Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Identifying Hospital Cost Savings Opportunities by Optimizing Surgical Approach for Distal Pancreatectomy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery Aims and scope

Abstract

Background

The economic implications of relevant clinicopathologic factors on the surgical approach to distal pancreatectomy (DP) should be clearly defined and understood to potentially allow the implementation of cost reduction strategies.

Methods

Administrative and clinical datasets of patients undergoing a DP between 2012 and 2016 were merged and queried. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify clinicopathologic predictors of cost differentials for minimally invasive DP (MIDP) relative to open DP (ODP). Time trends in cost were also assessed to identify opportunities for cost containment.

Results

Among two hundred and twenty five patients, 128 underwent an ODP (57%) and 97 a MIDP (43%). The DP groups were comparable with regard to relevant perioperative and disease characteristics. Total hospitalization and total OR costs for MIDP were significantly lower (− 12%, P = 0.0048) and higher (+ 16%, P < 0.0001) respectively, compared to ODP. On univariate analysis, age > 60 (− 12%, P = 0.0262), BMI > 25 (− 10%, P = 0.0222), ASA class ≥ 3 (− 11%, P = 0.0045), OpTime > 230 min (− 16%, P = 0.0004), and T stage ≥ 3 (− 8%, P = 0.0452) were associated with decreased total costs after MIDP compared to ODP. Linear regression analysis revealed that BMI > 25 (Estimate − 0.31, SE 0.15, P = 0.0482), ASA class ≥ 3 (Estimate − 0.36, SE 0.17, P = 0.0344), and T stage ≥ 3 (Estimate − 0.57, SE 0.26, P = 0.0320) were associated with decreased hospitalization costs after MIDP compared to ODP. Overtime, total hospitalization cost for MIDP increased from − 21 to 1% (P = 0.0197), while OR costs for MIDP decreased from + 41% to − 2% (P = 0.0049), nearly equalizing the cost differences between ODP and MIDP.

Conclusions

Relevant clinicopathologic factors predicted decreased hospitalization costs after MIDP relative to ODP. In equivalent stages of disease, optimizing the surgical approach to DP based on specific clinicopathologic characteristics may afford significant cost-saving opportunities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Vollmer CM, Pratt W, Vanounou T, Maithel SK, Callery MP. Quality assessment in high-acuity surgery: volume and mortality are not enough. Arch Surg 2007;142(4):371–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kennedy EP, Rosato EL, Sauter PK, Rosenberg LM, Doria C, Marino IR, Chojnacki KA, Berger AC, Yeo CJ. Initiation of a critical pathway for pancreaticoduodenectomy at an academic institution–the first step in multidisciplinary team building. J Am Coll Surg 2007;204(5):917–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Vanounou T, Pratt W, Fischer JE, Vollmer CM, Callery MP. Deviation-based cost modeling: a novel model to evaluate the clinical and economic impact of clinical pathways. J AmColl Surg 2007;204:570–9.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kooby, Gillespie, Bentrem, Nakeeb, Schmidt, Merchant, . . . Hawkins. (2008). Left-sided Pancreatectomy: A Multicenter Comparison of Laparoscopic and Open Approaches. Annals of Surgery, 248(3), 438–446.

  5. Kooby, Hawkins, Schmidt, Weber, Bentrem, Gillespie, . . . Lillemoe. (2010). A Multicenter Analysis of Distal Pancreatectomy for Adenocarcinoma: Is Laparoscopic Resection Appropriate?. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 210(5), 779–785.

  6. Venkat REB, Schulick RD, Lidor AO, Makary MA, Wolfgang CL. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy is associated with significantly less overall morbidity compared to the open technique: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 2012; 255:1048–1059.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Nigri, Rosman, Petrucciani, Fancellu, Pisano, Zorcolo, & Melis (2010). Meta-Analysis of Trials Comparing Minimally-Invasive and Open Distal Pancreatectomy. Journal of Surgical Research, 158(2), 383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jin, T., Altaf, K., Xiong, J., Huang, W., Javed, M., Mai, G., . . . Xia, Q. (2012). A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing laparoscopic and open distal pancreatectomy. HPB, 14(11), 711–724.

