Notes
Page number cited in this article followed the page order in the online available version of Jackson and Bradford’s piece, which is not consistent with the number in the final print of the article.
References
Bottoms, A., & Tankebe, J. (2012). Beyond procedural justice: a dialogic approach to legitimacy in criminal justice. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 102, 119.
Jackson, J. (2018). Norms, normativity, and the legitimacy of justice institutions: international perspectives. Annual Review of Law and Social Sciences, 14, 145–165.
Jackson, J., & Bradford, B. (2019). Blurring the distinction between empirical and normative legitimacy? A commentary on ‘police legitimacy and citizen cooperation in China’. Asian Journal of Criminology, (online first).
Mazerolle, L., Bennett, S., Davis, J., Sargeant, E., & Manning, M. (2013). Procedural justice and police legitimacy: a systematic review of the research evidence. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 9, 245–274.
Nix, J., Pickett, J., & Wolfe, S. (2019). Testing a theoretical model of perceived audience legitimacy: the neglected linkage in the dialogic model of police-community relations. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, (online first).
Sun, I., Wu, Y., Hu, R., & Farmer, A. (2017). Procedural justice, legitimacy, and public cooperation with police: does Western wisdom hold in China? Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 54, 454–478.
Sun, I., Li, L., Wu, Y., & Hu, R. (2018). Police legitimacy and citizen cooperation in China: testing an alternative model. Asian Journal of Criminology, 13, 275–291.
Tankebe, J. (2013). Viewing things differently: the dimensions of public perceptions of police legitimacy. Criminology, 51, 103–135.
Tyler, T. (1990). Why people obey the law. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Informed Consent
This article does not involve in any human participants or animals.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sun, I.Y., Wu, Y. & Li, L. Response to Criticism: Understanding the Conceptual and Measurement Models of Legitimacy. Asian J Criminol 14, 305–308 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-019-09303-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-019-09303-1