Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The cost of complying with human rights treaties: The convention on the rights of the child and basic immunization

  • Published:
The Review of International Organizations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The determinants of compliance with human rights treaties likely vary according to the right in question, yet heterogeneity in the pathways through which ratification affects various human rights outcomes has received limited attention. This paper first develops an account of treaty compliance that incorporates the intrinsic benefits to the state of compliance, regime costs associated with certain rights, the political costs that NGOs, judges, and others are able to impose for non-compliance, and the fiscal and economic costs of compliance. The paper argues that for child survival rights, fiscal and economic costs are likely to be dispositive, and that as a result richer countries are more likely to comply. The paper then uses an instrumental variable approach to investigate whether ratification of the Convention of the Rights of the Child was associated with stronger effort at the country level on child survival rights. It finds that ratification of the CRC was correlated with a subsequent increase in immunization rates, but only in upper middle and high income countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Conversations with World Bank staff working on immunization, November 2010.

  2. http://www.crin.org/NGOGroup/about/WorkingGroups/

  3. The one declaration related to health was from Singapore, which held that “The Republic of Singapore considers that articles 19 and 37 of the Convention do not prohibit . . . (b) measures and restrictions which are prescribed by law and which are necessary in the interests of national security, public safety, public order, the protection of public health or the protection of the rights and freedoms of others. . .” In other words, the declaration indicated Singapore’s desire to place an even higher priority on child survival rights, relative to other rights of the child, than does the Convention. See http://treaties.un.org/Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-11&chapter=4&lang=en#EndDec

  4. http://www.unicef.org/wsc/plan.htm#Child

  5. The State Party Reports from the first session of the Committee on the Rights of the Child are available at http://tb.ohchr.org/default.aspx?Symbol=CRC/C/3/Add.2

  6. Other control variables, such as NGOs or other civil society participation in the CRC, state conflict, and judicial independence, were considered; but these were ultimately not included because of the number of missing observations. Sample sizes would have fallen significantly, particularly for the sub-samples split by income level, which are crucial for the approach taken here.

References

  • Boerma, J. T., & Macro Systems. Institute for Resource Development. Demographic and Health Surveys. (1990). Immunization: Levels, trends, and differentials. Columbia, Md., USA: Institute for Resource Development/Macro Systems.

  • Chayes, A., & Chayes, A. H. (1993). On compliance. International Organization, 47(2), 175–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chau, N. H., & Kanbur, R. (2001). The adoption of international labor standards conventions: Who, when and why? Brookings Trade Forum, 113–156.

  • Collier, P. (2007). The bottom billion: Why the poorest countries are failing and what can be done about it. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desai, S., & Alva, S. (1998). Maternal education and child health: Is there a strong causal relationship? Demography, 35(1), 71–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehreth, J. (2003). The global value of vaccination. Vaccine, 21(7–8), 596–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gauri, V., & Brinks, D. M. (2008). Courting social justice: Judicial enforcement of social and economic rights in the developing world. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gauri, V., & Khaleghian, P. (2002). Immunization in developing countries: Its political and institutional determinants. World Development, 30(12), 2109–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodliffe, J., & Hawkins, D. G. (2008). Explaining commitment: States and the convention against torture. The Journal of Politics, 68(02), 358–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, R., & Jinks, D. (2005). International law and state socialization: Conceptual, empirical, and normative challenges. Duke Law Journal, 54(4), 983–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hafner-Burton, E. M. (2008). Sticks and stones: Naming and shaming the human rights enforcement problem. International Organization, 62(4), 689–716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hathaway, O. (2002). Do human rights treaties make a difference? Yale Law Journal, 111(8), 1935–2042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helfer, L. R., & Slaughter, A. M. (1997). Toward a theory of effective supranational adjudication. Yale Law Journal, 107(2), 273–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herbst, JI. (2000). States and power in Africa: Comparative lessons in authority and control: Princeton Univ Pr.

  • Koh, H. H. (1999). How is international human rights law enforced? Indiana Law Journal, 74(4), 1397–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krasner, S.D. (1993). Sovereignty, regimes, and human rights. Regime theory and international relations:pp 139–167.

  • La Porta, R., Lopez-De-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). Legal determinants of external finance. Journal of finance, 52(3), 1131–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landman, T. (2005). Protecting human rights: A comparative study. Washington: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langford, M. (2009). Social rights jurisprudence: Emerging trends in comparative and international law. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeBlanc, L. J. (1995). The convention on the rights of the child: United Nations lawmaking on human rights. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macq, J., Ferrinho, P., De Brouwere, V., & Van Lerberghe, W. (2001). Managing health services in developing countries: between ethics of the civil servant and the need for moonlighting: managing and moonlighting. Hum Res Health Dev J, 5, 17–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, R. T., Ramachandran, S., & Xu, Z. Y. (2000). The introduction of new vaccines into developing countries II. Vaccine financing. Vaccine, 18(24), 2625–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neumayer, E. (2005). Do international human rights treaties improve respect for human rights? Journal of Conflict Resolution, 49(6), 925–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, E. J., & Staton, J. K. (2009). Domestic judicial institutions and human rights treaty violation. International Studies Quarterly, 53(1), 149–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prasad, E. S., Rajan, R. G., & Subramanian, A. (2007). Foreign capital and economic growth. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research. In NBER working paper; no. 13619.

    Google Scholar 

  • Risse, T., Ropp, S. C., & Sikkink, K. (1999). The power of human rights: International norms and domestic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, B. A. (2009). Mobilizing for human rights: International law in domestic politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Susanti, B. (2008). The implementation of the rights to health care and education in Indonesia. In V. Gauri & D. M. Brinks (Eds.), Courting social justice: Judicial enforcement of social and economic rights in the developing world. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNICEF. (1996). Sustainability of achievements: Lessons learned from universal child immunization: Report of a steering committee. New York: UNICEF.

  • World Health Organization. Dept. of Vaccines and Other Biologicals. (1999). Informal meeting on issues of immunization data and monitoring/management of adverse events: Geneva, 17-20 November 1998. Geneva: World Health Organization.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Varun Gauri.

Additional information

I would like to thank Afroza Chowdhury, Jessica Wintfeld, and Brett Stark for fine research assistance; and Beth King, Nita Rudra, Hans Peter Schmitz, Erik Voeten, Jim Vreeland, participants at the Political Economy of International Organizations meeting (Monte Verità 2008), and three anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions. The views and findings of this paper are those of the author alone and do not necessarily reflect those of the World Bank or its Executive Directors.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Esm 1

(DO 6 kb)

Esm 2

(DTA 2138 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gauri, V. The cost of complying with human rights treaties: The convention on the rights of the child and basic immunization. Rev Int Organ 6, 33–56 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-010-9100-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-010-9100-7

Keywords

JEL codes

Navigation