  9. Jusoh AC, Ammori BJ. Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy: a systematic review of comparative studies. Surg Endosc 2012; 26:904–913.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Xourafas D, Tavakkoli A, Clancy TE, Ashley SW. Distal pancreatic resection for neuroendocrine tumors: Is laparoscopic really better than open?. J Gastrointest Surg 2015; 19(5):831–840.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Tiwari MM, Reynoso JF, High R, Tsang AW, Oleynikov D. Safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of common laparoscopic procedures. Surg Endosc 2011; 25:1127–1135.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Limongelli, Paolo, Belli, Andrea, Russo, Gianluca, Cioffi, Luigi, D’Agostino, Alberto, Fantini, Corrado, & Belli, Giulio. (2012). Laparoscopic and open surgical treatment of left-sided pancreatic lesions: Clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness analysis. Surgical Endoscopy, 26(7), 1830–1836.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Abu Hilal M, Hamdan M, Di Fabio F, Pearce NW, Johnson CD. Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy: a clinical and costeffectiveness study. Surg Endosc 2012; 26:1670–1674.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Fox, A., Pitzul, M., Bhojani, K., Kaplan, F., Moulton, M., Wei, C., . . . Okrainec, I. (2012). Comparison of outcomes and costs between laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy and open resection at a single center. Surgical Endoscopy, 26(5), 1220–1230.

  15. Eom BW, Jang JY, Lee SE, Han HS, Yoon YS, Kim SW. Clinical outcomes compared between laparoscopic and open distal pancreatectomy. Surg Endosc 2008; 22:1334–1338.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Waters, Canal, Wiebke, Dumas, Beane, Aguilar-Saavedra, . . . Schmidt. (2010). Robotic distal pancreatectomy: Cost effective?. Surgery, 148(4), 814–823.

  17. Rutz, D., Squires, M., Maithel, S., Sarmiento, J., Etra, J., Perez, S., . . . Kooby, D. (2014). Cost comparison analysis of open versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. HPB, 16(10), 907–914.

  18. Chen, Hai-Ning, Chen, Xin-Zu, Zhang, Wei-Han, Yang, Kun, Chen, Xiao-Long, Zhang, Bo, . . . Hu, Jian-Kun. (2015). The Impact of Body Mass Index on the Surgical Outcomes of Patients With Gastric Cancer: A 10-Year, Single-Institution Cohort Study. Medicine,94(42), E1769.

  19. Sabzi F, Faraji R. Effect of Body Mass Index on Postoperative Complications in Beating Coronary Artery Surgery. Ethiopian Journal of Health Sciences. 2016;26(6):509–516.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. S S Zhang, H Yang, K J Luo, Q Y Huang, J Y Chen, F Yang, J H Fu. (2013). The impact of body mass index on complication and survival in resected esophageal cancer: A clinical-based cohort and meta-analysis. British Journal of Cancer,109(11), 2894–2903.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Damania R, Cocieru A. Impact of enhanced recovery after surgery protocols on postoperative morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing routine hepatectomy: review of the current evidence. Annals of Translational Medicine. 2017;5(17):341.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Partelli, Crippa, Castagnani, Ruffo, Marmorale, Franconi, . . . Falconi. (2016). Evaluation of an enhanced recovery protocol after pancreaticoduodenectomy in elderly patients. HPB, 18(2), 153–158.

  23. Kagedan, D., Ahmed, M., Devitt, K., & Wei, A. (2015). Enhanced recovery after pancreatic surgery: A systematic review of the evidence. HPB, 17(1), 11–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Intuitive SIW, the Free Encyclopedia. [Last accessed on 2015 Sep 10]. Available from: http://www.enwikipedia.org/wiki/Intuitive_Surgical.

  25. Peter Van Dam, Jan Hauspy, Luc Verkinderen, Xuan Bich Trinh, Pieter-Jan Van Dam, Luc Van Looy, & Luc Dirix. (2011). Are Costs of Robot-Assisted Surgery Warranted for Gynecological Procedures?. Obstetrics and Gynecology International, 2011(2011), 103–108.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Heemskerk J, Bouvy ND, Baeten CG. The end of robot-assisted laparoscopy? A critical appraisal of scientific evidence on the use of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc. 2014;28:1388–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Albani JM, Lee DI. Virtual reality-assisted robotic surgery simulation. J Endourol. 2007;21:285–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Iavazzo C, Papadopoulou EK, Gkegkes ID. Cost assessment of robotics in gynecologic surgery: A systematic review. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2014;40:2125–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis St., Boston, MA, 02115, USA

    Dimitrios Xourafas, Thomas E. Clancy & Stanley W. Ashley

  2. Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA

    Dimitrios Xourafas, Jordan M. Cloyd & Timothy M. Pawlik

Authors
  1. Dimitrios Xourafas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jordan M. Cloyd
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Thomas E. Clancy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Timothy M. Pawlik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Stanley W. Ashley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

D. Xourafas, J. M. Cloyd, T. E. Clancy, T. M. Pawlik, and S.W. Ashley have contributed to the design, analysis, interpretation of data, and drafting of the manuscript. All authors have approved the final version of the manuscript and are accountable for all aspects of the work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dimitrios Xourafas.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

All authors have no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xourafas, D., Cloyd, J.M., Clancy, T.E. et al. Identifying Hospital Cost Savings Opportunities by Optimizing Surgical Approach for Distal Pancreatectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 23, 1172–1179 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-018-4002-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-018-4002-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation