Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Visual simulation of regional development differentiation in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Metropolitan Region

  • Published:
Journal of Geographical Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Regional development differentiation is a complicated spatial and temporal dynamic process. Recent developments in spatial statistics and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) have led to an increasing interest in quantitative analysis and visualization of the process. However, so far, few direct connections have been made between the newly developed methods and classic spatial development theories, which would be very helpful for the interpretation and understanding of regional spatiotemporal differentiation. Using basic concepts and academic principles of polarized growth theory and gradient transfer theory, this paper quantifies the concept of regional development space. It then proposes a method based on GIS to visually simulate and analyze regional development spatiotemporal differentiation through a case study of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Metropolitan Region (BTHMR), China. The main research results are as follows. 1) The proposed method, built on classic theories and well-developed GIS technology, presents a good picture of regional development spatiotemporal differentiation. 2) The levels of regional development, in terms of per capita GDP across BTHMR, diminished significantly with increased distances away from city propers (which can be seen as the regional growth poles), leading to the appearance of development valley zones between different cities. The development valley zones between each city coincided with their boundary areas, which indicates that administrative boundaries have some impact on regional development, if the regional division is based on administrative boundaries. 3) From 1993 to 2007, the development level in the whole BTHMR improved significantly, of which polarized growth was dominant, especially for Beijing and Tianjin. However, as the two economic development engines in BTHMR, the pull effects of both Beijing and Tianjin on their peripheral areas were comparatively weak, except for those on Tangshan. 4) The structure and pattern of gradient transfer and balanced development in the BTHMR had not been completely developed yet, and the sustained polarized development of the regional economy in BTHMR was still going to be the main trend in the next 5–10 years.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • An H S, 2005. Principle of Spatial Economics. Beijing: Economic Science Press. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Anselin L, 2001. Rao’s score test in spatial econometrics. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 97(1): 113–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beach C M, Slotsve G A, 1996. Are we becoming two societies? Income, polarization and the middle class in Canada. Toronto: C.D. Howe Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boudeville J R, 1966. Problems of Regional Economic Planning. Edinburgh: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrough P A, 1986. Principles of Geographical Information Systems for Land Resources Assessment. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen C, Liu S G, 1999. An initial approach to the construction of methodology in regional economic geography. Geographical Research, 18(1): 1–6. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dai X Z, 2002. Discussion on the spatial interaction between Beijing and Tianjin. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 22(3): 257–262. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwent D F, 1969. Growth poles and growth centers in regional planning: A review. Environment and Planning, 1: 5–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esteban J M, Ray D, 1994. On the measurement of polarization. Econometrica, 62(4): 819–851.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan C C, 1997. Uneven development and beyond: Regional development theory in post-Mao China. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 21(4): 620–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster J E, Wolfson M C, 1992. Polarization and the decline of the middle class: Canada and the U.S. [D]. Mimeo: Vanderbilt University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedmann J R, 1967. A general theory of polarized development. Mimeo: Santiago, Chile.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujita M, Krugman P, Venables A J, 1999. The Spatial Economy: Cities, Regions and International Trade. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman A, 1958. The Strategy of Economic Development. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu L F, Zhou L, 2004. On the disputes over tourist resources across administrative regions. Journal of Guangzhou University (Social Science Edition), 3(1): 58–61. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Isard W, 1965. Methods of Regional Science. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isard W, Schooler E W, 1959. Industrial complex analysis: Agglomeration, economics and regional development. Journal of Regional Science, 1(2): 19–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins S P, 1996. Recent trends in the U.K. income distribution: What happened and why. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 12(1): 29–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ke S Z, Feser E, 2010. Count on the growth pole strategy for regional economic growth? Spread-Backwash effects in greater central China. Regional Studies, 44(9): 1131–1147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinsey J, 1978. The application of growth pole theory in the Aire Metropolitaine Marsellaise. Geoforum, 9(4/5): 245–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krugman P, 1998. What’s new about the new economic geography. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 14(2): 7–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulkarni R, Schintler L A, Stough R R, et al., 2002. A Kohonen self-organizing map approach to modeling growth pole dynamics. Network and Spatial Economics, 2(2): 175–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam N S, 1983. Spatial interpolation methods: A review. The American Cartographer, 10(2): 129–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy F, Murnane R J, 1992. U.S. earnings levels and earnings inequality: A review of recent trends and proposed explanations. Journal of Economic Literature, 30(3): 1333–1381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li G P, Liu J, 2004. A comprehensive appraisal on regional grades distribution in China. Industrial Technology and Economy, 23(5): 67–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li G P, Xu Y, 2002. The development and implication of gradient transfer theory. Economist, 4: 69–75. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Cheng G D, Lu L, 2000. Comparison of spatial interpolation methods. Advance in Earth Sciences, 15(3): 260–265. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Li X B, 1999. Visualizing spatial equality of development. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 19(3): 254–257. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Li X J, 1999. Economic Geography. Beijing: Higher Education Press. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu D D, 2001. An analysis of spatial structure and optimal regional development. Acta Geographica Sinica, 56(2): 127–135. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu D D, 2002. Formation and dynamics of the “pole-axis” spatial system. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 22(1): 1–6. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu Y Q, 2002. The mechanism of the model of dual-nuclei structure. Acta Geographica Sinica, 57(1): 85–96. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Nijkamp P, 1987. Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, Vol 1: Regional Economics. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perroux F, 1950. Economic Space: Theory and Application. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 64(1): 89–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rey S J, Montouri B D, 1999. US regional income convergence: A spatial econometric perspective. Regional Studies, 33(2):143–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson P A, 1976. Economics. 10th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan C W, Li G P, Yang K Z, 2001. Three development strategies of China Capital Area. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 21(1): 12–18. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang X H, 2003. Application of multivariate statistical analysis in regionalization study. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 23(1): 66–71. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei H K, 2009. Change and prospects of thoughts in new China’s 60-year regional development. Henan Social Sciences, (4): 8–11. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei M, Li G P, 2005. A research of the factors of grades process cohesion based on regional differences. Economic Geography, 25(1): 33–37. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells L T, 2000. Government, business, and academia: Origins of Raymond Vernon’s understanding of multinational enterprises. Journal of International Management, 6(4): 279–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xia Y L, Feng Z J, 1982. Gradient theory and regional economy. Research and Advice, (8): 5–7. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ying L G, 2000. Measuring the spillover effects: Some Chinese evidence. Papers in Regional Science, 79(1): 75–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao X, 1996. Spatial disparities and economic development in China, 1953–1992: A comparative study. Development and Change, 27(1): 131–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou Q Y, Liu Z X, Zhu C et al., 1989. Regional Economics. Beijing: China Renmin University Press. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing, 100101, China

    Yanhua Liu, Yong Xu, Tengyun Guo & Zhiqiang Wang

  2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China

    Yanhua Liu

Authors
  1. Yanhua Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yong Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tengyun Guo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Zhiqiang Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tengyun Guo.

Additional information

Foundation: The Key Project of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, No.KZZD-EW-06-01; National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.40830741; No.40671054

Author: Liu Yanhua, Ph.D Candidate, specialized in regional sustainable development, rural poverty.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liu, Y., Xu, Y., Guo, T. et al. Visual simulation of regional development differentiation in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Metropolitan Region. J. Geogr. Sci. 23, 549–566 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-013-1028-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-013-1028-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation