Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The spiral model of collaborative knowledge improvement: an exploratory study of a networked collaborative classroom

  • Published:
International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

While there are many studies on students’ collaborative learning at the small group level, pedagogies and strategies for supporting students’ collaborative learning at the class level are underexplored. This study proposes a pedagogical model named the Spiral Model of Collaborative Knowledge Improvement (SMCKI) to inform the design and implementation of multi-layered collaborative learning activities in a networked class where there are many groups of students working collaboratively. Starting with a phase of individual ideation, the pedagogical model scaffolds students to go through five phases of intra-group and inter-group knowledge improvement and refinement, with the goal of supporting the advancement of their individual and collective knowledge. An exploratory case study is presented to illustrate how this model was used in a pre-service teachers’ technology-enhanced learning (TEL) activity design lesson in a Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) environment. The results show that the participants significantly improved the quality of TEL design throughout the five phases of SMCKI. The implications of the findings on designing and implementing CSCL activities in authentic class environments are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbitt, J. T. (2011). Measuring technological pedagogical content knowledge in pre-service teacher education: A review of current methods and instruments. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(4), 281–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akanmu, S. O. (2016). The need to develop peer-rating procedure for optimal achievement in schools. International Journal for Cross-Disciplinary Subjects in Education, 7(1), 2700–2704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barron, B. (2003). When smart groups fail. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(3), 307–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benbunan-Fich, R., Hiltz, S. R., & Harasim, L. (2005). The online interaction learning model: An integrated theoretical framework for learning networks. In S. R. Hiltz and R. Goldman, Learning together online: Research on asynchronous learning networks (pp. 19-37). Routledge.

  • Borge, M., & Mercier, E. (2019). Towards a micro-ecological approach to CSCL. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 14(2), 219–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouta, H., Retalis, S., & Paraskeva, F. (2012). Utilising a collaborative macro-script to enhance student engagement: A mixed method study in a 3D virtual environment. Computers & Education, 58(1), 501–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cecez-Kecmanovic, D., & Webb, C. (2000). Towards a communicative model of collaborative web-mediated learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 16(1), 73–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., Tsai, C. C., & Tan, L. L. W. (2011). Modeling primary school pre-service teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge for meaningful learning with information and communication technology. Computers & Education, 57(1), 1184–1193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, W., & Looi, C. K. (2011). Active classroom participation in a GroupScribbles primary science classroom. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(4), 676–686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, W., Looi, C. K., & Tan, S. (2010). What do students do in a F2F CSCL classroom? The optimization of multiple communications modes. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1159–1170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, W., Wen, Y., Looi, C. K., & Ooi, C. (2011). Technology and pedagogy design for collaborative second language learning. The Communications in Information Science and Management Engineering, 1(8), 19–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, W., Zhang, S., Wen, Y., Looi, C., & Yeo, J. (2019). A spiral model of collaborative knowledge improvement to support collaborative argumentation for science learning. In K. Lund, G. P. Niccolai, E. Lavoué, C. E. Hmelo-Silver, G. Gweon, & M. Baker (Eds.), A wide lens: Combining embodied, enactive, extended, and embedded learning in collaborative settings. Proceedings of the 13th international conference on computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) 2019, (Vol. 1. pp. 240–247). Lyon: International Society of the Learning Sciences.

  • Chitpin, S., & Evers, C. W. (2012). Using Popper's philosophy of science to build pre-service Teachers' knowledge. International Journal of Education, 4(4), 144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, D. B., & Sampson, V. (2007). Personally-seeded discussions to scaffold online argumentation. International Journal of Science Education, 29(3), 253–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by collaborative learning? In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative-learning: Cognitive and computational approaches (pp. 1–19). Oxford: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillenbourg, P. (2002). Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design. In P. A. Kirschner (Ed.), Three worlds of CSCL. Can we support CSCL? (pp. 61–91). Heerlen: Open Universiteit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillenbourg, P. (2013). Design for classroom orchestration. Computers & Education, 69, 485–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillenbourg, P. (2016). The evolution of research on digital education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26(2), 544–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillenbourg, P., & Hong, F. (2008). The mechanics of CSCL macro scripts. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3(1), 5–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • English, L. D. (2017). Advancing elementary and middle school STEM education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(1), 5–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Stegmann, K., & Wecker, C. (2013). Toward a script theory of guidance in computer-supported collaborative learning. Educational Psychologist, 48(1), 56–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frith, C. D. (2012). The role of metacognition in human social interactions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 367(1599), 2213–2223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gadanidis, G. (2014). Young children, mathematics and coding: A low floor, high ceiling, wide walls learning environment. In D. Polly (Ed.), Cases on technology integration in mathematics education (pp. 312–344). Hersey: IGI Global.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hämäläinen, R., & Arvaja, M. (2009). Scripted collaboration and group-based variations in a higher education CSCL context. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 53(1), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Häkkinen, P. (2013). Multiphase method for analysing online discussions. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(6), 547–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Häkkinen, P., Järvelä, S., Mäkitalo-Siegl, K., Ahonen, A., Näykki, P., & Valtonen, T. (2017). Preparing teacher-students for twenty-first-century learning practices (PREP 21): A framework for enhancing collaborative problem-solving and strategic learning skills. Teachers and Teaching, 23(1), 25–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isohätälä, J., Järvenoja, H., & Järvelä, S. (2017). Socially shared regulation of learning and participation in social interaction in collaborative learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 81, 11–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Järvelä, S., Kirschner, P. A., Hadwin, A., Järvenoja, H., Malmberg, J., Miller, M., & Laru, J. (2016). Socially shared regulation of learning in CSCL: Understanding and prompting individual-and group-level shared regulatory activities. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 11(3), 263–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeong, H., Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Jo, K. (2019). Ten years of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning: A meta-analysis of CSCL in STEM education during 2005-2014. Educational Research Review, 100284.

  • Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koh, J. H. L. (2013). A rubric for assessing teachers' lesson activities with respect to TPACK for meaningful learning with ICT. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(6), 887–900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kollar, I., Fischer, F., & Hesse, F. W. (2006). Collaboration scripts–a conceptual analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 18(2), 159–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kollar, I., Fischer, F., & Slotta, J. D. (2007). Internal and external scripts in computer-supported collaborative inquiry learning. Learning and Instruction, 17(6), 708–721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., & Jochems, W. (2003). Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: A review of the research. Computers in Human Behavior, 19(3), 335–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirschner, P. A., & Erkens, G. (2013). Toward a framework for CSCL research. Educational Psychologist, 48(1), 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, C. P., Chen, W., Yang, S. J., Xie, W., & Lin, C. C. (2014). Exploring students’ learning effectiveness and attitude in group scribbles-supported collaborative reading activities: A study in the primary classroom. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 30(1), 68–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Looi, C. K., Chen, W., & Ng, F. K. (2010a). Collaborative activities enabled by GroupScribbles (GS): An exploratory study of learning effectiveness. Computers & Education, 54(1), 14–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Looi, C. K., Chen, W., & Patton, C. M. (2010b). Principles and enactment of rapid collaborative knowledge building in classrooms. Educational Technology, 50(5), 26–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Looi, C. K., Patton, C., & Chen, W. (2011). Rapid collaborative knowledge improvement. In S. Norbert (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the sciences of learning (pp. 2759–2762). Munich: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludvigsen, S., Cress, U., Law, N., Rosé, C. P., & Stahl, G. (2016). Future-looking conversations in CSCL. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 11(3), 255–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2003). Not “what” but “how”: Becoming design-wise about educational technology. In Y. Zhao (Ed.), What teachers should know about technology: Perspectives and practices (pp. 99–122). Greenwich: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgil, I., Secken, N., & Oskay, O. O. (2004). Online collaborative learning enhancement through the Delphi method. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 7(2), 66–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Näykki, P., Isohätälä, J., Järvelä, S., Pöysä-Tarhonen, J., & Häkkinen, P. (2017). Facilitating socio-cognitive and socio-emotional monitoring in collaborative learning with a regulation macro script–an exploratory study. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 12(3), 251–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng, F. K., Looi, C. K., Chen, W. (2008). Rapid collaborative knowledge building: Lessons learned from two primary science classrooms. In P. A. Krischner., J, van Merriënboer., T, de Jong (Eds). Cre8ting a learning world: The Proceedings of the 8th international conference on International conference for the learning sciences, (pp. 115-123).

