forest Fires in Europe, Middle East and North Africa. European Commission, Publications Office, Luxembourg. https://effis.jrc.ec.europa.eu/. Accessed 11 June 2021

  • Field A (2013) Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics, 4th edn. SAGE Publications, p 916

    Google Scholar 

  • Floress K, Huff ES, Snyder SA, Koshollek A, Butler S, Allred SB (2019) Factors associated with family forest owner actions: a vote-count meta-analysis. Landsc Urban Plan 188:19–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldammer J, Xanthopoulos G, Eytixidis G, Mallinis G, Mitsopoulos I, Dimitrakopoulos A (2019) Prospects for the Management of Forest and Landscape Fires in Greece (In Greek). The Global Fire Monitoring Center (GFMC);Secretariat of the Global Wildland Fire Network; UNISDR Wildland Fire Advisory Group; International Wildfire Preparedness Mechanism; International Fire Aviation Working Group, Athens, Greece. 80 p.

  • Hardy CH (2005) Wildland fire hazard and risk: Problems, definition, and context. Ecol Manag 211:73–82

    Google Scholar 

  • IPBES (2019) Summary for policymakers of the global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. The IPBES global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services: Summary for policy makers. Bonn, Germany. 56

  • Kalabokidis KD, Gatzojannis S, Galatsidas S (2002) Introducing wildfire into forest management planning: towards a conceptual approach. For Ecol Manage 158(1–3):41–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalabokidis K, Palaiologou P, Gerasopoulos E, Giannakopoulos C, Kostopoulou E, Zerefos C (2015) Effect of climate change projections on forest fire behavior and values-at-risk in southwestern Greece. Forests 6(6):2214–2240

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline JD, White EM, Fischer AP, Steen-Adams MM, Charnley S, Olsen CS, Spies TA, Bailey JD (2017) Integrating social science into empirical models of coupled human and natural systems. Ecol Soc 22(3):25. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09329-220325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leys B, Higuera PE, McLauchlan KK, Dunnette PV (2016) Wildfires and geochemical change in a subalpine forest over the past six millennia. Environ Res Lett 11(12):125003

    Google Scholar 

  • Loehman RA (2020) Drivers of wildfire carbon emissions. Nat Clim Change 10:1070–1071

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald D, Crabtree JR, Wiesinger G, Dax T, Stamou N, Fleury P, Gutierrez Lazpita J, Gibon A (2000) Agricultural abandonment in mountain areas of Europe: environmental consequences and policy response. J Environ Manage 59(1):47–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Maguire LA, Albright EA (2005) Can behavioral decision theory explain risk-averse fire management decisions? For Ecol Manage 211:47–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Marlon J (2020) What the past can say about the present and future of fire. Quatern Res 96:66–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellon RC, Papanikolau V, Prodromitis G (2009) Locus of control and psychopathology in relation to levels of trauma and loss: Self-reports of Peloponnesian wildfire survivors. J Traum Stress Off Publ Int Soc Traum Stress Studies 22(3):189–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Moriondo M, Good P, Durao R, Bindi M, Giannakopoulos C, Corte-Real J (2006) Potential impact of climate change on fire risk in the Mediterranean area. Climate Res 31:85–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss RH, Edmonds JA, Hibbard KA, Manning MR, Rose SK, Van Vuuren DP, Carter TR, Emori S, Kainuma M, Kram T (2010) The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment. Nature 463(7282):747–756

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen-Pincus M, Moseley C, Gebert K (2014) Job growth and loss across sectors and time in the western US: the impact of large wildfires. Forest Policy Econ 38:199–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira TM, Guiomar N, Baptista FO, Pereira JMC, Claro J (2017) Is Portugal’s forest transition going up in smoke? Land Use Policy 66:214–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Palaiologou P, Ager AA, Nielsen-Pincus M, Evers C, Kalabokidis K (2018) Using transboundary wildfire exposure assessments to improve fire management programs: a case study in Greece. Int J Wildland Fire 27:501–513

    Google Scholar 

  • Palaiologou P, Kalabokidis K, Ager AA, Day MA (2020) Development of comprehensive fuel management strategies for reducing wildfire risk in Greece. Forests 11(8):789

    Google Scholar 

  • Palaiologou P, Kalabokidis K, Ager AA, Galatsidas S, Papalampros L, Day MA (2021a) Spatial optimization and tradeoffs of alternative forest management scenarios in Macedonia. Greece Forests 12(6):697

    Google Scholar 

  • Palaiologou P, Kalabokidis K, Troumbis AY, Day MA, Nielsen-Pincus M, Ager AA (2021b) Socio-ecological perceptions of wildfire management and effects in Greece. Fire 4(2):18. https://doi.org/10.3390/fire4020018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papanastasis VP, Kazaklis A (1998) Land Use Changes and Conflicts in the Mediterranean-Type Ecosystems of Western Crete. In: Rundel PW, Montenegro G, Jaksic FM (eds) Landscape Disturbance and Biodiversity in Mediterranean-Type Ecosystems. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 141–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascual U, Balvanera P, Díaz S, Pataki G, Roth E, Stenseke M, Watson RT, Dessane EB, Islar M, Kelemen E (2017) Valuing nature’s contributions to people: the IPBES approach. Current Opin Environ Sustainability 26:7–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Pituch KA, Stevens JP (2016) Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences: Analyses with SAS and IBM’s SPSS, 6th edn. Routledge, New York, USA, p 814

