Abstract
Among the literature on self-regulated learning and social networking, the studies, which explore the impact of social networks on learning regarding connection sizes and relationship-establishing factors, are rarely seen in the context of social networking among strangers. This descriptive study addresses the gap by exploring data from 468 Chinese junior high school graduates in an online learning resource platform with an integrated social network. The data is digitally generated when the graduates engaged in online self-regulated learning activities for an average of 36 days without any facilitations. The data analysis explores the connection sizes and types of follow links, types of self-regulated learners, and their relationship with lesson completion. The study reveals that social networks trigger different levels of learning engagement. Specifically, the graduates with bidirectional follow links and the optimal connection size of five complete more lessons than other graduates. The study also finds that academic factors (similar learning goals and achievement gaps) are more important than social factors (common identity) in establishing social connections to support self-regulated learning activities. These findings have direct implications for the design of social networking that facilitates self-regulated learning, and enhances students’ self-regulated learning efficacy in online learning environments.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alloway, T. P., Horton, J., Alloway, R. G., & Dawson, C. (2013). Social networking sites and cognitive abilities: do they make you smarter? Computers & Education, 63, 10–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.030.
Altermatt, E. R., & Pomerantz, E. M. (2003). The development of competence-related and motivational beliefs: an investigation of similarity and influence among friends. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 111–123. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.111.
Aydin, S. (2012). A review of research on Facebook as an educational environment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60(6), 1093–1106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-012-9260-7.
Azar, H. K., Lavasani, M. G., Malahmadi, E., & Amani, J. (2010). The role of self-efficacy, task value, and achievement goals in predicting learning approaches and mathematics achievement. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 5, 942–947. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.07.214.
Bakshy, E., Hofman, J. M., Mason, W. A., & Watts, D. J. (2011). Everyone’s an influencer: quantifying influence on twitter. In Proceedings of the fourth ACM international conference on Web search and data mining (pp. 65–74). Washington, DC: Association for Computing Machinery (ACM). Doi:10.1145/1935826.1935845
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc.
Bannert, M., Reimann, P., & Sonnenberg, C. (2014). Process mining techniques for analysing patterns and strategies in students’ self-regulated learning. Metacognition and Learning, 9(2), 161–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-013-9107-6.
Bliss, C. A., Kloumann, I. M., Harris, K. D., Danforth, C. M., & Dodds, P. S. (2012). Twitter reciprocal reply networks exhibit assortativity with respect to happiness. Journal of Computational Science, 3(5), 388–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocs.2012.05.001.
Bohn, A., Buchta, C., Hornik, K., & Mair, P. (2014). Making friends and communicating on Facebook: implications for the access to social capital. Social Networks, 37, 29–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2013.11.003.
Boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210–230. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x.
Bricheno, P., & Thornton, M. (2007). Role model, hero or champion? children's views concerning role models. Educational research, 49(4), 383–396. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131880701717230.
Carrell, S. E., Fullerton, R. L., & West, J. E. (2009). Does your cohort matter? measuring peer effects in college achievement. Journal of Labor Economics, 27(3), 439–464. https://doi.org/10.1086/600143.
Dixson, M. D. (2015). Measuring student engagement in the online course: the online student engagement scale (OSE). Online Learning, 19(4), n4. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v19i4.561.
Duncan, T. G., & McKeachie, W. J. (2005). The making of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire. Educational Psychologist, 40(2), 117–128. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4002_6.
EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative (2011). 7 things you should know about first-generation learning analytics. Louisville, CO: EDUCAUSE. https://library.educause.edu/resources/2011/12/7-things-you-should-know-about-firstgeneration-learning-analytics. Accessed 16 December 2018.
Ellison, N. B., & Boyd, D. (2013). Sociality through social network sites. In W. H. Dutton (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of Internet studies (pp. 151–172). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fisher, M., & Baird, D. E. (2005). Online learning design that fosters student support, self-regulation, and retention. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 22(2), 88–107. https://doi.org/10.1108/10650740510587100.
Gelley, B., & John, A. (2015). Do I need to follow you?: Examining the utility of the pinterest follow mechanism. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing(pp. 1751–1762). Washington, DC: Association for Computing Machinery. Doi:10.1145/2675133.2675209
Gewerc, A., Rodríguez-Groba, A., & Martínez-Piñeiro, E. (2016). Academic social networks and learning analytics to explore self-regulated learning: a case study. IEEE Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologias del Aprendizaje, 11(3), 159–166. https://doi.org/10.1109/RITA.2016.2589483.
Gonyea, R. M. (2005). Self-reported data in institutional research: review and recommendations. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2005(127), 73–89. https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.156.
Grabowicz, P. A., Ramasco, J. J., Moro, E., Pujol, J. M., & Eguiluz, V. M. (2012). Social features of online networks: the strength of intermediary ties in online social media. PLoS ONE, 7(1), e29358. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0029358.
Hamid, S., Waycott, J., Kurnia, S., & Chang, S. (2015). Understanding students’ perceptions of the benefits of online social networking use for teaching and learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 26, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.02.004.
Hill, R. A., & Dunbar, R. I. (2003). Social network size in humans. Human Nature, 14(1), 53–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-003-1016-y.
Howard, J. A. (2000). Social psychology of identities. Annual review of sociology, 26(1), 367–393. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.367.
Hung, H. T., & Yuen, S. C. Y. (2010). Educational use of social networking technology in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(6), 703–714. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2010.507307.
