Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of the rise of water level in the typical catchments, Three Gorges Reservoir area

Journal of Mountain Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Water level is an important index for studying hydrologic processes. Water level rise processes were studied in three catchments (catchment I, II, III in Chen Jiagou watershed in the Three Gorge Reservoir Area) with different areas to provide useful information to inform data extension from a gauged-catchment to an ungauged catchment. The results showed that there are seasonal changes in the dominant driving mode of the rise of the water level. The rise of the water level in March is likely mainly driven by the mode of stored-full runoff, and in September or October, it is mainly driven by Horton-flow. The correlation coefficients of all indexes were significant among the three catchments, suggesting that these catchments have similarities and that water level data extension is likely to be completed successfully between the large catchment (III-Catchment) and the small catchment (I-Catchment). It was confirmed that there is good similarity between the 0.6 km2 and 6 km2 catchments, and the data correlation is good between the catchments with the area differences in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area. In addition, the rise processes of the water level in the catchments were not only different under the same rain conditions, but this difference could also change with the rain condition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bozzi S, Passoni G, Bernardara P, et al. (2015) Roughness and Discharge Uncertainty in 1D Water Level Calculations. Environmental Modeling & Assessment 20(4): 343–353. DOI: 10.1007/s10666-014-9430-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bressiani DD, Gassman PW, Fernandes JG, et al. (2015) Review of Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) applications in Brazil: Challenges and prospects. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering 8(3):9–35. DOI: 10.3965/j.ijabe.20150803.1765

    Google Scholar 

  • China MWRPRC (1991) Standard for water level observation (GBJ138-90). China Planning Press, Beijing. (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • China MWRPRC (2006) Standard for precipitation observation (SL21-2006). China Water & Power Press, Beijing. (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • de Vente J, Poesen J (2005) Predicting soil erosion and sediment yield at the basin scale: Scale issues and semiquantitative models. Earth-Science Reviews 71(1-2): 95–125. DOI: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2005.02.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Didszun J, Uhlenbrook S (2008) Scaling of dominant runoff generation processes: Nested catchments approach using multiple tracers. Water Resources Research 44(2): 1–15. DOI: 10.1029/2006WR005242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groisman PY, Knight RW, Karl TR, et al. (2004) Contemporary changes of the hydrological cycle over the contiguous United States: Trends derived from in situ observations. Journal of Hydrometeorology 5: 64–85. DOI: 10.1175/1525-7541(2004) 005<0064:CCOTHC>2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hrachowitz M, Savenije HHG, Bloschl G, et al. (2013) A decade of Predictions in Ungauged Basins (PUB) a review. Hydrological Sciences Journal-Journal Des Sciences Hydrologiques 58(6): 1198–1255. DOI: 10.1080/02626667.2013.803183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kokkonen T, Koivusalo H, Karvonen T, et al. (2004) Exploring streamflow response to effective rainfall across event magnitude scale. Hydrological Processes 18(8): 1467–1486. DOI: 10.1002/hyp.1423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee G, Tachikawa Y, Sayama T, et al. (2012) Catchment responses to plausible parameters and input data under equifinality in distributed rainfall-runoff modeling. Hydrological Processes 26(6): 893–906. DOI: 10.1002/hyp.8303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li R, Zhu AX, LI B, et al. (2011) Response of simulated stream flow to soil data spatial detail across different routing areas. Progress in Geography 30(1): 80–86. DOI: 1007-6301(2011)30:1<80:LYSWMX>2.0.TX;2-C. (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Montanari A (2012) Hydrology of the Po River: looking for changing patterns in river discharge. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 16(10): 3739–3747. DOI: 10.5194/hess-16-3739-2012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery DR, Dietrich WE, Torres R, et al. (1997) Hydrologic response of a steep, unchanneled valley to natural and applied rainfall. Water Resources Research 33(1): 91–109. DOI: 10.1029/96WR02985

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ni J (2005) Effects of Spatial Scale and Scaling on Soil and Water Loss in Three Gorges Reservoir Area. Collage of Resources and Environment. PhD thesis, Southwest Agricultural University (Now, Southwest University), Chongqing, China, p 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reggiani P, Sivapalan M, Hassanizadeh SM (2000) Conservation equations governing hillslope responses: Exploring the physical basis of water balance. Water Resources Research 36(7): 1845–1863. DOI: 10.1029/2000WR900066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheffield J, Wood EF (2008) Global trends and variability in soil moisture and drought characteristics, 1950-2000, from observation-driven Simulations of the terrestrial hydrologic cycle. Journal of Climate 21(3): 432–458. DOI: 10.1175/2007JCLI1822.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sivapalan M, Grayson R, Woods R (2004) Scale and scaling in hydrology. Hydrological Processes 18(8): 1369–1371. DOI: 10.1002/hyp.1417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smajstrla AG (1990) Technical Manual: Agricultural field scale irrigation requirements simulation (AFSIRS) model. Agricultural Engineering Department, University of Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith JA, Miller AJ, Baeck ML, et al. (2005) Extraordinary flood response of a small urban watershed to short-duration convective rainfall. Journal of Hydrometeorology 6(5): 599–617. DOI: 10.1175/JHM426.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Gaalen JF, Kruse S, Lafrenz WB, et al. (2013) Predicting Water Table Response to Rainfall Events, Central Florida. Ground Water 51(3): 350–362. DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2012.00970.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuan YJ, Zeng GM, Liang J, et al. (2015) Variation of water level in Dongting Lake over a 50-year period:Implications for the impacts of anthropogenic and climatic factors. Journal of Hydrology 525: 450–456. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.04.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahabiyoun B, Goodarzi MR, Bavani ARM, et al. (2013) Assessment of Climate Change Impact on the Gharesou River Basin Using SWAT Hydrological Model. Clean-Soil Air Water 41(6): 601–609. DOI: 10.1002/clen.201100652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J, Dong H, Na N, et al. (2008) Comparison of rainfallrunoff process in watersheds under different scales on the loess area in western Shanxi Province, northern China Journal of Beijing Forestry University 30(2): 106–112. DOI: 1000-1522(2008)30:2<106:JXHTQB>2.0.TX;2-Y. (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiao-yong Liao.

Additional information

http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0521-7498

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3556-635X

http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8281-745X

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7785-7710

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sun, Hy., Liao, Xy., Xia, Zm. et al. Comparison of the rise of water level in the typical catchments, Three Gorges Reservoir area. J. Mt. Sci. 13, 715–724 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-014-3331-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-014-3331-7

Keywords

Navigation