Skip to main content
Log in

S-wave crustal and upper mantle’s velocity structure in the eastern Tibetan Plateau — Deep environment of lower crustal flow

  • Published:
Science in China Series D: Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A teleseismic profile consisting of 26 stations was deployed along 30°N latitude in the eastern Tibetan Plateau. By use of the inversion of P-wave receiver function, the S-wave velocity structures at depth from surface to 80 km beneath the profile have been determined. The inversion results reveal that there is significant lateral variation of the crustal structure between the tectonic blocks on the profile. From Linzhi north of the eastern Himalayan Syntaxis, the crust is gradually thickened in NE direction; the crustal thickness reaches to the maximum value (∼72 km) at the Bangong-Nujiang suture, and then decreased to 65 km in the Qiangtang block, to 57–64 km in the Bayan Har block, and to 40–45 km in the Sichuan Basin. The eastern segment of the teleseismic profile (to the east of Batang) coincides geographically with the Zhubalong-Zizhong deep seismic sounding profile carried out in 2000, and the S-wave velocity structure determined from receiver functions is consistent with the P-wave velocity structure obtained by deep seismic sounding in respect of the depths of Moho and major crustal interfaces. In the Qiangtang and the Bayan Har blocks, the lower velocity layer is widespread in the lower crust (at depth of 30–60 km) along the profile, while there is a normal velocity distribution in lower crust in the Sichuan Basin. On an average, the crustal velocity ratio (Poisson ratio) in tectonic blocks on the profile is 1.73 (σ = 0.247) in the Lhasa block, 1.78 (σ = 0.269) in the Banggong-Nujiang suture, 1.80 (σ = 0.275) in the Qiangtang block, 1.86 (σ = 0.294) in the Bayan Har blocks, and 1.77 (σ = 0.265) in the Yangtze block, respectively. The Qiangtang and the Bayan Har blocks are characterized by lower S-wave velocity anomaly in lower crust, complicated Moho transition, and higher crustal Poisson ratio, indicating that there is a hot and weak medium in lower crust. These are considered as the deep environment of lower crustal flow in the eastern Tibetan Plateau. Flowage of the ductile material in lower crust may be attributable to the variation of the gravitational potential energy in upper crust from higher on the plateau to lower off plateau.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Langston C A. Structure under Mount Rainier, Washington, inferred from teleseismic body waves. J Geophys Res, 1979, 84(9): 4749–4762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Owens T J, Zandt G, Taylor S R. Seismic evidence for an ancient rift beneath the Cumberland Plateau, Tennessee: A detailed analysis of broadband teleseismic P waveforms. J Geophys Res, 1984, 89: 7783–7795

    Google Scholar 

  3. Zhu L, Owens T J, Randall G E. Lateral variation in crustal structure of the northern Tibetan Plateau inferred from teleseismic receiver functions. Bull Seism Soc Am, 1995, 85(6): 1531–1540

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kind R, Ni J, Zhao W, et al. Evidence from earthquake data for a partially molten crustal layer in southern Tibet. Science, 1996, 274: 1692–1694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Yuan X, Ni J, Kind R, et al. Lithospheric and upper mantle structure of southern Tibet from a seismological passive source experiment. J Geophys Res, 1997, 102(B12): 27491–27500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Liu Q, Kind R, Li S. Receiver functions at the stations of the Chinese digital seismic network (CDSN) and their nonlinear inversion. Chinese J Geophys (in Chinese), 1997, 40(3): 356–368

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kosarev G, Kind R, Sobolev S V, et al. Seismic evidence for a detached Indian lithospheric mantle beneath Tibet. Science, 1999, 283: 1306–1309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Vergne J, Wittlinger G, Qiang H, et al. Seismic evidence for stepwise thickening of the crust across the NE Tibetan Plateau. Earth Planet Sci Lett, 2002, 203: 25–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Li X, Kind R, Yuan X, et al. Rejuvenation of the lithosphere by the Hawaiian plume. Nature, 2004, 427: 827–829. doi:10,1038/nature02349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ai Y, Zheng T, Xu W, et al. A complex 660 km discontinuity beneath northeast China. Earth Planet Sci Lett, 2003, 212: 63–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wu Q, Zeng R. The crustal structure of Tibetan plateau inferred from broadband teleseismic waveforms. Chinese J Geophys (in Chinese), 1998, 41(5): 669–679

