Abstract
Many empirical studies have found an association between sustainable consumption and well-being. However, the direction of causality between these constructs remains unclear. Well-being could be an antecedent of sustainable consumption or, sustainable consumption a driver of well-being; also, there could be a reciprocal relationship between these two constructs. Alternatively, both well-being and sustainable consumption could be outcomes of another construct that could be masking a relationship between well-being and sustainable consumption. This study aims to advance the well-being and sustainable consumption research by testing these three relationships in a longitudinal study with young consumers (n = 369). The findings show that when controlling for the constructs at Time 1, the relationship between the focal constructs is no longer significant. Results lead to support the hypothesis that sustainable consumption and well-being are explained by a particular trait of the individual, nature relatedness, so that individuals with greater nature relatedness are more likely to adopt a sustainable lifestyle and have greater well-being. Nature relatedness thus acts as a predictor of both focal constructs. This result implies that by nurturing nature relatedness, societies will achieve the double dividend of well-being and sustainability.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
Under request to authors.
References
Ashraf, R., & Merunka, D. (2017). The use and misuse of student samples: An empirical investigation of European marketing research. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 16(4), 295–308. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1590.
Barbaro, N., & Pickett, S. M. (2016). Mindfully green: Examining the effect of connectedness to nature on the relationship between mindfulness and engagement in pro-environmental behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 93, 137–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.05.026.
Binder, M., & Blankenberg, A. K. (2017). Green lifestyles and subjective well-being: More about self-image than actual behavior? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 137, 304–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2017.03.009.
Binder, M., Blankenberg, A. K., & Guardiola, J. (2020). Does it have to be a sacrifice? Different notions of the good life, pro-environmental behavior and their heterogeneous impact on well-being. Ecological Economics, 167, 106448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106448.
Bragg, E. A. (1996). Towards ecological self: Deep ecology meets constructionist self-theory. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 16(2), 93–108. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.1996.0008.
Bray, J., Johns, N., & Kilburn, D. (2011). An exploratory study into the factors impeding ethical consumption. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(4), 597–608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0640-9.
Brown, K. W., & Kasser, T. (2005). Are psychological and ecological well-being compatible? The role of values, mindfulness, and lifestyle. Social Indicators Research, 74(2), 349–368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-004-8207-8.
Calder, B. J., Phillips, L. W., & Tybout, A. M. (1981). Designing research for application. Journal of Consumer Research, 8(2), 197–207. https://doi.org/10.1086/208856.
Capaldi, C. A., Dopko, R. L., & Zelenski, J. M. (2014). The relationship between nature connectedness and happiness: A meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 976. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00976.
Carrero, I., Valor, C., & Redondo, R. (2020). Do all dimensions of sustainable consumption Lead to psychological well-being? Empirical Evidence from Young Consumers. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 33, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-019-09818-8.
Chawla, L., & Cushing, D. F. (2007). Education for strategic environmental behavior. Environmental Education Research, 13(4), 437–452. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620701581539.
Choi, J. (2016). Sustainable behavior: Study engagement and happiness among university students in South Korea. Sustainability, 8(7), 599. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8070599.
Clayton, S. (2003). Environmental identity: A conceptual and operational definition. In S. Clayton & S. Opotow (Eds.), Identity and the natural environment: The psychological significance of nature (pp. 45–65). MIT Press.
Cleary, A., Roiko, A., Burton, N, W., Fielding, K, S., Murray, Z., & Turrell, G. (2019). Changes in perceptions of urban green space are related to changes in psychological well-being: Cross-sectional and longitudinal study of mid-aged urban residents. Health & Place, 59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2019.102201.
Cole, D. A., & Maxwell, S. E. (2003). Testing mediational models with longitudinal data: Questions and tips in the use of structural equation modeling. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112(4), 558–577. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.112.4.558.
Corral-Verdugo, V., Mireles-Acosta, J, F., Tapia-Fonllem, C., & Fraijo-Sing, B. (2011). Happiness as correlate of sustainable behavior: A study of pro-ecological, frugal, equitable and altruistic actions that promote subjective wellbeing. Human Ecology Review, 95–104. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24707465
Davis, J. L., Green, J. D., & Reed, A. (2009). Interdependence with the environment: Commitment, interconnectedness, and environmental behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(2), 173–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.11.001.
DeNeve, K. M., & Cooper, H. (1998). The happy personality: A meta-analysis of 137 personality traits and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 197–229.
Díaz, D., Rodríguez-Carvajal, R., Blanco, A., Moreno-Jiménez, B., Gallardo, I., Valle, C., & Van Dierendonck, D. (2006). Adaptación española de las escalas de bienestar psicológico de Ryff. Psicothema, 18(3), 572–577.
Dodge, R., Daly, A. P., Huyton, J., & Sanders, L. D. (2012). The challenge of defining wellbeing. International journal of wellbeing, 2(3), 222–235. https://doi.org/10.5502/ijw.v2i3.4.
Dutcher, D. D., Finley, J. C., Luloff, A. E., & Johnson, J. B. (2007). Connectivity with nature as a measure of environmental values. Environment and Behavior, 39(4), 474–493. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916506298794.
Ernst, J., & Theimer, S. (2011). Evaluating the effects of environmental education programming on connectedness to nature. Environmental Education Research, 17(5), 577–598. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2011.565119.
Ganglmair-Wooliscroft, A., & Wooliscroft, B. (2016). Diffusion of innovation: The case of ethical tourism behavior. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 2711–2720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.11.006.
Gifford, R., & Nilsson, A. (2014). Personal and social factors that influence pro-environmental concern and behaviour: A review. International Journal of Psychology, 49(3), 141–157. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12034.
Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., Anderson, R., & Tatham, R. (2005). Multivariate data analysis. Prentice Hall.
Hanley, A. W., Derringer, S. A., & Hanley, R. T. (2017). Dispositional mindfulness may be associated with deeper connections with nature. Ecopsychology, 9(4), 225–231. https://doi.org/10.1089/eco.2017.0018.
Henry, P. J. (2008). Student sampling as a theoretical problem. Psychological Inquiry, 19(2), 114–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/10478400802049951.
Hobson, K. (2002). Competing discourses of sustainable consumption: Does the'rationalisation of lifestyles' make sense? Environmental politics, 11(2), 95–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/714000601.
Howell, A. J., Dopko, R. L., Passmore, H. A., & Buro, K. (2011). Nature connectedness: Associations with well-being and mindfulness. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(2), 166–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.03.037.
Hsiao, C. (2005). Why panel data? The Singapore Economic Review, 50(02), 143–154. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217590805001937.
Huta, V. (2017). An overview of hedonic and eudaimonic well-being concepts. In L. Reinecke & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of media use and well-being: International perspectives on theory and research on positive media effects (p. 14–33). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315714752.ch3.
Hwang, K., & Kim, H. (2018). Are ethical consumers happy? Effects of ethical consumers' motivations based on empathy versus self-orientation on their happiness. Journal of Business Ethics, 151(2), 579–598. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3236-1.
International Amnesty (2019). Climate change ranks highest as vital issue or our time. Access through https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2019/12/climate-change-ranks-highest-as-vital-issue-of-our-time/
Israelashvili, J., & Karniol, R. (2018). Testing alternative models of dispositional empathy: The affect-to-cognition (ACM) versus the cognition-to-affect (CAM) model. Personality and Individual Differences, 121, 161–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.09.036.
Jackson, T. (2005). Motivating sustainable consumption. Sustainable Development Research Network, 29(1), 30–40.
Kaida, N., & Kaida, K. (2016). Pro-environmental behavior correlates with present and future subjective well-being. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 18(1), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-015-9629-y.
Kals, E., Schumacher, D., & Montada, L. (1999). Emotional affinity toward nature as a motivational basis to protect nature. Environment and Behavior, 31(2), 178–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/00139169921972056.
Kasser, T. (2009). Psychological need satisfaction, personal well-being, and ecological sustainability. Ecopsychology, 1(4), 175–180. https://doi.org/10.1089/eco.2009.0025.
Kasser, T. (2017). Living both well and sustainably: A review of the literature, with some reflections on future research, interventions and policy. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 375(2095), 20160369. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2016.0369.
Kasser, T., & Ryan, R. M. (1996). Further examining the American dream: Differential correlates of intrinsic and extrinsic goals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(3), 280–287. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167296223006.
Kellert, S. R. (1993). Values and perceptions of invertebrates. Conservation Biology, 7(4), 845–855. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1993.740845.x.
Kellert, S. R., & Wilson, E. O. (Eds.). (1993). The biophilia hypothesis. Island Press.
Kokko, K., Tolvanen, A., & Pulkkinen, L. (2013). Associations between personality traits and psychological well-being across time in middle adulthood. Journal of Research in Personality, 47(6), 748–756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2013.07.002.
Kuoppamäki, S. M., Wilska, T. A., & Taipale, S. (2017). Ageing and consumption in Finland: The effect of age and life course stage on ecological, economical and self-indulgent consumption among late middle-agers and young adults between 1999 and 2014. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 41(5), 457–464. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12353.
Lewis, G. J., Kanai, R., Rees, G., & Bates, T. C. (2014). Neural correlates of the ‘good life’: Eudaimonic well-being is associated with insular cortex volume. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(5), 615–618. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nst032.
Liefländer, A. K., Fröhlich, G., Bogner, F. X., & Schultz, P. W. (2013). Promoting connectedness with nature through environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 19(3), 370–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2012.697545.
Lumber, R., Richardson, M., & Sheffield, D. (2017). Beyond knowing nature: Contact, emotion, compassion, meaning, and beauty are pathways to nature connection. PLoS One, 12(5), e0177186. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177186.
Lyubomirsky, S., King, L., & Diener, E. (2005). The benefits of frequent positive affect: Does happiness lead to success? Psychological Bulletin, 131(6), 803–855. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.6.803.
Manolis, C., & Roberts, J. A. (2012). Subjective well-being among adolescent consumers: The effects of materialism, compulsive buying, and time affluence. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 7(2), 117–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-011-9155-5.
Manríquez-Betanzos, J. C., Corral-Verdugo, V., Vanegas-Rico, M. C., Fraijo-Sing, B. S., & Tapia-Fonllem, C. O. (2016). Positive (gratitude, eudaimonia) and negative (scarcity, costs) determinants of water conservation behaviour/Determinantes positivos (gratitud, eudaimonia) y negativos (escasez, costos) del ahorro de agua. Psycoecology, 7(2), 178–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/21711976.2016.1149986.
Mayer, F. S., & Frantz, C. M. (2004). The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(4), 503–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.10.001.
Naess, A. (1973). The shallow and the deep, long-range ecology movement. A summary. Inquiry, 16(1–4), 95–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/00201747308601682.
Nisbet, E, K. (2005). The human-nature connection: Increasing nature relatedness, environmental concern, and well-being through education. Unpublished master’s thesis, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Nisbet, E. K., & Zelenski, J. M. (2013). The NR-6: A new brief measure of nature relatedness. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 813. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00813.
Nisbet, E. K., Zelenski, J. M., & Murphy, S. A. (2009). The nature relatedness scale: Linking individuals' connection with nature to environmental concern and behavior. Environment and Behavior, 41(5), 715–740. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916508318748.
Nisbet, E. K., Zelenski, J. M., & Murphy, S. A. (2011). Happiness is in our nature: Exploring nature relatedness as a contributor to subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12(2), 303–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-010-9197-7.
