Skip to main content
Log in

Parameterization and Evaluation of a Simple Simulation Model (SSM-iCrop2) for Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) Growth and Yield in Iran

  • Published:
Potato Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Crop models can be used to estimate yield, water requirements and plant nutrition requirements under different conditions. This study examines the performance of the SSM-iCrop2 model in terms of predicting tuber yield, phenological stage and water requirement of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) under changing climate circumstances in Iran. Simulation of potato growth, tuber yield and water requirement for cultivars commonly grown in Iran (Agria, Marfona, Sante and Arinda) was performed using the SSM-iCrop2 model. Data from different field experiments in major potato-producing provinces were used for parameterization and evaluation. The parameterization results of the SSM-iCrop2 model showed that two maturity groups (early and late maturity) were determined with thermal units of 1100 and 1500 °C day−1, respectively, in the important potato-producing provinces. The model was evaluated based on independent experimental data which were not used for parameterization step. The observed tuber yield and water requirement ranged between 2013 and 5902 g m−2 and 3523 and 8547 m3 ha−1 with an average of 3542 g m−2 and 6178 m3 ha−1, respectively. The simulated tuber yield and water requirement varied in the range of 2489 to 5881 g m−2 and 2200 to 7149 m3 ha−1 with an average of 3607 g m−2 and 5901 m3 ha−1, respectively. Also, the evaluation results indicated that the correlation coefficient (r), root mean square error (RMSE) and coefficient of variation (CV) for the simulated versus observed tuber yield and water requirement were 0.80, 543 g m−2 and 14% and 0.85, 944 m3 ha−1 and 15%, respectively. Therefore, the model can be used to estimate potential tuber yield, yield gap and the effects of climate change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aboutalebian MA, Mazaheri D (2011) The combined effect of soil cover on weed control and yield of potato yield. Iran J Field Crop Sci 43:255–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmadvand G, Haji-Nia S (2015) Effect of cover plant and different tillage systems on physical properties of soil and yield of potato. Elec J Crop Prod 8:163–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Akbari S, Soltani E (2017) Parameterization and evaluation of simple model for simulation of growth and yield of soybean in Tehran climatic condition. J Agric Crop Prod 19:751–764

    Google Scholar 

  • Alberda T (1962) Actual and potential production of agricultural crops. Neth J Agric Sci 10:325–333

    Google Scholar 

  • Amini RA, Dabakh-mohamad-inasab A, Ghorbani-Far S (2015) Use of physical, agronomic and chemical methods in the management of potato weed. J Agric Sci Sustain Prod 25(4):105–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Amir J, Sinclair TR (1991) A model of water limitation on spring wheat growth and yield. Field Crop Res 28:59–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baghani J, Sadr-Ghaen H, Kanooni A (2007) The effect of planting pattern and water levels on the yield of potato under drip irrigation. J Agric Eng Res 8(4):81–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Baghani J, Alizadeh A, Farid-hosseini A (2012) The effect of surface and subsurface drip irrigation on quantity and quality potato. Iran J lrri Drain 3(6):238–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagheri HR, Gharineh MH, Bakhshandeh AM, Taei J, Mehnatkesh AM, Andarzyan B (2016) Effect of water stress and different levels of nitrogen fertilizer on yield and yield components and potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) water use efficiency. J Environ Stress Agric Sci 9(1):1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Borus D, Parsons D, Boersma M, Brown H, Mohammed C (2018) Improving the prediction of potato productivity: APSIM-potato model parameterization and evaluation in Tasmania. Aust J Crop Sci 12:32–43

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brown HE, Huth N, Holzworth D (2011) A potato model built using the APSIM Plant.NET Framework. In: 19th International Congress on Modelling and Simulation. p 961–967

  • Carli C, Yuldashev F, Khalikov D, Condori B, Mares V, Monneveux P (2014) Effect of different irrigation regimes on yield, water use efficiency and quality of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) in the lowlands of Tashkent, Uzbekistan: a field and modeling perspective. Field Crops Res 163:90–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Condori B, Hijmans RJ, Quiroz R, Ledent J-F (2010) Quantifying the expression of potato genetic diversity in the high Andes through growth analysis and modeling. Field Crops Res 119:135–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Wit CT (1964) Photosynthesis of leaf canopies. Agricultural Research Report 663. Pudoc Wageningen 57

  • Eskandari A, Khazaie HR, Nezami A, Kafi M (2011) Study the effects of irrigation regimes on yield and some qualitative characteristics of three cultivars of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). J Water Soil 25(2):240–247

    Google Scholar 

  • FAOSTAT (2017) Online database. Available at http://faostat.fao.org. Accessed 13th to18th June 2017

  • Ghadami-Firouzabadi A, Parvizi K (2010) The effect of low irrigation on yield and water use efficiency of new colonies of potato in row drip irrigation. J Res Water Agric 24(2):133–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin TS, Johnson BS, Ritchie JT (1993) A simulation model for potato growth and development: Substor-potato version 2.0. Michigan State University. Department of Crop and Soil Sciences

  • Haghighati B, BromandNasab S, Naseri A (2016) Effect of deficit irrigation and partial root–zone drying on yield and water use efficiency of two potato cultivars. J Water Soil 30(3):717–729

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajjarpoor A, Vadez V, Soltani A, Gaur P, Whitbread A, Babu DS, Gumma MK, Diancoumba M, Kholová J (2018) Characterization of the main chickpea cropping systems in India using a yield gap analysis approach. Field Crops Res 223:93–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammer GL, van Oosterom E, McLean G, Chapman SC, Broad I, Harland P, Muchow RC (2010) Adapting APSIM to model the physiology and genetics of complex adaptive traits in field crops. J Exp Bot 61:2185–2202

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haverkort AJ, Franke AC, Steyn JM, Pronk AA, Caldiz DO, Kooman PL (2015) A robust potato model: LINTUL-POTATO-DSS. Potato Res 58(4):313–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hossein-Panahi F, Koocheki A, Nassiri M, Ghorbani R (2009) Evaluation of yield and yield component in potato/corn intercropping. Iran J Field Crops Res 7(1):23–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao TC, Heng L, Steduto P, Rojas-Lara B, Raes D, Fereres E (2009) AquaCrop the FAO crop model to simulate yield response to water: III. Parameterization and testing for maize. Agron J 101:448–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jalali AH, Salehi F (2015) The effect of nitrogen application and its split on yield, dry matter percentage and potato harvest index of Marfona cultivar. J Crop Prod Proc 15:83–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Jam E, Ebadi A, Amini I, Dehdar B (2015) Effect of planting density and seed-mini tuber size on some quantitative and qualitative traits of potato. Agron J 81:20–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson PD, Semenov MA (2000) Modelling nitrogen uptake and redistribution in wheat. Field Crops Res 68:21–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirda C, Hera C, Moutonnet P, Nielsen DR (1999) Crop yield response to deficit irrigation: report of an FAO/IAEA co-ordinated research program by using nuclear techniques: executed by the soil and water management and crop nutrition section of the joint FAO/IAEA division of nuclear techniques in food and agriculture. Springer Science and Business Media

  • Koo J, Dimes J (2013) HC27 generic soil profile database. Harvard Dataverse ver. 4. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Kooman PL, Haverkort AJ (1994) Modelling development and growth of the potato crop influenced by temperature and day length: LINTUL-POTATO. In: Haverkort AJ, MacKerron DKL (eds) Ecology and modelling of potato crops under conditions limiting growth. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 41–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurance WF, Sayer J, Cassman KG (2014) Agricultural expansion and its impacts on tropical nature. Trends Ecol Evol 29:107–116

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lisson SN, Cotching WE (2011) Modelling the fate of water and nitrogen in the mixed vegetable farming systems of northern Tasmania. Aust Agric Syst 104:600–608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madani H, Moghimi A, Sajedi NA (2010) Effect of different levels of zeolite and irrigation interval on yield and some potato traits. New Find Agric 3:281–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Mamnoei E, Karaminezhad MR, Rashed Mohasel MH, Shimi P, Aein A (2016) Evaluation of some herbicides on potato weed control in Jiroft and Karaj. J Plant Prot 30(3):368–378

    Google Scholar 

  • Masoudi F, Zardashti MR, Abdollahi M, Oulakani B, Rasoli Sadghiani MH, Nazarli H (2010) Effect of irrigation intervals on yield and plant characteristics of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Iran J Crop Sci 12(3):265–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Naderi M, Shayannejad M, Haidari S, Haghighati B (2016) Effect of different levels of irrigation water on quantitative and qualitative characteristics of potato and determination of its optimum consumptive use of water in Shahr-e-Kord. J Water Soil 30(5):1370–1381

    Google Scholar 

  • Nasrollahzadeh-Asl A, Sedaqat G (2015) Effects of planting depth and irrigation disruption on yield and yield components in potato (Solanum tuberosum L). J Crop Sci Res Arid Reg 2(1):31–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Nehbandani AR, Soltani A, Zeinali E, Raeisi S, Rajabi R (2015) Parameterization and evaluation of SSM-soybean model for prediction of growth and yield of soybean in Gorgan. J Plant Prod Res 22:1–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng E, Loomis RS (1984) Simulation of growth and yield the potato crop. Simulation Monographs Pudoc, Wageningen

    Google Scholar 

  • Nikzad M, Taei J, Azamisardoei ZA, Amiri E (2015) Agro-ecological zonation of potato using GIS and WOFOST simulation model in Jiroft city. MSc thesis Faculty of Agriculture Jiroft Univ Kerman

  • Noorhosseini S, Soltani A, Ajamnoroozi H (2018) Simulating peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) growth and yield with the use of the simple simulation model (SSM). Comput Electron Agric 145:63–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parvizi K (2008) Evaluation of quantitative and qualitative traits of late and early ripening advanced potato cultivars. Agron J 79:80–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickering NB, Hansen JW, Jones JW, Wells CM, Chan VK, Godwin DC (1994) WeatherMan: a utility for managing and generating daily weather data. Agron J 86:332–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranjbar M, Nasresfahani M, Mirzakhani M (2013) The study of growth indices of commercial and conventional potato cultivars in Esfahan region. Iran J Dyn Agric 1(4):295–304

    Google Scholar 

  • Raymundo R, Asseng S, Cammarano D, Quiroz R (2014) Potato, sweet potato, and yam models for climate change: a review. Field Crops Res 166:173–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richter GM, Semenov MA (2005) Modelling impacts of climate change on wheat yields in England and Wales: assessing drought risks. Agric Syst 84:77–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie JT, Griffin TS, Johnson BS (1995) SUBSTOR functional model of potato growth, development and yield. In: Kabat P et al (eds) Modelling and parameterization of the soil–plant–atmosphere system: a comparison of potato growth models. Wageningen, Wageningen Pers, pp 401–435

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson MJ, Carberry PS, Huth NI, Turpin JE, Probert ME, Poulton PL, Bell M, Wright GC, Yeates SJ, Brinsmead RB (2002) Simulation of growth and development of diverse legume species in APSIM. Aust J Agric Res 53:429–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rostami-Ajirloo A, Mohamadi GhR, Shaban M (2012) Effect of nitrogen biofertilizers with urea fertilizer on some quantitive and qualitative traits of potato var. Marphona. Elect J Crop Prod 5(3):131–144

  • Sabbah A, Ghaffari-Nejad SA (2008) Determination of the best water level as trickle, irrigation and method of tape replacement on potato yield in Jiroft area. Agron J 79:194–199

    Google Scholar 

  • SCI (2015) Statistical Center of Iran. www.amar.org.ir/english. Accessed 11 Sept 2015

  • Sinclair TR, Muchow RC (1999) Radiation use efficiency. In: Advances in Agronomy. Elsevier, p 215–265

  • Sobhani AR, Hamidi H (2014) Effects of different irrigation levels and amounts of potassium on qualitative characteristics of potato in Mashhad climatic conditions. J Plant Prod 20(4):65–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Soltani A (2001) Production and completion of incomplete meteorological data using existing data. Report of research project. Gorgan Univ Agric Sci. and Natur Resour. Gorgan Iran

  • Soltani A, Hoogenboom G (2007) Assessing crop management options with crop simulation models based on generated weather data. Field Crops Res 103:198–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soltani A, Sinclair TR (2011) A simple model for chickpea development, growth and yield. Field Crops Res 124:252–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soltani A, Sinclair TR (2012) Modeling physiology of crop development, growth and yield. CABI

  • Soltani A, Sinclair TR (2015) A comparison of four wheat models with respect to robustness and transparency: simulation in a temperate, sub-humid environment. Field Crops Res 175:37–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soltani A, Maddah V, Sinclair TR (2013) SSM-wheat: a simulation model for wheat development, growth and yield. Int J Plant Prod 7(4):711–740

  • Soltani A, Robertson MJ, Torabi B, Yousefi-Daz M, Sarparast R (2006) Modelling seedling emergence in chickpea as influenced by temperature and sowing depth. Agric For Meteorol 138:156–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torabi B, Soltani A, Galeshi S, Zeinali E (2011) Assessment of yield gap due to nitrogen management in wheat. Aust J Crop Sci 5:879

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Diepen CA, Wolf J, Van Keulen H, Rappoldt C (1989) WOFOST: a simulation model of crop production. Soil Use Manag 5:16–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Ittersum M, Leffelaar P, van Keulen H, Kropff M, Bastiaans L, Goudriaan J (2003) On approaches and applications of the Wageningen crop models. Eur J Agron 18:201–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Keulen H, Penning de Vries FWT, Drees EM (1982) A summary model for crop growth. In: Van Laar HH (ed) Simulation of plant growth and crop production. Simulation Monographs, Pudoc Wageningen, pp 87–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams SL, Watson N (1985) Perceived danger and perceived self-efficacy as cognitive determinants of acrophobic behavior. Behav Ther 16:136–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yazdandoust-Hamedani M (2003) A study of the effect of nitrogen rates on yield, yield components and nitrate accumulation in potato varieties. Iran J Crop Sci 34:977–985

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the cooperation of Dr. Alireza Nehbandani and Majid Alimagham from the Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources.

Funding

This research was supported by the Agricultural Research, Education and Extention Organization of Iran, hereby the authors express their gratitude.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benjamin Torabi.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Highlights

The significance of the paper to the readers of the Potato Research is:

1. Two maturity groups were determined with thermal units of 1100 and 1500°C day-1 in the important potato-producing provinces.

2. The evaluation results indicated that r, RMSE and CV for simulated tuber yield versus observed tuber yield were 0.80, 543 g m−2 and 14%, respectively

3. The SSM model can be proposed to estimate potential tuber yield, yield gap and the effects of climate change.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dadrasi, A., Torabi, B., Rahimi, A. et al. Parameterization and Evaluation of a Simple Simulation Model (SSM-iCrop2) for Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) Growth and Yield in Iran. Potato Res. 63, 545–563 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11540-020-09456-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11540-020-09456-y

Keywords

Navigation