Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Automated detection of vulnerable plaque in intravascular ultrasound images

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a syndrome caused by a decrease in blood flow in the coronary arteries. The ACS is usually related to coronary thrombosis and is primarily caused by plaque rupture followed by plaque erosion and calcified nodule. Thin-cap fibroatheroma (TCFA) is known to be the most similar lesion morphologically to a plaque rupture. In this paper, we propose methods to classify TCFA using various machine learning classifiers including feed-forward neural network (FNN), K-nearest neighbor (KNN), random forest (RF), and convolutional neural network (CNN) to figure out a classifier that shows optimal TCFA classification accuracy. In addition, we suggest pixel range–based feature extraction method to extract the ratio of pixels in the different region of interests to reflect the physician’s TCFA discrimination criteria. Our feature extraction method examines the pixel distribution of the intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) image at a given ROI, which allows us to extract general characteristics of the IVUS image while simultaneously reflecting the different properties of the vessel’s substances such as necrotic core and calcified nodule depending on the brightness of the pixel. A total of 12,325 IVUS images were labeled with corresponding optical coherence tomography (OCT) images to train and evaluate the classifiers. We achieved 0.859, 0.848, 0.844, and 0.911 area under the ROC curve (AUC) in the order of using FNN, KNN, RF, and CNN classifiers. As a result, the CNN classifier performed best and the top 10 features of the feature-based classifiers (FNN, KNN, RF) were found to be similar to the physician’s TCFA diagnostic criteria.

AUC result of proposed classifiers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abadi M, Agarwal A, Barham P et al (2016) Tensorflow: large-scale machine learning on heterogeneous distributed systems. arXiv:1603.04467

  2. Bishop CM (1995) Neural networks for pattern recognition. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  3. Breiman L (2001) Random forests. Mach Learn 45(1):5–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Calvert PA, Obaid DR, O’Sullivan M et al (2011) Association between IVUS findings and adverse outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease: the VIVA (VH-IVUS in Vulnerable Atherosclerosis) Study. JACC: Cardiovasc Imaging 4(8):894–901

    Google Scholar 

  5. Clevert DA, Unterthiner T, Hochreiter S (2015) Fast and accurate deep network learning by exponential linear units (elus). arXiv:1511.07289

  6. Duchi J, Hazan E, Singer Y (2011) Adaptive subgradient methods for online learning and stochastic optimization. J Mach Learn Res 12:2121–2159

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fisher RA (1992) Statistical methods for research workers. In: Breakthroughs in Statistics. Springer, New York, pp 66–70

  8. Garcia-Garcia HM, Costa MA, Serruys PW (2010) Imaging of coronary atherosclerosis: intravascular ultrasound. Eur Heart J 31(20):2456–2469

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Guyon I, Weston J, Barnhill S et al (2002) Gene selection for cancer classification using support vector machines. Mach Learn 46(1-3):389–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. He K, Zhang X, Ren S et al (2016) Deep residual learning for image recognition. In: IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp 770–778

  11. Hosmer Jr DW, Lemeshow S, Sturdivant RX (2013) Applied logistic regression. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Inaba S, Mintz GS, Burke AP et al (2017) Intravascular ultrasound and near-infrared spectroscopic characterization of thin-cap fibroatheroma. Am J Cardiol 119(3):372–378

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ioffe S, Szegedy C (2015) Batch normalization: accelerating deep network training by reducing internal covariate shift. arXiv:1502.03167

  14. Jang IK, Tearney GJ, MacNeill B, et al (2005) In vivo characterization of coronary atherosclerotic plaque by use of optical coherence tomography. Circulation 111(12):1551–1555

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Jun TJ, Kang SJ, Lee JG et al (2017) Thin-Cap fibroatheroma detection with deep neural networks. In: International Conference on Neural Information Processing, pp 759–768

