Abstract
Educators use various strategies to increase listening comprehension for nonnative English speakers in the classroom and multimedia environments. Research on audio reduction has shown mixed results, whereas a study that enhanced (doubled) virtual human gesturing found increased listening comprehension with procedural information (Davis and Vincent, British Journal of Educational Technology 50:3252–3263, 2019). This research examined the use of virtual human gesture frequency (enhanced, average, no) and video speed (normal, reduced 25%) on participant satisfaction and learning outcomes with procedural information. Analysis based on 234 multinational university students indicated that normal video speed significantly increased satisfaction compared to reduced speed; satisfaction was rated significantly higher with agents that gestured compared with the no-gesture condition; and enhancing the gesture frequency significantly increased learning outcomes compared to the average and no-gesture conditions. These findings support previous studies that indicated enhanced gestures significantly increase the learning of procedural information. Also, agent gesturing increased the satisfaction with the agent, which supports systematic review findings that gesturing is a principal moderator for agent persona (Davis et al., Journal of Research on Technology in Education 53:89–106, 2021). However, this research provides evidence that a 25% reduction in video speed may be too slow to maintain satisfaction with advanced foreign language users and that less reduced rates such as 15% or 10% should to be considered. Finally, this research puts forth a gesture design framework for designers to create gesturing virtual humans in multimedia environments.
Similar content being viewed by others
Change history
12 July 2021
A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10027-2
References
Adesope, O. O., & Nesbit, J. C. (2012). Verbal redundancy in multimedia learning environments: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(1), 250.
Alibali, M. W., Heath, D. C., & Myers, H. J. (2001). Effects of visibility between speaker and listener on gesture production: Some gestures are meant to be seen. Journal of Memory and Language, 44(2), 169–188.
Blau, E. K. (1990). The effect of syntax, speed, and pauses on listening comprehension. TESOL Quarterly, 24(4), 746–753.
Carlotto, T., & Jaques, P. A. (2016). The effects of animated pedagogical agents in an English-as-a-foreign-language learning environment. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 95(November), 15–26.
Carrier, K. (1999). The social environment of second language listening: Does status play a role in comprehension? The Modern Language Journal, 83, 65–79.
Chaudron, C. (1988). Second language classrooms: Research on teaching and learning. Cambridge University Press.
Chiou, E. K., Schroeder, N. L., & Craig, S. D. (2020). How we trust, perceive, and learn from virtual humans: The influence of voice quality. Computers & Education, 146, 103756.
Choi, S., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Cognitive and affective benefits of an animated pedagogical agent for learning English as a second language. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 34(4), 441–466.
Church, R. B., Ayman-Nolley, S., & Mahootian, S. (2004). The role of gesture in bilingual education: Does gesture enhance learning? International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 7(4), 303–319.
Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37–46.
Conrad, L. (1989). The effects of time-compressed speech on native and EFL listening comprehension. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11(1), 1–16.
Craig, S. D., & Schroeder, N. L. (2017). Reconsidering the voice effect when learning from a virtual human. Computers & Education, 114, 193–205.
Davis, R. O. (2018). The impact of pedagogical agent gesturing in multimedia learning environments: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 24, 193–209.
Davis, R., & Antonenko, P. (2017). Effects of pedagogical agent gestures on social acceptance and learning: Virtual real relationships in an elementary foreign language classroom. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 28(4), 459–480.
Davis, R. O., Park, T., & Vincent, J. (2021). A systematic narrative review of agent persona on learning outcomes and design variables to enhance personification. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 53(1), 89–106.
Davis, R. O., & Vincent, J. (2019). Sometimes more is better: Agent gestures, procedural knowledge and the foreign language learner. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(6), 3252–3263.
Derwing, T., & Munro, M. J. (2001). What speaking rates do non-native listeners prefer? Applied Linguistics, 22(3), 324–337.
Dunsworth, Q., & Atkinson, R. K. (2007). Fostering multimedia learning of science: Exploring the role of an animated agent’s image. Computers & Education, 49(3), 677–690.
Elkhafaifi, H. (2005). The effects of prelistening activities on listening comprehension in Arabic learners. Foreign Language Annals, 38, 505–513.
Ellis, R. (1993). Naturally Simplified Input, Comprehension, and Second Language Acquisition.
Flowerdew, J., & Miller, L. (1992). Student perceptions, problems and strategies in second language lecture comprehension. RELC Journal, 23(2), 60–80.
Frechette, C., & Moreno, R. (2010). The roles of animated pedagogical agents’ presence and nonverbal communication in multimedia learning environments. Journal of Media Psychology, 22(2), 61–72.
Goldin-Meadow, S., Kim, S., & Singer, M. (1999). What the teacher’s hands tell the student’s mind about math. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(4), 720.
Griffiths, R. (1990). Facilitating listening comprehension through rate-control. RELC Journal, 21(1), 55–65.
Griffiths, R. (1992). Speech rate and listening comprehension: Further evidence of the relationship. TESOL Quarterly, 26(2), 385–390.
Grosjean, F. (1972). Le rôle joué par trois variables temporelles dans la compréhension orale de l'anglais étudié comme seconde langue et perception de la vitesse de lecture par des lecteurs et des auditeurs (Doctoral dissertation).
Hinkel, E. (2006). Current perspectives on teaching the four skills. TESOL Quarterly, 40, 109–131.
Honing, H. (2006). Evidence for tempo-specific timing in music using a web-based experimental setup. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(3), 780.