    Google Scholar 

  • Poljansek K, Casajus Valles A, Marin Ferrer M, De Jager A, Dottori F, Galbusera L, Garcia Puerta B, Giannopoulos G, Girgin S, Hernandez Ceballos MA, Iurlaro G, Karlos V, Krausmann E, Larcher M, Lequarre AS, Theocharidou M, Montero Prieto M, Naumann G, Necci A, Salamon P, Sangiorgi M, Raposo ML, Trueba Alonso C, Tsionis G, Vogt J, Wood M (2019) Recommendations for National Risk Assessment for Disaster Risk Management in EU: Where Science and Policy Meet. JRC Science for Policy Report, European Union, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Psarros C, Theleritis C, Kokras N, Lyrakos D, Koborozos A, Kakabakou O, Tzanoulinos G, Katsiki P, Bergiannaki JD (2018) Personality characteristics and individual factors associated with PTSD in firefighters one month after extended wildfires. Nord J Psychiatry 72(1):17–23

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Purnomo H, Shantiko B, Sitorus S, Gunawan H, Achdiawan R, Kartodihardjo H, Dewayani AA (2017) Fire economy and actor network of forest and land fires in Indonesia. Forest Policy Econ 78:21–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Rius D, Vannière B, Galop D (2012) Holocene history of fire, vegetation and land use from the central Pyrenees (France). Quatern Res 77(1):54–64

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez-Franco C, Haan TJ (2015) Understanding climate change perceptions, attitudes, and needs of forest service resource managers. J Sustain for 34(5):423–444

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruane AC, Antle J, Elliott J, Folberth C, Hoogenboom G, Croz DM-D, Müller C, Porter C, Phillips MM, Raymundo RM (2018) Biophysical and economic implications for agriculture of+ 1.5 and+ 2.0 C global warming using AgMIP Coordinated Global and Regional Assessments. Climate Res 76(1):17–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Sallares R (1991) The ecology of the ancient Greek world. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, p 598

    Google Scholar 

  • Shindler B, Spies T, Bolte J, Kline J (2017) Integrating ecological and social knowledge: learning from CHANS research. Ecol Soc 22(1):26. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08776-220126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinführer A (2015) Citizens wanted. Changing roles in the provision of public services in rural areas. Spatial Res Planning 73(1):5–16

    Google Scholar 

  • St-Laurent GP, Hagerman S, Kozak R (2018) What risks matter? Public views about assisted migration and other climate-adaptive reforestation strategies. Clim Change 151(3):573–587

    Google Scholar 

  • St-Laurent GP, Hagerman S, Findlater KM, Kozak R (2019) Public trust and knowledge in the context of emerging climate-adaptive forestry policies. J Environ Manage 242:474–486

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan GM, Artino ARJ (2013) Analyzing and interpreting data from Likert-type scales. J Grad Med Educ 5(4):541

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Tedim F, Leone V, Coughlan M, Bouillon C, Xanthopoulos G, Royé D, Correia FJ, Ferreira C (2020) Extreme wildfire events: the definition. In: Extreme Wildfire Events and Disasters. Elsevier, pp 3–29

  • Troumbis AY (2021) Imbalances in attitudes of European citizens towards biodiversity: Did the communication of the European Biodiversity Strategy work? Journal for Nature Conservation (in press)

  • Troumbis AY, Hatziantoniou MN (2018) Too much, too fast, too complex or too strange? Asymmetric sequences in public opinion regarding biodiversity conservation in Island social-ecological setups. Biodivers Conserv 27(6):1403–1418

    Google Scholar 

  • Troumbis AY, Zevgolis Y (2020) Biodiversity crime and economic crisis: Hidden mechanisms of misuse of ecosystem goods in Greece. Land Use Policy 99:105061

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2019a) Special Eurobarometer 481: Attitudes of Europeans towards Biodiversity. European Union. p 18. https://ec.europa.eu/clima/sites/clima/files/support/docs/report_2019_en.pdf. Accessed 11 June 2021

  • European Commission (2019b) Special Eurobarometer 490: Climate Change. European Union. p 130. https://ec.europa.eu/clima/sites/clima/files/support/docs/report_2019_en.pdf. Accessed 11 June 2021

  • UNISDR (2009) UNISDR terminology on disaster risk reduction. United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction, Geneva, Switzerland. p 30.

Download references

Funding

No funding received for this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Environment, University of the Aegean, 81100, Mytilene, Lesvos Island, Greece

    Andreas Y. Troumbis

  2. Department of Geography, University of the Aegean, 81100, Mytilene, Lesvos Island, Greece

    Kostas Kalabokidis & Palaiologos Palaiologou

Authors
  1. Andreas Y. Troumbis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kostas Kalabokidis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Palaiologos Palaiologou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

AYT, KK and PP are the contributors to this research (from conception to submission).

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andreas Y. Troumbis.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declared that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

No ethical issues (experimentation on humans and/or animals) to this work

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The online version is available at http://www.springerlink.com

Corresponding editor: Yu Lei

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Troumbis, A.Y., Kalabokidis, K. & Palaiologou, P. Diverging rationalities between forest fire management services and the general public after the 21st-century mega-fires in Greece. J. For. Res. 33, 553–564 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-021-01371-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-021-01371-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation