Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluating Multiple Diagnostic Tools for Monitoring In-season Nitrogen Status of Chipping Potatoes in the Upper Midwest of the USA

  • Published:
Potato Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Potato production requires intensive nitrogen (N) fertilization. To maintain yield and profitability, potato farmers must satisfy the need of the crops for N by applying fertilizer during the growing season. Petiole nitrate analysis and whole leaf total N test have been studied before to guide in-season N application, and both have strengths and weaknesses. Whole vine total N test has been discussed by the US potato industry as another diagnostic tool to understand the overall N uptake of the plant, but little data are available. A 2-year field study was conducted at the University of Wisconsin Hancock Agricultural Research Station in 2018 and 2019 with the objective to compare three diagnostic tools, petiole nitrate analysis, whole leaf total N test and whole vine total N test, for identifying the nutrient status of two chipping potato cultivars subjected to five different N rates. It was found that petiole nitrate analysis is still the most responsive method to reflect supplemental N application during the growing season and is the most relevant to final tuber yield. Whole leaf total N test is less responsive, but it can reflect plant N uptake up to the date of testing. Comparatively, whole vine total N test is not acceptable because of the excessive amount of time needed to collect and process the samples, and the concern over whether or not the sample tested in the last step of analysis is representative. Future diagnostic tools using cutting-edge remote sensing and machine learning technologies that can detect spatial variability should be developed to further enhance the effectiveness of in-season N monitoring, which is critical for sustainable potato production.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

N:

Nitrogen

GDD:

Growing degree days

DAE:

Days after emergence

References

  • Belanger G, Walsh JR, Richards JE, Milburn PH, Ziadi N (2003) Critical petiole nitrate concentration of two processing potato cultivars in Eastern Canada. Am J Potato Res 80:251–262

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brink PP, Combrink NJJ, Knight FH (2002) Evaluation of petiole nitrate measurement as an aid for N fertilisation of potatoes (Solanum tuberosum L.) on sandy soils. S Afr J Plant Soil 19:1–7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Colquhoun JB, Chapman SA, Gevens AJ, Groves RL, Heider DJ, Jensen BM, Nice GRW, Ruark MD, Wang Y (2020) Commercial vegetable production in Wisconsin. Madison: University of Wisconsin Extension. (Available at https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0145/8808/4272/files/A3422-2021.pdf. Accessed 13 April, 2020)

  • Giletto CM, Reussi Calvo NI, Sandana P, Echeverria HE, Belanger G (2020) Shoot- and tuber-based critical nitrogen dilution curves for the prediction of the N status in potato. Eur J Agron 119:126114

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gojon A (2017) Nitrogen nutrition in plants: rapid progress and new challenges. J Exp Bot 68:2457–2462

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haverkort AJ, van de Waart M (1994) Yield and leaf nitrate concentration of start potato on sandy humic soils supplied with varying amounts of starter and supplemental nitrogen fertilizer. Eur J Agron 3:29–41

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins B, Stark J (2010) Potato Nutrition. In: Bohl W, Johnson S (eds) Commercial potato production in North America. America. Second Revision of American Potato Journal Supplement Volume 57 and USDA Handbook 267. Available at https://potatoassociation.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/A_ProductionHandbook_Final_000.pdf. Accessed 17 Jun 2019

  • Kaiser DE, Rosen CJ (2018) Understanding plant analysis for crops. University of Minnesota Extension. (Available at extension.umn.edu/testing-and-analysis/understanding-plant-analysis-crops. Accessed 20 June, 2019)

  • Kleinkopf GE, Westermann DT, Wille MJ, Kleinschmidt GD (1987) Specific gravity of Russet Burbank potatoes. Am Potato J 64:579–587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kniffin M, Potter K, Bussan AJ, Colquhoun JB, Bradbury K (2014) Sustaining Central Sands water resources - state of the science 2014. University of Wisconsin - Extension publication G4058. Available at https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0145/8808/4272/files/G4058.pdf. Accessed 20 Jun 2019

  • Laboski CAM, Peters JB (2012) Nutrient application guidelines for field, vegetable, and fruit crops in Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin - Extension publication A2809. Available at https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0145/8808/4272/files/A2809.pdf. Accessed 22 Jun 2019

  • Lawlor D, Lemaire G, Gastal F (2001) Nitrogen, plant growth and crop yield. In: Lea PJ, Morot-Gaudry JF (eds) Plant Nitrogen. Springer, Berlin, pp 343–367

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Leghari S, Wahocho N, Laghari G, HafeezLaghari A, MustafaBahabhan G, HussainTalpur K, Bhutto T, Wahocho S, Lashari A (2016) Role of nitrogen for plant growth and development: a review. Adv Environ Biol 10:209–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Li B, Xu X, Zhang L, Han J, Bian C, Li G, Liu J, Jin L (2020) Above-ground biomass estimation and yield prediction in potato by using UAV-based RGB and hyperspectral imaging. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 162:161–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu N, Townsend PA, Naber MR, Bethke PC, Hills WB, Wang Y (2021) Hyperspectral imagery to monitor crop nutrient status within and across growing seasons. Remote Sens Environ 255:112303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markus DK, McKinnon JP, Buccafuri AF (1985) Automated analysis of nitrite, nitrate, and ammonium nitrogen in soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 49:1208–1215

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meisinger J (2008) Soil nitrogen budgets. In: Schepers J, Raun W (eds) Nitrogen in agricultural systems. Agronomy Monograph 49. ASA, CSSA, and SSSA, Madison, pp 505–562

    Google Scholar 

  • Mihovilovich E, Carli C, De Mendiburu F, Hualla V, Bonierbale M (2014) Tuber bulking maturity assessment of elite and advanced potato clones protocol. International Potato Center, Lima, p 43 (Available at http://cipotato.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/006162-2.pdf. Accessed 1 July, 2020)

    Google Scholar 

  • Morier T, Cambouris AN, Chokmani K (2015) In-season nitrogen status assessment and yield estimation using hyperspectral vegetation indices in a potato crop. Agron J 107:1295–1309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neshev N, Manolov I (2015) Content and uptake of nutrients with plant biomass of potatoes depending on potassium fertilizer. Agric Agric Sci Procedia 6:63–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Nigon TJ (2012) Aerial imagery and other non-invasive approaches to detect nitrogen and water stress in a potato crop. Dissertation, University of Minnesota

  • Nigon TJ, Mulla DJ, Rosen CJ, Cohen Y, Alchanatis V, Knight J, Rud R (2015) Hyperspectral aerial imagery for detecting nitrogen stress in two potato cultivars. Comput Electron Agric 112:36–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noguero M, Lacombe B (2016) Transporters involved in root nitrate update and sensing by Arabidopsis. Front Plant Sci 7:1391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O'Brien JA, Vega A, Bouguyon E, Krouk G, Gojon A, Coruzzi G, Gutierrez RA (2016) Nitrate transport, sensing, and responses in plants. Mol Plant 9:837–856

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson TC, Stott PA, Herring S (2012) Explaining extreme events of 2011 from a climate perspective. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 93:1041–1067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson A (2020) Fertilizing potato in North Dakota. (Available at https://www.ag.ndsu.edu/publications/crops/fertilizing-potato-in-north-dakota. Accessed 2 July, 2020)

  • Rosen CJ (2018) Potato fertilization on irrigated soils. (Available at https://extension.umn.edu/crop-specific-needs/potato-fertilization-irrigated-soils. Accessed 2 July, 2020)

  • Rosen CJ, Bierman PM (2008) Best management practices for nitrogen use: irrigated potatoes. Publication 08559. University of Minnesota Extension Service, St Paul (Available at https://conservancy.umn.edu/bitstream/handle/11299/198232/n-bmps-irrigated-potatoes-2008.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y. Accessed 2 July, 2020)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sands PJ, Hackett C, Nix HA (1979) A model of the development and bulking of potatoes (Solanum tuberosum L.). I. Derivation from well-managed field crops. Field Crop Res 2:309–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun L, Gu L, Peng X, Liu Y, Li X, Yan X (2012) Effects of nitrogen fertilizer application time on dry matter accumulation and yield and Chinese potato variety KX13. Potato Res 55:303–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornton PK, Ericksen PJ, Herrero M, Challinor AJ (2014) Climate variability and vulnerability to climate change: a review. Glob Chang Biol 20:3313–3328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of Agriculture National Agricultural Statistics Service (2019) Wisconsin Ag News - Potatoes. (Available at https://www.nass.usda.gov/Statistics_by_State/Wisconsin/Publications/Crops/2019/WI-Potatoes-09-19.pdf. Accessed 1 July, 2020)

  • University of Wisconsin Soil and Forage Lab (2007) Lab procedures and methods. (Available at https://uwlab.webhosting.cals.wisc.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/17/2015/10/potato_N.pdf. Accessed July 1 2020)

  • Westcott MP, Stewart VR, Lund RE (1991) Critical petiole nitrate levels in potato. Agron J 83:844–850

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wisconsin Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection (2020) Wisconsin Agricultural Statistics. (Available at https://datcp.wi.gov/Pages/Publications/WIAgStatistics.aspx. Accessed 1 July, 2020)

  • Wolkowski RP, Kelling KA, Bundy LG (1995) Nitrogen management on sandy soils. University of Wisconsin - Extension publication A3634. Available at https://soilsextension.webhosting.cals.wisc.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/68/2014/02/A3634.pdf. Accessed 22 Jun 2019

  • Wu J, Wang D, Rosen CJ, Bauer ME (2007) Comparison of petiole nitrate concentrations, SPAD chlorophyll readings, and QuickBird satellite imagery in detecting nitrogen status of potato canopies. Field Crop Res 101:96–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaeen AA, Sharma L, Jasim A, Bali S, Buzza A, Alyokhin A (2020) In-season potato yield prediction with active optical sensors. Agrosyst Geosci Environ 3:e20024

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang H, Smeal D, Arnold R, Gregory E (1996) Potato nitrogen management by monitoring petiole nitrate level. J Plant Nutr 19:1405–1412

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Paul Sytsma and the field crew at the UW Hancock Agricultural Research Station for providing field management assistance, particularly performing the nitrogen application with different rates and timing for this study. The authors also thank the Wisconsin Fertilizer Research Council for providing funds to support the research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yi Wang.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, Y., Naber, M., Crosby, T. et al. Evaluating Multiple Diagnostic Tools for Monitoring In-season Nitrogen Status of Chipping Potatoes in the Upper Midwest of the USA. Potato Res. 65, 31–50 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11540-021-09507-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11540-021-09507-y

Keywords

Navigation