Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Biogeochemical simulation of microbially induced calcite precipitation with Pararhodobacter sp. strain SO1

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Acta Geotechnica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Biogrouting is a ground improvement technique, which utilizes microorganisms. The numerical simulation of biogrouting is important to ensure efficient operation and to assess the applicability to the target ground. In this study, we compared syringe-scale biogrouting with biogeochemical simulation. Parameters suitable for practical applications were included. The rate constant and half-saturation constant of the reaction rate law in ureolytic bacteria Pararhodobacter sp. strain SO1, obtained from the simulation based on the urease activity test, were 1 × 10−8 mol/mg/s and 0.635 M, respectively. To achieve the same mineral precipitation in measurement and simulation, a setting in which only the calcite precipitated was used. In the sequential simulation of the solidification test, a variation in discharged Ca2+ concentration was reproduced by introducing an “adjustment index”, which considers the microbial biomass contributing to the reaction. Moreover, for the re-injection test, in which microbes were injected again to further improve the biogrout strength, the settings were validated by the sequential simulation followed by predictive simulation on different injection dates. The results indicate that by conducting a biogeochemical simulation of calcite precipitation for biogrouting using ureolytic bacteria, the strength of biogrout can be predicted and managed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Achal V, Kawasaki S (2016) Biogrout: a novel binding material for soil improvement and concrete repair. Front Microbiol 7:314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Akiyama M, Kawasaki S (2012) Microbially mediated sand solidification using calcium phosphate compounds. Eng Geol 137–138:29–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Barkouki T, Martinez BC, Mortensen BM, Weathers TS, DeJong JT, Ginn TR, Spycher NF, Smith RW, Fujita Y (2011) Forward and inverse bio-geochemical modeling of microbially induced calcite precipitation in half-meter column experiments. Transp Porous Med 90:23–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bethke CM (2008) Geochemical and biogeochemical reaction modeling. Cambridge University Press, New York. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511619670

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Bethke CM, Sanford RA, Kirk MF, Jin Q, Flynn TM (2011) The thermodynamic ladder in geomicrobiology. Amer J Sci 311:183–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Danjo T, Kawasaki S (2016) Microbially induced sand cementation method using Pararhodobacter sp. strain SO1, inspired by beachrock formation mechanism. Mater Trans 57:428–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. De Muynck W, De Belie N, Verstraete W (2010) Microbial carbonate precipitation in construction materials: a review. Ecol Eng 36:118–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. DeJong JT, Fritzges MB, Nusslein K (2006) Microbial induced cementation to control sand response to undrained shear. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 132:1381–1392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. DeJong JT, Soga K, Kazazanjian E, Burns S, Van Paassen LA, Al Qabany A, Aydilek A, Bang SS, Burbank M, Caslake LF, Chen CY, Cheng X, Chu J, Ciurli S, Esnault-Filet A, Fauriel S, Hamdan N, Hata T, Inagaki Y, Jefferies S, Kuo M, Loloui L, Larrahondo J, Manning DAC, Martinez B, Montoya BM, Nelson DC, Palomino A, Renforth P, Santamarina JC, Seagren EA, Tanyu B, Tsesarsky M, Weaver T (2013) Biogeochemical processes and geotechnical applications: progress opportunities and challenges. Géotechnique 63:287–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fauriel S, Laloui L (2012) A bio-chemo-hydro-mechanical model for microbially induced calcite precipitation in soils. Comput Geotech 46:104–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fidaleo M, Lavecchia R (2003) Kinetic study of enzymatic urea hydrolysis in the pH range 4–9. Chem Biochem Eng Q 17:311–318

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fujita M, Nakashima K, Achal V, Kawasaki S (2017) Whole’cell evaluation of urease activity of Pararhodobacter sp. isolated from peripheral beachrock. Biochem Eng J 124:1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Humphreys PN, West JM, Metcalfe R (2010) Microbial effects on repository performance. Quintessa QRS-1378Q-1, version 3.0

  14. Inagaki Y, Tsukamoto M, Mori H, Sasaki T, Soga K, Qabany AAl, Hata T (2011) The influence of injection conditions and soil types on soil improvement by microbial functions. Geo-Frontiers 2011:4021–4030

