Skip to main content
Log in

Do social regulation strategies predict learning engagement and learning outcomes? A study of English language learners in wiki-supported literature circles activities

  • Development Article
  • Published:
Educational Technology Research and Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Combining wiki technology with the literature circles could be powerful and beneficial for promoting the learning of English as a foreign language (EFL). However, little research has been conducted to investigate the role of EFL students’ social forms of regulatory strategies in their learning performance in the context of wiki-supported literature activities. This research explored how students’ social regulation strategies relate to learning engagement and learning outcomes. Ninety-five college EFL students participated in wiki-supported literature circles activities. The results showed that “socially shared regulation” acted as a predictor for students’ engagement, while “co-regulation” acted as a predictor for students’ learning outcomes. The results also highlighted the roles of “monitoring,” “time management,” and “task understanding” in predicting students’ learning performance. In addition, this study also revealed that the students’ social regulation strategies focused more on “planning,” “time management,” and “task understanding”, with few regulatory strategies in “evaluation” and “content monitoring.” The results are discussed, and suggestions for teachers, tool developers and researchers are also proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Backer, L. D., Keer, H. V., & Valcke, M. (2020). Variations in socially shared metacognitive regulation and their relation with university students’ performance. Metacognition and Learning, 15, 233–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J. M. (1997). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bikowski, D., & Vithanage, R. (2016). Effects of web-based collaborative writing on individual l2 writing development. Language Learning and Technology, 20(1), 79–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castañeda, D. A., & Cho, M.-H. (2013). The role of wiki writing in learning Spanish grammar. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 26(4), 334–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, C. J., Chang, M. H., Chiu, B. C., Liu, C. C., Chiang, S. H. F., Wen, C. T., et al. (2017). An analysis of student collaborative problem solving activities mediated by collaborative simulations. Computers & Education, 114, 222–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chao, Y. C. J., & Lo, H. C. (2011). Students’ perceptions of Wiki-based collaborative writing for learners of English as a foreign language. Interactive Learning Environments, 19(4), 395–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Y., & Jiang, H. (2015). Instant messenger-based online discourse platform and its impacts on students’ academic performances: An exploratory study in art and design education. Computers & Education, 88, 315–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho, M.-H., & Lim, S. (2017). Using regulation activities to improve undergraduate collaborative writing on wikis. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 54(1), 53–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung, J. M. (1997). A comparison of two multiple-choice test formats for assessing English structure competence. Foreign Language Annals, 30(1), 111–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, H. (2002). Literature circles: Voice and choice in book clubs & reading groups (2nd ed.). New York, ME: Stenhouse.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, H. (2006). What’s the next big thing with literature circles? Voices from the Middle, 13(4), 10–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Wever, B., Hämäläinen, R., Voet, M., & Gielen, M. (2015). A wiki task for first-year university students: The effect of scripting students’ collaboration. Internet and Higher Education, 25, 37–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ducate, L. C., Anderson, L. L., & Moreno, N. (2011). Wading through the world of wikis: An analysis of three wiki projects. Foreign Language Annals, 44(3), 495–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eeds, M., & Wells, D. (1989). Grand conversations: An exploration of meaning construction in literature study groups. Research in the Teaching of English, 23(1), 4–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elhess, M., & Egbert, J. (2015). Literature circles as support for language development. English Language Forum, 53, 13–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Er, E., Dimitriadis, Y., & Gašević, D. (2020). Collaborative peer feedback and learning analytics: Theory-oriented design for supporting class-wide interventions. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1764490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fransen, J., Weinberger, A., & Kirschner, P. A. (2013). Team effectiveness and team development in CSCL. Educational Psychologist, 48(1), 9–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fredricks, J. A., & McColskey, W. (2012). The measurement of student engagement: A comparative analysis of various methods and student self-report instruments. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 763–782). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Furr, M. (2011). Bookworms club reading circles teacher’s handbook (3rd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gettinger, M., & Walter, M. J. (2012). Classroom strategies to enhance academic engaged time. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 653–673). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hadwin, A. F., Järvelä, S., & Miller, M. (2011). Self-regulated, co-regulated, and socially-shared regulation of learning. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 65–84). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadwin, A., & Oshige, M. (2011). Self-regulation, coregulation, and socially shared regulation: Exploring perspectives of social in self-regulated learning theory. Teachers College Record, 113(2), 240–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hathaway, R. (2011). A powerful pairing: The literature circle and the wiki. The ALAN Review, 38(3), 14–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, H. (2019). Wiki-mediated collaboration and its association with L2 writing development: An exploratory study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(8), 945–967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, H. C., & Lo, Y. F. (2018). Using wiki-mediated collaboration to foster L2 writing performance. Language Learning & Technology, 22(3), 103–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, J., Erkens, G., Kirschner, P. A., & Kanselaar, G. (2012). Task-related and social regulation during online collaborative learning. Metacognition and Learning, 7(1), 25–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Järvelä, S., & Hadwin, A. F. (2013). New frontiers: Regulating learning in CSCL. Educational Psychologist, 48(1), 25–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Järvelä, S., Jävernoja, H., & Malmberg, J. (2019). Capturing the dynamic and cyclical nature of regulation: Methodological progress in understanding socially shared regulation in learning. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 14, 425–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Järvelä, S., Järvenoja, H., Malmberg, J., & Hadwin, A. F. (2013). Exploring socially shared regulation in the context of collaboration. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 12(3), 267–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Järvelä, S., Järvenoja, H., Malmberg, J., Isohätälä, J., & Sobocinski, M. (2016a). How do types of interaction and phases of self-regulated learning set a stage for collaborative engagement? Learning and Instruction, 43, 39–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Järvelä, S., Kirschner, P. A., Hadwin, A., Järvenoja, H., Malmberg, J., Miller, M., et al. (2016b). Socially shared regulation of learning in CSCL: Understanding and prompting individual- and group-level shared regulatory activities. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 11(3), 263–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Järvelä, S., Malmberg, J., & Koivuniemi, M. (2016c). Recognizing socially shared regulation by using the temporal sequences of online chat and logs in CSCL. Learning & Instruction, 42, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Järvelä, S., Volet, S., & Järvenoja, H. (2010). Research on motivation in collaborative learning: Moving beyond the cognitive–situative divide and combining individual and social processes. Educational Psychologist, 45(1), 15–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, C., & Miceli, T. (2013). In piazza online: Exploring the use of wikis with beginner foreign language learners. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 26(5), 389–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khosa, D. K., & Volet, S. E. (2014). Productive group engagement in cognitive activity and metacognitive regulation during collaborative learning: Can it explain differences in students’ conceptual understanding? Metacognition & Learning, 9(3), 287–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, D., & Lim, C. (2018). Promoting socially shared metacognitive regulation in collaborative project-based learning: A framework for the design of structured guidance. Teaching in Higher Education, 23(2), 194–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, M., & Kim, S. (2020). Dynamic learner engagement in a wiki-enhanced writing course. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 32(3), 582–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lajoie, S. P., & Lu, J. (2012). Supporting collaboration with technology: Does shared cognition lead to coregulation in medicine? Metacognition and Learning, 7(1), 45–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson, L. C. (2009). Reader response meets new literacies: Empowering readers in online learning communities. The Reading Teacher, 62(8), 638–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, L., Lajoie, S. P., Poitras, E. G., Nkangu, M., & Doleck, T. (2016). Co-regulation and knowledge construction in an online synchronous problem based learning setting. Education and Information Technologies, 22(4), 1623–1650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, A., O’Donnell, A. M., & Rogat, T. K. (2015). Exploration of the cognitive regulatory sub-processes employed by groups characterized by socially shared and other-regulation in a CSCL context. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 617–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, M., & Zhu, W. (2017). Good or bad collaborative wiki writing: Exploring links between group interactions and writing products. Journal of Second Language Writing, 35, 38–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, X., & Chu, S. K. W. (2018). Using design-based research methodology to develop a pedagogy for teaching and learning of Chinese writing with wiki among Chinese upper primary school students. Computers & Education, 126, 359–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, X., Chu, S. K. W., Ki, W. W., & Woo, M. (2012). Using a wiki-based collaborative process writing pedagogy to facilitate collaborative writing among Chinese primary school students. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(1), 159–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, X., Chu, S. K. W., & Ki, W. W. (2014). The effects of a wiki-based collaborative process writing pedagogy on writing ability and attitudes among upper primary school students in mainland china. Computers & Education, 77, 151–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y., Li, X., Su, Y., Peng, Y., & Peng, Y. (2020). Exploring the role of EFL learners’ online self-regulation profiles in their social regulation of learning in wiki-supported collaborative reading activities. Journal of Computers in Education, 7(4), 575–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, W. C., & Yang, S. C. (2011). Exploring students’ perceptions of integrating wiki technology and peer feedback into English writing courses. English Teaching, 10(2), 88–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413–468). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, J., & Churchill, D. (2014). The effect of social interaction on learning engagement in a social networking environment. Interactive Learning Environments, 22(4), 401–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma, Q. (2019). Examining the role of inter-group peer online feedback on wiki writing in an EAP context. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(3), 197–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malmberg, J., Järvelä, S., & Järvenoja, H. (2017). Capturing temporal and sequential patterns of self-, co-, and socially shared regulation in the context of collaborative learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 49, 160–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macfadyen, L. P., & Dawson, S. (2010). Mining LMS data to develop an “early warning system” for educators: A proof of concept. Computers & Education, 54, 588–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McElvain, C. M. (2010). Transactional literature circles and the reading comprehension of English learners in the mainstream classroom. Journal of Research in Reading, 33(2), 178–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, M., & Hadwin, A. (2015). Scripting and awareness tools for regulating collaborative learning: Changing the landscape of support in CSCL. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 573–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreillon, J., Hunt, J., & Ewing, S. (2009). Learning and teaching in WANDA wiki wonderland: Literature circles in the digital commons. Teacher Librarian, 37(2), 23–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, L. V., Finnegan, C., & Wu, S. S. (2005). Tracking student behavior, persistence, and achievement in online courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 8(3), 221–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panadero, E., Jonsson, A., & Botella, J. (2017). Effects of self-assessment on self-regulated learning and self-efficacy: Four meta-analyses. Educational Research Review, 22, 74–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panadero, E., & Alonso-Tapia, J. (2013). Self-assessment: Theoretical and practical connotations. When it happens, how is it acquired and what to do to develop it in our students. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 11(2), 551–576.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qiu, X., & Lee, M. K. (2020). Regulated learning and self-efficacy beliefs in peer collaborative writing: An exploratory study of L2 learners’ written products, task discussions, and self-reports. System. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oller, J. W. (1979). Language tests at school. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogat, T. K., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2011). Socially shared regulation in collaborative groups: An analysis of the interplay between quality of social regulation and group processes. Cognition and Instruction, 29(4), 375–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shelton-Strong, S. J. (2011). Literature circles in ELT. ELT Journal, 66(2), 214–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shelton-Strong, S. J. (2019). An analysis of collaborative dialogue in literature circles. In C. Jones (Ed.), Literature, spoken language and speaking skills in second language learning (pp. 176–201). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Storch, N. (2013). Collaborative writing in L2 classrooms. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Su, Y., Li, Y., Hu, H., & Rosé, C. P. (2018). Exploring college English language learners’ self and social regulation of learning during wiki-supported collaborative reading activities. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 13(1), 35–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su, Y., Li, Y., Liang, J. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2019). Moving literature circles into wiki-based environment: The role of online self-regulation in EFL learners’ attitude toward collaborative learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(5–6), 556–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ucan, S. (2017). Changes in primary school students’ use of self and social forms of regulation of learning across collaborative inquiry activities. International Journal of Educational Research, 85, 51–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ucan, S., & Webb, M. (2015). Social regulation of learning during collaborative inquiry learning in science: How does it emerge and what are its functions? International Journal of Science Education, 37(15), 2503–2532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind and society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volet, S., & Mansfield, C. (2006). Group work at university: Significance of personal goals in the regulation strategies of students with positive and negative appraisals. Higher Education Research & Development, 25(4), 341–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volet, S., Summers, M., & Thurman, J. (2009a). High-level co-regulation in collaborative learning: How does it emerge and how is it sustained? Learning and Instruction, 19(2), 128–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volet, S., Vauras, M., & Salonen, P. (2009b). Self- and social regulation in learning contexts: An integrative perspective. Educational Psychologist, 44(4), 215–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, F. H. (2017). An exploration of online behaviour engagement and achievement in flipped classroom supported by learning management system. Computers & Education, 114, 79–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, L. (2019). Effects of regulation on interaction pattern in web-based collaborative writing activity. Computer Assisted Language Learning. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1667831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y. C. (2015). Promoting collaborative writing through wikis: A new approach for advancing innovative and active learning in an ESP context. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28(6), 499–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei, X., Cheng, I., Chen, N., et al. (2020). Effect of the flipped classroom on the mathematics performance of middle school students. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 1461–1484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wichmann, A., & Rummel, N. (2013). Improving revision in wiki-based writing: Coordination pays off. Computers & Education, 62, 262–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Widodo, H. P. (2016). Engaging students in literature circles: Vocational English reading programs. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 25(2), 347–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woo, M. M., Chu, S. K. W., & Li, X. (2013). Peer-feedback and revision process in a wiki mediated collaborative writing. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61(2), 279–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Q., Peck, K. L., Hristova, A., et al. (2016). Exploring the communication preferences of MOOC learners and the value of preference-based groups: Is grouping enough? Education Technology Research and Development, 64, 809–837.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, Y., & Cheng, L. (2008). College English test (CET) in China. Language Testing, 25(3), 408–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, L., & Huang, R. (2016). The effects of sentiments and co-regulation on group performance in computer supported collaborative learning. Internet and Higher Education, 28, 59–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B., & Schunk, D. H. (2011). Self-regulated learning and performance: An introduction and overview. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 1–12). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zorko, V. (2009). Factors affecting the way students collaborate in a wiki for English language learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(5), 645–665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their enlightening comments and suggestions.

Funding

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (61877003), Humanities and Social Sciences Fund of Chinese Ministry of Education (18YJC740084), Teaching Reform Project supported by Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications (2017JY64), and the International Joint Research Project of Faculty of Education, Beijing Normal University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to You Su.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, Y., Chen, K., Su, Y. et al. Do social regulation strategies predict learning engagement and learning outcomes? A study of English language learners in wiki-supported literature circles activities. Education Tech Research Dev 69, 917–943 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09934-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09934-7

Keywords

Navigation