Abstract
J. Benjamin Hurlbut’s book Experiments in Democracy: Human Embryo Research and the Politics of Bioethics is an historiographical analysis of the American debate over embryo research. It covers more than four decades of this debate and uses key actors, bodies, and events as empirical evidence for its analysis. At a first glance, it might seem like a book that tells a story, but Experiments in Democracy is much more than that. Hurlbut uses the chapters of this narrative as case studies through which to examine practices of deliberative democracy and the role played by scientists and ethicists in the deliberative processes concerning embryo research and the governance thereof.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Notes
A very interesting attempt to do so is notably the work of Philip Kitcher in Science, Truth, and Democracy (Kitcher 2001).
References
Hurlbut, J.B. 2017. Experiments in democracy: Human embryo research and the politics of bioethics. New York: Columbia University Press.
Jasanoff, S., J.B. Hurlbut, and K. Saha. 2015. CRISPR democracy: Gene editing and the need for inclusive deliberation. Issues in Science and Technology 32(1): 37–49.
Kitcher, P. 2001. Science, truth, and democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
Wilson, D. 2014. The making of British bioethics. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cavaliere, G. Disciplining Bioethics: The Debate Over Human Embryo Research. Bioethical Inquiry 15, 163–165 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-017-9830-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-017-9830-9