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ivanov V, Chu J (2008) Applications of microorganisms to geotechnical engineering for bioclogging and biocementation of soil in situ. Rev Environ Sci Biotech 7:139–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jonkers HM, Van Loosdrecht KCM (2010) Biogeocivil engineering. Ecol Eng 36:97–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kawasaki S, Murao A, Hiroyoshi N, Tsunekawa M, Kaneko K (2006) Fundamental study on novel grout cementing due to microbial metabolism. J Jpn Soc Eng Geol 47:2–12 (in Japanese with English abstract)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Khodadadi TH, Kavazanjian E, Van Paassen L, Dejong J (2017) Bio-grout materials: a review. Geotech Spec Publ 288 GSP:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784480793.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kim G, Youn H (2016) Microbially induced calcite precipitation employing environmental isolates. Mater (Basel) 9:468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lauchnor EG, Topp DM, Parker AE, Gerlach R (2015) Whole cell kinetics of ureolysis by Sporosarcina pasteurii. J Appl Microbiol 118:1321–1332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Maclachlan E, El Mountassir G, Lunn RJ (2013) Use of bacterial ureolysis for improved gelation of silica sol in rock grouting. Géotech Lett 3:180–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mahanty B, Kim S, Kim CG (2014) Bacillus pasteurii mediated ureolysis—a numerical approach for kinetic analysis. Int J Environ Eng 1:41–47

    Google Scholar 

  23. Monod J (1949) The growth of bacterial cultures. Ann Rev Microbiol 3:371–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Neidhardt FC, Ingraham JL, Schaechter M (1990) Physiology of the bacterial cell: a molecular approach. Sinauer Associates Inc., Sunderland

    Google Scholar 

  25. Parkhurst DL (1995) User's guide to PHREEQC—a computer program for speciation, reaction-path, advective-transport, and inverse geochemical calculations. Water-Resour Invest Rep 95(4227):1–143

    Google Scholar 

  26. Shestopaloff YK (2016) Metabolic allometric scaling model: combining cellular transportation and heat dissipation constraints. J Exp Biol 219:2481–2489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Shimazaki S (2015) Experimental study on coral sand solidification test using Pararhodobacter sp. M.D. thesis, Hokkaido University (in Japanese)

  28. Tobler DJ, Cuthbert MO, Greswell RB, Riley MS, Renshaw JC, Handley-Sidhu S, Phoenix VR (2011) Comparison of rates of ureolysis between Sporosarcina pasteurii and an indigenous groundwater community under conditions required to precipitate large volumes of calcite. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 75:3290–3301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Tobler DJ, Cuthbert MO, Phoenix VR (2014) Transport of Sporosarcina pasteurii in sandstone and its significance for subsurface engineering technologies. Appl Geochem 42:38–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Van Paassen LA, Harkes MP, Van Zwieten GA, Van der Zon WH, Van der Star WRL, Van Loosdrecht MCM (2009) Scale up of BioGrout: a biological ground reinforcement method. In: Proceedings of 17th international conference on soil mechanics and geotechnical engineering, pp 2328–2333

  31. Van Wijingaarden WK, Vermolen FJ, Van Meurs GAM, Vuik C (2011) Modelling biogrout: a new ground improvement method based on microbial-induced carbonate precipitation. Transp Porous Med 87:397–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Whiffin VS, Van Paassen LA, Harkes MP (2007) Microbial carbonate precipitation as a soil improvement technique. Geomicrobiol J 24:417–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Wilkins MJ, Daly RA, Mouser PJ, Trexler R, Sharma S, Cole DR, Wrighton KC, Biddle JF, Denis EH, Fredrickson JK, Kieft TL, Onstott TC, Peterson L, Pfiffner SM, Phelps TJ, Schrenk MO (2014) Trends and future challenges in sampling the deep terrestrial biosphere. Front Microbiol 5:481

    Google Scholar 

  34. Xu T, Sonnenthal E, Spycher N, Pruess K (2004) TOUGHREACT User’s guide: a simulation program for non-isothermal multiphase reactive geochemical transport in variably saturated geologic media. Earth Science Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, University of California, LBNL-55460

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masaru Akiyama.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Akiyama, M., Kawasaki, S. Biogeochemical simulation of microbially induced calcite precipitation with Pararhodobacter sp. strain SO1. Acta Geotech. 14, 685–696 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-019-00784-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-019-00784-z

Keywords

Navigation