Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Facilitating Molecular Biology Teaching by Using Augmented Reality (AR) and Protein Data Bank (PDB)

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
TechTrends Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Spatial understanding of molecules in molecular biology provides a better understanding of molecules in isolation and relation to their next elements. Augmented reality (AR) has recently been developed as a computer interface that enables the users to see the real world with virtual objects superimposed on it. We report a method that shows the use of AR and data provided from protein data bank (PDB) to facilitate the teaching of macromolecules in biology. Users can easily convert the molecules structures obtained from PDB to a 3D format and use it with an AR application to study the molecules from different perspectives. A sample of 60 college students was assigned randomly to one of two conditions namely 2D and AR. At the end of the experiment, participants completed a comprehensive test and then a satisfaction questionnaire. The results of the study showed a significant difference between 2D and AR in satisfaction, the media usability, perception, and apprehension.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Azuma, R. T. (1997). A survey of augmented reality. Presence, 6(4), 355–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, K. H., & Tsai, C. C. (2016). The interaction of child–parent shared reading with an augmented reality (AR) picture book and parents' conceptions of AR learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(1), 203–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawley, L., & Dede, C. (2014). Situated learning in virtual worlds and immersive simulations. In Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 723–734). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dede, C. (2008). Theoretical perspectives influencing the use of information technology in teaching and learning. In International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 43–62). Springer. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-0-387-73315-9_3

  • Dunleavy, M. (2014). Design principles for augmented reality learning. TechTrends, 58(1), 28–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunleavy, M., & Dede, C. (2014). Augmented reality teaching and learning. In Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 735–745). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, A. G., & O’Sullivan, G. C. (2011). Fundamentals of surgical simulation–principles and practices. Retrieved from http://archpsyc.jamanetwork.com/data/Journals/JAMA/22492/jbk0307_974_975.pdf

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Galton, F. (1883). Inquiries into the human faculty & its development. JM Dent and Company. Retrieved from https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=V91CAQAAMAAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA1&dq=Galton,+1883&ots=crKYQGAe1A&sig=hduPNx4tK2kAXnV2oMwOIeZlCiA

  • Ganley, C. M., Vasilyeva, M., & Dulaney, A. (2014). Spatial ability mediates the gender difference in middle school students' science performance. Child Development, 85(4), 1419–1432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillet, A., Sanner, M., Stoffler, D., & Olson, A. (2005). Tangible interfaces for structural molecular biology. Structure, 13(3), 483–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J. P., & Lacey, J. I. (1947). Printed classification tests. DTIC Document. Retrieved from http://oai.dtic.mil/oai/oai?verb=getRecord&metadataPrefix=html&identifier=AD0651781

  • Holopainen, J., Mattila, O., Parvinen, P., Pöyry, E., & Seppälä, K. (2018). Employing mixed reality applications: Customer experience perspective. In Proceedings of the 51st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosslyn, S. M., Ganis, G., & Thompson, W. L. (2006). Mental imagery and the human brain. Progress in Psychological Science around the World, 1, 195–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malone, T. W. (1981). Toward a theory of intrinsically motivating instruction*. Cognitive Science, 5(4), 333–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martín-Gutiérrez, J., Saorín, J. L., Contero, M., Alcañiz, M., Pérez-López, D. C., & Ortega, M. (2010). Design and validation of an augmented book for spatial abilities development in engineering students. Computers & Graphics, 34(1), 77–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North, M. M., & North, S. M. (2016). A comparative study of sense of presence of traditional virtual reality and immersive environments. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 20. https://doi.org/10.3127/ajis.v20i0.1168.

  • Palincsar, A. S. (2005). 12 Social constructivist perspectives on teaching and learning. In An Introduction to Vygotsky (Vol. 285).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodic, M., Zhou, X., Tikhomirova, T., Wei, W., Malykh, S., Ismatulina, V., ... & Kovas, Y. (2015). Cross-cultural investigation into cognitive underpinnings of individual differences in early arithmetic. Developmental Science, 18(1), 165–174.

  • Salancik, G. R., & Pfeffer, J. (1978). A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23, 224–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stieff, M., & Uttal, D. (2015). How much can spatial training improve STEM achievement? Educational Psychology Review, 27(4), 607–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teo, T., & Zhou, M. (2014). Explaining the intention to use technology among university students: a structural equation modeling approach. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 26(2), 124–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Towle, E., Mann, J., Kinsey, B., Brien, E. J., Bauer, C. F., & Champoux, R. (2005). Assessing the self efficacy and spatial ability of engineering students from multiple disciplines. In Frontiers in Education, 2005. FIE’05. Proceedings 35th Annual Conference (p. S2C–15). IEEE. Retrieved from http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=1612216

  • Treisman, A. M. (1964). Verbal cues, language, and meaning in selective attention. The American Journal of Psychology, 77, 206–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of perceived ease of use: integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 342–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei, X., Weng, D., Liu, Y., & Wang, Y. (2015). Teaching based on augmented reality for a technical creative design course. Computers & Education, 81, 221–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA

    Parviz Safadel & David White

Authors
  1. Parviz Safadel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David White
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Parviz Safadel.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

I have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Safadel, P., White, D. Facilitating Molecular Biology Teaching by Using Augmented Reality (AR) and Protein Data Bank (PDB). TechTrends 63, 188–193 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-018-0343-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-018-0343-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation