Skip to main content
Log in

Response to Criticism: Understanding the Conceptual and Measurement Models of Legitimacy

  • Published:
Asian Journal of Criminology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. Page number cited in this article followed the page order in the online available version of Jackson and Bradford’s piece, which is not consistent with the number in the final print of the article.

References

  • Bottoms, A., & Tankebe, J. (2012). Beyond procedural justice: a dialogic approach to legitimacy in criminal justice. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 102, 119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, J. (2018). Norms, normativity, and the legitimacy of justice institutions: international perspectives. Annual Review of Law and Social Sciences, 14, 145–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, J., & Bradford, B. (2019). Blurring the distinction between empirical and normative legitimacy? A commentary on ‘police legitimacy and citizen cooperation in China’. Asian Journal of Criminology, (online first).

  • Mazerolle, L., Bennett, S., Davis, J., Sargeant, E., & Manning, M. (2013). Procedural justice and police legitimacy: a systematic review of the research evidence. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 9, 245–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nix, J., Pickett, J., & Wolfe, S. (2019). Testing a theoretical model of perceived audience legitimacy: the neglected linkage in the dialogic model of police-community relations. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, (online first).

  • Sun, I., Wu, Y., Hu, R., & Farmer, A. (2017). Procedural justice, legitimacy, and public cooperation with police: does Western wisdom hold in China? Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 54, 454–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, I., Li, L., Wu, Y., & Hu, R. (2018). Police legitimacy and citizen cooperation in China: testing an alternative model. Asian Journal of Criminology, 13, 275–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tankebe, J. (2013). Viewing things differently: the dimensions of public perceptions of police legitimacy. Criminology, 51, 103–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. (1990). Why people obey the law. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ivan Y. Sun.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed Consent

This article does not involve in any human participants or animals.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sun, I.Y., Wu, Y. & Li, L. Response to Criticism: Understanding the Conceptual and Measurement Models of Legitimacy. Asian J Criminol 14, 305–308 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-019-09303-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-019-09303-1

Navigation