Junco, R. (2012). The relationship between frequency of Facebook use, participation in Facebook activities, and student engagement. Computers & Education, 58(1), 162–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.004.
Karpinski, A. C., Kirschner, P. A., Ozer, I., Mellott, J. A., & Ochwo, P. (2013). An exploration of social networking site use, multitasking, and academic performance among United States and European university students. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 1182–1192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.10.011.
Kim, J., & Lee, J. E. R. (2011). The Facebook paths to happiness: effects of the number of Facebook friends and self-presentation on subjective well-being. CyberPsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14(6), 359–364. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2010.0374.
Knight, S., Shum, S. B., & Littleton, K. (2014). Epistemology, assessment, pedagogy: Where learning meets analytics in the middle space. Journal of Learning Analytics, 1(2), 23–47. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2014.12.3.
Lin, H., Fan, W., & Chau, P. Y. (2014). Determinants of users’ continuance of social networking sites: a self-regulation perspective. Information & Management, 51(5), 595–603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2014.03.010.
Lin, J. W., Lai, Y. C., Lai, Y. C., & Chang, L. C. (2016). Fostering self-regulated learning in a blended environment using group awareness and peer assistance as external scaffolds. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(1), 77–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12120.
Livingstone, S. (2008). Taking risky opportunities in youthful content creation: teenagers’ use of social networking sites for intimacy, privacy and self-expression. New Media & Society, 10(3), 393–411. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444808089415.
Matzat, U., & Vrieling, E. M. (2016). Self-regulated learning and social media—a ‘natural alliance’? evidence on students’ self-regulation of learning, social media use, and student-teacher relationship. Learning, Media and Technology, 41(1), 73–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2015.1064953.
McDonald, J. H. (2014). Handbook of biological statistics (3rd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Sparky House Publishing.
Muilenburg, L. Y., & Berge, Z. L. (2005). Student barriers to online learning: a factor analytic study. Distance Education, 26(1), 29–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910500081269.
Nichols, J. D., & White, J. (2001). Impact of peer networks on achievement of high school algebra students. The Journal of Educational Research, 94(5), 267–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670109598762.
Nielsen.com (2011). Friends & frenemies: Why we add and remove Facebook friends.https://www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/news/2011/friends-frenemies-why-we-add-and-remove-facebook-friends.html. Accessed 16 December 2018.
Nilson, L. B. (2013). Creating self-regulated learners: strategies to strengthen students’ self-awareness and learning skills. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing LLC.
Rennie, F., & Morrison, T. M. (2013). E-learning and social networking handbook: resources for higher education (2ndd ed.). New York: Routledge.
Roblyer, M. D., McDaniel, M., Webb, M., Herman, J., & Witty, J. V. (2010). Findings on Facebook in higher education: a comparison of college faculty and student uses and perceptions of social networking sites. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(3), 134–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.03.002.
Tanes, Z., Arnold, K. E., King, A. S., & Remnet, M. A. (2011). Using Signals for appropriate feedback: perceptions and practices. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2414–2422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.05.016.
Tong, S. T., Van Der Heide, B., Langwell, L., & Walther, J. B. (2008). Too much of a good thing? the relationship between number of friends and interpersonal impressions on Facebook. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(3), 531–549. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2008.00409.x.
Tower, M., Latimer, S., & Hewitt, J. (2014). Social networking as a learning tool: nursing students’ perception of efficacy. Nurse Education Today, 34(6), 1012–1017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2013.11.006.
Veletsianos, G., Kimmons, R., & French, K. D. (2013). Instructor experiences with a social networking site in a higher education setting: expectations, frustrations, appropriation, and compartmentalization. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61(2), 255–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-012-9284-z.
Wang, S. L., & Wu, P. Y. (2008). The role of feedback and self-efficacy on web-based learning: the social cognitive perspective. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1589–1598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.03.004.
Yu, A. Y., Tian, S. W., Vogel, D., & Kwok, R. C. W. (2010). Can learning be virtually boosted? an investigation of online social networking impacts. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1494–1503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.06.015.
Yu, X. H. (2012). Modeling and Implementation of Self-Regulated Learning from the Perspective of Personal Learning Environment Design, Ph.D. Dissertation. Shanghai, PRC: East China Normal University.
Zaidieh, A. J. Y. (2012). The use of social networking in education: challenges and opportunities. World of Computer Science and Information Technology Journal (WCSIT), 2(1), 18–21.
Zhang, Q., Peck, K. L., Hristova, A., Jablokow, K. W., Hoffman, V., Park, E., et al. (2016). Exploring the communication preferences of MOOC learners and the value of preference-based groups: Is grouping enough? Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(4), 809–837. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9439-4.
Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(3), 329–339. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.81.3.329.
Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (Eds.). (1989). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: theory, research, and practice. New York: Springer.
Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (Eds.). (2001). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: theoretical perspectives. New York: Routledge.
Acknowledgements
This study was funded by the Peak Discipline Construction Project of Education and the Advantage Discipline Innovation Platform Principal Investigator Construction Project of Teacher Education at East China Normal University. The authors would like to thank to all the experts and editors who have participated in the review of the paper, especially reviewer #9.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Author Xiaohua Yu has received research data support from the Zhiliao learning platform company. The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yu, X., Wang, C.X. & Spector, J.M. Factors that impact social networking in online self-regulated learning activities. Education Tech Research Dev 68, 3077–3095 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09843-9
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09843-9