Skip to main content
Log in

Tide-induced hydraulic response in a semi-infinite seabed with a subaqueous drained tunnel

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Acta Geotechnica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, analytical solutions for tide-induced pore pressure, seepage force and water inflow into a subaqueous drained tunnel are developed. The results are compared with numerical solutions from a commercial software. The effects of the soil permeability, shear modulus, lining thickness and buried depth of the tunnel on tide-induced pore pressure, seepage force and water inflow are discussed. Larger tide-induced pore pressure and seepage force are obtained for smaller tunnel depth and higher soil permeability. The phase lags of the maximal tide-induced pore pressure at different depths are determined and investigated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

a I0, a Im, a II0, a IIm :

Coefficients (see Eqs. (20)–(23))

A n :

Coefficient

Arg:

The argument of a complex number

B n :

Coefficient

β f :

Compressibility of the pore fluid

c lk , c sk :

Coefficients, \(c_{\text{lk}} = \sqrt {i\omega C_{\text{ls}} }\); \(c_{\text{sk}} = \sqrt {i\omega C_{\text{ss}} }\)

C s :

Coefficient of composite compressibility

C ls, C ss :

Coefficients of composite compressibility for the lining and seabed

E :

Young’s modulus

E n :

Coefficient

G :

Shear modulus of the soil

G n :

Coefficient

Γ 0, Γ m :

Coefficients

γ f :

Unit weight of the fluid

H (1) n ,H (2) n :

Hankel functions of the first kind and the second kind, respectively

h :

Burial depth of the tunnel

i:

Imaginary unit

Im:

Imaginary part of a complex number

k l , k s :

Permeability coefficients of the lining and seabed, respectively

n :

Soil porosity

n l , n s :

Porosities of the lining and seabed, respectively

p :

Tide-induced pore pressure

p I , p II :

Tide-induced pore pressures in the seabed and lining, respectively

p max :

Maximal tide-induced pore pressure

p 0 :

Amplitude of the hydrodynamic pressure acting on the mud line

ρ, θ :

Polar coordinates

ρ 2 , θ 2 :

Expressions of ρ and θ

Q :

Water inflow into the tunnel

R, r :

External and internal radii of the lining, respectively

Re:

The real part of a complex number

S r :

Degree of saturation

S rl, S rs :

Degrees of saturation of the lining and seabed, respectively

t :

Time in seconds

T :

Period of the tide

\(\overset{\lower0.5em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\rightharpoonup}$}} {u}\) :

Soil displacement vector

ν :

Poisson’s ratio

ν l , ν s :

Poisson’s ratios of the lining and seabed, respectively

V 0 , V n :

Coefficients

ω :

Tide angular frequency (=2π/T)

W n :

Coefficient

x, y :

Cartesian coordinates

References

  1. Biot MA (1941) General theory of three-dimensional consolidation. J Appl Phys 12:155–164. doi:10.1063/1.1712886

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Cheng AH, Liu PL (1986) Seepage force on a pipeline buried in a poroelastic seabed under wave loadings. Appl Ocean Res 8:22–32. doi:10.1016/S0141-1187(86)80027-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. El Tani M (2003) Circular tunnel in a semi-infinite aquifer. Tunn Undergr Space Tech 18:49–55. doi:10.1016/S0886-7798(02)00102-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fernández G, Alvarez TA (1994) Seepage-induced effective stresses and water pressures around pressure tunnels. J Geotech Eng ASCE 120:108–127. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1994)120:1(108)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Goodman RE, Moye DG, Van Schalkwyk A, Javandel I (1965) Ground water inflows during tunnel driving. Eng Geol 2:39–56

    Google Scholar 

  6. Harr ME (1962) Groundwater and seepage. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hsu JRC, Jeng DS (1994) Wave-induced soil response in an unsaturated anisotropic seabed of finite thickness. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 18:785–807. doi:10.1002/nag.1610181104

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Jeng DS, Hsu JSC (1996) Wave-induced soil response in a nearly saturated sea-bed of finite thickness. Geotechnique 46:427–440. doi:10.1680/geot.1996.46.3.427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jeng DS (2003) Wave-induced sea floor dynamics. Appl Mech Rev 56:407–429. doi:10.1115/1.1577359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kokkinowrachos K, Asorakos S (1985) Hydrodynamic analysis of large offshore structure on porous elastic seabed. In: Proceedings of the fourth offshore mechanics and artic engineering symposium, vol 2. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Tokyo, pp 172–181

  11. Kolymbas D, Wagner P (2007) Groundwater ingress to tunnel—the exact analytical solution. Tunn Undergr Space Tech 22:23–27. doi:10.1016/j.tust.2006.02.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lei S (1999) An analytical solution for steady flow into a tunnel. Ground Water 37:23–26. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6584.1999.tb00953.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Liu PL (1973) Damping of water waves over porous bed. J Hydraul Eng ASCE 99:2263–2271

    Google Scholar 

  14. MacPherson H (1978) Wave forces on pipeline buried in permeable seabed. J Waterw Port C Div 104:407–419

    Google Scholar 

  15. McDougal WG, Davidson SH, Monkmeyer PL, Sollitt CK (1988) Wave-induced forces on buried pipeline. J Waterw Port C Div 114:220–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Moshagen H, Torum A (1975) Wave induced pressures in permeable seabeds. J Waterw Div ASCE 101:49–58

    Google Scholar 

  17. Okusa S (1985) Wave-induced stresses in unsaturated submarine sediments. Geotechnique 35:517–532. doi:10.1680/geot.1985.35.4.517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Park K, Owatsiriwong A, Lee J (2008) Analytical solution for steady-state groundwater inflow into a drained circular tunnel in a semi-infinite aquifer: a revisit. Tunn Undergr Space Tech 23:206–209. doi:10.1016/j.tust.2007.02.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Putnam JA (1949) Loss of wave energy due to percolation in a permeable sea bottom. EOS Trans Am Geophy Union 30:662–666. doi:10.1029/TR030i003p00349

    Google Scholar 

  20. Prevost JH, Eide O, Anderson KH (1975) Discussion of wave induced pressures in permeable seabed. J Waterw Div ASCE 101:464–465

    Google Scholar 

  21. Verruijt A (1969) Elastic storage of aquifers. In: De Wiest RJM (ed) Flow through porous media. Academic Press, New York, pp 331–376

    Google Scholar 

  22. Yamamoto T, Koning HL, Sellmeijer H, Hijum EV (1978) On the response of a poro-elastic bed to water waves. J Fluid Mech 87:193–206. doi:10.1017/S0022112078003006

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The preparation of this paper was supported by the National Natural Science Fund of China under Research Project Nos. 51338009, 51678523 and 51278462. The authors greatly appreciate the support provided.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hongwei Ying.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ying, H., Zhu, C. & Gong, X. Tide-induced hydraulic response in a semi-infinite seabed with a subaqueous drained tunnel. Acta Geotech. 13, 149–157 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-017-0525-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-017-0525-5

Keywords

Navigation