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chen J, Liu Q, Li S, et al. Crust and upper mantle S-wave velocity structure across Northeastern Tibetan Plateau and Ordos block. Chinese J Geophys (in Chinese), 2005, 48: 333–342

    Google Scholar 

  13. Shi D, Zhao W J, Brown L, et al. Detection of southward intracontinental subduction of Tibetan lithosphere along the Bangong-Nujiang suture by P-to-S converted waves. Geology, 2004, 32: 209–212, Doi:10,1130/G19814.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Burchfiel B C, Chen Z, Liu Y, et al. Tectonics of Longmen Shan and adjacent regions, Central China. Int Geol Rev, 1995, 37: 661–736

    Google Scholar 

  15. King R W, Shen F, Burchfiel B C, et al. Geodetic measurement of crustal motion in southwest China. Geology, 1997, 25: 179–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yu R, Hao Z, Huo L. Tectonic evolution of Mesozoic and Cenozoic collisional orogens in Western Sichuan Plateau. Sichuan J Geol (in Chinese), 1989, 9: 1–9

    Google Scholar 

  17. Xu Z, Hou L, Wang Z, et al. Orogenic Processes of Songpan-Garze Orogenic Belt, China (in Chinese). Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 1992. 1–60

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sichuan Seismological Bureau. Xianshuihe Active Fault Belt (in Chinese). Chengdu: Sichuan Science and Technology Press, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wang Y. Principal features of the active tectonics in Tibetan Plateau. In: Ma Z, Wang Y, Zhang Y, eds. Study on the Recent Deformation and Dynamics of the Lithosphere of Qinghai-Xizang Plateau (in Chinese). Beijing: Seismological Press, 2001. 251–262

    Google Scholar 

  20. Yin A. Geologic evolution of the Himalayan-Tibetan orogen in the context of Phanerozoic Continental growth of Asia. Acta Geosci Sin (in Chinese), 2001, 22: 193–230

    Google Scholar 

  21. Tapponnier P, Peltzer G, Ledain A, et al. Propogating extrusion tectonics in Asia: new insights from simple experiments with plasticine. Geology, 1982, 10: 611–616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tapponnier P, Peltzer G, Armijo R. On the mechanics of the collision between India and Asia. In: Coward M P, Ries A C, eds. Collision Tectonics. London: Geol Soc Spec Publ 19, 1986, 115–157

    Google Scholar 

  23. Chen X, Wu Y, Du P, et al. Crustal velocity structure at two sides of Longmenshan tectonic belt. In: Department of Scientific Programming and Earthquake Monitoring, China Seismological Bureau eds., Developments in the Research of Deep Structure of China’s Continent (in Chinese). Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 1986. 112–127

    Google Scholar 

  24. Li L, Jin G. Magnetotelluric sounding study of crust and upper mantle in the Panxi “rift zone” and the Longmenshan fault belt. Geophys Geochem Explor (in Chinese), 1987, 11: 161–169

    Google Scholar 

  25. Cui Z, Chen J, Wu L. Deep Crustal Structure and Tectonics along Huashixia-Shaoyang Profile (in Chinese). Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 1996. 49–168

    Google Scholar 

  26. Zeng R, Zhu J, Zhou B, et al. 3-D seismic velocity structure of the Tibetan Plateau and its eastern neighboring areas with implication to model of collision between continents. Acta Seismol Sin (in Chinese), 1992, 14(Suppl): 523–533

    Google Scholar 

  27. Liu J, Liu F, Wu H, et al. Three dimensional velocity images of the Crust and upper mantle beneath North-South Zone in China. Chin J Geophys (in Chinese), 1989, 32: 143–152

    Google Scholar 

  28. Huang J, Zhao D, Zheng S. Lithospheric structure and its relationship to seismic and volcanic activity in southwest China. J Geophys Res, 2002, 107(B10), doi: 10.1029/2000JB000137

  29. Wang C Y, Chan W W, Mooney W D. 3-D velocity structure of crust and upper mantle in southwestern China and its tectonic implications. J Geophys Res, 2003, 108(B9): 2442, doi: 10.1029/2002JB001973

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Li Y, Xu G, Zhou R, et al. Isostatic gravity anomaly in Longmenshan Mountains and its constraint on the crustal uplift in the eastern margin of Tibetan Plateau. Geol Bull (in Chinese), 2005, 24(12): 1162–1168