Ojala, M. (2012). Hope and climate change: The importance of hope for environmental engagement among young people. Environmental Education Research, 18(5), 625–642. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2011.637157.
Olivos, P., & Clayton, S. (2017). Self, nature and well-being: Sense of connectedness and environmental identity for quality of life. In Handbook of environmental psychology and quality of life research (pp. 107–126). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31416-7_6.
Papaoikonomou, E., Cascon-Pereira, R., & Ryan, G. (2016). Constructing and communicating an ethical consumer identity: A social identity approach. Journal of Consumer Culture, 16(1), 209–231. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540514521080.
Pedrycz, W., & Kwak, K. C. (2007). The development of incremental models. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 15(3), 507–518. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2006.889967.
Prati, G., Albanesi, C., & Pietrantoni, L. (2017). Social well-being and pro-environmental behavior: A cross-lagged panel design. Human Ecology Review, 23(1), 123–140. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26367967
Pritchard, A., Richardson, M., Sheffield, D., & McEwan, K. (2020). The relationship between nature connectedness and eudaimonic well-being: A meta-analysis. Journal of Happiness Studies, 21(3), 1145–1167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-019-00118-6.
Quazi, A., Amran, A., & Nejati, M. (2016). Conceptualizing and measuring consumer social responsibility: A neglected aspect of consumer research. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 40(1), 48–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12211.
Rich, S. A., Hanna, S., & Wright, B. J. (2017). Simply satisfied: The role of psychological need satisfaction in the life satisfaction of voluntary simplifiers. Journal of Happiness Studies, 18(1), 89–105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-016-9718-0.
Rindfleisch, A., Malter, A. J., Ganesan, S., & Moorman, C. (2008). Cross-sectional versus longitudinal survey research: Concepts, findings, and guidelines. Journal of Marketing Research, 45(3), 261–279. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.45.3.261.
Robinson, J. L., & Demaree, H. A. (2007). Physiological and cognitive effects of expressive dissonance. Brain and Cognition, 63(1), 70–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2006.08.003.
Rutter, M. (1994). Beyond longitudinal data: Causes, consequences, changes, and continuity. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62(5), 928–940.
Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 1069–1081.
Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(4), 719–727. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.4.719.
Ryff, C. D., & Singer, B. H. (2008). Know thyself and become what you are: A eudaimonic approach to psychological well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9(1), 13–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-006-9019-0.
Schmitt, M. T., Aknin, L. B., Axsen, J., & Shwom, R. L. (2018). Unpacking the relationships between pro-environmental behavior, life satisfaction, and perceived ecological threat. Ecological Economics, 143, 130–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.07.007.
Schultz, P. W. (2002). Inclusion with nature: The psychology of human-nature relations. In Psychology of Sustainable Development (pp. 61–78). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0995-0_4.
Schultz, P. W., & Tabanico, J. (2007). Self, identity, and the natural environment: Exploring implicit connections with nature 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37(6), 1219–1247. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2007.00210.x.
Schutte, N. S., & Malouff, J. M. (2018). Mindfulness and connectedness to nature: A meta-analytic investigation. Personality and Individual Differences, 127, 10–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.01.034.
Soto, C. J. (2015). Is happiness good for your personality? Concurrent and prospective relations of the big five with subjective well-being. Journal of Personality, 83(1), 45–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12081.
Suárez-Varela, M., Guardiola, J., & González-Gómez, F. (2016). Do pro-environmental behaviors and awareness contribute to improve subjective well-being? Applied Research in Quality of Life, 11(2), 429–444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-014-9372-9.
Tam, K. P. (2013). Concepts and measures related to connection to nature: Similarities and differences. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 34, 64–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.01.004.
Tang, I. C., Sullivan, W. C., & Chang, C. Y. (2015). Perceptual evaluation of natural landscapes: The role of the individual connection to nature. Environment and Behavior, 47(6), 595–617. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916513520604.
Tiwari, G. K. (2016). Sustainable behaviors and happiness: An optimistic link. The International Journal of Indian Psychology, 4(1), 127–136 DOI: 18.01.051/20160401.
Tkach, C., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2006). How do people pursue happiness?: Relating personality, happiness-increasing strategies, and well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 7(2), 183–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-005-4754-1.
Trudel, R. (2019). Sustainable consumer behavior. Consumer psychology review, 2(1), 85–96. https://doi.org/10.1002/arcp.1045.
Unsworth, S., Palicki, S. K., & Lustig, J. (2016). The impact of mindful meditation in nature on self-nature interconnectedness. Mindfulness, 7(5), 1052–1060. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-016-0542-8.
Valor, C., Antonetti, P., & Merino, A. (2020). The relationship between moral competences and sustainable consumption among higher education students. Journal of Cleaner Production, 248, 119161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119161.
Venhoeven, L. A., Bolderdijk, J. W., & Steg, L. (2013). Explaining the paradox: How pro-environmental behaviour can both thwart and foster well-being. Sustainability, 5(4), 1372–1386. https://doi.org/10.3390/su5041372.
Venhoeven, L. A., Bolderdijk, J. W., & Steg, L. (2016). Why acting environmentally-friendly feels good: Exploring the role of self-image. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1846. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01846.
Vitell, S. J., & Muncy, J. (2005). The Muncy–Vitell consumer ethics scale: A modification and application. Journal of Business Ethics, 62(3), 267–275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-7058-9.
Walton, T. N., & Jones, R. E. (2018). Ecological identity: The development and assessment of a measurement scale. Environment and Behavior, 50(6), 657–689. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916517710310.
Wang, E., & Kang, N. (2019). Does life satisfaction matter for pro-environmental behavior? Empirical evidence from China general social survey. Quality & Quantity, 53(1), 449–469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-018-0763-0.
Waterman, A. S. (1993). Two conceptions of happiness: Contrasts of personal expressiveness (eudaimonia) and hedonic enjoyment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(4), 678–691. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.64.4.678.
Webb, D. J., Mohr, L. A., & Harris, K. E. (2008). A re-examination of socially responsible consumption and its measurement. Journal of Business Research, 61(2), 91–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.05.007.
Weinstein, N., Przybylski, A. K., & Ryan, R. M. (2009). Can nature make us more caring? Effects of immersion in nature on intrinsic aspirations and generosity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(10), 1315–1329. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167209341649.
Welsch, H., & Kühling, J. (2011). Are pro-environmental consumption choices utility-maximizing? Evidence from subjective well-being data. Ecological Economics, 72, 75–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.04.015.
White, K., Habib, R., & Hardisty, D. J. (2019). How to SHIFT consumer behaviors to be more sustainable: A literature review and guiding framework. Journal of Marketing, 83(3), 22–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022242919825649.
Williams, C., Colovic, A., & Zhu, J. (2017). Integration-responsiveness, local hires and subsidiary performance amidst turbulence: Insights from a survey of Chinese subsidiaries. Journal of World Business, 52(6), 842–853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2017.09.006.
Xiao, J. J., & Li, H. (2011). Sustainable consumption and life satisfaction. Social Indicators Research, 104(2), 323–329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-010-9746-9.
Zelenski, J. M., & Nisbet, E. K. (2014). Happiness and feeling connected: The distinct role of nature relatedness. Environment and Behavior, 46(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916512451901.
Zelenski, J. M., Dopko, R. L., & Capaldi, C. A. (2015). Cooperation is in our nature: Nature exposure may promote cooperative and environmentally sustainable behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 42, 24–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.01.005.
Code Availability
Not applicable.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
No conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Redondo, R., Valor, C. & Carrero, I. Unraveling the Relationship between Well-Being, Sustainable Consumption and Nature Relatedness: a Study of University Students. Applied Research Quality Life 17, 913–930 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-021-09931-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-021-09931-9