  • Nussbaum, M., Alvarez, C., McFarlane, A., Gomez, F., Claro, S., & Radovic, D. (2009). Technology as small group face-to-face collaborative scaffolding. Computers & Education, 52(1), 147–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papert, S. (1993). The children's machine: Rethinking school in the age of the computer. New York: Basic books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Persico, D., Pozzi, F., & Sarti, L. (2010). Monitoring collaborative activities in computer supported collaborative learning. Distance Education, 31(1), 5–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popov, V., Biemans, H. J., Brinkman, D., Kuznetsov, A. N., & Mulder, M. (2013). Facilitation of computer-supported collaborative learning in mixed-versus same-culture dyads: Does a collaboration script help? The Internet and Higher Education, 19(1), 36–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popov, V., van Leeuwen, A., & Buis, S. C. A. (2017). Are you with me or not? Temporal synchronicity and transactivity during CSCL. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 33(5), 424–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prins, F. J., Sluijsmans, D. M., Kirschner, P. A., & Strijbos, J. W. (2005). Formative peer assessment in a CSCL environment: A case study. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(4), 417–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radkowitsch, A., Vogel, F., & Fischer, F. (2020). Good for learning, bad for motivation? A meta-analysis on the effects of computer-supported collaboration scripts. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 15(1), 5–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reeves, T. C., Herrington, J., & Oliver, R. (2004). A development research agenda for online collaborative learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(4), 53–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Resnick, M., Maloney, J., Monroy-Hernández, A., Rusk, N., Eastmond, E., Brennan, K., Millner, A., Rosenbaum, E., Silver, J., Silverman, B., & Kafai, Y. (2009). Scratch: Programming for all. Communications of the ACM, 52(11), 60–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Resnick, M. (2017). Lifelong kindergarten: Cultivating creativity through projects, passion, peers, and play. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez-Triana, M. J., Martínez-Monés, A., Asensio-Pérez, J. I., & Dimitriadis, Y. (2015). Scripting and monitoring meet each other: Aligning learning analytics and learning design to support teachers in orchestrating CSCL situations. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(2), 330–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shneiderman, B., Fischer, G., Czerwinski, M., Resnick, M., Myers, B., Candy, L., Eisenberg, M., Hewett, T., Jennings, P., Kules, B., Nakakoji, K., Nunamaker, J., Pausch, R., Selker, T., & Terry, M. (2006). Creativity support tools: Report from a US National Science Foundation sponsored workshop. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 20(2), 61–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stegmann, K., Weinberger, A., & Fischer, F. (2007). Facilitating argumentative knowledge construction with computer-supported collaboration scripts. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2(4), 421–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, G. (2016). The group as paradigmatic unit of analysis: The contested relationship of computer-supported collaborative learning to the learning sciences. In M. A. Evans, M. J. Packer, & R. K. Sawyer (Eds.), Reflections on the learning sciences (pp. 76–102). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, G., Ludvigsen, S., Law, N., & Cress, U. (2014). CSCL artifacts. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 9(3), 237–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suthers, D. D. (2006). Technology affordances for intersubjective meaning making: A research agenda for CSCL. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1(3), 315–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suthers, D., & Medina, R. (2011). Tracing interaction in distributed collaborative learning. In.: Puntambekar S., Erkens G., Hmelo-silver C. (Eds). Analyzing Interactions in CSCL. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 12, 341–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorsteinsson, G., & Page, T. (2012). Encouraging innovativeness through computer-assisted collaborative learning. Journal on School Educational Technology, 7(3), 22–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, F., Wecker, C., Kollar, I., & Fischer, F. (2017). Socio-cognitive scaffolding with computer-supported collaboration scripts: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 29(3), 477–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberger, A., Ertl, B., Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2005). Epistemic and social scripts in computer–supported collaborative learning. Instructional Science, 33(1), 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wen, Y., Looi, C. K., & Chen, W. (2012). Supporting teachers in designing CSCL activities: A case study of principle-based pedagogical patterns in networked second language classrooms. Educational Technology & Society, 15(2), 138–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wen, Y., Looi, C. K., & Chen, W. (2015). Appropriation of a representational tool in a second-language classroom. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 10(1), 77–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witherspoon, C. L., Bergner, J., Cockrell, C., & Stone, D. N. (2013). Antecedents of organizational knowledge sharing: A meta-analysis and critique. Journal of Knowledge Management, 17(2), 250–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz, F. G. K., & Yilmaz, R. (2019). Impact of pedagogic agent-mediated metacognitive support towards increasing task and group awareness in CSCL. Computers & Education, 134, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (1992). The case study method as a tool for doing evaluation. Current Sociology, 40(1), 121–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yulianto, T., Pramudya, I., & Slamet, I. (2019). Effects of the 21st century learning model and problem-based models on higher order thinking skill. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 4, 749–755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan, J., & Kim, C. (2018). The effects of autonomy support on student engagement in peer assessment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66(1), 25–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zambrano, J., Kirschner, F., Sweller, J., & Kirschner, P. A. (2019). Effects of prior knowledge on collaborative and individual learning. Learning and Instruction, 63, 101214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by the Education Research Funding Programme, National Institute of Education (NIE), Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, project no. OER 17/19 CWL. The views expressed in this paper are the author’s and do not necessarily represent the views of the host institution.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University Singapore, Nanyang Ave, Singapore, Singapore

    Wenli Chen, Jesmine S. H. Tan & Zhongling Pi

Authors
  1. Wenli Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jesmine S. H. Tan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zhongling Pi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jesmine S. H. Tan.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 2 TPACK Coding scheme
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, W., Tan, J.S.H. & Pi, Z. The spiral model of collaborative knowledge improvement: an exploratory study of a networked collaborative classroom. Intern. J. Comput.-Support. Collab. Learn 16, 7–35 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-021-09338-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-021-09338-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation