Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Men Who Purchase Sex, Who Are They? An Interurban Comparison

  • Published:
Journal of Urban Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Most research concerning clients of commercial sex workers (CSWs) relies upon CSW reports of client characteristics and behavior. We describe correlates of ever purchasing sex among 3,829 men from three cities: São Paulo, Brazil; Cuernavaca, Mexico; and Tampa, USA. A computer-assisted self-interview collected data on demographics and sexual behavior. There were significant site differences—26.5 % paid for sex in São Paulo, 10.4 % in Cuernavaca, and 4.9 % in Tampa. In all cities, men who had sex with men and women (versus sex with women only) were more likely to have ever paid for sex. In São Paulo and Cuernavaca, CSW clients were older, had higher educational attainment, and were less likely to be married. In Tampa, older age was associated with being a CSW client but not education and marital status. In São Paulo and Cuernavaca, CSW clients had more partners than men who had never paid for sex. In São Paulo, CSW clients initiated vaginal sex at an earlier age, while in Cuernavaca they were more likely to self-report a sexually transmitted infection. CSW clients varied with respect to demographics across the three cities while the association between paying for sex and risky sexual behavior seems to be somewhat conserved. These findings suggest that interventions among CSW clients should focus on condom use with commercial and non-commercial partners as these men may be at increased risk for transmitting and acquiring sexually transmitted infections to and from their sex partners. Better understanding of client characteristics is needed for targeting interventions and creating culturally appropriate content.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sanders T. Paying for Pleasure: Men Who Buy Sex. Portland, OR: Willan; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Monto MA. Prostitutes' customers: motives and misconceptions. In: Weitzer R, ed. Sex for sale: prostitution, pornography, and the sex industry. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Routledge; 2010: 233–254.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ward H, Mercer CH, Wellings K, et al. Who pays for sex? An analysis of the increasing prevalence of female commercial sex contacts among men in Britain. Sex Transm Infect. 2005; 81: 467–471.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Schei B, Stigum H. A study of men who pay for sex, based on the Norwegian national sex surveys. Scand J Public Health. 2010; 38: 135–140.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Melbye M, Biggar RJ. Interactions between persons at risk for AIDS and the general population in Denmark. Am J Epidemiol. 1992; 135: 593–602.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Belza MJ, de la Fuente L, Suarez M, et al. Men who pay for sex in Spain and condom use: prevalence and correlates in a representative sample of the general population. Sex Transm Infect. 2008; 84: 207–211.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. South SJ, Trent K. Imbalanced sex ratios, men's sexual behavior, and risk of sexually transmitted infection in China. J Health Soc Behav. 2010; 51: 376–390.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Huang ZJ, Wang W, Martin MC, Nehl EJ, Smith BD, Wong FY. "Bridge population": sex workers or their clients?—STI prevalence and risk behaviors of clients of female sex workers in China. AIDS Care. 2011; 23(Suppl 1): 45–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Shutt JE, Barnes JC, Beaver KM, Higgins GE, Tewksbury R. Does biology underlie the oldest profession? Prostitution and sex disparities in john behavior. Biodemography Soc Biol. 2011; 57: 155–170.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Brewer DD, Roberts JM Jr, Muth SQ, Potterat JJ. Prevalence of male clients of street prostitute women in the United States. Hum Organ. 2008; 67: 346–356.

    Google Scholar 

  11. U.S.Department of State. 2008 Country reports on human rights practices. http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/hrrpt/2008/index.htm [serial online] 2009; Accessed April 22, 2011.

  12. Della Giusta M, Di Tommaso ML, Shima I, Strom S. What money buys: clients of street sex workers in the US. Appl Econ. 2009; 41: 2261–2277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Giuliano AR, Lee JH, Fulp W, et al. Incidence and clearance of genital human papillomavirus infection in men (HIM): a cohort study. Lancet. 2011; 377: 932–940.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Giuliano AR, Lazcano E, Villa LL, et al. Circumcision and sexual behavior: factors independently associated with human papillomavirus detection among men in the HIM study. Int J Cancer. 2009; 124: 1251–1257.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. State of Florida. Prostitution. http://www.flsenate.gov/Laws/Statutes/2011/Chapter796 Title XLVI, Chapter 796. 2011. 9-28-2011.

  16. MEASURE DHS. HIV/AIDS Survey indicators database. http://www.measuredhs.com/hivdata/ [serial online] 2011; Accessed October 19, 2011.

  17. Rodrigues MT. O sistema de justiça criminal ea prostituição no Brasil contemporâneo: administração de conflictos, discriminação e exclusão. Soc estando. 2004; 19: 151–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Conde-Glez CJ, Calderón E, Juárez-Figueroa L, Hernández-Avila M. Historical account of venereal diseases in Mexico. Genitourin Med. 1993; 69: 462–466.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bliss K. The science of redemption: syphilis, sexual promiscuity, and reformism in revolutionary Mexico City. Hisp Am Hist Rev. 1999; 79: 1–40.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bliss KE. Compromised Positions: Prostitution, Public Health and Gender Politics in Revolutionary Mexico City. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Statutory Revision Department. Florida statutes 1949. Tallahassee, Florida: State of Florida; 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  22. State of Florida. Prohibiting prostitution, etc.; evidence; penalties. §796.07. 1949.

  23. Galvan FH, Ortiz DJ, Martinez V, Bing EG. The use of female commercial sex workers' services by Latino day laborers. Hisp J Behav Sci. 2009; 31: 553–575.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Monto MA, McRee JN. A comparison of the male customers of female street prostitutes with national samples of men. Int J Offender Ther. 2011; 49: 505–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Parrado EA, Flippen C. Community attachment, neighborhood context, and sex worker use among Hispanic migrants in Durham, North Carolina, USA. Soc Sci Med. 2010; 70: 1059–1069.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Pitts MK, Smith AM, Grierson J, O'Brien M, Misson S. Who pays for sex and why? An analysis of social and motivational factors associated with male clients of sex workers. Arch Sex Behav. 2004; 33: 353–358.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Xantidis L, McCabe MP. Personality characteristics of male clients of female commercial sex workers in Australia. Arch Sex Behav. 2000; 29: 165–176.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Treas J. How cohorts, education, and ideology shaped a new sexual revolution on American attitudes toward nonmarital sex, 1972–1998. Sociol Perspect. 2002; 45: 267–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wellings K, Field J, Johnson AM, Wadsworth J. Sexual behaviour in Britain. London: Penguin; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Dew BJ, Chaney MP. The relationship among sexual compulsivity, internalized homophobia, and HIV at-risk sexual behavior in gay and bisexual male users of internet chat rooms. Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity. 2005; 12: 259–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Rosario M, Hunter J, Maguen S, Gwadz M, Smith R. The coming-out process and its adaptational and health-related associations among gay, lesbian, and bisexual youths: stipulation and exploration of a model. Am J Community Psychol. 2001; 29: 133–160.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Newcomb ME, Mustanski B. Moderators of the relationship between internalized homophobia and risky sexual behavior in men who have sex with men: a meta-analysis. Arch Sex Behav. 2011; 40: 189–199.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Smolenski DJ, Stigler MH, Ross MW, Rosser BR. Direct and indirect associations between internalized homonegativity and high-risk sex. Arch Sex Behav. 2011; 40: 785–792.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Young RM, Meyer IH. The trouble with "MSM" and "WSW": erasure of the sexual-minority person in public health discourse. Am J Public Health. 2005; 95: 1144–1149.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Semple SJ, Strathdee SA, Gallardo CM, Robertson A, Goldenberg S, Patterson TL. Psychosexual and social-cognitive correlates of sexual risk behavior among male clients of female sex workers in Tijuana, Mexico. AIDS Care. 2010; 22: 1473–1480.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Kalichman SC, Cain D. The relationship between indicators of sexual compulsivity and high risk sexual practices among men and women receiving services from a sexually transmitted infection clinic. J Sex Res. 2004; 41: 235–241.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Seal DW, Agostinelli G. Individual differences associated with high-risk sexual behaviour: implications for intervention programmes. AIDS Care. 1994; 6: 393–397.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Ostovich JM, Sabini J. How are sociosexuality, sex drive, and lifetime number of sexual partners related? Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2004; 30: 1255–1266.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Kinsey A, Pomeroy W, Martin C. Sexual Behavior in the Human Male. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 1948.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Kinsey A, Pomeroy W, Martin C, Gebhart P. Sexual Behavior in the Human Female. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Hewett PC, Mensch BS, Ribeiro MC, et al. Using sexually transmitted infection biomarkers to validate reporting of sexual behavior within a randomized, experimental evaluation of interviewing methods. Am J Epidemiol. 2008; 168: 202–211.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Simoes AA, Bastos FI, Moreira RI, Lynch KG, Metzger DS. A randomized trial of audio computer and in-person interview to assess HIV risk among drug and alcohol users in Rio De Janeiro, Brazil. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2006; 30: 237–243.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Ghanem KG, Hutton HE, Zenilman JM, Zimba R, Erbelding EJ. Audio computer assisted self interview and face to face interview modes in assessing response bias among STD clinic patients. Sex Transm Infect. 2005; 81: 421–425.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Kurth AE, Martin DP, Golden MR, et al. A comparison between audio computer-assisted self-interviews and clinician interviews for obtaining the sexual history. Sex Transm Dis. 2004; 31: 719–726.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like thank the men who provided personal information for the study. This study was supported by the National Cancer Institute (1R03CA134204 and RO1CA098803 (ARG)).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Danielle C. Ompad.

Additional information

Publication and report contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the NCI/NIH.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ompad, D.C., Bell, D.L., Amesty, S. et al. Men Who Purchase Sex, Who Are They? An Interurban Comparison. J Urban Health 90, 1166–1180 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-013-9809-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-013-9809-8

Keywords

Navigation