  16. Kingma DP, Ba J (2014) Adam: a method for stochastic optimization. arXiv:1412.6980

  17. Kolodgie FD, Burke AP, Farb A et al (2001) The thin-cap fibroatheroma: a type of vulnerable plaque: the major precursor lesion to acute coronary syndromes. Curr Opin Cardiol 16(5):285–292

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I, Hinton GE (2012) Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In: Advances in neural information processing systems, pp 1097–1105

  19. LeCun Y, Boser B, Denker JS et al (1989) Backpropagation applied to handwritten zip code recognition. Neural Comput 1(4):541–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Maas AL, Hannun AY, Ng AY (2013) Rectifier nonlinearities improve neural network acoustic models. Int Conf Mach Learn 30(1):3

    Google Scholar 

  21. McDonald JH (2009) Handbook of biological statistics. Sparky House Publishing, Baltimore, pp 173–181

    Google Scholar 

  22. Nissen SE, Yock P (2001) Intravascular ultrasound: novel pathophysiological insights and current clinical applications. Circulation 103(4):604–616

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Pedregosa F, Varoquaux G, Gramfort A (2011) Scikit-learn: m learning in Python. J Mach Learn Res 12:2825–2830

    Google Scholar 

  24. Plackett RL (1983) Karl Pearson and the chi-squared test. Int Stat Rev/Revue Internationale de Statistique 51(1):59–72

    Google Scholar 

  25. Rodriguez-Granillo GA, García-García HM, Mc Fadden EP et al (2005) In vivo intravascular ultrasound-derived thin-cap fibroatheroma detection using ultrasound radiofrequency data analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 46(11):2038–2042

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Russakovsky O, Deng J, Su H et al (2015) Imagenet large scale visual recognition challenge. Int J Comput Vis 115(3):211– 252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sawada T, Shite J, Garcia-Garcia HM et al (2008) Feasibility of combined use of intravascular ultrasound radiofrequency data analysis and optical coherence tomography for detecting thin-cap fibroatheroma. Eur Heart J 29(9):1136–1146

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Simard PY, Steinkraus D, Platt JC (2003) Best practices for convolutional neural networks applied to visual document analysis. In: International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition, pp 958–962

  29. Simonyan K, Zisserman A (2014) Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. arXiv:1409.1556

  30. Srivastava N, Hinton G, Krizhevsky A et al (2014) Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting. J Mach Learn Res 15(1):1929–1958

    Google Scholar 

  31. Szegedy C, Liu W, Jia Y et al (2015) Going deeper with convolutions. In: IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp 1–9

  32. Tieleman T, Hinton G (2012) Lecture 6.5-rmsprop: divide the gradient by a running average of its recent magnitude. COURSERA: neural networks for machine learning 4(2):26–31

    Google Scholar 

  33. Virmani R, Burke AP, Farb A et al (2006) Pathology of the vulnerable plaque. J Am Coll Cardiol 47.8 (Supplement):13–18

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Wolf I, Vetter M, Wegner I et al (2005) The medical imaging interaction toolkit. Med Image Anal 9(6):594–604

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Zeiler MD (2012) ADADELTA: an adaptive learning rate method. arXiv:1212.5701

  36. Zeiler MD, Fergus R (2013) Stochastic pooling for regularization of deep convolutional neural networks. arXiv:1301.3557

  37. Zhang L, Wahle A, Chen Z et al (2015) Prospective prediction of thin-cap fibroatheromas from baseline virtual histology intravascular ultrasound data. In: International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, pp 603–610

  38. Zhou B, Khosla A, Lapedriza A et al (2016) Learning deep features for discriminative localization. In: IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp 2921–2929

Download references

Acknowledgements

Support of Asan Medical Center providing IVUS images and clinical advices for this research is gratefully acknowledged.

Funding

This research was supported by the International Research and Development Program of the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning of Korea (2016K1A3A7A03952054).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tae Joon Jun.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jun, T.J., Kang, SJ., Lee, JG. et al. Automated detection of vulnerable plaque in intravascular ultrasound images. Med Biol Eng Comput 57, 863–876 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-018-1925-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-018-1925-x

Keywords

Navigation