    Google Scholar 

  31. Wang C Y, Wu J P, Lou H, et al. P-wave crustal velocity structure in western Sichuan and eastern Tibetan region. Sci China Ser D-Earth Sci, 2003, 46(Suppl): 254–265

    Google Scholar 

  32. Wang C Y, Han W B, Wu J P, et al. Crustal structure beneath the eastern margin of the Tibetan Plateau and its tectonic implications. J Geophys Res, 2007, 112: B07307, doi: 10.1029/ 2005JB003873

  33. Yao H, Van der Hilst R D, De Hoop M V. Surface-wave array tomography in SE Tibet from ambient seismic noise and two-station analysis, I—Phase velocity maps. Geophys J Int, 2006, 166: 732–744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Su W, Peng Y, Zheng Y, et al. Crustal and upper mantle’s shear velocity structure beneath the Tibetan Plateau and adjacent areas. Acta Geosci Sin (in Chinese), 2002, 23(3): 193–200

    Google Scholar 

  35. Rapine R, Tillman F, West M, et al. Crustal structure of northern and southern Tibet from surface wave dispersion analysis. J Geophys Res, 2003, 108(B2): 2120, doi:10,1029/2001JB0000445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Kennett B L N. Seismic Wave Propagation in Stratified Media. London: Cambridge University Press, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  37. Randall G E. Efficient calculation of differential seismograms for lithospheric receiver functions. Geophys J Int, 1989, 99(2): 469–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Zhu L, Kanamori H. Moho depth variation in southern California from teleseismic receiver functions. J Geophys Res, 2000, 105(B2): 2969–2980

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Zhao W J, Zhao X, Shi D, et al. Research progress of INDEPTH. Geol Bull (in Chinese), 2002, 22(11): 691–700

    Google Scholar 

  40. Xu Z Q, Li H, Yang J. An orogenic plateau-the orogenic collage and orogenic types of the Tibetan plateau. Earth Sci Front (in Chinese), 2006, 13(4): 1–17

    Google Scholar 

  41. Christensen N I. Poisson’s ratio and crustal seismology. J Geophys Res, 1996, 101: 3139–3156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Owens T J, Zandt G. Implications of crustal property variations for model of Tibetan Plateau evolution. Nature, 1997, 387: 37–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Royden L H, Burchfiel B C, King R W, et al. Surface deformation and lower crustal flow in eastern Tibet. Science, 1997, 276: 788–790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Klemperer S L. Crustal flow in Tibet: Geological evidence for the physical state of Tibetan lithosphere. In: Searle M P, Law R D, eds. Channel Flow, Ductile Extrusion and Exhumation of Lower Mid-Crust in Continental Collision Zones. Geol Soc London Spec Pub, 2006, 268: 39–70

  45. Kind R, Yuan X, Sual J, et al. Seismic images of crust and upper mantle beneath Tibet: Evidence for Eurasian plate subduction. Science, 2002, 298: 1219–1221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Zandt G, Myers S C, Wallace T C. Crust and mantle structure across the Basin and Range — Colorado plateau boundary at 37°N latitude and implications for Cenozoic extensional mechanism. J Geophys Res, 1995, 100: 10529–10548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Chen, Z., Burchfiel B C, Liu Y, et al. Global positioning system measurements from eastern Tibet and their implications for India/Eurasia intercontinental deformation. J Geophys Res, 2000, 105(B7): 16215–16227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Meisnner R, Tilmann F, Haines S. About the lithospheric structure of central Tibet, based on seismic data from the INDEPTH III profile. Tectonophys, 2004, 380: 1–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Zhang Z J, Klemperer S L. West-east variation in crustal thickness in northern Lhasa block, central Tibet, from deep seismic sounding data. J Geophys Res, 2005, 110: B09403, doi: 10.1029/2004/2004-JB003139

  50. Flesch L M, Holt W E, Silver P G, et al. Constraining the extent of crust-mantle coupling in central Asia using GPS, geologic, and shear-wave splitting data. Earth Planet Sci Lett, 2005, 238: 248–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wang ChunYong.

Additional information

Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants No. 40334041 and 40774037) and the International Cooperation Program of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (Grant No. 2003DF000011)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, C., Lou, H., Lü, Z. et al. S-wave crustal and upper mantle’s velocity structure in the eastern Tibetan Plateau — Deep environment of lower crustal flow. Sci. China Ser. D-Earth Sci. 51, 263–274 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-008-0008-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-008-0008-5

Keywords

Navigation