Hostetter, A. B. (2008). Mind in motion: The gesture as simulated action framework (PhD thesis). The University of Wisconsin, Madison
Hostetter, A. B. (2011). When do gestures communicate? A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 137(2), 297–315.
Jensen, E., & Vinther, T. (2003). Exact repetition as input enhancement in second language acquisition. Language Learning, 53, 373–428.
Kelly, S. D., McDevitt, T., & Esch, M. (2009). Brief training with co-speech gesture lends a hand to word learning in a foreign language. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24(2), 313–334.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2003). Teaching language: From grammar to grammaring. Heinle & Heinle Pub.
Lester, J. C., Voerman, J. L., Towns, S. G., & Callaway, C. B. (1999). Deictic believability: Coordinated gesture, locomotion, and speech in lifelike pedagogical agents. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 13(4–5), 383–414.
Lewis, K., Lange, D., & Gillis, L. (2005). Transactive memory systems, learning, and learning transfer. Organization Science, 16(6), 581–598.
Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). . Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R. E., & DaPra, C. S. (2012). An embodiment effect in computer-based learning with animated pedagogical agents. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 18(3), 239.
McBride, K. (2011). The effect of rate of speech and distributed practice on the development of listening comprehension. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(2), 131–154.
McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. University of Chicago Press.
Mecartty, F. (2000). Lexical and grammatical knowledge in reading and listening comprehension by foreign language learners of Spanish. Applied Language Learning, 11, 323–348.
Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (1999). Cognitive principles of multimedia learning: The role of modality and contiguity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(2), 358.
Osada, N. (2004). Listening comprehension research: A brief review of the past thirty years. Dialogue, 3(1), 53–66.
Pastore, R. S. (2010). The effects of diagrams and time-compressed instruction on learning and learners’ perceptions of cognitive load. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(5), 485–505.
Pastore, R. (2012). The effects of time-compressed instruction and redundancy on learning and learners’ perceptions of cognitive load. Computers & Education, 58(1), 641–651.
Rader, K. E. (1990). The effects of three different levels of word rate on the listening comprehension of third-quarter university Spanish students (Doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University).
Reeves, L., & Weisberg, R. W. (1994). The role of content and abstract information in analogical transfer. Psychological Bulletin, 115(3), 381.
Ritzhaupt, A. D., & Barron, A. (2008). Effects of time-compressed narration and representational adjunct images on cued-recall, content recognition, and learner satisfaction. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 39(2), 161–184.
Ritzhaupt, A. D., Gomes, N. D., & Barron, A. E. (2008). The effects of time-compressed audio and verbal redundancy on learner performance and satisfaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(5), 2434–2445.
Ritzhaupt, A. D., Pastore, R., & Davis, R. (2015). Effects of captions and time-compressed video on learner performance and satisfaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 222–227.
Rothermich, K., Harris, H. L., Sewell, K., & Bobb, S. C. (2019). Listener impressions of foreigner-directed speech: A systematic review. Speech Communication, 112, 22–29.
Schlaug, G., Knorr, U., & Seitz, R. J. (1994). Inter-subject variability of cerebral activations in acquiring a motor skill: A study with positron emission tomography. Experimental Brain Research, 98(3), 523–534.
Seo, K. (2002). The effect of visuals on listening comprehension: A study of Japanese learners’ listening strategies. International Journal of Listening, 15, 57–81.
Stewart, M. A., & Pertusa, I. (2004). Gains to language learners from viewing target anguage close-captioned films. Foreign Language Annals, 37, 438–447.
Theune, M., & Brandhorst, C. J. (2009). To beat or not to beat: Beat gestures in direction giving. In S. Kopp & I. Wachsmuth (Eds.), Gesture in embodied communication and human-computer interaction (pp. 195–206). Springer.
Underwood, M., Kenworthy, J., & Rost, M. (1989). Teaching listening. (Vol. 117). Longman.
Vandergrift, L. (2007). Recent developments in second and foreign language listening comprehension research. Language Teaching, 40(3), 191–210.
Vandergrift, L., Goh, C. C., Mareschal, C. J., & Tafaghodtari, M. H. (2006). The metacognitive awareness listening questionnaire: Development and validation. Language Learning, 56(3), 431–462.
Verdugo, D., & Belmonte, I. A. (2007). Using digital stories to improve listening comprehension with Spanish young learners of English. Language Learning & Technology, 11(1), 87–101.
Willems, R. M., Özyürek, A., & Hagoort, P. (2007). When language meets action: The neural integration of gesture and speech. Cerebral Cortex, 17(10), 2322–2333.
Winke, P., Gass, S., & Sydorenko, T. (2010). The effects of captioning videos used for foreign language listening activities. Language Learning and Technology, 14(1), 65–86.
Zhao, Y. (1997). The effects of listeners’ control of speech rate on second language comprehension. Applied Linguistics, 18, 49–68.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
There are no conflicts of interest to report for this research or the authors involved.
Informed consent
The research involved human participants. Informed consent was explained orally to the participants, and also presented in written form and agreed to before beginning the experiment.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The original version of this article was revised: The original publication inadvertently referenced agent persona instead of satisfaction in the title and abstract (lines 11 and 17). The abstract misstated the use of structural equation modeling as the method of analysis.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Davis, R.O., Wan, L.L., Vincent, J. et al. The effects of virtual human gesture frequency and reduced video speed on satisfaction and learning outcomes. Education Tech Research Dev 69, 2331–2352 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10010-x
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10010-x