Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Estimating a Model for Mental Healthcare Utilization Using Subjective Unmet Need and Psychological Distress Measures

  • Published:
The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of this study is to assess the predictive value of self-reported need and psychological distress in mental healthcare service use across racial and ethnic groups in California. Using 2014–2018 data for adults aged 18–64 in the California Health Interview Survey, both logistic and Poisson regression models are used to estimate mental healthcare utilization. Patient-reported outcome measures, such as psychological distress, are commonly used to evaluate healthcare utilization patterns. The Kessler-6 screener for psychological distress is frequently used as a tool for determining whether someone’s level of distress necessitates evaluation by a mental healthcare professional. Serious psychological distress has been widely studied as a predictor of higher healthcare expenditures and use; however, moderate distress and self-reported need has been less examined in the literature. Seventy-two percent of individuals with moderate psychological distress felt like they needed to see a professional for their mental or emotional needs compared to 4% of individuals with serious psychological distress. Individuals with moderate psychological distress had 34% of all healthcare visits for mental or emotional needs during the study period, compared to 17% for those with serious psychological distress. Subjective unmet need for mental healthcare was reported by 77% of those who utilized mental healthcare during the study period. Studying subjective unmet need, in addition to moderate and serious distress, provides additional understanding of the need for mental healthcare and mental healthcare utilization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Novak P, Anderson AC, Chen J. Changes in health insurance coverage and barriers to health care access among individuals with serious psychological distress following the affordable care act. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research. 2018; 45(6):924-932. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-018-0875-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gonzales G, Golberstein E, Hill SC, et al. Psychological distress and enrollment in Medicaid. The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research. 2016; 44(4):523-535. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11414-016-9532-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lin M-T, Burgess JF, Carey K. The association between serious psychological distress and emergency department utilization among young adults in the USA. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology. 2011; 47(6):939-947. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-011-0401-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Stockbridge EL, Wilson FA, Pagán JA. Psychological distress and emergency department utilization in the United States: evidence from the medical expenditure panel survey. Academic Emergency Medicine. 2014; 21(5):510-519. https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.12369

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Characteristics of Adults with Serious Psychological Distress as Measured by the K6 Scale, United States, 2001–04. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/6840. Accessed June 8, 2021.

  6. Services Dof HC. Mental Health Services Act. Mental Health Services Act (MHSA). https://www.dhcs.ca.gov/services/MH/Pages/MH_Prop63.aspx. Accessed June 8, 2021.

  7. September 2020 Serious Psychological Distress on the Rise ... https://healthpolicy.ucla.edu/publications/Documents/PDF/2020/SPD-policybrief-sep2020.pdf. Accessed June 8, 2021.

  8. Mental Health Care Health Professional Shortage Areas (HPSAs). KFF. https://www.kff.org/other/state-indicator/mental-health-care-health-professional-shortage-areas-hpsas/?currentTimeframe=0&sortModel=%7B%22colId%22%3A%22Location%22%2C%22sort%22%3A%22asc%22%7D. Published November 5, 2020. Accessed June 23, 2021.

  9. Alegría, M., NeMoyer, A., Falgàs Bagué, I., et al. Social determinants of mental health: where we are and where we need to go. Current Psychiatry Reports, 2018; 20(11), 95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-018-0969-9

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. UCLA Center for Health Policy Research. About CHIS | UCLA Center for Health Policy Research. (n.d.). Retrieved October 22, 2021, from https://healthpolicy.ucla.edu/chis/about/Pages/about.aspx.

  11. Williams G, Nardo FD, Verma A. The relationship between self-reported health status and signs of psychological distress within European urban contexts. European Journal of Public Health. 2017; 27(suppl_2):68-73. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckx008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Boscardin CK, Gonzales R, Bradley KL, et al. Predicting cost of care using self-reported health status data. BMC Health Services Research. 2015; 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-1063-1

  13. Garbarski D. Research in and Prospects for the Measurement of Health Using Self-Rated Health. Public Opinion Quarterly. 2016; 80(4):977-997. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfw033

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Mojtabai R, Olfson M, Sampson NA, et al. Barriers to mental health treatment: results from the national comorbidity survey replication. Psychological Medicine. 2010; 41(8):1751-1761. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291710002291

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Psychological distress – APA Dictionary of Psychology. (n.d.). Retrieved March 23, 2021, from https://dictionary.apa.org/psychological-distress

  16. Characteristics of adults with serious psychological distress as measured by the K6 scale, United States, 2001–04. (n.d.). Retrieved March 23, 2021, from https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/6840

  17. Prochaska, J. J., Sung, H.-Y., Max, et al. Validity study of the K6 scale as a measure of moderate mental distress based on mental health treatment need and utilization. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 2012; 21(2), 88–97. https://doi.org/10.1002/mpr.1349

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Andrews, G., & Slade, T. Interpreting scores on the Kessler psychological distress scale (K10). Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 2001; 25(6), 494–497. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-842X.2001.tb00310.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kessler, R., Andrews, G., Colpe, L., et al. Short screening scales to monitor population prevalence and trends in non-specific psychological distress. Psychological Medicine, 2002; 32, 959–976. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291702006074

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ferraro KF, Nuriddin TA. Psychological distress and mortality: are women more vulnerable? Journal of Health and Social Behavior. 2006; 47(3):227-241. https://doi.org/10.1177/002214650604700303

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Ritsner M, Ponizovsky A, Nechamkin Y, et al. Gender differences in psychosocial risk factors for psychological distress among immigrants. Comprehensive Psychiatry. 2001; 42(2):151-160. https://doi.org/10.1053/comp.2001.19750

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Cook BL, McGuire TG, Zaslavsky AM. Measuring racial/ethnic disparities in health care: methods and practical issues. Health Services Research. 2012; 47(3pt2):1232-1254. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6773.2012.01387.x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Cook BL, Trinh N-H, Li Z, et al. Trends in racial-ethnic disparities in access to mental health care, 2004–2012. Psychiatric Services. 2017; 68(1):9-16. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201500453

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. McGuire TG, Alegria M, Cook BL, et al. Implementing the Institute of Medicine definition of disparities: an application to mental health care. Health Services Research. 2006; 41(5):1979-2005. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00583.x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Lofquist, D. (n.d.). Roundtable discussion. https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/working-papers/2013/acs/lofquist-01.pdf

  26. Rote, S. M., & Moon, H. Racial/ethnic differences in caregiving frequency: does immigrant status matter? The Journals of Gerontology 2018; Series B, 73(6), 1088–1098. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbw106

  27. Marshall, G. N., Schell, T. L., & Miles, J. N. V. Ethnic differences in posttraumatic distress: Hispanics’ symptoms differ in kind and degree. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 2009; 77(6), 1169–1178. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017721

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Salas-Wright, C. P., Robles, E. H., Vaughn, M. G., et al. Toward a typology of acculturative stress: results among Hispanic immigrants in the United States. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 2015; 37(2), 223–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739986315573967

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Travis, J., Western, B., & Redburn, F. The growth of incarceration in the united states: exploring causes and consequences. Publications and Research. 2014. https://academicworks.cuny.edu/jj_pubs/27

Download references

Funding

Funding for this research was provided by Health Assessment Lab/Medical Outcomes Trust (MOT).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ebony Toussaint PhD, MPH.

Ethics declarations

Compliance with Ethical Standards

The authors attest that they have no conflicts of interest. The California Health Interview Survey was submitted by the Data Access Center (DAC) at the UCLA Center for Health Policy Research. The UCLA South General Institutional Review Board (IRB) has approved the DAC to conduct analyses of confidential CHIS data (UCLA IRB#17–000362). The DAC operates by policies and procedures approved by the UCLA Office for the Protection of Research Subjects (OPRS) and the State of California’s Committee for the Protection of Human Subjects (CPHS).

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Toussaint, E., Roby, D., Yue, D. et al. Estimating a Model for Mental Healthcare Utilization Using Subjective Unmet Need and Psychological Distress Measures. J Behav Health Serv Res 49, 500–512 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11414-022-09797-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11414-022-09797-1

Keywords

Navigation